They have recently been in the news due to persecution from the predominantly Buddhist populace of Myanmar. Even Aung Sung Suu Kyi has been lacklustre in defending them. No I kid you not. In an interview she tried to deflect the blame with what was happening NOW from the actions of the regular Myanmar citizens by blaming what the military junta did years before. That is she said the military junta made everyone paranoid, not trusting of people and that explains the persecution of the Rohingya.
Well refugees have been escaping by boat into other ASEAN countries reminiscent of the Vietnamese "boat people" that fled the turmoil of that region in the 1970s and 80s. Australia has weighed in when asked what we would do.
http://www.theguardian.com/world/2015/m ... a-refugees
Despite Abbott's idiocy including forgetting the country is Myanmar, and no longer called Burma, forgetting that they are actually facing ethnic cleansing, and since Myanmar wants to cleanse them it kind of helps their goals to let the Rohingya leave (so blaming them for doing something they want to do in the first place seems to miss the point), he does represent what is a difficult proposition. That is what to do to help the Rohingya.'Nope, nope, nope': Tony Abbott says Australia will take no Rohingya refugees The prime minister says, ‘To start a new life, come through the front door, not the back door’, and insists Australia is ‘a good international citizen’
Shalailah Medhora
Thursday 21 May 2015 13.09 AEST Last modified on Thursday 21 May 2015 16.38 AEST
Share on Facebook Share on Twitter Share via Email Share on LinkedIn Share on Google+ Share on WhatsApp
None of the more than 8,000 Rohingya refugees caught in a weeks-long standoff at sea will be resettled in Australia, the prime minister, Tony Abbott, confirmed on Thursday.
Overnight the governments of Indonesia and Malaysia agreed to give temporary shelter to the thousands of Rohingya Muslim migrants fleeing Burma and Bangladesh. And Gambia has offered to resettle all Rohingya refugees.
Some have been stranded at sea for weeks after Thai authorities closed a well-used trafficking route out of Burma and the people smugglers jumped ship and left their human cargo to starve.
The US has indicated it is willing to take some of the refugees, and the United Nations High Commissioner on Refugees (UNHCR) has urged Australia to work with its neighbours in finding a solution.
But the prime minister has closed the door on suggestions some could be resettled in Australia: “Nope, nope, nope.
“Australia will do absolutely nothing that gives any encouragement to anyone to think that they can get on a boat, that they can work with people smugglers to start a new life.
“I’m sorry. If you want to start a new life, you come through the front door, not through the back door.
“Don’t think that getting on a leaky boat at the behest of a people smuggler is going to do you or your family any good.
“We are not going to do anything that will encourage people to get on boats. If we do the slightest thing to encourage people to get on the boats, this problem will get worse, not better.”
Despite the firm words, Abbott insists Australia “has always been a good international citizen”.
The opposition leader, Bill Shorten, said Australia should engage more in the region.
“Labor supports regional resettlement – there is no change in that. We certainly do. But where there is an unfolding humanitarian crisis in south-east Asia, Tony Abbott’s ‘not my problem’ approach is disappointing,” he said.
Australia will be part of regional talks on people trafficking to be held next week, and the UNHCR has urged the country to cooperate with its neighbours.
“We hope Australia will be among countries that work towards there being a collective approach towards dealing with this,” a spokesman, Adrian Evans, told ABC Radio.
“Really, the go-it-alone approach – and we’ve seen what’s been going wrong with that in south-east Asia over the last week – that go-it-alone approach simply doesn’t work.”
The Greens senator Sarah Hanson-Young said “turning a blind eye” is not a solution.
“The asylum seekers, many suffering from starvation, are in desperate need of assistance, and Australia, as a regional leader, has an international responsibility to provide leadership and provide immediate assistance,” she said.
Abbott has pointed the finger of blame at Burma for letting the asylum seekers leave.
“This is quite properly a regional responsibility and the countries that will have to take the bulk of the responsibility are obviously the countries which are closest to the problem. In the end, the culprit is Burma because it is Burma where there is an issue,” Abbott said.
The opposition spokesman on immigration, Richard Marles, said that classification was unhelpful.
“I think that if what comes out of this is that everyone points the finger solely at Myanmar that’s not going to end up with the kind of results the global community would want to see,” he told Sky News.
“There simply has to be a point at which Tony Abbott understands that he is not just a low-rent domestic politician but is the prime minister of Australia. He enters the world stage as a statesman or at least he should and that’s what we need to see and hear from him.”
The problem lies in Myanmar, not just the government, but the average people are targetting the Rohingya. The government is either turning a blind eye to this, or silently supporting the demagogue Buddhists monks (IIRC there is some evidence to support this), and Nobel Peace Prize winner Aung Sung Suu Kyi is reluctant to tackle the problem with more than a few token words. The other issue is the numbers of potential refugees. The Rohingya population in Myanmar is close around 800 000 in a 2012 census.
I am really not sure what we can do about this.,
Compelling Myanmar looks like its going to be an exercise in futility (these were the guys who didn't even allow a US navy ship to help after a natural disaster a few years ago), and its certainly in their interest for more Rohingya's to leave Myanmar. With the exception of Singapore, most ASEAN nations are poor to middle income countries, and intuitively I feel would struggle economically to support them in large numbers even if Islam requires them to help fellow Muslims.Australia's PM was elected on a basis to "stop the boats," and I doubt we could take that many even if we wanted to.
Any ideas? Maybe convince the developed world to put their money where their human right claims are and take a few refugees.
