US Uses Tac. Nukes

Admiral Valdemar · Post by **Admiral Valdemar** » 2003-04-02 05:38pm

http://www.balochistanpost.com/item.asp?ID=3629

Okay, this ladies and gentlemen, is why you don't let reporters with an aversion to the US and as much knowledge on military hardware and science as a salamander write articles for the masses.

MKSheppard · Post by **MKSheppard** » 2003-04-02 05:43pm

Someone change the fucking title of this thread. Gave me a doble pause

Admiral Valdemar · Post by **Admiral Valdemar** » 2003-04-02 05:48pm

MKSheppard wrote:Someone change the fucking title of this thread. Gave me a doble pause

Good, then it's working.

This is the stupidity we face, people. Just think of all those anti-war troglodytes that are eating this up now and tell me that isn't scary.

Montcalm · Post by **Montcalm** » 2003-04-02 05:49pm

OK these jerks watched too much sci-fi

Post by **fgalkin** » 2003-04-02 05:49pm

It may be mentioned here that there was a movement in the United States for years to force their administration to stop manufacturing and use of these tactical nuclear weapons. But, the Zionist expansionists who control the Pentagon kept manufacturing this devastating weapon for their ulterior motives

Suure, it's all a Jewish conspiracy to take over the world. I wonder, where have I heard this before.

What a fucktard.

Have a very nice day.
-fgalkin

Shinova · Post by **Shinova** » 2003-04-02 05:50pm

Dang. Vacuum force???

Rrrriiiigghhhttt.....

Glocksman · Post by **Glocksman** » 2003-04-02 05:53pm

Would someone please tell me what a 'semi-nuclear' bomb is?

Shinova · Post by **Shinova** » 2003-04-02 05:56pm

Article wrote:Although US had used depleted uranium bullets and shells in previous Iraq war and in Bosnia, but the bombs based on this lethal material were only used in Afghanistan and Iraq. Daisy Cutter, a semi-nuclear bomb was excessively used in Afghanistan.

If so, then why are we not hearing of horrific radiation dosage cases from Afghanistan?

Anyway, article is no doubt fluff.

Post by **weemadando** » 2003-04-02 05:58pm

You know, thats a major problem with all sides in this war - stupidity. Its not exclusive to the anti-war...

Post by **Beowulf** » 2003-04-02 05:59pm

I get the feeling that it's an april fools joke...

Nobody could be stupid enough to actually write this as a serious piece...

RadiO · Post by **RadiO** » 2003-04-02 06:00pm

In the opening battle, the tank unit fired two 120 mm high velocity depleted uranium rounds straight down the main road, creating a powerful vacuum that literally sucked guerrillas out from their hideaways into the street, where they were shot down by small arms fire or run over by the tanks,” said a commander of tank unit as quoted by the MSNBC.

Why the all powerful vacuum doesn't suck the tank commander and Ma Deuce off the top of the turret is not explored.

These weapons create vacuum of such a great intensity that even the blood and flesh comes out of the mouth. It was not enough.

Je-eeesus. Not enough?

The brave US soldiers ruthless fired on the civilians who were sucked out of their homes by the vacuum created by these tactical nuclear weapons. [/quote]

Oh, right.

Well, there you go, folks: Super Nukes that are so motherfucking Super that the victims still have to be shot dead after it's had its wicked way with them. I bet the guys and gals at Sandia feel pretty proud about that one.
What the fuck is this person smoking? Hasish cut with dried correction fluid?

[/quote]

Burak Gazan · Post by **Burak Gazan** » 2003-04-02 06:00pm

Glocksman wrote:Would someone please tell me what a 'semi-nuclear' bomb is?

I believe the closest thing to that would be known as a "fizzle"

Post by **fgalkin** » 2003-04-02 06:03pm

Beowulf wrote:I get the feeling that it's an april fools joke...

Nobody could be stupid enough to actually write this as a serious piece...

given the banner on their site, I doubt it.

WARNING: EXTREME STUPIDITY AND ANTI-SEMITISM

Have a very nice day.
-fgalkin

Post by **Beowulf** » 2003-04-02 06:15pm

fgalkin wrote:
Beowulf wrote:I get the feeling that it's an april fools joke...

Nobody could be stupid enough to actually write this as a serious piece...
given the banner on their site, I doubt it.

WARNING: EXTREME STUPIDITY AND ANTI-SEMITISM

You're right, they're just a bunch of dumbfucks.

Nathan F · Post by **Nathan F** » 2003-04-02 06:17pm

ROFLMAO!!!

THEY THINK THAT A DAMN APDU ROUND IS A NUKE!!!

*dies laughing*

whooo, what a bunch of farking morons...

Post by **Sea Skimmer** » 2003-04-02 06:18pm

That stupid piece of shit wrote:
These weapons which are commonly known as Depleted Uranium Bombs, work like a Hydrogen bomb.

That's so fucking stupid I can't believe this site is real. Depleted Uranium is depleted but all its fissabul material has been removed.

Nathan F · Post by **Nathan F** » 2003-04-02 06:19pm

Article wrote:Although US had used depleted uranium bullets and shells in previous Iraq war and in Bosnia, but the bombs based on this lethal material were only used in Afghanistan and Iraq. Daisy Cutter, a semi-nuclear bomb was excessively used in Afghanistan.

Would REALLY help if they learned their military weapons. A BLU-82 has no radioactive material in it whatsoever, it is just a big conventional bomb.

It doesn't even BEGIN to have the power of a TINY nuke.

Nathan F · Post by **Nathan F** » 2003-04-02 06:19pm

They don't have a forum on that site, do they?

*draws up plans*

Shinova · Post by **Shinova** » 2003-04-02 06:21pm

But if the US were forced to use a tac nuke-like weapons in the war (not saying it's remotely possible but what if), would they use an actual tac nuke or a FAE?

Nathan F · Post by **Nathan F** » 2003-04-02 06:22pm

article wrote: “In the opening battle, the tank unit fired two 120 mm high velocity depleted uranium rounds straight down the main road, creating a powerful vacuum that literally sucked guerrillas out from their hideaways into the street, where they were shot down by small arms fire or run over by the tanks,” said a commander of tank unit as quoted by the MSNBC.

WTF?

They say that just by firing a 120mm round down a street, it can suck people out?

Yeah....

As I said, they need to get their heads out of their asses and learn about military equipment.

Post by **Colonel Olrik** » 2003-04-02 06:25pm

"Dalochistan" news? I smell a hoax, here. A fucking stupid joke, to be sure, but still better than the possibility of that article being serious. No one can seriously believe that shit.

Post by **fgalkin** » 2003-04-02 06:27pm

Colonel Olrik wrote:"Dalochistan" news? I smell a hoax, here. A fucking stupid joke, to be sure, but still better than the possibility of that article being serious. No one can seriously believe that shit.

Once again, this is a link from their site

Have a very nice day.
-fgalkin

Stormbringer · Post by **Stormbringer** » 2003-04-02 06:29pm

Shinova wrote:But if the US were forced to use a tac nuke-like weapons in the war (not saying it's remotely possible but what if), would they use an actual tac nuke or a FAE?

FAE. The difference in actual effect wouldn't be that great but avoiding anything nuclear would decide it easly.

Glocksman · Post by **Glocksman** » 2003-04-02 06:29pm

I think it's serious.
It appears to come from the Pakistani tribal area of Baluchistan

Balochistan is the largest province of Pakistan with an area about 343,000 square km. To its south is Arabian Sea, to its west-Iran, and to its north is Afghanistan. It also shares boundaries with the provinces of Punjab, Sindh and NWFP.

Balochistan has many climatic and ecological zones where temperature fluctuates between –30 Celsius in winter to 52 Celsius in summer. Major ethnic groups of the province are Baloch and Pashtoon while a sizeable community of Punjabis and Hazaras also live in the provincial metropolis. Prominent languages spoken in the province are Balochi, Pashto, Brahvi and Persian while Urdu being the national language is lingua franca.

Shinova · Post by **Shinova** » 2003-04-02 06:33pm

Well Pakistan isn't exactly friendly to the US so, yeah.