Lord Revan wrote: ↑2023-05-04 06:46am
Ralin wrote: ↑2023-05-04 04:13am
I still find it weird that assassinating an enemy country's president or other high-level politicians during an actual war is somehow considered an outrage or crossing a line.
I think the idea is that you're not suppose to target civilians in a war (which most if not all politicians are), granted in case of Putin it's just fake outrage he needs to push to justify breaking pretty much every law and custom of war ever invented by men.
Um.... not quite sure if a nation's leaders get civilian "protection". Especially in the case where things are structured like in the US: our President may be a civilian, but he is
also Commander in Chief of our armed forces. It does blur the line. Likewise, if civilian politicians are directing the military are they really purely civilians?
Putin/Kremlin/Current iteration of Russia are outraged because Ukraine is not submitting on their schedule, on their terms (apparently, "abject surrender"). They're acting as a bully - nothing they do is wrong, everything Ukraine (or [fill in the blank]) is wrong.
We also see Putin/Kremlin/Current iteration of Russia bullshit in that they are, today, maintaining this drone attacks was not, in fact Ukraine's responsibility but that of the United States because, of course, they are trying to promote the view that Ukraine is nothing but a puppet (repeating what they've said from the beginning that Ukraine is someone not a real country) and Biden is pulling the strings.
Personally, right now, I think it's either a Kremlin false-flag or the work of Russia protestors/dissidents/nutballs. I also think the drones were launched from within Moscow, quite near to the Kremlin itself, as that would avoid some of the air defenses around the city and Kremlin. Of course, if it was the Kremlin doing a false flag Kremlin defenses would not be an obstacle anyway.