I do kind of wish those lines of Luke's about a balance of Light and Dark were cut- I believe I've made my views on the moral relativist equation of the Light and Dark Side some fans seem to push quite clear.Dass.Kapital wrote: Well... I think in the above context is because, as kind of shown, the 'Force' is making BOTH light as well as Dark force users so that there's always 'Balance' between the two sides.
That said, it was a fairly minor element of the film for the amount of time devoted to it, and the film seems to come down more in the end in favour of the conventional Light Side=good, Dark Side=evil interpretation. Like a lot of things about TLJ, its somewhat ambiguous (perhaps deliberately so)- I think you could read it a lot of different ways if you wanted to.
Well, that's life. Nothing remains unchanged forever. I don't know that that's a sign of malevolence on the part of the Force- just proof that the Force either can't or won't maintain a state of perfect galactic Utopia constantly.The down side being the damage that is causd as the pendulum swings between one group rising into ascendance over the other.
One thing I do like about this film is that it makes a point of noting that "Light Side" and Jedi (particularly the Prequel Order) are not synonymous terms.The Sith use weapons of mass destruction to grasp the galxy in their metal fists.
The Jedi and their allies (And unfortunate collateral damage) as they drive the Sith back into the sdarkness, freeing every one. (Except the force sensitive people who are removed from their families and other rather intrusive 'For the greater good' policies the Jedi council have shown to act upon)
Like a lot of people, I've found, who paint the Force, or the Light Side, as malevolent and destructive, you are making the mistake of conflating "Jedi" with "Light Side"- they are not synonymous.
The Force is a universal metaphysical... force, or entity (depending on your interpretation and how much consciousness and intent you ascribe to it). The Jedi are merely one organization that attempts to follow the Light Side- the Jedi (much less the specific rules and practices of the Late Old Republic Jedi) do not have a monopoly on it.
In fact, if TLJ has an overall point or message, its that we should hold to our ideals, without being bound to outdated structures and symbols. Perhaps most blatantly illustrated in Yoda's talk with Luke- he does not repudiate the Light Side, or even the Jedi, but basically tells Luke to stop thinking in terms of the symbolism and structure of the old Jedi Order (either by adhering to it, or fearing it and trying to reject anything associated with it).
Which is admittedly hypocritical, coming from Yoda, but I like that Yoda is probably the character who grows most in consistently in their views over the course of the films.
Interestingly, Kylo by the end doesn't seem to regard himself as a Sith. Though the difference may be largely one of semantics.ONLY for the Sith to begin their inevitable rise to power again.
Rinse/repeat, seemingly forever.
Indeed. I think there are... about five things from the old EU (that haven't been retconned back in) that I regret losing. At most.I was just offering a comment to Kojiro about how West End games dealt with things.
Back in the day when any one creating anything for the setting HAD to make sure it passed Lucas' (Or who ever) seal of aproval that it 'Matched'. (Yeah, I know that it was still some times pretty hit and miss. )