The newest US fighter, F-22 I think
Moderator: Edi
The newest US fighter, F-22 I think
Is it true it can slide Wing Commander style, fire stuff sideways at an enemy, turn back forward and continue on?
What's her bust size!?
It's over NINE THOUSAAAAAAAAAAND!!!!!!!!!
It's over NINE THOUSAAAAAAAAAAND!!!!!!!!!
- EmperorMing
- Sith Devotee
- Posts: 3432
- Joined: 2002-09-09 05:08am
- Location: The Lizard Lounge
Re: The newest US fighter, F-22 I think
Huge exaggeration. It has thrust-vectoring engines which confer extra maneuverability, but hardly on that level, that's just ridiculous.Shinova wrote:Is it true it can slide Wing Commander style, fire stuff sideways at an enemy, turn back forward and continue on?
It's a stealthy F-15. Not that there's anything wrong with that
Like Legend of Galactic Heroes? Please contribute to http://gineipaedia.com/
- EmperorMing
- Sith Devotee
- Posts: 3432
- Joined: 2002-09-09 05:08am
- Location: The Lizard Lounge
Re: The newest US fighter, F-22 I think
That's a good description.Vympel wrote:
It's a stealthy F-15. Not that there's anything wrong with that
DILLIGAF: Does It Look Like I Give A Fuck
Kill your God!
2005. The first birds have been delivered, but they are not 'in service' so to speak.Strafe wrote:When are the F-22's supposed to go into service?
Like Legend of Galactic Heroes? Please contribute to http://gineipaedia.com/
- Col. Crackpot
- That Obnoxious Guy
- Posts: 10228
- Joined: 2002-10-28 05:04pm
- Location: Rhode Island
- Contact:
It still uses Amraams for medium range firepower, but it's onboard computer's got a helluva lot of options for their deployment. For example, the pilot can either choose to guide his missiles using his onboard radar, the AWACS returns, his wingmen's radar, etc - so, theoretically, the F22 taking the shot doesn't need to illuminate the target himself.
Plus there are nifty other things, like datalinks...360 degree view of the battlefield, courtesy of AWACs downlink - all the pilot needs to do is take one look at the proper display to see what's going around him. It can also receive data from other F22s, etc.
At least that's what I heard lately
Plus there are nifty other things, like datalinks...360 degree view of the battlefield, courtesy of AWACs downlink - all the pilot needs to do is take one look at the proper display to see what's going around him. It can also receive data from other F22s, etc.
At least that's what I heard lately
-
- Resident Redneck
- Posts: 4979
- Joined: 2002-09-10 08:01am
- Location: Around the corner
- Contact:
The 2D thrust vectoring can allow it to 'slide' forward, so to speak. It can be travelling foward with an angle of attack that is pointing above the horizon, yet not gaining altitude. Of course, this can be done in many planes by putting it into a stall and using the thrust to hold you up, but you risk putting the aircraft into a spin and FUBARing things quickly.
- Admiral Valdemar
- Outside Context Problem
- Posts: 31572
- Joined: 2002-07-04 07:17pm
- Location: UK
The thrust vectoring is, as stated, 2-D, meaning the nozzles are only going up or down together. There will be an upgrade when both nozzles can swing independently, but really thrust vectoring is only really useful in getting off the ground quickly and aiding some manoeuvres.
It wastes far too much energy in dogfights and is practically useless in BVR combat anyway.
It wastes far too much energy in dogfights and is practically useless in BVR combat anyway.
Only within a certain range. The idea that AMRAAM is a fire-and-forget missile is a falsehood- it's radar seeker is far too small for it to be able to home in on its target unassisted at it's maximum range. Under 20km, sure it's fire and forget, anything higher than that, the Raptor must keep the target locked.Col. Crackpot wrote:everyhing is fire and forget too, IIRC so it can engage multiple bandits at once.
Like Legend of Galactic Heroes? Please contribute to http://gineipaedia.com/
- Sea Skimmer
- Yankee Capitalist Air Pirate
- Posts: 37390
- Joined: 2002-07-03 11:49pm
- Location: Passchendaele City, HAB
Actually, thrust vectoring of this form lets you conserve energy.Admiral Valdemar wrote:The thrust vectoring is, as stated, 2-D, meaning the nozzles are only going up or down together. There will be an upgrade when both nozzles can swing independently, but really thrust vectoring is only really useful in getting off the ground quickly and aiding some manoeuvres.
It wastes far too much energy in dogfights and is practically useless in BVR combat anyway.
"This cult of special forces is as sensible as to form a Royal Corps of Tree Climbers and say that no soldier who does not wear its green hat with a bunch of oak leaves stuck in it should be expected to climb a tree"
— Field Marshal William Slim 1956
— Field Marshal William Slim 1956
- Sea Skimmer
- Yankee Capitalist Air Pirate
- Posts: 37390
- Joined: 2002-07-03 11:49pm
- Location: Passchendaele City, HAB
Well, its possibul to shoot it further and not maintain a lock for updates, but the INS is unlikely to get it close enough to aquire the target, unless your shooting down a drone or an airliner or somthing else that lumbers along without ESM.Vympel wrote:Only within a certain range. The idea that AMRAAM is a fire-and-forget missile is a falsehood- it's radar seeker is far too small for it to be able to home in on its target unassisted at it's maximum range. Under 20km, sure it's fire and forget, anything higher than that, the Raptor must keep the target locked.Col. Crackpot wrote:everyhing is fire and forget too, IIRC so it can engage multiple bandits at once.
"This cult of special forces is as sensible as to form a Royal Corps of Tree Climbers and say that no soldier who does not wear its green hat with a bunch of oak leaves stuck in it should be expected to climb a tree"
— Field Marshal William Slim 1956
— Field Marshal William Slim 1956
Re: The newest US fighter, F-22 I think
Oddly enough, a plane which could do that was:Shinova wrote:Is it true it can slide Wing Commander style, fire stuff sideways at an enemy, turn back forward and continue on?
http://www.oldrhinebeck.org/aircraft/Fo ... eRhone.JPG
WWI German ace Werner Voss was known to apply full rudder to kick his triplane into a skid, shoot at an enemy while his plane was moving sideways, and apply opposite rudder to return to normal, forward flight before his plane went into a spin.
Isn't that the way it always works? Just when you think you've come up with something really novel, you find out somebody else got there first.
Watch the formatting, okay? ~ Stormbringer
- Captain tycho
- Has Elected to Receive
- Posts: 5039
- Joined: 2002-12-04 06:35pm
- Location: Jewy McJew Land
- Captain tycho
- Has Elected to Receive
- Posts: 5039
- Joined: 2002-12-04 06:35pm
- Location: Jewy McJew Land
PeZook wrote:There are always flight simsCaptain tycho wrote:I drool at the though of flying an F-22.
Wish I'd stayed in the Air Force longer.
Though I guess there are few things that can compare to cruising around at supersonic speeds, playing with guns and missiles and getting PAID to do this...
Yeah, you can't imagine.
PS, Join the Air Force, and you'll get to fly one of those gems.
Captain Tycho!
The worst fucker ever!
The Best reciever ever!
The worst fucker ever!
The Best reciever ever!
Yeah, I'd get to fly a Mig-29 if I'm lucky. Or MAYBE an F-16Captain tycho wrote:
Yeah, you can't imagine.
PS, Join the Air Force, and you'll get to fly one of those gems.
Besides, they only take people with 20/20 eyesight. I actually thought about entering a flight school for helicopter pilots, but then found out they require a perfect physical record.
So I guess no jetfighters for me...
There are still civilian prop planes, though, but you don't get guns, bombs and missiles in the package
- Captain tycho
- Has Elected to Receive
- Posts: 5039
- Joined: 2002-12-04 06:35pm
- Location: Jewy McJew Land
They do allow laser surgery, if policy hasn't changed since I was in.PeZook wrote:Yeah, I'd get to fly a Mig-29 if I'm lucky. Or MAYBE an F-16Captain tycho wrote:
Yeah, you can't imagine.
PS, Join the Air Force, and you'll get to fly one of those gems.
Besides, they only take people with 20/20 eyesight. I actually thought about entering a flight school for helicopter pilots, but then found out they require a perfect physical record.
So I guess no jetfighters for me...
There are still civilian prop planes, though, but you don't get guns, bombs and missiles in the package
Captain Tycho!
The worst fucker ever!
The Best reciever ever!
The worst fucker ever!
The Best reciever ever!
- Captain tycho
- Has Elected to Receive
- Posts: 5039
- Joined: 2002-12-04 06:35pm
- Location: Jewy McJew Land
It's only 600-800 bucks here. Not very expensive, considering 5 years ago it was up to 3k.PeZook wrote:I haven't thought of that, but even if they do, there are no clinics that perform this kind of surgery over here.Captain tycho wrote:They do allow laser surgery, if policy hasn't changed since I was in.
Plus, it's expensive from what I've heard.
Where are you right now, btw?
Captain Tycho!
The worst fucker ever!
The Best reciever ever!
The worst fucker ever!
The Best reciever ever!
Gdansk, Poland.Captain tycho wrote:It's only 600-800 bucks here. Not very expensive, considering 5 years ago it was up to 3k.PeZook wrote:I haven't thought of that, but even if they do, there are no clinics that perform this kind of surgery over here.Captain tycho wrote:They do allow laser surgery, if policy hasn't changed since I was in.
Plus, it's expensive from what I've heard.
Where are you right now, btw?
- Admiral Valdemar
- Outside Context Problem
- Posts: 31572
- Joined: 2002-07-04 07:17pm
- Location: UK
That may be so, but any amount of fancy manoeuvres in a dogfight with any type of decent pilot will get you killed. You'd be amazed how many people talk to me and say "Wow, the Russian planes that can do the Cobra will 0wn any Western plane!" Yeah, is that before or after the ASRAAM shows them true agility?Sea Skimmer wrote:Actually, thrust vectoring of this form lets you conserve energy.Admiral Valdemar wrote:The thrust vectoring is, as stated, 2-D, meaning the nozzles are only going up or down together. There will be an upgrade when both nozzles can swing independently, but really thrust vectoring is only really useful in getting off the ground quickly and aiding some manoeuvres.
It wastes far too much energy in dogfights and is practically useless in BVR combat anyway.
Being a fighter pilot is getting more boring anyway, we're getting into an age of going up in the sky, seeing a blob on the RADAR and pushing a button then confirming a kill and landing. WWI and WWII had true knife fights, GUNS, GUNS, GUNS!
- MKSheppard
- Ruthless Genocidal Warmonger
- Posts: 29842
- Joined: 2002-07-06 06:34pm
Tell that to the US Navy and US Air Force Pilots who tangled with NVAFAdmiral Valdemar wrote: Being a fighter pilot is getting more boring anyway, we're getting into an age of going up in the sky, seeing a blob on the RADAR and pushing a button then confirming a kill and landing. WWI and WWII had true knife fights, GUNS, GUNS, GUNS!
MiGs
"If scientists and inventors who develop disease cures and useful technologies don't get lifetime royalties, I'd like to know what fucking rationale you have for some guy getting lifetime royalties for writing an episode of Full House." - Mike Wong
"The present air situation in the Pacific is entirely the result of fighting a fifth rate air power." - U.S. Navy Memo - 24 July 1944
"The present air situation in the Pacific is entirely the result of fighting a fifth rate air power." - U.S. Navy Memo - 24 July 1944