Was the Lars family relatively wealthy?

PSW: discuss Star Wars without "versus" arguments.

Moderator: Vympel

User avatar
FaxModem1
Emperor's Hand
Posts: 7700
Joined: 2002-10-30 06:40pm
Location: In a dark reflection of a better world

Was the Lars family relatively wealthy?

Post by FaxModem1 »

In A New Hope, Luke Skywalker lived on Tattoine, and as established in Attack of the Clones, it was at the Lars family farm. Considering that the family owned property, could afford to buy personal droids, was able to buy Shmi from Watto, a speeder convertible for Luke, and a T-16 Skyhopper, was this normal for non-enslaved citizens of Tattooine, or was it a showing of how well the Lars family were doing with their moisture farm?

Does this mean that Luke was doing rather well as a big fish in a small desert pond, with relatively wealthy friends like Biggs, or was he just a normal kid on Tattoine, where everyone owned their own T-16 Skyhopper and it was the same as getting a kid a bicycle for Christmas?
Image
User avatar
Borgholio
Sith Acolyte
Posts: 6297
Joined: 2010-09-03 09:31pm
Location: Southern California

Re: Was the Lars family relatively wealthy?

Post by Borgholio »

I wouldn't say they were fairly wealthy. They obviously weren't poor but you have to look at the circumstances.

1. Owning property isn't anything special. Farmers own vast tracts of land all over the world.

2. Droids are very common in the SW universe. Buying one is probably no different than you or I buying a lawnmower, tree mulcher, or some other kind of equipment for the yard or the house. So for him, it was basically a mobile swap meet that came rolling by and he picked out a couple things to help around the farm.

3. Watto did imply that a slave was a valuable (and expensive) piece of property. But he was desperate for money at that time (having lost everything on the Boonta Eve Pod race). He may have let her go at a discount.

4. The speeder was a piece of junk. It worked, but it was obviously not a high-end model like you would find on Coruscant. It could have been the equivalent of an old Chevy pickup that is held together with spit and duct tape. Even Rey, someone in a far worse financial position than Luke, had a speeder. So it was probably a general purpose utility vehicle for use around the farm.

5. We don't know the in-universe cost of a T-16. The EU states that is a very common vehicle that is often used as a trainer for higher-end starfighters. I doubt it's all *that* expensive and it's probably something Luke saved up for as his own personal vehicle, with the open-cockpit speeder used for work and transporting stuff.

So overall I don't think they're wealthy, they're probably about typical for a farming family.
You will be assimilated...bunghole!
User avatar
Joun_Lord
Jedi Master
Posts: 1211
Joined: 2014-09-27 01:40am
Location: West by Golly Virginia

Re: Was the Lars family relatively wealthy?

Post by Joun_Lord »

Pretty much what Borgholio said, it seems like a typical farming family.

When I was growing up we lived on a bigass farm and while we weren't wealthy we could afford a few things like new-ish and new equipment and old junker cars. While we weren't a "traditional" farm, mostly the farming was a side business, neighbors who were full time farmers could have or afford the real world equivalent of the the stuff the Lars had.

Most kids growing up had access to some ancient truck that at times would be in the family for literally generations, pretty much how Luke had an old speeder to tool around in. I wouldn't be surprised if the speeder was second or third hand or had even been in the Lars family since little orphan Anni was whining in the garage.The T-16 would probably be a bit like a quad or dirt-bike, something else alot of farm kids had.

The Owen buying the droids are probably the same as any farmer going to a flea market and picking up a used plow and wheelbarrow.

The buying of Shmi was the only thing to show any real wealth but like Borgholio said they might have got her at a discount. If I remember correctly the Old EU said Cliegg with the help of Owen actually tricked Watto into selling her for pretty much nothing and Watto had softened towards her to the point he was happy to let her go so she could be happy, even had deactivated her slave bomb thing after Anakin left because he was afraid she'd blow herself up in her grief. I don't know what the story of her freedom is in the new canon though.

I don't think the Lars were dirt poor but certainly were not wealthy.
User avatar
FaxModem1
Emperor's Hand
Posts: 7700
Joined: 2002-10-30 06:40pm
Location: In a dark reflection of a better world

Re: Was the Lars family relatively wealthy?

Post by FaxModem1 »

How common is a T-16 Skyhopper then? Is it the equivalent of buying the teenager of the house a bicycle, a convertible, or a propeller plane for them to fart around in when they're bored so that they can shoot at small animals?
Image
User avatar
Borgholio
Sith Acolyte
Posts: 6297
Joined: 2010-09-03 09:31pm
Location: Southern California

Re: Was the Lars family relatively wealthy?

Post by Borgholio »

I'd say it's the equivalent of a lifted 4x4 that is used by a bored farm boy. In the SW-verse, flying or hovering vehicles are as common as ground vehicles today. So while an 18 year old in Nebraska would not be out of place with a lifted 4x4 sporting Yosemite Sam mud flaps and a horn that plays Dixieland, having a personal flying machine may be fairly common as well. It's worth noting that nobody batted an eye or raised any question about Luke being a bush pilot or when he boasts about shooting womp rats in the thing. So it can't be all that unusual.
You will be assimilated...bunghole!
User avatar
Elheru Aran
Emperor's Hand
Posts: 13073
Joined: 2004-03-04 01:15am
Location: Georgia

Re: Was the Lars family relatively wealthy?

Post by Elheru Aran »

This is an economy where repulsor vehicles are highly common, filling the general slot of automobiles, after all. If Coruscant is any indication, you can have repulsor vehicles that can fly quite a distance above ground with ease. I would expect a T-16 or something along the lines of the snowspeeder to be about as easily obtainable as an automobile, especially considering that with droid and computer technology on the level they have, it would be quite easy for them to automate flight while the driver learns how to fly it. Something like if the driver starts throwing the skyhopper into an uncontrollable spin, the autopilot kicks in, disables the pilot controls, takes it out of the spin, flashes a "you dumbass don't do that" signal and restores it to its previous course.
It's a strange world. Let's keep it that way.
User avatar
NecronLord
Harbinger of Doom
Harbinger of Doom
Posts: 27384
Joined: 2002-07-07 06:30am
Location: The Lost City

Re: Was the Lars family relatively wealthy?

Post by NecronLord »

The deleted scenes imply that the farm is barely solvent, though it may be that they bought these amenities beforehand.

The speeder shouldn't be considered a luxury purchase necessarily; it's a vehicle Luke uses for farm work. We can't say whether they're rich or not, but they're not free and clear of debt.
Superior Moderator - BotB - HAB [Drill Instructor]-Writer- Stardestroyer.net's resident Star-God.
"We believe in the systematic understanding of the physical world through observation and experimentation, argument and debate and most of all freedom of will." ~ Stargate: The Ark of Truth
User avatar
Knife
Emperor's Hand
Posts: 15769
Joined: 2002-08-30 02:40pm
Location: Behind the Zion Curtain

Re: Was the Lars family relatively wealthy?

Post by Knife »

Yeah, the T 16 seems to me the symbolic version of the old crop duster on the farm where Luke grew up. It is also the only other vessel we see at the farm besides Luke's old beat up Chevy... er speeder. It's possible it was just the family car/truck that Owen used to move his crop and/or make runs to town in. Slightly better than Luke's POS but not necessarily a Lincoln town car either.
They say, "the tree of liberty must be watered with the blood of tyrants and patriots." I suppose it never occurred to them that they are the tyrants, not the patriots. Those weapons are not being used to fight some kind of tyranny; they are bringing them to an event where people are getting together to talk. -Mike Wong

But as far as board culture in general, I do think that young male overaggression is a contributing factor to the general atmosphere of hostility. It's not SOS and the Mess throwing hand grenades all over the forum- Red
User avatar
Elheru Aran
Emperor's Hand
Posts: 13073
Joined: 2004-03-04 01:15am
Location: Georgia

Re: Was the Lars family relatively wealthy?

Post by Elheru Aran »

Actually the Lars family had another speeder, we see it in the garage where Threepio is hiding after Artoo escapes. It's slightly larger, sort of looks like a station wagon with a pointy nose and a spoiler. That one was the 'family car'.
It's a strange world. Let's keep it that way.
User avatar
Knife
Emperor's Hand
Posts: 15769
Joined: 2002-08-30 02:40pm
Location: Behind the Zion Curtain

Re: Was the Lars family relatively wealthy?

Post by Knife »

Image

Oh, yeah. Forgot about that. Well, same thing really. Owen has his car and a truck to do farm work, not seeing how it changes things much. The other speeder doesn't look like it could carry much, we see another of it's kind in Mos Eisely, and the aircraft looking one (T16) has some carrying capacity. Besides the 'old dust cropper' but so that look 'knows how to fly', I would say it is just t he farm truck.
They say, "the tree of liberty must be watered with the blood of tyrants and patriots." I suppose it never occurred to them that they are the tyrants, not the patriots. Those weapons are not being used to fight some kind of tyranny; they are bringing them to an event where people are getting together to talk. -Mike Wong

But as far as board culture in general, I do think that young male overaggression is a contributing factor to the general atmosphere of hostility. It's not SOS and the Mess throwing hand grenades all over the forum- Red
User avatar
biostem
Jedi Master
Posts: 1488
Joined: 2012-11-15 01:48pm

Re: Was the Lars family relatively wealthy?

Post by biostem »

Given the longevity of tech in the Star Wars universe, Luke's speeder and skyhopper could have been decades old, (or older). As for property, what little we do see is basically a graded section of dirt with those moisture vaporator pillar things - they don't run a conventional farm, remember.
User avatar
Lord Revan
Emperor's Hand
Posts: 12235
Joined: 2004-05-20 02:23pm
Location: Zone:classified

Re: Was the Lars family relatively wealthy?

Post by Lord Revan »

biostem wrote:Given the longevity of tech in the Star Wars universe, Luke's speeder and skyhopper could have been decades old, (or older). As for property, what little we do see is basically a graded section of dirt with those moisture vaporator pillar things - they don't run a conventional farm, remember.
I don't remember atm how canon the novelizations are now, but in the ANH novelization it was implied that without a working moisture vaporator the Lars Farm isn't anything but dried up dirt and they need those vaporators to get enough water to grow anything. With a fully functioning vaporators it was implied to look like conventional farm looks like on earth.
I may be an idiot, but I'm a tolerated idiot
"I think you completely missed the point of sigs. They're supposed to be completely homegrown in the fertile hydroponics lab of your mind, dried in your closet, rolled, and smoked...
Oh wait, that's marijuana..."Einhander Sn0m4n
User avatar
Elheru Aran
Emperor's Hand
Posts: 13073
Joined: 2004-03-04 01:15am
Location: Georgia

Re: Was the Lars family relatively wealthy?

Post by Elheru Aran »

biostem wrote:Given the longevity of tech in the Star Wars universe, Luke's speeder and skyhopper could have been decades old, (or older). As for property, what little we do see is basically a graded section of dirt with those moisture vaporator pillar things - they don't run a conventional farm, remember.
It's probable that the moisture gathered by the vaporators is piped to a central tank of some sort. Nearly all crops on Tattooine would have to be grown hydroponically or in imported soil, if there's no suitable dirt on the planet. If the atmosphere is too intense for ordinary crops to grow, all these would by necessity have to be underground. The implication is fairly strong that most of Tattooine's development is underground; note the architecture of the Lars homestead, most of which is in dugouts around a large pit. The little dome-building is only the entrance. Considering the casual use of droids and slave labour, it wouldn't be particularly difficult to dig all this out in a low-tech fashion (albeit unethical, of course).
It's a strange world. Let's keep it that way.
User avatar
biostem
Jedi Master
Posts: 1488
Joined: 2012-11-15 01:48pm

Re: Was the Lars family relatively wealthy?

Post by biostem »

Wait - they referred to them as moisture farmers - I thought that they collected and sold the water as their primary function, and the growing of other vegetables and such was secondary.
User avatar
Elheru Aran
Emperor's Hand
Posts: 13073
Joined: 2004-03-04 01:15am
Location: Georgia

Re: Was the Lars family relatively wealthy?

Post by Elheru Aran »

Oh, I wasn't actually saying the Larses (Lars? Larss?) specifically grew crops, I was just talking about crops on Tattooine in general. Certainly the Lars family could have made the bulk of their income by moisture farming rather than actual crop farming.
It's a strange world. Let's keep it that way.
User avatar
Solauren
Emperor's Hand
Posts: 10375
Joined: 2003-05-11 09:41pm

Re: Was the Lars family relatively wealthy?

Post by Solauren »

um, I thought I saw the T-16 in the garage in AOTC when Anakin was hiding in their after her recovered Shimi and before her funeral service.
I've been asked why I still follow a few of the people I know on Facebook with 'interesting political habits and view points'.

It's so when they comment on or approve of something, I know what pages to block/what not to vote for.
User avatar
Knife
Emperor's Hand
Posts: 15769
Joined: 2002-08-30 02:40pm
Location: Behind the Zion Curtain

Re: Was the Lars family relatively wealthy?

Post by Knife »

biostem wrote:Given the longevity of tech in the Star Wars universe, Luke's speeder and skyhopper could have been decades old, (or older). As for property, what little we do see is basically a graded section of dirt with those moisture vaporator pillar things - they don't run a conventional farm, remember.
Oh I get it's not a 'real farm'. But the theme stays the same, bored farm kid who got to play with uncles/dad's crop duster who went on a great adventure and fought the space nazi's in a fighter plane.
They say, "the tree of liberty must be watered with the blood of tyrants and patriots." I suppose it never occurred to them that they are the tyrants, not the patriots. Those weapons are not being used to fight some kind of tyranny; they are bringing them to an event where people are getting together to talk. -Mike Wong

But as far as board culture in general, I do think that young male overaggression is a contributing factor to the general atmosphere of hostility. It's not SOS and the Mess throwing hand grenades all over the forum- Red
User avatar
Scottish Ninja
Jedi Knight
Posts: 964
Joined: 2007-02-26 06:39pm
Location: Not Scotland, that's for sure

Re: Was the Lars family relatively wealthy?

Post by Scottish Ninja »

And considering the parallels of the T-16 - you can buy a light airplane like a Cessna 172 for around $25000 nowadays. Right after WW2, you could buy a war surplus Stearman biplane for as little as $250 - around $3000 today. I'm sure someone like Broomstick could speak with a lot more experience about the costs of flying but I imagine a plane like that, pretty much kept in a barn, do your own maintenance, take off and land on cleared farm fields... that's a pretty reasonable thing to own on a farm, especially a remote one. Especially in a place like Tatooine where no one's going to check your pilot's license.
Image
"If the flight succeeds, you swipe an absurd amount of prestige for a single mission. Heroes of the Zenobian Onion will literally rain upon you." - PeZook
"If the capsule explodes, heroes of the Zenobian Onion will still rain upon us. Literally!" - Shroom
Cosmonaut Ivan Ivanovich Ivanov (deceased, rain), Cosmonaut Petr Petrovich Petrov, Unnamed MASA Engineer, and Unnamed Zenobian Engineerski in Let's play: BARIS
Captain, MFS Robber Baron, PRFYNAFBTFC - "Absolute Corruption Powers Absolutely"
User avatar
Enigma
is a laughing fool.
Posts: 7777
Joined: 2003-04-30 10:24pm
Location: c nnyhjdyt yr 45

Re: Was the Lars family relatively wealthy?

Post by Enigma »

Looking at the stats from Wookieepedia, it has a cargo capacity of 50kg? 110lbs? That can't be right. My subcompact can carry more than that.
ASVS('97)/SDN('03)

"Whilst human alchemists refer to the combustion triangle, some of their orcish counterparts see it as more of a hexagon: heat, fuel, air, laughter, screaming, fun." Dawn of the Dragons

ASSCRAVATS!
Simon_Jester
Emperor's Hand
Posts: 30165
Joined: 2009-05-23 07:29pm

Re: Was the Lars family relatively wealthy?

Post by Simon_Jester »

With aircraft, weight isn't the only issue; balance is a problem too. If a T-16 represents the bare minimum of what can function as a flying vehicle, it may not be designed to compensate for large loads of cargo.
This space dedicated to Vasily Arkhipov
User avatar
Borgholio
Sith Acolyte
Posts: 6297
Joined: 2010-09-03 09:31pm
Location: Southern California

Re: Was the Lars family relatively wealthy?

Post by Borgholio »

By comparison, the X-wing fighter wasn't able to store all THAT much equipment either. On Dagobah, Luke had enough room for a few crates of gear and that's about it.
You will be assimilated...bunghole!
User avatar
Batman
Emperor's Hand
Posts: 16427
Joined: 2002-07-09 04:51am
Location: Seriously thinking about moving to Marvel because so much of the DCEU stinks

Re: Was the Lars family relatively wealthy?

Post by Batman »

I doubt the limit on the X-Wing was mass so much as volume, though. The X-Wing is tiny. Given the accelerations Wars ships are capable of 50 kilos does seem a tad on the low side and with their technology balance issues should be a nonconcern.
Of course that number comes from a now noncanon source.
'Next time I let Superman take charge, just hit me. Real hard.'
'You're a princess from a society of immortal warriors. I'm a rich kid with issues. Lots of issues.'
'No. No dating for the Batman. It might cut into your brooding time.'
'Tactically we have multiple objectives. So we need to split into teams.'-'Dibs on the Amazon!'
'Hey, we both have a Martian's phone number on our speed dial. I think I deserve the benefit of the doubt.'
'You know, for a guy with like 50 different kinds of vision, you sure are blind.'
User avatar
SpottedKitty
Jedi Master
Posts: 1004
Joined: 2014-08-22 08:24pm
Location: UK

Re: Was the Lars family relatively wealthy?

Post by SpottedKitty »

Enigma wrote:Looking at the stats from Wookieepedia, it has a cargo capacity of 50kg? 110lbs? That can't be right. My subcompact can carry more than that.
A better comparison might be with one of those not-quite-microlight planes, the sort that looks like a chibi Bulldog. Planes like that really do have a lifting capacity limited to one non-overweight pilot plus one medium suitcase.
“Despite rumor, Death isn't cruel — merely terribly, terribly good at his job.”
Terry Pratchett, Sourcery
User avatar
Elheru Aran
Emperor's Hand
Posts: 13073
Joined: 2004-03-04 01:15am
Location: Georgia

Re: Was the Lars family relatively wealthy?

Post by Elheru Aran »

It's a matter of primary function and efficiency. X-wings aren't *supposed* to carry a lot of cargo. The T-16 has always been portrayed in EU material as a joyride vehicle for Luke. They've got other vehicles for the cargo duties.
It's a strange world. Let's keep it that way.
Adam Reynolds
Jedi Council Member
Posts: 2354
Joined: 2004-03-27 04:51am

Re: Was the Lars family relatively wealthy?

Post by Adam Reynolds »

Enigma wrote:Looking at the stats from Wookieepedia, it has a cargo capacity of 50kg? 110lbs? That can't be right. My subcompact can carry more than that.
That is probably the same source that claims that an X-wing can only travel 1000 kph, so I wouldn't pay too much attention to it.
Post Reply