Archives?Esquire wrote:By pulling the LAAT design out of the archives, frankly. Starfighters with multi-kiloton lasers and 4,100g acceleration are ridiculously overengineered for use on the ground.

Moderator: NecronLord
Archives?Esquire wrote:By pulling the LAAT design out of the archives, frankly. Starfighters with multi-kiloton lasers and 4,100g acceleration are ridiculously overengineered for use on the ground.
TIEs did well enough over the Death Star. Even though they lost the battle, their overall performance was actually quite effective in dogfights. Their problem was that there just plain weren't enough fighters, because Vader wanted to solve the problem himself.Purple wrote:But as cannon is concerned it does not work well in space combat either. When is the last time TIE's won an engagement in cannon by using this tactic?
Okay those are cool what are they?NecronLord wrote:
Archives?
Ah, see, now that is what they should have done to reuse TIE parts and pilots as a ground vehicle. Forget even trying to fight on the ground with it, make a helicopter-equivalent.NecronLord wrote:Archives?Esquire wrote:By pulling the LAAT design out of the archives, frankly. Starfighters with multi-kiloton lasers and 4,100g acceleration are ridiculously overengineered for use on the ground.
*snip*
If it had adjustable suspension it'd be able to turn okay. But its vertical obstruction climbing ability would be almost nothing. In an ambush I'd figure the huge exposed guns would be easily shot off or wrecked by explosions.Purple wrote:Same answer really. That thing is huge. It has no lateral turning ability for its main armament. And the three track design yields it self extremely poorly to mobility as any rotation is going to be heavily effected by having to drag the middle track.
It has been awhile since I saw it, but I believe the behind the scenes footage for AOTC showed those tanks climbing/jumping a fairly significant obstruction and before running over clone troopers.Sea Skimmer wrote:If it had adjustable suspension it'd be able to turn okay. But its vertical obstruction climbing ability would be almost nothing. In an ambush I'd figure the huge exposed guns would be easily shot off or wrecked by explosions.Purple wrote:Same answer really. That thing is huge. It has no lateral turning ability for its main armament. And the three track design yields it self extremely poorly to mobility as any rotation is going to be heavily effected by having to drag the middle track.
Not when the track slopes backwards! It'd simply get the nose stuck on contact with a good curb.Purple wrote:Climbing and jumping is not at odds with such a design. IIRC a tracked vehicle with decent suspension can drive over obstacles something like 1/2 of its own ground clearance and up 45 degree slopes. Combine that with a speed and you can indeed get some rather large jumps.
At least it's gun are a wee bit higher than that TIE abomination, meaning that it has less chance to have it's line of fire blocked by the tiniest hilly slope, street curb or rock that's on the wayPurple wrote:Same answer really. That thing is huge. It has no lateral turning ability for its main armament. And the three track design yields it self extremely poorly to mobility as any rotation is going to be heavily effected by having to drag the middle track. On the plus side this thing does seem to pack enough firepower to at least make an ambush style attack possible.