Battle of the Questionable Tanks (40K vs SW)

SF: discuss futuristic sci-fi series, ideas, and crossovers.

Moderator: NecronLord

User avatar
NecronLord
Harbinger of Doom
Harbinger of Doom
Posts: 27384
Joined: 2002-07-07 06:30am
Location: The Lost City

Re: Battle of the Questionable Tanks (40K vs SW)

Post by NecronLord »

Esquire wrote:By pulling the LAAT design out of the archives, frankly. Starfighters with multi-kiloton lasers and 4,100g acceleration are ridiculously overengineered for use on the ground.
Archives?

Image
Superior Moderator - BotB - HAB [Drill Instructor]-Writer- Stardestroyer.net's resident Star-God.
"We believe in the systematic understanding of the physical world through observation and experimentation, argument and debate and most of all freedom of will." ~ Stargate: The Ark of Truth
Adam Reynolds
Jedi Council Member
Posts: 2354
Joined: 2004-03-27 04:51am

Re: Battle of the Questionable Tanks (40K vs SW)

Post by Adam Reynolds »

Purple wrote:But as cannon is concerned it does not work well in space combat either. When is the last time TIE's won an engagement in cannon by using this tactic?
TIEs did well enough over the Death Star. Even though they lost the battle, their overall performance was actually quite effective in dogfights. Their problem was that there just plain weren't enough fighters, because Vader wanted to solve the problem himself.

Over Endor, on the other hand, they did just plain loose. Though they were let down by the fact that the Empire sent in their fighters unsupported, while the Rebel Alliance closely coordinated fighter attacks with fire from capital ships.

The underlying problem Imperial fighters faced was that nearly every Rebel pilot, especially at Endor, was a combat veteran. I doubt one could say the same about Imperial ones. Kills ratios would thus skew heavily towards the Rebels, regardless of the quality of their respective fighters.
User avatar
Jedi Commisar
Youngling
Posts: 62
Joined: 2011-12-20 03:11pm

Re: Battle of the Questionable Tanks (40K vs SW)

Post by Jedi Commisar »

NecronLord wrote:
Archives?

Image
Okay those are cool what are they?
"We are the Borg. You will be annihilated. Your biological and technological distinctiveness have become irrelevant. Resistance is futile...but welcome."

From the novel Greater than the Sum
User avatar
Lord Revan
Emperor's Hand
Posts: 12236
Joined: 2004-05-20 02:23pm
Location: Zone:classified

Re: Battle of the Questionable Tanks (40K vs SW)

Post by Lord Revan »

They're some kind of gunships from the Rebels series.
I may be an idiot, but I'm a tolerated idiot
"I think you completely missed the point of sigs. They're supposed to be completely homegrown in the fertile hydroponics lab of your mind, dried in your closet, rolled, and smoked...
Oh wait, that's marijuana..."Einhander Sn0m4n
User avatar
Me2005
Padawan Learner
Posts: 292
Joined: 2012-09-20 02:09pm

Re: Battle of the Questionable Tanks (40K vs SW)

Post by Me2005 »

NecronLord wrote:
Esquire wrote:By pulling the LAAT design out of the archives, frankly. Starfighters with multi-kiloton lasers and 4,100g acceleration are ridiculously overengineered for use on the ground.
Archives?
*snip*
Ah, see, now that is what they should have done to reuse TIE parts and pilots as a ground vehicle. Forget even trying to fight on the ground with it, make a helicopter-equivalent.
User avatar
NecronLord
Harbinger of Doom
Harbinger of Doom
Posts: 27384
Joined: 2002-07-07 06:30am
Location: The Lost City

Re: Battle of the Questionable Tanks (40K vs SW)

Post by NecronLord »

They are Imperial Patrol Transports, They're basically miniature, lighter armed LAATs, they're seemingly less well armed. They were also used by police in the Clone Wars. Perhaps they're not rated for full-scale war.

See them here

The full scale imperial LAAT, the Imperial Dropship Transport, has also snuck back into canon in the (lol how selective that nu-EU is, such quality control) browser game Star Wars: Commander

Canon wookiepedia page

Image

It's imported from the Legends-EU version from The Force Unleashed games:

Image

Which certainly looks like it carries LAAT firepower.
Superior Moderator - BotB - HAB [Drill Instructor]-Writer- Stardestroyer.net's resident Star-God.
"We believe in the systematic understanding of the physical world through observation and experimentation, argument and debate and most of all freedom of will." ~ Stargate: The Ark of Truth
User avatar
NecronLord
Harbinger of Doom
Harbinger of Doom
Posts: 27384
Joined: 2002-07-07 06:30am
Location: The Lost City

Re: Battle of the Questionable Tanks (40K vs SW)

Post by NecronLord »

Ding Ding!

Round two:

Image

Replace the TIE Crawler with a NR-N99 Persuader-class droid enforcer.
Superior Moderator - BotB - HAB [Drill Instructor]-Writer- Stardestroyer.net's resident Star-God.
"We believe in the systematic understanding of the physical world through observation and experimentation, argument and debate and most of all freedom of will." ~ Stargate: The Ark of Truth
User avatar
Purple
Sith Acolyte
Posts: 5233
Joined: 2010-04-20 08:31am
Location: In a purple cube orbiting this planet. Hijacking satellites for an internet connection.

Re: Battle of the Questionable Tanks (40K vs SW)

Post by Purple »

Same answer really. That thing is huge. It has no lateral turning ability for its main armament. And the three track design yields it self extremely poorly to mobility as any rotation is going to be heavily effected by having to drag the middle track. On the plus side this thing does seem to pack enough firepower to at least make an ambush style attack possible.
It has become clear to me in the previous days that any attempts at reconciliation and explanation with the community here has failed. I have tried my best. I really have. I pored my heart out trying. But it was all for nothing.

You win. There, I have said it.

Now there is only one thing left to do. Let us see if I can sum up the strength needed to end things once and for all.
User avatar
SilverDragonRed
Padawan Learner
Posts: 217
Joined: 2014-04-28 08:38am

Re: Battle of the Questionable Tanks (40K vs SW)

Post by SilverDragonRed »

The Leman Russ is still going to have greater than the Persuader thanks to how low those guns are on the craft. Most of the few situations that would favor the Persuader is when it is ambushing the opponent.
Ah yes, the "Alpha Legion". I thought we had dismissed such claims.
User avatar
Sea Skimmer
Yankee Capitalist Air Pirate
Posts: 37390
Joined: 2002-07-03 11:49pm
Location: Passchendaele City, HAB

Re: Battle of the Questionable Tanks (40K vs SW)

Post by Sea Skimmer »

Purple wrote:Same answer really. That thing is huge. It has no lateral turning ability for its main armament. And the three track design yields it self extremely poorly to mobility as any rotation is going to be heavily effected by having to drag the middle track.
If it had adjustable suspension it'd be able to turn okay. But its vertical obstruction climbing ability would be almost nothing. In an ambush I'd figure the huge exposed guns would be easily shot off or wrecked by explosions.
"This cult of special forces is as sensible as to form a Royal Corps of Tree Climbers and say that no soldier who does not wear its green hat with a bunch of oak leaves stuck in it should be expected to climb a tree"
— Field Marshal William Slim 1956
Adam Reynolds
Jedi Council Member
Posts: 2354
Joined: 2004-03-27 04:51am

Re: Battle of the Questionable Tanks (40K vs SW)

Post by Adam Reynolds »

Sea Skimmer wrote:
Purple wrote:Same answer really. That thing is huge. It has no lateral turning ability for its main armament. And the three track design yields it self extremely poorly to mobility as any rotation is going to be heavily effected by having to drag the middle track.
If it had adjustable suspension it'd be able to turn okay. But its vertical obstruction climbing ability would be almost nothing. In an ambush I'd figure the huge exposed guns would be easily shot off or wrecked by explosions.
It has been awhile since I saw it, but I believe the behind the scenes footage for AOTC showed those tanks climbing/jumping a fairly significant obstruction and before running over clone troopers.

Though with any sense of realism, obviously the design is crap.
User avatar
Purple
Sith Acolyte
Posts: 5233
Joined: 2010-04-20 08:31am
Location: In a purple cube orbiting this planet. Hijacking satellites for an internet connection.

Re: Battle of the Questionable Tanks (40K vs SW)

Post by Purple »

Climbing and jumping is not at odds with such a design. IIRC a tracked vehicle with decent suspension can drive over obstacles something like 1/2 of its own ground clearance and up 45 degree slopes. Combine that with a speed and you can indeed get some rather large jumps.

The issue with this thing is that there is no way it's going to have adjustable suspension to any meaningful degree thanks to that large central hull that's so low to the ground. And with that being so it's going to have the turning radius of a big rig truck. Well unless those side arms can actually drop down and suspend the entire weight of the vehicle on those tiny side tracks. But I would not trust that mechanism to achieve that without catastrophic failure.
It has become clear to me in the previous days that any attempts at reconciliation and explanation with the community here has failed. I have tried my best. I really have. I pored my heart out trying. But it was all for nothing.

You win. There, I have said it.

Now there is only one thing left to do. Let us see if I can sum up the strength needed to end things once and for all.
User avatar
Sea Skimmer
Yankee Capitalist Air Pirate
Posts: 37390
Joined: 2002-07-03 11:49pm
Location: Passchendaele City, HAB

Re: Battle of the Questionable Tanks (40K vs SW)

Post by Sea Skimmer »

Purple wrote:Climbing and jumping is not at odds with such a design. IIRC a tracked vehicle with decent suspension can drive over obstacles something like 1/2 of its own ground clearance and up 45 degree slopes. Combine that with a speed and you can indeed get some rather large jumps.
Not when the track slopes backwards! It'd simply get the nose stuck on contact with a good curb.

60% slope climb is considered normal for modern armored vehicles, though this assumes a paved slope, the best I've seen anything tracked rated for is 70%, and a 40% side slope, but again, the tracks have to be angled forward, not backwards. Jumping would require an immense amount of power and traction, it'd have little to do with the suspension except being able to avoid breaking said suspension on landing.
"This cult of special forces is as sensible as to form a Royal Corps of Tree Climbers and say that no soldier who does not wear its green hat with a bunch of oak leaves stuck in it should be expected to climb a tree"
— Field Marshal William Slim 1956
User avatar
Purple
Sith Acolyte
Posts: 5233
Joined: 2010-04-20 08:31am
Location: In a purple cube orbiting this planet. Hijacking satellites for an internet connection.

Re: Battle of the Questionable Tanks (40K vs SW)

Post by Purple »

A good point. I neglected to think about the track angle. Come to think of it it's not just the track but the hull as well. Modern tanks tend to have a sloped bottom front that slides over obstacles instead of slamming into them.
It has become clear to me in the previous days that any attempts at reconciliation and explanation with the community here has failed. I have tried my best. I really have. I pored my heart out trying. But it was all for nothing.

You win. There, I have said it.

Now there is only one thing left to do. Let us see if I can sum up the strength needed to end things once and for all.
User avatar
wautd
Emperor's Hand
Posts: 7593
Joined: 2004-02-11 10:11am
Location: Intensive care

Re: Battle of the Questionable Tanks (40K vs SW)

Post by wautd »

Purple wrote:Same answer really. That thing is huge. It has no lateral turning ability for its main armament. And the three track design yields it self extremely poorly to mobility as any rotation is going to be heavily effected by having to drag the middle track. On the plus side this thing does seem to pack enough firepower to at least make an ambush style attack possible.
At least it's gun are a wee bit higher than that TIE abomination, meaning that it has less chance to have it's line of fire blocked by the tiniest hilly slope, street curb or rock that's on the way :lol:
Gods, such a stupid design that TIE tank. I'd see the LR simply drive over it assuming it's as blind as a bat as well.
User avatar
Purple
Sith Acolyte
Posts: 5233
Joined: 2010-04-20 08:31am
Location: In a purple cube orbiting this planet. Hijacking satellites for an internet connection.

Re: Battle of the Questionable Tanks (40K vs SW)

Post by Purple »

At least its guns are moderately protected from incoming fire at angles where it can't see the enemy, let alone fire back. The droid tank basically has its guns completely exposed. One good HE shell is going to disarm it instantly.
It has become clear to me in the previous days that any attempts at reconciliation and explanation with the community here has failed. I have tried my best. I really have. I pored my heart out trying. But it was all for nothing.

You win. There, I have said it.

Now there is only one thing left to do. Let us see if I can sum up the strength needed to end things once and for all.
Post Reply