innerbrat wrote:
But high school kids tend to stick to their own age group. When an 18 yr old joins college, he's suddenyl in contact with a range of students of all ages, and yet is still unable to socialise with them, without serious repercussions involved with novice underage drinkers.
Ask Coyote about the problems involved with underage binge drinking at college...
I read about his situation.
I was just saying that by making the age 21 the government was trying to cut down on high school binge drinking. While 18-20 year olds might be binge drinking illegally at college it's still better than 13-19 year olds doing it in high school. If the drinking age were 18-19 that would happen more than it already does.
I get what your saying, although it took awhile to sink in
, about where the age groups don't mix as much in high school as they do in college. That's a valid point. I still think a age limit within the high school range would potentially open up the same problems, although to a lesser degree.
I was one of the younger people in my high school class and I turned 18 a month before we graduated. There were a lot of people who were 18 or older the whole year and plenty who turned 18 early on. Still, I don't see why the drinking age couldn't be 20 and still basically do what the 21 age limit does.
In about 30 years the drinking age in the state I grew up in went from 21--18--19 and back to 21. During a lot of the time the state owned and operated all liquor stores. I think supermarkets were allowed to sell beer and maybe some wine but everything else was at the state liquor stores.