However, it does nothing for anyone's arc as a character. It doesn't proceed from anything Arya has done as a person, or the reasons she has done anything. It doesn't advance anyone in the scene as a person, it was there because it was badass.The Romulan Republic wrote: ↑2019-05-07 05:03am Whether or not Arya had previously interacted with the White Walkers has no bearing on whether it is believeable for her to kill him. That would be conflating realism with traditional narrative convention, which are two different things.
Its in character for her to do so, and consistent with her established abilities. It might feel like a bait and switch after the Prince Who Was Promised build up around Jon and Danny, but I'd even argue its somewhat thematically consistent with a show that has repeatedly made a point of showing that being a skilled warrior and being a good leader aren't necessarily the same thing.
It was exactly the fan pandering you go on to complain about.
And yes, it's about narrative convention, because as much as people often say A Song of Ice and Fire defies such convention it doesn't. It is absolutely driven by who its characters are as people and why they do things is intimiately related to what eventually happens. (PS that is why it was popular).
If GRRM ever gets this far with the books, I think we can cast iron guarantee that Arya will not be there because nothing about who she is as a person would lead her to that conflict or outcome.