Expansion of the Hadley Cells

SLAM: debunk creationism, pseudoscience, and superstitions. Discuss logic and morality.

Moderator: Alyrium Denryle

User avatar
madd0ct0r
Sith Acolyte
Posts: 6259
Joined: 2008-03-14 07:47am

Re: Expansion of the Hadley Cells

Post by madd0ct0r »

Given enough energy we can do anything, but if we are getting off coal than it will be harder. Particularly on short timescales like a decade, we're talking appollo mission levels of commitment
"Aid, trade, green technology and peace." - Hans Rosling.
"Welcome to SDN, where we can't see the forest because walking into trees repeatedly feels good, bro." - Mr Coffee
Adam Reynolds
Jedi Council Member
Posts: 2354
Joined: 2004-03-27 04:51am

Re: Expansion of the Hadley Cells

Post by Adam Reynolds »

madd0ct0r wrote:Given enough energy we can do anything, but if we are getting off coal than it will be harder. Particularly on short timescales like a decade, we're talking Apollo mission levels of commitment
That isn't going to happen in reality. Even as the United States could potentially stop using it entirely(the upside to fracking as much as green energy), and China has even leveled out consumption(nuclear rather than green energy is picking up the slack), India is looking to double production(and corresponding consumption) by 2020.

Solar will undoubtedly win in the long run, but not fast enough to do anything about climate change for the time being. We're stuck with it. The Apollo program is a joke in comparison to this sort of problem. The United States alone was easily able to go to the moon. The problem with climate change is that it requires every nation to completely agree that it is necessary to take drastic steps and agree as to the means to do this. And as we see with the India example, that isn't happening anytime soon.

For the absurdly simple version of the underlying question: Should prosperous nations have to pay for the right to continue producing CO2 to stay at an existing level of development? Or should they be allowed to pull up the ladder behind them and leave the undeveloped world in at best relative poverty?
User avatar
Guardsman Bass
Cowardly Codfish
Posts: 9281
Joined: 2002-07-07 12:01am
Location: Beneath the Deepest Sea

Re: Expansion of the Hadley Cells

Post by Guardsman Bass »

We'll probably just muddle through, rich countries doing better than poor countries both because most of them are further north, and because they have more money. Some of the poorer countries at least seem interested in taking unilateral and joint steps to reduce climate change.

At least we'll have plenty of tomatoes and lettuce. Both of them appear to be very amenable to being grown in-doors, in tightly water-managed conditions.
“It is possible to commit no mistakes and still lose. That is not a weakness. That is life.”
-Jean-Luc Picard


"Men are afraid that women will laugh at them. Women are afraid that men will kill them."
-Margaret Atwood
Post Reply