Gee, Pat Robertson sure looks persecuted, eh? Jerks.
My uncle's like that. You should have seen the fit he threw when he heard about the 9th Circuit Court ruling against the Pledge of Allegance. "I think they need a history lesson!" "We all have to cater to the one or two atheists* in this country!" I have to live with this. Help me. The only thing I agree with him on is the social cancer that is political correctness. Fucking bleeding hearts.
Gah. Help me. ...Suffocating...
*Said with much resentment.
...This would sharpen you up and make you ready for a bit of the old...ultraviolence.
Darth Wong wrote:What do you expect? Alabama is the state where 40% of the voters wanted to keep interracial marriage illegal as recently as 2001. The donkey-fucker ratio is high in that place.
It's like the South is stuck behind the rest of the country 40 years civil rights-wise or something. Hell, in some places, it's illegal to posess a vibrator, right?
As for the donkey-fucking part, how do they have so many kids if they do so? I sure wish they did fuck donkeys, so they would have died out ages ago.
Remember, you can also put it is as (excuse my spelling) Cronium-Acidente-Carbon-Potassium, Sulphur-Molybledum-Potassium-Iodine-Nitrogen-Germanium-Minus-Electron, Deutriem-Oxygen-Nitrogen-Potassium-Electron-Yttrium, Flourine-Uranium-Carbon-Potassium-Electron-Rubidium-Minus-Boron.
EDIT : Noticed the misspelling of Boron right after I posted.
Asst. Asst. Lt. Cmdr. Smi wrote:
As for the donkey-fucking part, how do they have so many kids if they do so? I sure wish they did fuck donkeys, so they would have died out ages ago.
It is easy to explain, they fuck their wife during 3 months of the year, and the donkey during the 9 months she is pregnant.
Darth Wong wrote:What do you expect? Alabama is the state where 40% of the voters wanted to keep interracial marriage illegal as recently as 2001. The donkey-fucker ratio is high in that place.
It's like the South is stuck behind the rest of the country 40 years civil rights-wise or something. Hell, in some places, it's illegal to posess a vibrator, right?
*shrug* Forty years behind in civil rights, a century behind in economical development. Per capita income in Georgia before the Civil War was highest in 1860. After the Civil War, per capita income (adjusted for inflation) remained below pre-War levels until the mid 1960s. The rest of the Deep South was roughly the same. I think a lot of the anger/anti-intellectual backlash in the South comes from a subconscious hatred of the North, bred through the oppression that occurred after the war ended. The South is still the weakest portion of America economically, and there is still resentment over the treatment of the South after the end of the war, justified or not.
Stanley Hauerwas wrote:[W]hy is it that no one is angry at the inequality of income in this country? I mean, the inequality of income is unbelievable. Unbelievable. Why isn’t that ever an issue of politics? Because you don’t live in a democracy. You live in a plutocracy. Money rules.
von Neufeld wrote:Fucking your *Wife* for anything other than making children? Are you mad man? That is sin, and makes you burn in hell!
While I'm largely ignorant of the specific ins and outs of the great multitude of Christian denominations, I don't believe Protestants in general, and hence the majority of Christian Southeners, have a problem with contraception.
"The fool saith in his heart that there is no empty set. But if that were so, then the set of all such sets would be empty, and hence it would be the empty set." -- Wesley Salmon
von Neufeld wrote:Fucking your *Wife* for anything other than making children? Are you mad man? That is sin, and makes you burn in hell!
While I'm largely ignorant of the specific ins and outs of the great multitude of Christian denominations, I don't believe Protestants in general, and hence the majority of Christian Southeners, have a problem with contraception.
Not contraception per se, but they do have a problem with sex for the sake of pure, unadulterated pleasure. For example, in three southern states, vibrators are illegal, and possession is punishable with fines and even prison terms.
"It's not evil for God to do it. Or for someone to do it at God's command."- Jonathan Boyd on baby-killing
"you guys are fascinated with the use of those "rules of logic" to the extent that you don't really want to discussus anything."- GC
"I do not believe Russian Roulette is a stupid act" - Embracer of Darkness
"Viagra commercials appear to save lives" - tharkûn on US health care.
It fucking infects every thought in America it seems. That if every sex act doesn't have incredible spiritual enlightening joy, it will immediately transform you into a crack whore and contribute to the decline of society.
*sigh*
"You know what the problem with Hollywood is. They make shit. Unbelievable. Unremarkable. Shit." - Gabriel Shear, Swordfish
"This statement, in its utterly clueless hubristic stupidity, cannot be improved upon. I merely quote it in admiration of its perfection." - Garibaldi in reply to an incredibly stupid post.
The Fifth Illuminatus Primus | Warsie | Skeptical Empiricist | Florida Gator | Sustainability Advocate | LibertarianSocialist |
Darth Wong wrote:Not contraception per se, but they do have a problem with sex for the sake of pure, unadulterated pleasure. For example, in three southern states, vibrators are illegal, and possession is punishable with fines and even prison terms.
It seems I have underestimated fundamentalist hypocrisy.
"The fool saith in his heart that there is no empty set. But if that were so, then the set of all such sets would be empty, and hence it would be the empty set." -- Wesley Salmon
I hear in some states that have sodomy laws define sodomy as both sex for non-procreation purposes as well as any position where a partner isn't facing the other.
I'm kind of old-fashioned myself. I'd never have sex with someone I didn't love. I guess I'm one of the only people in my generation that still thinks sex means something on a higher level.
...This would sharpen you up and make you ready for a bit of the old...ultraviolence.
UltraViolence83 wrote:I hear in some states that have sodomy laws define sodomy as both sex for non-procreation purposes as well as any position where a partner isn't facing the other.
I'm kind of old-fashioned myself. I'd never have sex with someone I didn't love. I guess I'm one of the only people in my generation that still thinks sex means something on a higher level.
It all depends on the person. You can't say that someone is a bad person for enjoying sex and having it with many different partners (though you can say he is a moron if he doesn't practice safe sex), nor does a person who "saves himself for marriage" or something similar hold any kind of moral high ground. It's a completely personal choice.
Damien Sorresso
"Ever see what them computa bitchez do to numbas? It ain't natural. Numbas ain't supposed to be code, they supposed to quantify shit."
- The Onion
UltraViolence83 wrote:I hear in some states that have sodomy laws define sodomy as both sex for non-procreation purposes as well as any position where a partner isn't facing the other.
I'm kind of old-fashioned myself. I'd never have sex with someone I didn't love. I guess I'm one of the only people in my generation that still thinks sex means something on a higher level.
Why do they bother with anti-sodomy laws anyway? It's a victimless crime, and besdies, the government screws you from behind all the time. They say it contributes to the "moral decay" of society, but so what? They defined morality, and it's not like something really bad is going to happen if we don't accept their standards.
The Dark wrote:
Per capita income in Georgia before the Civil War was highest in 1860. After the Civil War, per capita income (adjusted for inflation) remained below pre-War levels until the mid 1960s. The rest of the Deep South was roughly the same.
those figures almost certainly dont account for the slaves either... well... actually they did count -- as property for the slaveowners.
