The newest US fighter, F-22 I think

OT: anything goes!

Moderator: Edi

User avatar
Shinova
Emperor's Hand
Posts: 10193
Joined: 2002-10-03 08:53pm
Location: LOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOL

The newest US fighter, F-22 I think

Post by Shinova »

Is it true it can slide Wing Commander style, fire stuff sideways at an enemy, turn back forward and continue on?
What's her bust size!?

It's over NINE THOUSAAAAAAAAAAND!!!!!!!!!
User avatar
EmperorMing
Sith Devotee
Posts: 3432
Joined: 2002-09-09 05:08am
Location: The Lizard Lounge

Post by EmperorMing »

Not quite. The thing is extremely maneuverable and stealthy and is supposed to be able to engage the enemy before they know that it is there.
Image

DILLIGAF: Does It Look Like I Give A Fuck

Kill your God!
User avatar
Vympel
Spetsnaz
Spetsnaz
Posts: 29312
Joined: 2002-07-19 01:08am
Location: Sydney Australia

Re: The newest US fighter, F-22 I think

Post by Vympel »

Shinova wrote:Is it true it can slide Wing Commander style, fire stuff sideways at an enemy, turn back forward and continue on?
Huge exaggeration. It has thrust-vectoring engines which confer extra maneuverability, but hardly on that level, that's just ridiculous.

It's a stealthy F-15. Not that there's anything wrong with that :)
Like Legend of Galactic Heroes? Please contribute to http://gineipaedia.com/
User avatar
Strafe
Youngling
Posts: 118
Joined: 2003-01-24 12:24pm

Post by Strafe »

When are the F-22's supposed to go into service?
Plato's Beard. Dulling Occam's razor since...um...a long time ago.
User avatar
EmperorMing
Sith Devotee
Posts: 3432
Joined: 2002-09-09 05:08am
Location: The Lizard Lounge

Re: The newest US fighter, F-22 I think

Post by EmperorMing »

Vympel wrote:
It's a stealthy F-15. Not that there's anything wrong with that :)
That's a good description.
Image

DILLIGAF: Does It Look Like I Give A Fuck

Kill your God!
User avatar
Vympel
Spetsnaz
Spetsnaz
Posts: 29312
Joined: 2002-07-19 01:08am
Location: Sydney Australia

Post by Vympel »

Strafe wrote:When are the F-22's supposed to go into service?
2005. The first birds have been delivered, but they are not 'in service' so to speak.
Like Legend of Galactic Heroes? Please contribute to http://gineipaedia.com/
User avatar
Col. Crackpot
That Obnoxious Guy
Posts: 10228
Joined: 2002-10-28 05:04pm
Location: Rhode Island
Contact:

Post by Col. Crackpot »

everyhing is fire and forget too, IIRC so it can engage multiple bandits at once.
"This business will get out of control. It will get out of control and we’ll be lucky to live through it.” -Tom Clancy
User avatar
PeZook
Emperor's Hand
Posts: 13237
Joined: 2002-07-18 06:08pm
Location: Poland

Post by PeZook »

It still uses Amraams for medium range firepower, but it's onboard computer's got a helluva lot of options for their deployment. For example, the pilot can either choose to guide his missiles using his onboard radar, the AWACS returns, his wingmen's radar, etc - so, theoretically, the F22 taking the shot doesn't need to illuminate the target himself.

Plus there are nifty other things, like datalinks...360 degree view of the battlefield, courtesy of AWACs downlink - all the pilot needs to do is take one look at the proper display to see what's going around him. It can also receive data from other F22s, etc.

At least that's what I heard lately ;)
Nathan F
Resident Redneck
Posts: 4979
Joined: 2002-09-10 08:01am
Location: Around the corner
Contact:

Post by Nathan F »

The 2D thrust vectoring can allow it to 'slide' forward, so to speak. It can be travelling foward with an angle of attack that is pointing above the horizon, yet not gaining altitude. Of course, this can be done in many planes by putting it into a stall and using the thrust to hold you up, but you risk putting the aircraft into a spin and FUBARing things quickly.
User avatar
Admiral Valdemar
Outside Context Problem
Posts: 31572
Joined: 2002-07-04 07:17pm
Location: UK

Post by Admiral Valdemar »

The thrust vectoring is, as stated, 2-D, meaning the nozzles are only going up or down together. There will be an upgrade when both nozzles can swing independently, but really thrust vectoring is only really useful in getting off the ground quickly and aiding some manoeuvres.

It wastes far too much energy in dogfights and is practically useless in BVR combat anyway.
Nathan F
Resident Redneck
Posts: 4979
Joined: 2002-09-10 08:01am
Location: Around the corner
Contact:

Post by Nathan F »

Admiral Valdemar wrote: It wastes far too much energy in dogfights and is practically useless in BVR combat anyway.
And it is looking more and more that the majority of air combat is going to be BVR or over the horizon engagements.
User avatar
Vympel
Spetsnaz
Spetsnaz
Posts: 29312
Joined: 2002-07-19 01:08am
Location: Sydney Australia

Post by Vympel »

Col. Crackpot wrote:everyhing is fire and forget too, IIRC so it can engage multiple bandits at once.
Only within a certain range. The idea that AMRAAM is a fire-and-forget missile is a falsehood- it's radar seeker is far too small for it to be able to home in on its target unassisted at it's maximum range. Under 20km, sure it's fire and forget, anything higher than that, the Raptor must keep the target locked.
Like Legend of Galactic Heroes? Please contribute to http://gineipaedia.com/
User avatar
Sea Skimmer
Yankee Capitalist Air Pirate
Posts: 37390
Joined: 2002-07-03 11:49pm
Location: Passchendaele City, HAB

Post by Sea Skimmer »

Admiral Valdemar wrote:The thrust vectoring is, as stated, 2-D, meaning the nozzles are only going up or down together. There will be an upgrade when both nozzles can swing independently, but really thrust vectoring is only really useful in getting off the ground quickly and aiding some manoeuvres.

It wastes far too much energy in dogfights and is practically useless in BVR combat anyway.
Actually, thrust vectoring of this form lets you conserve energy.
"This cult of special forces is as sensible as to form a Royal Corps of Tree Climbers and say that no soldier who does not wear its green hat with a bunch of oak leaves stuck in it should be expected to climb a tree"
— Field Marshal William Slim 1956
User avatar
Sea Skimmer
Yankee Capitalist Air Pirate
Posts: 37390
Joined: 2002-07-03 11:49pm
Location: Passchendaele City, HAB

Post by Sea Skimmer »

Vympel wrote:
Col. Crackpot wrote:everyhing is fire and forget too, IIRC so it can engage multiple bandits at once.
Only within a certain range. The idea that AMRAAM is a fire-and-forget missile is a falsehood- it's radar seeker is far too small for it to be able to home in on its target unassisted at it's maximum range. Under 20km, sure it's fire and forget, anything higher than that, the Raptor must keep the target locked.
Well, its possibul to shoot it further and not maintain a lock for updates, but the INS is unlikely to get it close enough to aquire the target, unless your shooting down a drone or an airliner or somthing else that lumbers along without ESM.
"This cult of special forces is as sensible as to form a Royal Corps of Tree Climbers and say that no soldier who does not wear its green hat with a bunch of oak leaves stuck in it should be expected to climb a tree"
— Field Marshal William Slim 1956
User avatar
Perinquus
Virus-X Wannabe
Posts: 2685
Joined: 2002-08-06 11:57pm

Re: The newest US fighter, F-22 I think

Post by Perinquus »

Shinova wrote:Is it true it can slide Wing Commander style, fire stuff sideways at an enemy, turn back forward and continue on?
Oddly enough, a plane which could do that was:

http://www.oldrhinebeck.org/aircraft/Fo ... eRhone.JPG

WWI German ace Werner Voss was known to apply full rudder to kick his triplane into a skid, shoot at an enemy while his plane was moving sideways, and apply opposite rudder to return to normal, forward flight before his plane went into a spin.

Isn't that the way it always works? Just when you think you've come up with something really novel, you find out somebody else got there first.



Watch the formatting, okay? ~ Stormbringer
User avatar
Captain tycho
Has Elected to Receive
Posts: 5039
Joined: 2002-12-04 06:35pm
Location: Jewy McJew Land

Post by Captain tycho »

I drool at the though of flying an F-22. :twisted:
Wish I'd stayed in the Air Force longer. 8)
Captain Tycho!
The worst fucker ever!
The Best reciever ever!
User avatar
PeZook
Emperor's Hand
Posts: 13237
Joined: 2002-07-18 06:08pm
Location: Poland

Post by PeZook »

Captain tycho wrote:I drool at the though of flying an F-22. :twisted:
Wish I'd stayed in the Air Force longer. 8)
There are always flight sims :wink:

Though I guess there are few things that can compare to cruising around at supersonic speeds, playing with guns and missiles and getting PAID to do this...
User avatar
Captain tycho
Has Elected to Receive
Posts: 5039
Joined: 2002-12-04 06:35pm
Location: Jewy McJew Land

Post by Captain tycho »

PeZook wrote:
Captain tycho wrote:I drool at the though of flying an F-22. :twisted:
Wish I'd stayed in the Air Force longer. 8)
There are always flight sims :wink:

Though I guess there are few things that can compare to cruising around at supersonic speeds, playing with guns and missiles and getting PAID to do this...
:twisted:
Yeah, you can't imagine. :D

PS, Join the Air Force, and you'll get to fly one of those gems. :wink:
Captain Tycho!
The worst fucker ever!
The Best reciever ever!
User avatar
PeZook
Emperor's Hand
Posts: 13237
Joined: 2002-07-18 06:08pm
Location: Poland

Post by PeZook »

Captain tycho wrote: :twisted:
Yeah, you can't imagine. :D

PS, Join the Air Force, and you'll get to fly one of those gems. :wink:
Yeah, I'd get to fly a Mig-29 if I'm lucky. Or MAYBE an F-16 :P

Besides, they only take people with 20/20 eyesight. I actually thought about entering a flight school for helicopter pilots, but then found out they require a perfect physical record.

So I guess no jetfighters for me...

There are still civilian prop planes, though, but you don't get guns, bombs and missiles in the package ;)
User avatar
Captain tycho
Has Elected to Receive
Posts: 5039
Joined: 2002-12-04 06:35pm
Location: Jewy McJew Land

Post by Captain tycho »

PeZook wrote:
Captain tycho wrote: :twisted:
Yeah, you can't imagine. :D

PS, Join the Air Force, and you'll get to fly one of those gems. :wink:
Yeah, I'd get to fly a Mig-29 if I'm lucky. Or MAYBE an F-16 :P

Besides, they only take people with 20/20 eyesight. I actually thought about entering a flight school for helicopter pilots, but then found out they require a perfect physical record.

So I guess no jetfighters for me...

There are still civilian prop planes, though, but you don't get guns, bombs and missiles in the package ;)
They do allow laser surgery, if policy hasn't changed since I was in.
Captain Tycho!
The worst fucker ever!
The Best reciever ever!
User avatar
PeZook
Emperor's Hand
Posts: 13237
Joined: 2002-07-18 06:08pm
Location: Poland

Post by PeZook »

Captain tycho wrote:They do allow laser surgery, if policy hasn't changed since I was in.
I haven't thought of that, but even if they do, there are no clinics that perform this kind of surgery over here.

Plus, it's expensive from what I've heard.
User avatar
Captain tycho
Has Elected to Receive
Posts: 5039
Joined: 2002-12-04 06:35pm
Location: Jewy McJew Land

Post by Captain tycho »

PeZook wrote:
Captain tycho wrote:They do allow laser surgery, if policy hasn't changed since I was in.
I haven't thought of that, but even if they do, there are no clinics that perform this kind of surgery over here.

Plus, it's expensive from what I've heard.
It's only 600-800 bucks here. Not very expensive, considering 5 years ago it was up to 3k.
Where are you right now, btw?
Captain Tycho!
The worst fucker ever!
The Best reciever ever!
User avatar
PeZook
Emperor's Hand
Posts: 13237
Joined: 2002-07-18 06:08pm
Location: Poland

Post by PeZook »

Captain tycho wrote:
PeZook wrote:
Captain tycho wrote:They do allow laser surgery, if policy hasn't changed since I was in.
I haven't thought of that, but even if they do, there are no clinics that perform this kind of surgery over here.

Plus, it's expensive from what I've heard.
It's only 600-800 bucks here. Not very expensive, considering 5 years ago it was up to 3k.
Where are you right now, btw?
Gdansk, Poland.
User avatar
Admiral Valdemar
Outside Context Problem
Posts: 31572
Joined: 2002-07-04 07:17pm
Location: UK

Post by Admiral Valdemar »

Sea Skimmer wrote:
Admiral Valdemar wrote:The thrust vectoring is, as stated, 2-D, meaning the nozzles are only going up or down together. There will be an upgrade when both nozzles can swing independently, but really thrust vectoring is only really useful in getting off the ground quickly and aiding some manoeuvres.

It wastes far too much energy in dogfights and is practically useless in BVR combat anyway.
Actually, thrust vectoring of this form lets you conserve energy.
That may be so, but any amount of fancy manoeuvres in a dogfight with any type of decent pilot will get you killed. You'd be amazed how many people talk to me and say "Wow, the Russian planes that can do the Cobra will 0wn any Western plane!" Yeah, is that before or after the ASRAAM shows them true agility?

Being a fighter pilot is getting more boring anyway, we're getting into an age of going up in the sky, seeing a blob on the RADAR and pushing a button then confirming a kill and landing. WWI and WWII had true knife fights, GUNS, GUNS, GUNS! 8)
User avatar
MKSheppard
Ruthless Genocidal Warmonger
Ruthless Genocidal Warmonger
Posts: 29842
Joined: 2002-07-06 06:34pm

Post by MKSheppard »

Admiral Valdemar wrote: Being a fighter pilot is getting more boring anyway, we're getting into an age of going up in the sky, seeing a blob on the RADAR and pushing a button then confirming a kill and landing. WWI and WWII had true knife fights, GUNS, GUNS, GUNS! 8)
Tell that to the US Navy and US Air Force Pilots who tangled with NVAF
MiGs
"If scientists and inventors who develop disease cures and useful technologies don't get lifetime royalties, I'd like to know what fucking rationale you have for some guy getting lifetime royalties for writing an episode of Full House." - Mike Wong

"The present air situation in the Pacific is entirely the result of fighting a fifth rate air power." - U.S. Navy Memo - 24 July 1944
Post Reply