democratic socialism and capitalism

N&P: Discuss governments, nations, politics and recent related news here.

Moderators: Alyrium Denryle, Edi, K. A. Pital

User avatar
Guardsman Bass
Cowardly Codfish
Posts: 9281
Joined: 2002-07-07 12:01am
Location: Beneath the Deepest Sea

democratic socialism and capitalism

Post by Guardsman Bass »

Hi

I just visited the Democratic Socialists of America website, where they claim they are the largest socialist organization in America (although that is not saying much; I doubt their membership is over a million, and I guarantee it is smaller than the microscopic Libertarian Party) where they say they are in favor of "economic democracy."

Since they are wonderfully vague on what this means to non-members, I have decided to ask the board.

Although capitalism is "democratic" in the sense that it is always controlled by the populace through indirect means such as where one shops, the DS seem to advocate either one of the two following:

1. Government ownership of means of production established through gradual, democratic means. This, if true, would place them in the same category as the Fabians (british gradual socialists) and the Social Democrat party of the early twentieth century. I personally am apprehensive about this: It is effectively turning capitalism into mass representative democracies, which I believe will kill efficiency and quality.

2. Elimination of hierarchies in the workplace. In other words, eliminating the hierarchical corporation model, with its pyramid of workers on bottom, CEO on top, and orders always flowing downwards, into some sort of democratically managed "collective enterprises," which would still probably be for profit. Such collectives would elect their management, and distribute profits amongst themselves. This I am not sure about; I believe it will tend to eliminate superbly massive economies-of scale (although it may still be possibly by uniting the collective through association on the internet and other means), but will tend towards higher wages on average. Most likely will result in difficulties in starting businesses though, and reduce individual initiative to establish enterprises(probably a goal of the DS anyways). This form of economy is also favored generally by leftish anarchists ( not anarcho-capitalist Ayn Randians) and middle of the way greens(between extremists and moderates), who would prefer a smaller, more artisan style approach to production using individual, specialized engineering and advanced technology. Plus, they believe it will be easier to protect the environment if the economy is made of small collective enterprises rather than gigantic corporations. For readers of Kim Stanley Robinson, this is the economy used on Mars in Blue Mars the book. The interesting thing is that the system actually DOES exist in Spain (can't remember the link, but you can surely find it on google. Check it out; it is quite interesting.)

What are your thoughts, reader?
“It is possible to commit no mistakes and still lose. That is not a weakness. That is life.”
-Jean-Luc Picard


"Men are afraid that women will laugh at them. Women are afraid that men will kill them."
-Margaret Atwood
User avatar
Montcalm
Emperor's Hand
Posts: 7879
Joined: 2003-01-15 10:50am
Location: Montreal Canada North America

Post by Montcalm »

Socialism is just another word for communism.
Image
Jerry Orbach 1935 2004
Admiral Valdemar~You know you've fucked up when Wacky Races has more realistic looking vehicles than your own.
User avatar
Sea Skimmer
Yankee Capitalist Air Pirate
Posts: 37390
Joined: 2002-07-03 11:49pm
Location: Passchendaele City, HAB

Post by Sea Skimmer »

Montcalm wrote:Socialism is just another word for communism.
No its not, communism is a specific form of socialism.
"This cult of special forces is as sensible as to form a Royal Corps of Tree Climbers and say that no soldier who does not wear its green hat with a bunch of oak leaves stuck in it should be expected to climb a tree"
— Field Marshal William Slim 1956
User avatar
Joe
Space Cowboy
Posts: 17314
Joined: 2002-08-22 09:58pm
Location: Wishing I was in Athens, GA

Post by Joe »

1. Government ownership of means of production established through gradual, democratic means. This, if true, would place them in the same category as the Fabians (british gradual socialists) and the Social Democrat party of the early twentieth century. I personally am apprehensive about this: It is effectively turning capitalism into mass representative democracies, which I believe will kill efficiency and quality.
Stupid fucking idea. No private property equals no incentives equals drastically diminished productivity.
2. Elimination of hierarchies in the workplace. In other words, eliminating the hierarchical corporation model, with its pyramid of workers on bottom, CEO on top, and orders always flowing downwards, into some sort of democratically managed "collective enterprises," which would still probably be for profit. Such collectives would elect their management, and distribute profits amongst themselves. This I am not sure about; I believe it will tend to eliminate superbly massive economies-of scale (although it may still be possibly by uniting the collective through association on the internet and other means), but will tend towards higher wages on average. Most likely will result in difficulties in starting businesses though, and reduce individual initiative to establish enterprises(probably a goal of the DS anyways). This form of economy is also favored generally by leftish anarchists ( not anarcho-capitalist Ayn Randians) and middle of the way greens(between extremists and moderates), who would prefer a smaller, more artisan style approach to production using individual, specialized engineering and advanced technology. Plus, they believe it will be easier to protect the environment if the economy is made of small collective enterprises rather than gigantic corporations. For readers of Kim Stanley Robinson, this is the economy used on Mars in Blue Mars the book. The interesting thing is that the system actually DOES exist in Spain (can't remember the link, but you can surely find it on google. Check it out; it is quite interesting.)
Well, it might lead to higher wages (which will be wiped out by diminished profits) but the "smaller, more artisan" style of production is also going to boost prices. And these collective enterprises will be destroyed by cheaply-priced foreign goods.

And the environment? Try strengthening private property law. When it's your property, every day is Earth day.
Image

BoTM / JL / MM / HAB / VRWC / Horseman

I'm studying for the CPA exam. Have a nice summer, and if you're down just sit back and realize that Joe is off somewhere, doing much worse than you are.
User avatar
Darth Wong
Sith Lord
Sith Lord
Posts: 70028
Joined: 2002-07-03 12:25am
Location: Toronto, Canada
Contact:

Post by Darth Wong »

Montcalm wrote:Socialism is just another word for communism.
Communism outlaws the use of capital. Socialism does not; it merely involves the government controlling a lot of that capital for social purposes. This is no small distinction. America is not entirely capitalist, and is actually somewhat socialist because it has income taxes, a large government, and a welfare system.
Image
"It's not evil for God to do it. Or for someone to do it at God's command."- Jonathan Boyd on baby-killing

"you guys are fascinated with the use of those "rules of logic" to the extent that you don't really want to discussus anything."- GC

"I do not believe Russian Roulette is a stupid act" - Embracer of Darkness

"Viagra commercials appear to save lives" - tharkûn on US health care.

http://www.stardestroyer.net/Mike/RantMode/Blurbs.html
User avatar
BlkbrryTheGreat
BANNED
Posts: 2658
Joined: 2002-11-04 07:48pm
Location: Philadelphia PA

Post by BlkbrryTheGreat »

Darth Wong wrote:
Montcalm wrote:Socialism is just another word for communism.
Communism outlaws the use of capital. Socialism does not; it merely involves the government controlling a lot of that capital for social purposes. This is no small distinction. America is not entirely capitalist, and is actually somewhat socialist because it has income taxes, a large government, and a welfare system.
Socialism is just a halfway house in the journey towards Communism. Once redistribution is accepted as a valid "right" of the government, you can be sure that you'll eventually end up with Communism if the expansionist tendincies of government are not curtailed.
Devolution is quite as natural as evolution, and may be just as pleasing, or even a good deal more pleasing, to God. If the average man is made in God's image, then a man such as Beethoven or Aristotle is plainly superior to God, and so God may be jealous of him, and eager to see his superiority perish with his bodily frame.

-H.L. Mencken
User avatar
Alex Moon
Rabid Monkey
Posts: 3358
Joined: 2002-08-03 03:34am
Location: Weeeee!
Contact:

Post by Alex Moon »

BlkbrryTheGreat wrote:
Darth Wong wrote:
Montcalm wrote:Socialism is just another word for communism.
Communism outlaws the use of capital. Socialism does not; it merely involves the government controlling a lot of that capital for social purposes. This is no small distinction. America is not entirely capitalist, and is actually somewhat socialist because it has income taxes, a large government, and a welfare system.
Socialism is just a halfway house in the journey towards Communism. Once redistribution is accepted as a valid "right" of the government, you can be sure that you'll eventually end up with Communism if the expansionist tendincies of government are not curtailed.
Not really. Usually you just end up with really heavy socialism because the people in charge aren't willing to make the final steps to communism, one of which is that they give up power.
Warwolves | VRWC | BotM | Writer's Guild | Pie loves Rei
User avatar
Darth Wong
Sith Lord
Sith Lord
Posts: 70028
Joined: 2002-07-03 12:25am
Location: Toronto, Canada
Contact:

Post by Darth Wong »

BlkbrryTheGreat wrote:
Darth Wong wrote:Communism outlaws the use of capital. Socialism does not; it merely involves the government controlling a lot of that capital for social purposes. This is no small distinction. America is not entirely capitalist, and is actually somewhat socialist because it has income taxes, a large government, and a welfare system.
Socialism is just a halfway house in the journey towards Communism. Once redistribution is accepted as a valid "right" of the government, you can be sure that you'll eventually end up with Communism if the expansionist tendincies of government are not curtailed.
Slippery slope fallacy.
Image
"It's not evil for God to do it. Or for someone to do it at God's command."- Jonathan Boyd on baby-killing

"you guys are fascinated with the use of those "rules of logic" to the extent that you don't really want to discussus anything."- GC

"I do not believe Russian Roulette is a stupid act" - Embracer of Darkness

"Viagra commercials appear to save lives" - tharkûn on US health care.

http://www.stardestroyer.net/Mike/RantMode/Blurbs.html
User avatar
BlkbrryTheGreat
BANNED
Posts: 2658
Joined: 2002-11-04 07:48pm
Location: Philadelphia PA

Post by BlkbrryTheGreat »

Darth Wong wrote:
BlkbrryTheGreat wrote:
Darth Wong wrote:Communism outlaws the use of capital. Socialism does not; it merely involves the government controlling a lot of that capital for social purposes. This is no small distinction. America is not entirely capitalist, and is actually somewhat socialist because it has income taxes, a large government, and a welfare system.
Socialism is just a halfway house in the journey towards Communism. Once redistribution is accepted as a valid "right" of the government, you can be sure that you'll eventually end up with Communism if the expansionist tendincies of government are not curtailed.
Slippery slope fallacy.
Ever since government intervention was accepted in the 1930s the size and scope of government has continued to grow and government regulations have become more common; the government is regulating more of our lives and taking more of our money every year. Explain to me how this trend, if it continues, WON'T lead to a totalitarian-communist state.
Devolution is quite as natural as evolution, and may be just as pleasing, or even a good deal more pleasing, to God. If the average man is made in God's image, then a man such as Beethoven or Aristotle is plainly superior to God, and so God may be jealous of him, and eager to see his superiority perish with his bodily frame.

-H.L. Mencken
Howedar
Emperor's Thumb
Posts: 12472
Joined: 2002-07-03 05:06pm
Location: St. Paul, MN

Post by Howedar »

Theoretical communism is in many ways the exact opposite of socialism.
The withering away of the state vs The state is all powerful and controls everything
Howedar is no longer here. Need to talk to him? Talk to Pick.
User avatar
Darth Wong
Sith Lord
Sith Lord
Posts: 70028
Joined: 2002-07-03 12:25am
Location: Toronto, Canada
Contact:

Post by Darth Wong »

BlkbrryTheGreat wrote:Explain to me how this trend, if it continues, WON'T lead to a totalitarian-communist state.
First you must prove that the trend is bound to continue indefinitely until it reaches an absolute extreme.
Image
"It's not evil for God to do it. Or for someone to do it at God's command."- Jonathan Boyd on baby-killing

"you guys are fascinated with the use of those "rules of logic" to the extent that you don't really want to discussus anything."- GC

"I do not believe Russian Roulette is a stupid act" - Embracer of Darkness

"Viagra commercials appear to save lives" - tharkûn on US health care.

http://www.stardestroyer.net/Mike/RantMode/Blurbs.html
User avatar
Joe
Space Cowboy
Posts: 17314
Joined: 2002-08-22 09:58pm
Location: Wishing I was in Athens, GA

Post by Joe »

Howedar wrote:Theoretical communism is in many ways the exact opposite of socialism.
The withering away of the state vs The state is all powerful and controls everything
Yes, and theoretical communism is about as valid in reality as intelligent design.
Image

BoTM / JL / MM / HAB / VRWC / Horseman

I'm studying for the CPA exam. Have a nice summer, and if you're down just sit back and realize that Joe is off somewhere, doing much worse than you are.
Howedar
Emperor's Thumb
Posts: 12472
Joined: 2002-07-03 05:06pm
Location: St. Paul, MN

Post by Howedar »

Naturally.
Howedar is no longer here. Need to talk to him? Talk to Pick.
weemadando
SMAKIBBFB
Posts: 19195
Joined: 2002-07-28 12:30pm
Contact:

Post by weemadando »

Well, Australia is democratic socialist...

So I guess we're commie traitors.
User avatar
BlkbrryTheGreat
BANNED
Posts: 2658
Joined: 2002-11-04 07:48pm
Location: Philadelphia PA

Post by BlkbrryTheGreat »

Darth Wong wrote:
BlkbrryTheGreat wrote:Explain to me how this trend, if it continues, WON'T lead to a totalitarian-communist state.
First you must prove that the trend is bound to continue indefinitely until it reaches an absolute extreme.
You damn well know that this is impossible to prove. All I can do is point out trends and facts about American attitude towards goverment and its role in soceity and make predictions based on this data. I can't "Prove" it because human society isn't simple enough to predict, with the precision of scientific laboratory expirements, the results from any given set of facts.
Devolution is quite as natural as evolution, and may be just as pleasing, or even a good deal more pleasing, to God. If the average man is made in God's image, then a man such as Beethoven or Aristotle is plainly superior to God, and so God may be jealous of him, and eager to see his superiority perish with his bodily frame.

-H.L. Mencken
User avatar
Darth Wong
Sith Lord
Sith Lord
Posts: 70028
Joined: 2002-07-03 12:25am
Location: Toronto, Canada
Contact:

Post by Darth Wong »

BlkbrryTheGreat wrote:You damn well know that this is impossible to prove. All I can do is point out trends and facts about American attitude towards goverment and its role in soceity and make predictions based on this data. I can't "Prove" it because human society isn't simple enough to predict, with the precision of scientific laboratory expirements, the results from any given set of facts.
Then you have no basis for claiming that it's inevitable.
Image
"It's not evil for God to do it. Or for someone to do it at God's command."- Jonathan Boyd on baby-killing

"you guys are fascinated with the use of those "rules of logic" to the extent that you don't really want to discussus anything."- GC

"I do not believe Russian Roulette is a stupid act" - Embracer of Darkness

"Viagra commercials appear to save lives" - tharkûn on US health care.

http://www.stardestroyer.net/Mike/RantMode/Blurbs.html
User avatar
BlkbrryTheGreat
BANNED
Posts: 2658
Joined: 2002-11-04 07:48pm
Location: Philadelphia PA

Post by BlkbrryTheGreat »

Darth Wong wrote:
BlkbrryTheGreat wrote:You damn well know that this is impossible to prove. All I can do is point out trends and facts about American attitude towards goverment and its role in soceity and make predictions based on this data. I can't "Prove" it because human society isn't simple enough to predict, with the precision of scientific laboratory expirements, the results from any given set of facts.
Then you have no basis for claiming that it's inevitable.
Your ignoring the fact that I said "if the expansionist tendancies of government are not curtailed." There is no evidence to support that these expansionst tendancies are going to be curtailed, and pleanty to support the idea that government will continue to grow.
Devolution is quite as natural as evolution, and may be just as pleasing, or even a good deal more pleasing, to God. If the average man is made in God's image, then a man such as Beethoven or Aristotle is plainly superior to God, and so God may be jealous of him, and eager to see his superiority perish with his bodily frame.

-H.L. Mencken
User avatar
Darth Wong
Sith Lord
Sith Lord
Posts: 70028
Joined: 2002-07-03 12:25am
Location: Toronto, Canada
Contact:

Post by Darth Wong »

Then you have no basis for claiming that it's inevitable.
Your ignoring the fact that I said "if the expansionist tendancies of government are not curtailed."
So your statement applies only in the total absence of any individualistic tendencies among the population. Right. And you feel this is likely ... why?
There is no evidence to support that these expansionst tendancies are going to be curtailed, and pleanty to support the idea that government will continue to grow.
Bullshit. They are already being curtailed. The balance between size of government and reduction of taxes is hotly contested at every level.
Image
"It's not evil for God to do it. Or for someone to do it at God's command."- Jonathan Boyd on baby-killing

"you guys are fascinated with the use of those "rules of logic" to the extent that you don't really want to discussus anything."- GC

"I do not believe Russian Roulette is a stupid act" - Embracer of Darkness

"Viagra commercials appear to save lives" - tharkûn on US health care.

http://www.stardestroyer.net/Mike/RantMode/Blurbs.html
User avatar
BlkbrryTheGreat
BANNED
Posts: 2658
Joined: 2002-11-04 07:48pm
Location: Philadelphia PA

Post by BlkbrryTheGreat »

Darth Wong wrote:
Then you have no basis for claiming that it's inevitable.
Your ignoring the fact that I said "if the expansionist tendancies of government are not curtailed."
So your statement applies only in the total absence of any individualistic tendencies among the population. Right. And you feel this is likely ... why?
There is no evidence to support that these expansionst tendancies are going to be curtailed, and pleanty to support the idea that government will continue to grow.
Bullshit. They are already being curtailed. The balance between size of government and reduction of taxes is hotly contested at every level.
Most people blindly follow whatever indoctrination they're given as children. They're Southern Babtists cause their parents were (or Catholic or whatever), they go to every election and pull Deomocrat and Republican because their parents did.... they lack, or dont utilize critical thinking skills; they very thing that is needed to question the status quo of continued government growth and abuse of power.

Even if it passes, the latest tax cut won't reduce the size of the government. Expenses will exceed revenues and the shortfall will be made up through inflation (which is an indirect form of taxation).
Devolution is quite as natural as evolution, and may be just as pleasing, or even a good deal more pleasing, to God. If the average man is made in God's image, then a man such as Beethoven or Aristotle is plainly superior to God, and so God may be jealous of him, and eager to see his superiority perish with his bodily frame.

-H.L. Mencken
User avatar
kojikun
BANNED
Posts: 9663
Joined: 2002-07-04 12:23am
Contact:

Post by kojikun »

blkbrry, so youre saying that youre a moron because your parents were?
Sì! Abbiamo un' anima! Ma è fatta di tanti piccoli robot.
User avatar
BlkbrryTheGreat
BANNED
Posts: 2658
Joined: 2002-11-04 07:48pm
Location: Philadelphia PA

Post by BlkbrryTheGreat »

kojikun wrote:blkbrry, so youre saying that youre a moron because your parents were?
Yea, that obviously what I'm saying.... :roll:
Devolution is quite as natural as evolution, and may be just as pleasing, or even a good deal more pleasing, to God. If the average man is made in God's image, then a man such as Beethoven or Aristotle is plainly superior to God, and so God may be jealous of him, and eager to see his superiority perish with his bodily frame.

-H.L. Mencken
User avatar
Edi
Dragonlord
Dragonlord
Posts: 12461
Joined: 2002-07-11 12:27am
Location: Helsinki, Finland

Post by Edi »

BlkbrryTheGreat wrote:Socialism is just a halfway house in the journey towards Communism. Once redistribution is accepted as a valid "right" of the government, you can be sure that you'll eventually end up with Communism if the expansionist tendincies of government are not curtailed.
Then you will care to explain to me why my country (and the rest of Europe) is not communist despite social democratic (i.e. leftist) forces have been in power here for decades, as well as elsewhere in Europe? Your claim is complete and utter bullshit, and stinks accordingly. Given the general American attitudes toward European forms of government, not to mention actual communism, it will never gain any ground in the US unless the general attitude of the population dramatically shifts.

Edi
User avatar
Superman
Pink Foamin' at the Mouth
Posts: 9690
Joined: 2002-12-16 12:29am
Location: Metropolis

Post by Superman »

Socialism is NOT communism. This guy is obviously some Rush Limbaugh clone that wants to put his two cents in. Do your homework, dick wad.

And why don't you answer Edi. He brings up good points.
Image
User avatar
Stuart Mackey
Drunken Kiwi Editor of the ASVS Press
Posts: 5946
Joined: 2002-07-04 12:28am
Location: New Zealand
Contact:

Post by Stuart Mackey »

BlkbrryTheGreat wrote:
Darth Wong wrote:
Montcalm wrote:Socialism is just another word for communism.
Communism outlaws the use of capital. Socialism does not; it merely involves the government controlling a lot of that capital for social purposes. This is no small distinction. America is not entirely capitalist, and is actually somewhat socialist because it has income taxes, a large government, and a welfare system.
Socialism is just a halfway house in the journey towards Communism. Once redistribution is accepted as a valid "right" of the government, you can be sure that you'll eventually end up with Communism if the expansionist tendincies of government are not curtailed.
According to that theory NZ, Australia, Canada and Britian should have gone communist in 1946.
Via money Europe could become political in five years" "... the current communities should be completed by a Finance Common Market which would lead us to European economic unity. Only then would ... the mutual commitments make it fairly easy to produce the political union which is the goal"

Jean Omer Marie Gabriel Monnet
--------------
User avatar
NecronLord
Harbinger of Doom
Harbinger of Doom
Posts: 27384
Joined: 2002-07-07 06:30am
Location: The Lost City

Re: democratic socialism and capitalism

Post by NecronLord »

Ah superb. Economics. One of my favorite topics.
Idiots & the guardsman wrote: 1. Government ownership of means of production
I pointps to collective farming, five year plans and other assorted failures of total govt economic control as discreditation of any claim that this is a good or desirable idea.
established through gradual, democratic means.
Meaning what? nationalising non essential companies one at a time? While national transport infrastructue, public transport, education, order and healthcare are IMO neccessery for a modern state, nationalising the corprate sector is a terrible thing/
This, if true, would place them in the same category as the Fabians (british gradual socialists) and the Social Democrat party of the early twentieth century. I personally am apprehensive about this: It is effectively turning capitalism into mass representative democracies, which I believe will kill efficiency and quality.
I agree.
2. Elimination of hierarchies in the workplace.
Ah I see! A genius plan, which will increase efficiency one hunded fold:roll:
In other words, eliminating the hierarchical corporation model, with its pyramid of workers on bottom, CEO on top, and orders always flowing downwards, into some sort of democratically managed "collective enterprises,"
I can see it now.
"What shall we do today comrades?"
"Slack off!"
"All in favor of slacking off?"
"Right, to the pub!"
which would still probably be for profit.
Probably?
Such collectives would elect their management,
Ah good, popularity>ability
and distribute profits amongst themselves.
Party members first I suppose?
This I am not sure about; I believe it will tend to eliminate superbly massive economies-of scale (although it may still be possibly by uniting the collective through association on the internet and other means), but will tend towards higher wages on average.
That's contradictory. It would generate what are known as diseconomies of scale, as each small collective purchases supplies, the avrage cost per unit would increase. They clearly do not understand the reasons for economies of scale. If I need two hundred bricks of clay dilvered to a pottery factory, I will pay £/$1 for dilivery(Just take as read). If I need twenty bricks of clay dilivered to ten collectives of three workers then we (the people) need to pay £/$10. This means that working under a capitalist model is more efficient, period. Therefore, the costs that do not exist under the current model will be passed onto The Workers
Most likely will result in difficulties in starting businesses though
No shit.
, and reduce individual initiative to establish enterprises(probably a goal of the DS anyways).
The more mindless automotons the better huh? Because Innovation is a BAD thing and must be punished!
This form of economy is also favored generally by leftish anarchists ( not anarcho-capitalist Ayn Randians) and middle of the way greens(between extremists and moderates), who would prefer a smaller, more artisan style
You mean no common standards and massive costs? How the fuck do you make an 'artisan style' computer motherboard?
approach to production using individual, specialized engineering
:?
and advanced technology.
Which will of course no longer be produced to common standards, and thus won't work.
Plus, they believe it will be easier to protect the environment if the economy is made of small collective enterprises rather than gigantic corporations.
Why? It's far easier to keep an eye on corparations than it is to keep an eye on rogue 'artisans'
For readers of Kim Stanley Robinson, this is the economy used on Mars in Blue Mars the book.
I knew no-one on this planet could be stupid enough to concieve of this. Maybe we could model our society on the Borg?
The interesting thing is that the system actually DOES exist in Spain (can't remember the link, but you can surely find it on google. Check it out; it is quite interesting.)
I would imagine Olrik is better qualified to talk about this than myself.
Superior Moderator - BotB - HAB [Drill Instructor]-Writer- Stardestroyer.net's resident Star-God.
"We believe in the systematic understanding of the physical world through observation and experimentation, argument and debate and most of all freedom of will." ~ Stargate: The Ark of Truth
Post Reply