You thought it was a joke? Ha ha. No, this is (redneck) USA. Also, she said it during debate on allowing concealed guns into public buildings. You literally can't make this up

Moderators: Alyrium Denryle, Edi, K. A. Pital
Borgholio wrote:I was gonna post this a few days back but decided against it when I read a bit further into it. She apparently wasn't being serious but it was hyperbole, saying that rather than allow people to carry concealed weapons, that they should go to church instead and actually learn to be nicer to each other and thus would not NEED to carry weapons.
But in actuality if it ever DID become mandatory, she did say a church of my choosing...
On the other hand, when reporters asked her to clarify the remark she ran away to an elevator and said she didn't understand why they were making a fuss about it. Not really the sort of actions consistent of someone who wasn't being serious.Simon_Jester wrote:Borgholio wrote:I was gonna post this a few days back but decided against it when I read a bit further into it. She apparently wasn't being serious but it was hyperbole, saying that rather than allow people to carry concealed weapons, that they should go to church instead and actually learn to be nicer to each other and thus would not NEED to carry weapons.
But in actuality if it ever DID become mandatory, she did say a church of my choosing...
Context, it is a wonderful thing.
Thank you for sharing the context of this remark. It makes her seem a much more interesting/reasonable person even if she is all turbo-pious.
You know, if so, I wonder why every single news source treated it seriously, from left wing ones ("should we remind her of constitution?") to right wing ("of course damn libruls hate dem great idea, durr"). She also added "sadly, that would never be allowed" which somehow doesn't sound hyperbolic. See here, for example.Borgholio wrote:I was gonna post this a few days back but decided against it when I read a bit further into it. She apparently wasn't being serious but it was hyperbole, saying that rather than allow people to carry concealed weapons, that they should go to church instead and actually learn to be nicer to each other and thus would not NEED to carry weapons.
When right winger says that, I'd expect it to mean 'real' church (ME/Asian religions need not apply, Jews excepted).But in actuality if it ever DID become mandatory, she did say a church of my choosing.
Generally speaking, big cities are going to be substantially more progressive than areas where the entire city's population is expressed in four digits or less. Hell, Salt Lake City is in a state that is about as red as you can get, yet the mayor has been a Democrat since 1976. It's relatively friendly toward the LGBT community, too.Channel72 wrote:Why the hell is it that my anecdotal experiences with Arizona are totally contradictory to all this crazy shit I keep reading about in the news?
Arizona to me, or the Phoenix/Scotsdale area at least, comes off as sort of like an offshoot of L.A. - filled with college kids, shopping malls, spas and gyms, and a P.F. Chang's, Starbucks, Jamba Juice and overly-theatrical Sushi joint around every corner, plus lots of ex-Californian hippies who think that vortexes in Sedona channel mystical energy or whatever. How the fuck does Arizona also keep making headlines as this right-wing nut-land ruled by Jan Brewer and her cabal of anti-immigration, anti-abortion, pro-Jesus lawmakers?
Think of it this way. NYC is not like Long Island or for that matter, upstate NY.Channel72 wrote:Why the hell is it that my anecdotal experiences with Arizona are totally contradictory to all this crazy shit I keep reading about in the news?
Arizona to me, or the Phoenix/Scotsdale area at least, comes off as sort of like an offshoot of L.A. - filled with college kids, shopping malls, spas and gyms, and a P.F. Chang's, Starbucks, Jamba Juice and overly-theatrical Sushi joint around every corner, plus lots of ex-Californian hippies who think that vortexes in Sedona channel mystical energy or whatever. How the fuck does Arizona also keep making headlines as this right-wing nut-land ruled by Jan Brewer and her cabal of anti-immigration, anti-abortion, pro-Jesus lawmakers?
Without NYC New York would really be more along the lines of Georgia or Alabama, considering how much of a shithole upstate is. Major metro centers can really skew your perceptions of a state.Soontir C'boath wrote:Think of it this way. NYC is not like Long Island or for that matter, upstate NY.Channel72 wrote:Why the hell is it that my anecdotal experiences with Arizona are totally contradictory to all this crazy shit I keep reading about in the news?
Arizona to me, or the Phoenix/Scotsdale area at least, comes off as sort of like an offshoot of L.A. - filled with college kids, shopping malls, spas and gyms, and a P.F. Chang's, Starbucks, Jamba Juice and overly-theatrical Sushi joint around every corner, plus lots of ex-Californian hippies who think that vortexes in Sedona channel mystical energy or whatever. How the fuck does Arizona also keep making headlines as this right-wing nut-land ruled by Jan Brewer and her cabal of anti-immigration, anti-abortion, pro-Jesus lawmakers?
Channel72 wrote:Why the hell is it that my anecdotal experiences with Arizona are totally contradictory to all this crazy shit I keep reading about in the news?
Arizona to me, or the Phoenix/Scotsdale area at least, comes off as sort of like an offshoot of L.A. - filled with college kids, shopping malls, spas and gyms, and a P.F. Chang's, Starbucks, Jamba Juice and overly-theatrical Sushi joint around every corner, plus lots of ex-Californian hippies who think that vortexes in Sedona channel mystical energy or whatever. How the fuck does Arizona also keep making headlines as this right-wing nut-land ruled by Jan Brewer and her cabal of anti-immigration, anti-abortion, pro-Jesus lawmakers?
Doesn't that apply anywhere, really?Serafina wrote:Bavaria is a pretty conservative state. So much that it is practically a one-party system on state-level elections with the only real question being "do we get enough for an absolute (66+%) majority or will it just be a normal majority (50+%)" for that party.
Munich by comparison is much more liberal. We had a socialists mayor for a long time, and LGBT-parties get elected on a municipal level.
Shithole? My home this is!General Zod wrote:Without NYC New York would really be more along the lines of Georgia or Alabama, considering how much of a shithole upstate is. Major metro centers can really skew your perceptions of a state.
I believe there's a fancy term for it, but this is true across most of the world IIRC. The simplistic explanation is that rural areas have less diversity and less opportunities for people to share different opinions. Social groups are smaller and more closely knit, so expressing a contrary opinion can get you cast out, so there is less incentive to rock the boat. In urban areas, you tend to have a larger circle of friends/acquaintances, with a larger range of diverse opinions and experiences, which will flavour your own. Additionally, education is generally better in urban areas (not all, but some), while rural areas tend to have less formal education, which contributes. You can complicate the picture further with employment, racial diversity (Hicksville is less likely to have a Chinatown than Big City, to use a broad example), even religiosity (rural areas tend to have better church attendance than urban and less variety in actual religions).houser2112 wrote: I'd guess that you could say the same thing across the country and not be too far off.
Rochester is one of the most depressing cities I've ever visited, and by all accounts most of the other cities upstate are something of an economic wasteland.houser2112 wrote:Shithole? My home this is!General Zod wrote:Without NYC New York would really be more along the lines of Georgia or Alabama, considering how much of a shithole upstate is. Major metro centers can really skew your perceptions of a state.
If you broaden that to include all the major cities of the state, you're correct. Buffalo and Rochester (the two areas that I have personally lived in) are fairly liberal, with centrist/conservative suburbs. When you go more than a township or so away from the city, though, it's hardcore conservative. I'd guess that you could say the same thing across the country and not be too far off.
Thanas wrote:Arizona has now researched the idea of Church attendance duty.
Arizona will enjoy a 33% stability modifier.
"Democratic Korps (of those who are) Beneficently Anti-Government"Terralthra wrote:It's similar to the Arabic word for "one who sows discord" or "one who crushes underfoot". It'd be like if the acronym for the some Tea Party thing was "DKBAG" or something. In one sense, it's just the acronym for ISIL/ISIS in Arabic: Dawlat (al-) Islāmiyya ‘Irāq Shām, but it's also an insult.
Well yes, according to Christianity you do have free will... to either obey God or else spend eternity in damnation. Take your pick.cmdrjones wrote:Thanas wrote:Arizona has now researched the idea of Church attendance duty.
Arizona will enjoy a 33% stability modifier.
I admit it, I LOLed. I find the whole thing humorous despite her missing that one of the major tenets of Christianity is that pesky free will thing...
Tribble wrote:Well yes, according to Christianity you do have free will... to either obey God or else spend eternity in damnation. Take your pick.cmdrjones wrote:Thanas wrote:Arizona has now researched the idea of Church attendance duty.
Arizona will enjoy a 33% stability modifier.
I admit it, I LOLed. I find the whole thing humorous despite her missing that one of the major tenets of Christianity is that pesky free will thing...
"Democratic Korps (of those who are) Beneficently Anti-Government"Terralthra wrote:It's similar to the Arabic word for "one who sows discord" or "one who crushes underfoot". It'd be like if the acronym for the some Tea Party thing was "DKBAG" or something. In one sense, it's just the acronym for ISIL/ISIS in Arabic: Dawlat (al-) Islāmiyya ‘Irāq Shām, but it's also an insult.