One factor in that, beyond just "conservative" and "religious" explanations, is that in rural areas the church may be the major portion or the entirety of the area's social life.Elheru Aran wrote:rural areas tend to have better church attendance than urban and less variety in actual religions
Arizona Senators: church attendance should be compulsory
Moderators: Alyrium Denryle, Edi, K. A. Pital
- Broomstick
- Emperor's Hand
- Posts: 28846
- Joined: 2004-01-02 07:04pm
- Location: Industrial armpit of the US Midwest
Re: Arizona Senators: church attendance should be compulsory
A life is like a garden. Perfect moments can be had, but not preserved, except in memory. Leonard Nimoy.
Now I did a job. I got nothing but trouble since I did it, not to mention more than a few unkind words as regard to my character so let me make this abundantly clear. I do the job. And then I get paid.- Malcolm Reynolds, Captain of Serenity, which sums up my feelings regarding the lawsuit discussed here.
If a free society cannot help the many who are poor, it cannot save the few who are rich. - John F. Kennedy
Sam Vimes Theory of Economic Injustice
Now I did a job. I got nothing but trouble since I did it, not to mention more than a few unkind words as regard to my character so let me make this abundantly clear. I do the job. And then I get paid.- Malcolm Reynolds, Captain of Serenity, which sums up my feelings regarding the lawsuit discussed here.
If a free society cannot help the many who are poor, it cannot save the few who are rich. - John F. Kennedy
Sam Vimes Theory of Economic Injustice
-
- Jedi Council Member
- Posts: 2354
- Joined: 2004-03-27 04:51am
Re: Arizona Senators: church attendance should be compulsory
Not that this idea would ever actually happen, but if it did would we see actual atheist churches?
Then we could have various schisms as the competing movements each try and form their own church as it turns out that it is a bad idea to associate based on lack of belief in something.
EDIT: Something else that occurs to me is that she specifically says "on Sunday." So apparently if you are Jewish or Muslim, too bad. You would have to move your attendance to Sunday in violation of your belief system or go twice.
Then we could have various schisms as the competing movements each try and form their own church as it turns out that it is a bad idea to associate based on lack of belief in something.
EDIT: Something else that occurs to me is that she specifically says "on Sunday." So apparently if you are Jewish or Muslim, too bad. You would have to move your attendance to Sunday in violation of your belief system or go twice.
Re: Arizona Senators: church attendance should be compulsory
An atheist church could happen actually. Atheism is a set of beliefs just like religion, except that there's no worship involved. So an Atheist church could be like a club or support group, rather than a place for prayer.
You will be assimilated...bunghole!
- General Zod
- Never Shuts Up
- Posts: 29211
- Joined: 2003-11-18 03:08pm
- Location: The Clearance Rack
- Contact:
Re: Arizona Senators: church attendance should be compulsory
Not really, when a lack of belief is the usual definition of atheism. Atheist religions are a thing though, see the Church of Satan.Borgholio wrote:An atheist church could happen actually. Atheism is a set of beliefs just like religion, except that there's no worship involved. So an Atheist church could be like a club or support group, rather than a place for prayer.
"It's you Americans. There's something about nipples you hate. If this were Germany, we'd be romping around naked on the stage here."
Re: Arizona Senators: church attendance should be compulsory
Atheism is faith that there is no god. So you can have a church surrounding faith in nothing.
You will be assimilated...bunghole!
- General Zod
- Never Shuts Up
- Posts: 29211
- Joined: 2003-11-18 03:08pm
- Location: The Clearance Rack
- Contact:
Re: Arizona Senators: church attendance should be compulsory
That's how Christian apologists define it because it makes for a convenient strawman, not how most atheists define it.Borgholio wrote:Atheism is faith that there is no god.
"It's you Americans. There's something about nipples you hate. If this were Germany, we'd be romping around naked on the stage here."
Re: Arizona Senators: church attendance should be compulsory
Well I'm Atheist and I've found that's a good way to explain it to people who don't understand how we can't believe in God. I say that they have faith there is a God because of (reasons). I have faith there is not due to other reasons. That's really all there is to it.
You will be assimilated...bunghole!
- General Zod
- Never Shuts Up
- Posts: 29211
- Joined: 2003-11-18 03:08pm
- Location: The Clearance Rack
- Contact:
Re: Arizona Senators: church attendance should be compulsory
I think it's a terrible explanation because it lets apologists claim that atheism isn't any more reasonable than Christianity and opens the door to a lot of slimy attacks. I prefer to say that it's no different than Christians not having belief in Shiva.Borgholio wrote:Well I'm Atheist and I've found that's a good way to explain it to people who don't understand how we can't believe in God. I say that they have faith there is a God because of (reasons). I have faith there is not due to other reasons. That's really all there is to it.
"It's you Americans. There's something about nipples you hate. If this were Germany, we'd be romping around naked on the stage here."
Re: Arizona Senators: church attendance should be compulsory
Apologists would be wrong if you point out that their faith is based on a single book (without which they would have nothing), while my faith is based on stuff I can actually see and measure.
You will be assimilated...bunghole!
- General Zod
- Never Shuts Up
- Posts: 29211
- Joined: 2003-11-18 03:08pm
- Location: The Clearance Rack
- Contact:
Re: Arizona Senators: church attendance should be compulsory
I'll let Terry Pratchett field this one.Borgholio wrote:Apologists would be wrong if you point out that their faith is based on a single book (without which they would have nothing), while my faith is based on stuff I can actually see and measure.
Seeing, contrary to popular wisdom, isn't believing. It's where belief stops, because it isn't needed any more. - Terry Pratchett
"It's you Americans. There's something about nipples you hate. If this were Germany, we'd be romping around naked on the stage here."
Re: Arizona Senators: church attendance should be compulsory
I see his point, but if I were to point a gun at a target and pull the trigger, wouldn't expecting the gun to go off and a hole to be blasted in the target a form of faith?
You will be assimilated...bunghole!
- General Zod
- Never Shuts Up
- Posts: 29211
- Joined: 2003-11-18 03:08pm
- Location: The Clearance Rack
- Contact:
Re: Arizona Senators: church attendance should be compulsory
Prior experience tells me the gun will do x if I perform steps a, b, c. If x does not occur, a step is missing or something is wrong with the gun. I think we should really just stop using the term "faith" altogether to describe things.Borgholio wrote:I see his point, but if I were to point a gun at a target and pull the trigger, wouldn't expecting the gun to go off and a hole to be blasted in the target a form of faith?
"It's you Americans. There's something about nipples you hate. If this were Germany, we'd be romping around naked on the stage here."
Re: Arizona Senators: church attendance should be compulsory
Because the word is often used in a religious context?I think we should really just stop using the term "faith" altogether to describe things.
You will be assimilated...bunghole!
- General Zod
- Never Shuts Up
- Posts: 29211
- Joined: 2003-11-18 03:08pm
- Location: The Clearance Rack
- Contact:
Re: Arizona Senators: church attendance should be compulsory
I see it used as a cheap shot all the time when an apologist runs out of arguments against something. It's basically become a type of ad-hominem.Borgholio wrote:Because the word is often used in a religious context?I think we should really just stop using the term "faith" altogether to describe things.
"It's you Americans. There's something about nipples you hate. If this were Germany, we'd be romping around naked on the stage here."
Re: Arizona Senators: church attendance should be compulsory
"Faith" is believing something you have no reason to believe. You don't have faith the gun will shoot a hole in the target, you have reasonable expectations based on experience and evidence. To me, saying 'faith' as an atheist is akin to when religious/conservatives say 'it's just a theory'.
Granted, the word 'faith' has become a colloquialism but when discussing such ideals as atheism and theism, I think terms should be clear and precise and not vague and with multiple meanings.
Granted, the word 'faith' has become a colloquialism but when discussing such ideals as atheism and theism, I think terms should be clear and precise and not vague and with multiple meanings.
They say, "the tree of liberty must be watered with the blood of tyrants and patriots." I suppose it never occurred to them that they are the tyrants, not the patriots. Those weapons are not being used to fight some kind of tyranny; they are bringing them to an event where people are getting together to talk. -Mike Wong
But as far as board culture in general, I do think that young male overaggression is a contributing factor to the general atmosphere of hostility. It's not SOS and the Mess throwing hand grenades all over the forum- Red
But as far as board culture in general, I do think that young male overaggression is a contributing factor to the general atmosphere of hostility. It's not SOS and the Mess throwing hand grenades all over the forum- Red
- Soontir C'boath
- SG-14: Fuck the Medic!
- Posts: 6853
- Joined: 2002-07-06 12:15am
- Location: Queens, NYC I DON'T FUCKING CARE IF MANHATTEN IS CONSIDERED NYC!! I'M IN IT ASSHOLE!!!
- Contact:
Re: Arizona Senators: church attendance should be compulsory
Atheism isn't a set of beliefs either since it's just the lack of belief in a deity/god. However, that doesn't mean atheists don't have a general range of beliefs that each individual may have such as believing in ghosts! It would be hard to generalized atheists as a uniform group.
I have almost reached the regrettable conclusion that the Negro's great stumbling block in his stride toward freedom is not the White Citizen's Counciler or the Ku Klux Klanner, but the white moderate, who is more devoted to "order" than to justice; who constantly says: "I agree with you in the goal you seek, but I cannot agree with your methods of direct action"; who paternalistically believes he can set the timetable for another man's freedom; who lives by a mythical concept of time and who constantly advises the Negro to wait for a "more convenient season."
- General Zod
- Never Shuts Up
- Posts: 29211
- Joined: 2003-11-18 03:08pm
- Location: The Clearance Rack
- Contact:
Re: Arizona Senators: church attendance should be compulsory
Here's another way to look at it, atheism is just an answer to a question. Does God exist?
Atheism: No.
Theism: Yes.
Atheism: No.
Theism: Yes.
"It's you Americans. There's something about nipples you hate. If this were Germany, we'd be romping around naked on the stage here."
Re: Arizona Senators: church attendance should be compulsory
And don't forget Agnosticism, which is basically saying "it's impossible to know one way or another".
"I reject your reality and substitute my own!" - The official Troll motto, as stated by Adam Savage
- General Zod
- Never Shuts Up
- Posts: 29211
- Joined: 2003-11-18 03:08pm
- Location: The Clearance Rack
- Contact:
Re: Arizona Senators: church attendance should be compulsory
Agnosticism: I'm a coward.
"It's you Americans. There's something about nipples you hate. If this were Germany, we'd be romping around naked on the stage here."
-
- Emperor's Hand
- Posts: 30165
- Joined: 2009-05-23 07:29pm
Re: Arizona Senators: church attendance should be compulsory
Agnosticism is only cowardized atheism if you accept the core premise that saying "we can't know" is logically equivalent to saying "therefore we should assume the absence of."
This makes sense if you are fiercely materialist. Not so much sense if you aren't.
This makes sense if you are fiercely materialist. Not so much sense if you aren't.
This space dedicated to Vasily Arkhipov
Re: Arizona Senators: church attendance should be compulsory
You can see and measure negatives? Come on now, that's just giving canon fodder to your detractors.Borgholio wrote:Apologists would be wrong if you point out that their faith is based on a single book (without which they would have nothing), while my faith is based on stuff I can actually see and measure.
Re: Arizona Senators: church attendance should be compulsory
Zod's argument was that calling it faith only weakens my position by saying it's the same thing and not any better than an actual religion. My point was that it's not the same thing because I have "faith" in things I can predict mathematically or experimentally, whereas without a Bible, the religious faith is backed up by nothing at all.Patroklos wrote: You can see and measure negatives? Come on now, that's just giving canon fodder to your detractors.
You will be assimilated...bunghole!
Re: Arizona Senators: church attendance should be compulsory
And the opposite of course. "We can't know" being treated as the logical equivalent to saying "therefore we should assume the existence of" is cowardized theismSimon_Jester wrote:Agnosticism is only cowardized atheism if you accept the core premise that saying "we can't know" is logically equivalent to saying "therefore we should assume the absence of."
This makes sense if you are fiercely materialist. Not so much sense if you aren't.
Pure agnosticism is simply "we can't know" and leaves it at that.
Last edited by Tribble on 2015-04-06 12:01pm, edited 1 time in total.
"I reject your reality and substitute my own!" - The official Troll motto, as stated by Adam Savage
- General Zod
- Never Shuts Up
- Posts: 29211
- Joined: 2003-11-18 03:08pm
- Location: The Clearance Rack
- Contact:
Re: Arizona Senators: church attendance should be compulsory
The people you're arguing with will see it as a tacit admission that they're right and atheism's no different from any other religion.Borgholio wrote:Zod's argument was that calling it faith only weakens my position by saying it's the same thing and not any better than an actual religion. My point was that it's not the same thing because I have "faith" in things I can predict mathematically or experimentally, whereas without a Bible, the religious faith is backed up by nothing at all.Patroklos wrote: You can see and measure negatives? Come on now, that's just giving canon fodder to your detractors.
"It's you Americans. There's something about nipples you hate. If this were Germany, we'd be romping around naked on the stage here."
Re: Arizona Senators: church attendance should be compulsory
They would indeed tend to ignore the whole evidence thing, and use the Bible as all the evidence they need. I really know of no other way to argue the logic behind Atheism other than with using terms they would be familiar with.The people you're arguing with will see it as a tacit admission that they're right and atheism's no different from any other religion.
You will be assimilated...bunghole!