Given that Europe has kept the bailout terms so far in every bailout, that can only mean that you think Greece will lie and break the deal. Why would they siphon money for their economy into their debtor's pockets?Crown wrote:I'm sure it is in the bailout deal, I'm also just as sure the bailout deal is unworkable. They might as well say we'll give you a free lollipop when you flap your arms and fly.
Look, the Greeks chose to stay in it. It was their free choice. They could exit but they chose not to.Yes it was, I win!
Show what? That Greek pays 2.6% or that the military budget is way too high for a nation like Greece? For the former, already done so on multiple threads on this board.Show your working; or concede.
EDIT: Checking, it seems that Greece did indeed slash their defence budget to 2.3% in 2014. Still too high, they could take another percentage point of there and save the other from pensions. So 2.6% is still very doable.
Which is why there is this bailout that will cover these loans.Oh my god... Did you look at the payment schedule? This 2.6% blended interest rate that we have agreed for our discussions assumes a steady pay back of all the loans, but that's not reality. The loans immediately due are to the IMF and ECB (which are 6%), and these will not be met. The IMF just admitted as much (again), because the economy is depressed.
Why is it asinine? It is not as if they hunt down migrants boats in their submarines, no, that job is left to the police.And demanding a country that is on the periphery of South East Europe at the junctions of Asia and Africa and is receiving more migrants across its boarders than Italy now to cut military spending is asinine. And this coming from an obvious lefty who has no love for it!
In April, he is on record saying if there were ever a referendum, it would necessarily be on membership of the eurozone, nothing else. Then he claimed a 'no' vote is only for a better solution. On the 28th, he tweeted he was against capital controls. The next day, he introduced them. The day before the referendum, he claimed there would be a deal possible within 48 hours of it.Your kidding right? Did you read the leaks that The Guardian were posting on their live feed during the bailout talks?
How about this interview with Varoufakis where he claims;
The guy is a pathological liar, don't know why anybody would trust his word.
Yes.But wait, Varoufakis is a liar isn't he?
Ooh, Bank bailout lover and tax cheat Geithner. Surely he is a credible witness....Well how about Timmy Geithner;
Right, right, bad Schäuble - even though he is probably right on the issue. That being said, look up to what Tsipras said - he claims that it was never official policy of the German Government. So do you trust Tsipras or Geithner?Timmy Geithner, [i]Stress Test: Reflections on Financial Crises[/i], May 2014 wrote:A few days later [i.e., late July 2012], I flew to meet Wolfgang Schäuble for lunch during his vacation at a resort in Sylt, a North Sea island known as Germany’s Martha’s Vineyard. Schäuble was engaging, but I left Sylt feeling more worried than ever.
He told me there were many in Europe who still thought kicking the Greeks out of the eurozone was a plausible — even desirable — strategy.
The idea was that with Greece out, Germany would be more likely to provide the financial support the eurozone needed because the German people would no longer perceive aid to Europe as a bailout for the Greeks. At the same time, a Grexit would be traumatic enough that it would help scare the rest of Europe into giving up more sovereignty to a stronger banking and fiscal union. The argument was that letting Greece burn would make it easier to build a stronger Europe with a more credible firewall.
From the Guardian liveblog:
In march or april Varoufakis told me Schaeuble said "agree or consensual grexit", "contacted merkel, she said it wasn't her plan"
It does, but a) The banks took a 50% haircut and b) we are now on the third bailout and bank exposure is minimal. So the charge of "THIS WILL ALL GO TO BANKS" is pretty nonsensical on its face.YOU said "half a trillion Euros", does that, or does that not include the first bailout?