Colbert's predictions on new plots

PSW: discuss Star Wars without "versus" arguments.

Moderator: Vympel

Adam Reynolds
Jedi Council Member
Posts: 2354
Joined: 2004-03-27 04:51am

Colbert's predictions on new plots

Post by Adam Reynolds »

I had previously posted this in the main thread but it was buried by debates as to whether Abrams is a decent choice in director:

The relevant excerpt is this:
Entertainment Weekly wrote:But despite the intense secrecy around The Force Awakens, Colbert thinks he has the plot all figured out.

“It has been three decades since the events of the original trilogy. The dark and mysterious First Order has stepped into the power vacuum once held by the Empire. And the newly named Resistance fights in place of the Rebel Alliance, which has begun a tragic shift to the dark side,” Colbert speculated on Wednesday. “But John Boyega’s character is in a Stormtrooper, so it follows that now the new New Hope comes from the very enemy we’ve been trained to hate.

“Remember, the Dark Side was never explicitly tied to the Empire; the Force itself exists outside of mere temporal authority structures,” Colbert added. “So I predict that dark becomes light, light becomes dark, and the very fabric of the Force is stretched to its limit as a new generation emerges to tear down the false distinctions of the past and unite all of us: old and new, moisture farmers and nerf herders, star and wars, once and for all, bringing peace to the galaxy.”
It's one of the better and more positive theories I have heard, but I suspect Rey is the main new hope for this generation rather than Finn. Though Finn is presumably set to be a Jedi, so he is at least part of it.

Though I also agree that seeing a former stormtrooper as one of the main heroes is extremely interesting.
User avatar
FaxModem1
Emperor's Hand
Posts: 7700
Joined: 2002-10-30 06:40pm
Location: In a dark reflection of a better world

Re: Colbert's predictions on new plots

Post by FaxModem1 »

I like the idea of a now heroic Empire. Or the Empire as it should have been.
Image
User avatar
The Romulan Republic
Emperor's Hand
Posts: 21559
Joined: 2008-10-15 01:37am

Re: Colbert's predictions on new plots

Post by The Romulan Republic »

I don't.

I mean... how would people feel about a movie about heroic Nazis or the Third Reich as it should have been? Because that's basically what the Empire is. Space Nazis.

This is part of this widespread rush to grimdark and "necessary evil" and glorifying authoritarianism, and I despise it. Yeah, people think the Empire is cool because Vader is meaning and iconic and the Empire has fancy toys. But they are not the good guys.

That's not to say that individual Imperial loyalists can't turn to the Light Side. The notion of redemption is thematically central to Star Wars. And its not to say that all supporters of the Empire have bad intentions, even- many likely believed they were on the right side (dictatorships are often good at propaganda).

But for the Empire to be good, it would have to be so different that it would no longer be the Empire.
User avatar
Purple
Sith Acolyte
Posts: 5233
Joined: 2010-04-20 08:31am
Location: In a purple cube orbiting this planet. Hijacking satellites for an internet connection.

Re: Colbert's predictions on new plots

Post by Purple »

Honestly I would not at all be surprised if most of the imperial loyalists were in fact good people who simply carried their loyalty to the republic over or who, growing up under the empire were fed propaganda to believe it was not bad. Well, right up until the point where the Emperor showed his hand openly and blew up a planet. So with him dead, we might well see people trying to recreate their empire the way it was supposed to be.
It has become clear to me in the previous days that any attempts at reconciliation and explanation with the community here has failed. I have tried my best. I really have. I pored my heart out trying. But it was all for nothing.

You win. There, I have said it.

Now there is only one thing left to do. Let us see if I can sum up the strength needed to end things once and for all.
User avatar
The Romulan Republic
Emperor's Hand
Posts: 21559
Joined: 2008-10-15 01:37am

Re: Colbert's predictions on new plots

Post by The Romulan Republic »

Well, their were no doubt a lot of people who were brought up being told that Palpatine and the Empire were great. Not everyone bought it, of course, but some probably did.

And probably some people suffered so much during the fall of the Republic (not knowing Palpatine brought it about) that they were willing to pay too high a price if they thought it would bring order and peace.

A good example of the former category, I think, is Minister Tua from Rebels. From what I've seen, she was a fairly young official who didn't really get how bad the Empire was and panicked and tried to bail (too late to save her life) when she did.

And the latter category might have included a lot of Old Republic military folks.
Channel72
Jedi Council Member
Posts: 2068
Joined: 2010-02-03 05:28pm
Location: New York

Re: Colbert's predictions on new plots

Post by Channel72 »

It all depends on what the hell this "First Order" is, and what sort of beliefs they hold. Do they see themselves as the political continuation of the Empire? Or do they see themselves more like a rebel group fighting the New Republic? (As far as I know, these new movies don't even necessarily have any concept of a "New Republic" ... it seems the good guys are still underdogs, which ... I can't stay I'm exactly thrilled about.)

It depends on whether the First Order explicitly identifies itself as endorsing the Dark Side and/or Sith. The Galactic Empire was pretty much a secular dictatorship, because Palpatine and Vader sort of kept their religious affiliation and force powers somewhat low key, to the extent that even high-ranking military officers didn't even really believe them to be anything significant (beyond Vader occasionally choking people or whatever.)

The trailers seem to indicate that at least this guy Kylo Ren (I hate that name) is affiliated with the Dark Side or Sith or whatever ... but beyond that the nature of the First Order seems pretty unclear. (Although the word "Order" gives it more of a religious overtone than something like "Empire").
User avatar
FaxModem1
Emperor's Hand
Posts: 7700
Joined: 2002-10-30 06:40pm
Location: In a dark reflection of a better world

Re: Colbert's predictions on new plots

Post by FaxModem1 »

The Romulan Republic wrote:Well, their were no doubt a lot of people who were brought up being told that Palpatine and the Empire were great. Not everyone bought it, of course, but some probably did.

And probably some people suffered so much during the fall of the Republic (not knowing Palpatine brought it about) that they were willing to pay too high a price if they thought it would bring order and peace.

A good example of the former category, I think, is Minister Tua from Rebels. From what I've seen, she was a fairly young official who didn't really get how bad the Empire was and panicked and tried to bail (too late to save her life) when she did.

And the latter category might have included a lot of Old Republic military folks.

Or thought that while the Empire did bad things, it also did a lot of good things, and that by working within it, they could make it better. As you mentioned, Minister Tua, who used the Empire to make affordable housing for the citizens on Lothal.

Youtube link



Unless you think Tua was secretly making ghettos and slums because she was an evil bastard, the Empire probably did a lot of good things, and would have a lot of natural support and the support mechanisms in place to make it a better place.
The Romulan Republic wrote:I don't.

I mean... how would people feel about a movie about heroic Nazis or the Third Reich as it should have been? Because that's basically what the Empire is. Space Nazis.

This is part of this widespread rush to grimdark and "necessary evil" and glorifying authoritarianism, and I despise it. Yeah, people think the Empire is cool because Vader is meaning and iconic and the Empire has fancy toys. But they are not the good guys.

That's not to say that individual Imperial loyalists can't turn to the Light Side. The notion of redemption is thematically central to Star Wars. And its not to say that all supporters of the Empire have bad intentions, even- many likely believed they were on the right side (dictatorships are often good at propaganda).

But for the Empire to be good, it would have to be so different that it would no longer be the Empire.
That's more of an EU thing. Back in the 1970s, the Empire was evil, but more of a good government gone bad. Allusions to Nixon and a corrupt military.

For the majority of the galaxy, it was probably a shift in names and titles. It was only when they blew up Alderaan and disbanded the Senate that the Rebellion gets popular due to being able to win and the Empire acting hostile and violent to its members.

After all, the appeal of such a government is that it gets rid of the corruption, and makes the trains run on time. If that is happening on a galactic scale, after millenia of corruption where nothing got done and if you were really lucky, a Jedi might save you, it might seem to be a marked improvement for everybody.

So, the Empire/First Order or whatever these guys are, they could be people genuinely wanting to make the galaxy better, if only because they know how bad the Republic could be.
Image
User avatar
The Romulan Republic
Emperor's Hand
Posts: 21559
Joined: 2008-10-15 01:37am

Re: Colbert's predictions on new plots

Post by The Romulan Republic »

FaxModem1 wrote:
The Romulan Republic wrote:Well, their were no doubt a lot of people who were brought up being told that Palpatine and the Empire were great. Not everyone bought it, of course, but some probably did.

And probably some people suffered so much during the fall of the Republic (not knowing Palpatine brought it about) that they were willing to pay too high a price if they thought it would bring order and peace.

A good example of the former category, I think, is Minister Tua from Rebels. From what I've seen, she was a fairly young official who didn't really get how bad the Empire was and panicked and tried to bail (too late to save her life) when she did.

And the latter category might have included a lot of Old Republic military folks.

Or thought that while the Empire did bad things, it also did a lot of good things, and that by working within it, they could make it better. As you mentioned, Minister Tua, who used the Empire to make affordable housing for the citizens on Lothal.

Youtube link



Unless you think Tua was secretly making ghettos and slums because she was an evil bastard, the Empire probably did a lot of good things, and would have a lot of natural support and the support mechanisms in place to make it a better place.
Did the Empire do good things? Perhaps. But I don't think that outweighs the slavery and genocide and torture.

I mean, stuff like building infrastructure is part of what a government is supposed to do to meet its basic responsibilities. Meeting the basic responsibilities of your job does not balance out being space Hitler with dark supernatural powers.
That's more of an EU thing. Back in the 1970s, the Empire was evil, but more of a good government gone bad. Allusions to Nixon and a corrupt military.
Well, its a moot point thanks to the Prequels. The Empire was evil from the start.
For the majority of the galaxy, it was probably a shift in names and titles. It was only when they blew up Alderaan and disbanded the Senate that the Rebellion gets popular due to being able to win and the Empire acting hostile and violent to its members.
Rebels don't paint such a pleasant picture, and I doubt that their was anything pleasant about the fate of separatist worlds.
After all, the appeal of such a government is that it gets rid of the corruption, and makes the trains run on time. If that is happening on a galactic scale, after millenia of corruption where nothing got done and if you were really lucky, a Jedi might save you, it might seem to be a marked improvement for everybody.
So, the Empire/First Order or whatever these guys are, they could be people genuinely wanting to make the galaxy better, if only because they know how bad the Republic could be.
That might be their thinking, in some cases at least, but that doesn't mean they're right. I imagine a lot of Germans in 1930s and 1940s Germany who supported Hitler thought they were trying to make things better.
User avatar
FaxModem1
Emperor's Hand
Posts: 7700
Joined: 2002-10-30 06:40pm
Location: In a dark reflection of a better world

Re: Colbert's predictions on new plots

Post by FaxModem1 »

It really depends on how much slavery and genocide the Empire conducts in 30 years after the death of the Emperor, Vader, and a lot of his top staff. Unless we see Stormtroopers being served refreshments by chained wookies, it could very well be that this is a faction made up of the idealists who strove to make a 'proper Empire'.
Image
User avatar
The Romulan Republic
Emperor's Hand
Posts: 21559
Joined: 2008-10-15 01:37am

Re: Colbert's predictions on new plots

Post by The Romulan Republic »

I could see some Imperial loyalists deciding "We like the Empire but not everything Palpatine did. Let's try to do better."

But I still think that any decent government would no longer be recognizable as the Empire. Despotism and atrocities and actual metaphysical evil in the form of the Dark Side were woven into the Empire from the start. That's the canon, like it or not.
User avatar
FaxModem1
Emperor's Hand
Posts: 7700
Joined: 2002-10-30 06:40pm
Location: In a dark reflection of a better world

Re: Colbert's predictions on new plots

Post by FaxModem1 »

So is the Imperial Military's disdain of Dark Side force users, and their nervousness about being around them. It could very well be a clean break if the baddest apples in the bunch all died at Endor.
Image
User avatar
The Romulan Republic
Emperor's Hand
Posts: 21559
Joined: 2008-10-15 01:37am

Re: Colbert's predictions on new plots

Post by The Romulan Republic »

A clean break with the Dark Side, perhaps (though the teasers for Force Awakens suggest otherwise). And that's an improvement, no doubt about it. But its worth remembering that perhaps the worst mass killing perpetrated by the Empire was ordered by a man with no Force powers whatsoever. Turning away from the Dark Side won't stop the torture, slavery, mass murder, and other forms of despotism.

Also, do you have any evidence that disdain towards the Dark Side was universal, or nearly so, among the Imperial military? The only thing I recall is that one dipshit on the Death Star who Vader choked.
User avatar
Purple
Sith Acolyte
Posts: 5233
Joined: 2010-04-20 08:31am
Location: In a purple cube orbiting this planet. Hijacking satellites for an internet connection.

Re: Colbert's predictions on new plots

Post by Purple »

I don't really see where you are drawing your conclusions about the empire from. In the current cannon we have very little to work with after all. The movies tell us basically nothing aside from a few small glimpses at the very high end of the power structure. And the cartoon presumably follows the hero characters and does not pan over the entire galaxy. For all we know the empire might well have left the core worlds alone to do as they did in centuries past.
It has become clear to me in the previous days that any attempts at reconciliation and explanation with the community here has failed. I have tried my best. I really have. I pored my heart out trying. But it was all for nothing.

You win. There, I have said it.

Now there is only one thing left to do. Let us see if I can sum up the strength needed to end things once and for all.
User avatar
The Romulan Republic
Emperor's Hand
Posts: 21559
Joined: 2008-10-15 01:37am

Re: Colbert's predictions on new plots

Post by The Romulan Republic »

Well, their was the blowing up Alderan thing. Wasn't Alderan a major world? We also know that Coruscant was the centre of Imperial government, and so presumably was subject to heavy Imperial domination.

Beyond that, I can't speak to state of the Core Worlds in detail, but I doubt they ever had free reign to do whatever they wanted. And Episode IV shows the abolition of the Senate and power given to governors.

And the films alone show plenty of atrocities/despotic acts, including:

Torture.
Executing personel for failure/incompetence.
Secret detention (it is put out that everyone on Leia's ship was killed).
Genocide.

Rebels adds more, including:

Further torture.
Further executions for failure/incompetence.
Mass destruction of civilian homes.
The Empire murdering an attempted defector and framing the rebels for it.

Edit: Granted, a lot of that is done by a few high-up people. But if the people in charge are that bad, how good can the system as a whole be?
User avatar
Purple
Sith Acolyte
Posts: 5233
Joined: 2010-04-20 08:31am
Location: In a purple cube orbiting this planet. Hijacking satellites for an internet connection.

Re: Colbert's predictions on new plots

Post by Purple »

The Romulan Republic wrote:Well, their was the blowing up Alderan thing. Wasn't Alderan a major world?
Also notice that in a very short span of time after that the Empire is gone. This along with the rest of ANH (such as the existence of a senate) implies that behavior of this type was not in fact the norm.
We also know that Coruscant was the centre of Imperial government, and so presumably was subject to heavy Imperial domination.
Presumably because of what? What is the basis for these presumptions?
Beyond that, I can't speak to state of the Core Worlds in detail, but I doubt they ever had free reign to do whatever they wanted. And Episode IV shows the abolition of the Senate and power given to governors.
Who were these governors though? The whole thing really feels to me like a devolution of power from the senate back to the individual core worlds and their governors. It is my understanding, and I could be wrong here that the old republic was essentially a confederate structure like the UN more than anything. So devolving power to the core worlds whilst ensuring that the governor is loyal to the empire need not imply much evil.
And the films alone show plenty of atrocities/despotic acts, including:

Torture.
Executing personel for failure/incompetence.
Secret detention (it is put out that everyone on Leia's ship was killed).
The executing personnel thing only seems to happen in fleets directly controlled by a rather grumpy Darth Vader. And the people he kills tend to be high ranking officers who have blundered into mistakes that should not have happened to someone with their rank. As for the rest, it seems to me as standard MO for any counter terrorist operation. Sure it ain't nice. But like there are plenty of democratic nations right now professing to the ideals of liberty, justice and all that who do the same things.
Genocide.
Don't remember that one.
Further torture.
Further executions for failure/incompetence.
Mass destruction of civilian homes.
Is there evidence that these are not reasonably rare occurrences though? Like they might well be the equivalent of the Branch Davidian incident. You know, the one where a whole cult compound was massacred. Bad to be sure, but rare enough not to make people feel the government is evil.

And remember, the discussion here is not if the empire was evil at heart. Of course they were. But if the average citizen or minor official believed it to be up until the heavy hand of the enforcers of the evil space wizard came to their planet.
The Empire murdering an attempted defector and framing the rebels for it.
Since when is it wrong to punish traitors who try and defect to terrorists?
Edit: Granted, a lot of that is done by a few high-up people. But if the people in charge are that bad, how good can the system as a whole be?
God only knows. There is no reason to believe that what happens on remote outposts or where ever the cartoon is happening (I genuinely don't know) also goes for core worlds.

My main thesis is that basically the PT shows us that the core does not much care about what happens in the outer rim. So what might well have happened is a gradual decline into despotism as the core worlds willingly accept that a few genocides here and there are not such a big price to pay for peace and order. It's not like they are going to genocide anyone who is important after all. Only some random dirt farmers out in the outer rim. And you see the sort of gradual decline that we see today when it comes to the same situation with our governments. Except that the whole death star incident spoiled that and acted as a wake up call. The outrage over Alredan being destroyed might well have been "You are not supposed to do that to a core world!".
It has become clear to me in the previous days that any attempts at reconciliation and explanation with the community here has failed. I have tried my best. I really have. I pored my heart out trying. But it was all for nothing.

You win. There, I have said it.

Now there is only one thing left to do. Let us see if I can sum up the strength needed to end things once and for all.
User avatar
The Romulan Republic
Emperor's Hand
Posts: 21559
Joined: 2008-10-15 01:37am

Re: Colbert's predictions on new plots

Post by The Romulan Republic »

Purple wrote:Also notice that in a very short span of time after that the Empire is gone. This along with the rest of ANH (such as the existence of a senate) implies that behavior of this type was not in fact the norm.
Perhaps.

But I've read that Rebels refers to multiple Base Delta Zeros being committed, though if one wants to get really nitpicky, Base Delta Zero could mean something else now for all I know.
Presumably because of what? What is the basis for these presumptions?
My only "presumption" here is that the capital of Empire will be subject to direct rule by the Imperial government and that it will be heavy-handed. Seems reasonable, considering that Palpatine himself will be present and that it'll have to be a high security local.
Who were these governors though? The whole thing really feels to me like a devolution of power from the senate back to the individual core worlds and their governors. It is my understanding, and I could be wrong here that the old republic was essentially a confederate structure like the UN more than anything. So devolving power to the core worlds whilst ensuring that the governor is loyal to the empire need not imply much evil.
Its pretty clear to me from what I recall of it that the intent of the scene is to show a move towards greater despotism, not greater local power.
The executing personnel thing only seems to happen in fleets directly controlled by a rather grumpy Darth Vader. And the people he kills tend to be high ranking officers who have blundered into mistakes that should not have happened to someone with their rank.
Tarkin does it (or rather orders the Inquisitor to do it) to a couple guys in Rebels.
As for the rest, it seems to me as standard MO for any counter terrorist operation. Sure it ain't nice. But like there are plenty of democratic nations right now professing to the ideals of liberty, justice and all that who do the same things.
Pretty much correct.
Don't remember that one.
I'm thinking of Alderan, Order 66/Jedi, and possibly assorted Base Delta Zeros.
Is there evidence that these are not reasonably rare occurrences though? Like they might well be the equivalent of the Branch Davidian incident. You know, the one where a whole cult compound was massacred. Bad to be sure, but rare enough not to make people feel the government is evil.
Well, this kind of thing seems to pop up frequently in the works we see.
And remember, the discussion here is not if the empire was evil at heart. Of course they were. But if the average citizen or minor official believed it to be up until the heavy hand of the enforcers of the evil space wizard came to their planet.
I don't know what percentage it was, but many citizens and officials probably believed the Empire was good. And I don't think I said otherwise, so please don't insinuate that I did.
Since when is it wrong to punish traitors who try and defect to terrorists?
I'm skeptical about calling the Rebels terrorists unless they engage in terror tactics or hit non-military targets.

And punishing is one thing. Arranging their murder and pinning it on someone else, however, is a long fucking way from due process.
God only knows. There is no reason to believe that what happens on remote outposts or where ever the cartoon is happening (I genuinely don't know) also goes for core worlds.
Rebels has mostly been in fairly remote areas thus far from what I've seen.

However, even if Imperial atrocities were confined to outlying worlds (something that is obviously false to begin with), that is hardly a defence for those actions or a society that condoned them.
My main thesis is that basically the PT shows us that the core does not much care about what happens in the outer rim.
Quite possibly a lot of people in the core didn't care, though the Imperial military clearly did.
So what might well have happened is a gradual decline into despotism as the core worlds willingly accept that a few genocides here and there are not such a big price to pay for peace and order. It's not like they are going to genocide anyone who is important after all. Only some random dirt farmers out in the outer rim.
Well, it says nothing good about the core and Imperial society as a whole if that's true.
And you see the sort of gradual decline that we see today when it comes to the same situation with our governments. Except that the whole death star incident spoiled that and acted as a wake up call. The outrage over Alredan being destroyed might well have been "You are not supposed to do that to a core world!".
I think you'd be hard pressed to find a western government that is regularly committing genocide. Killing some civilians in war, sure. Other dubious acts, sure. But the Empire took it to a whole different level.

Plus their's the Dark Side thing. If you accept the films, metaphysical evil is a fact in Star Wars.
User avatar
FaxModem1
Emperor's Hand
Posts: 7700
Joined: 2002-10-30 06:40pm
Location: In a dark reflection of a better world

Re: Colbert's predictions on new plots

Post by FaxModem1 »

The Romulan Republic wrote:A clean break with the Dark Side, perhaps (though the teasers for Force Awakens suggest otherwise). And that's an improvement, no doubt about it. But its worth remembering that perhaps the worst mass killing perpetrated by the Empire was ordered by a man with no Force powers whatsoever. Turning away from the Dark Side won't stop the torture, slavery, mass murder, and other forms of despotism.

Also, do you have any evidence that disdain towards the Dark Side was universal, or nearly so, among the Imperial military? The only thing I recall is that one dipshit on the Death Star who Vader choked.
In the latest Rebels episode, "Always two there are", while one of the Inquisitors is on the bridge of the Star Destroyers, one of the officers says to Agent Gallus that they don't need their 'mystic kind' here in a rather disdainful tone. He's quick to shut up when the inquisitor comes over and starts issuing commands, but it is clearly not a popular thing with the rank and file.
Image
User avatar
The Romulan Republic
Emperor's Hand
Posts: 21559
Joined: 2008-10-15 01:37am

Re: Colbert's predictions on new plots

Post by The Romulan Republic »

Ugg. Missed it because apparently we don't get Star Wars TV up here in Canada.
User avatar
Thanas
Magister
Magister
Posts: 30779
Joined: 2004-06-26 07:49pm

Re: Colbert's predictions on new plots

Post by Thanas »

While I really love a great many Imperial characters, I am vehemently against turning the empire into the good guys. It betrays everything SW stands for in my opinion.
Whoever says "education does not matter" can try ignorance
------------
A decision must be made in the life of every nation at the very moment when the grasp of the enemy is at its throat. Then, it seems that the only way to survive is to use the means of the enemy, to rest survival upon what is expedient, to look the other way. Well, the answer to that is 'survival as what'? A country isn't a rock. It's not an extension of one's self. It's what it stands for. It's what it stands for when standing for something is the most difficult! - Chief Judge Haywood
------------
My LPs
User avatar
Anacronian
Padawan Learner
Posts: 430
Joined: 2011-09-04 11:47pm

Re: Colbert's predictions on new plots

Post by Anacronian »

I don't think for a second that The New Order will be the good guys - but I'm fascinated by the idea that The Resistance might be all that good anymore - power corrupts and all that.
Homo sapiens! What an inventive, invincible species! It's only been a few million years since they crawled up out of the mud and learned to walk. Puny, defenseless bipeds. They've survived flood, famine and plague. They've survived cosmic wars and holocausts. And now, here they are, out among the stars, waiting to begin a new life. Ready to outsit eternity. They're indomitable... indomitable. ~ Dr.Who
Adam Reynolds
Jedi Council Member
Posts: 2354
Joined: 2004-03-27 04:51am

Re: Colbert's predictions on new plots

Post by Adam Reynolds »

I don't think this is quite what he meant, but it is quite possible that the New Republic isn't all that good anymore. Given the relative power vacuum, they likely have the same problem as the Old Republic, they are too weak to be able to do much of anything. The Resistance breaks off from them in an attempt to do something.

As for the First Order being good, that is almost certainly not the case. Though Finn as a defector does sort of fit as the idea that he was talking about.
User avatar
The Romulan Republic
Emperor's Hand
Posts: 21559
Joined: 2008-10-15 01:37am

Re: Colbert's predictions on new plots

Post by The Romulan Republic »

Well, at the end of the day, Colbert is a comedian. He clearly wasn't being entirely serious.

Also, he seemed to be focussing in large part on Finn being a good guy, which doesn't equate to the Empire/First Order as a whole being good guys.
Vance
Youngling
Posts: 113
Joined: 2013-08-13 06:58am

Re: Colbert's predictions on new plots

Post by Vance »

The Romulan Republic wrote: Also, do you have any evidence that disdain towards the Dark Side was universal, or nearly so, among the Imperial military? The only thing I recall is that one dipshit on the Death Star who Vader choked.
Well it's a deleted scene and non canon, but there was another similar scene taken from Return of the Jedi...

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=R7fHTh6vwvs
The Romulan Republic wrote: But I've read that Rebels refers to multiple Base Delta Zeros being committed, though if one wants to get really nitpicky, Base Delta Zero could mean something else now for all I know.
Sabine Wren's private Journal describes a Base Delta Zero:
"That 'Base Delta Zero' initiative the Empire keeps talking about? The new 'key to planetary liberation?' Don't believe it. It's a military code phrase, and it means TOTAL EXTERMINATION OF A TARGET POPULATION. It's completely loathsome."
BlasTech.info
Adam Reynolds
Jedi Council Member
Posts: 2354
Joined: 2004-03-27 04:51am

Re: Colbert's predictions on new plots

Post by Adam Reynolds »

The Romulan Republic wrote:Well, at the end of the day, Colbert is a comedian. He clearly wasn't being entirely serious.

Also, he seemed to be focussing in large part on Finn being a good guy, which doesn't equate to the Empire/First Order as a whole being good guys.
That actually is an interesting comment that he has made before. In particular when he was hired by CBS. Which version of him were they hiring? Stephen Colbert the comedian, or Stephen Colbert the fictional character who shares the same name.
User avatar
The Romulan Republic
Emperor's Hand
Posts: 21559
Joined: 2008-10-15 01:37am

Re: Colbert's predictions on new plots

Post by The Romulan Republic »

He's been pretty clear that its Stephen Colbert the comedian, not Steven Colbert the Right wing pundit of Comedy Central.

Though I think the old role seems to seep into his performance sometimes.
Post Reply