A disturbing theory about ST weapons figures

Grand Admiral Thrawn · Post by **Grand Admiral Thrawn** » 2002-08-29 03:20pm

EVERYONE:

This guy's IP match's "ASSCLOWN" http://www.stardestroyer.net/phpBB2/vie ... light=#680

XaLEv · Post by **XaLEv** » 2002-08-29 03:20pm

Oh, yeah. Assuming you are actually the person who made that site, you just contradicted yourself. You claim the Executor was 8 km long here, but on the site you say 17.6 kms. Congrats.

Isil`Zha · Post by **Isil`Zha** » 2002-08-29 03:21pm

Imperial Federation wrote:
Demiurge wrote:
Imperial Federation wrote:So basically his reasoning is
"Star Wars is fantasy therefore I can make up whatever the hell I like about it even if it's complete and utter bullshit"

Right.

Did he deign to explain his Uber-Sovereign?
The sovvie info is based on CANON speculation.
Canon explanation? I think not.
More like cannon explanation, i.e. the cannon that you stuck your head in depriving you of much needed oxygen to your brain.

The executer was almost 8 km long, and since star trek is more advanced, it must have bigger ships!
Hardy har har, dimwit.
If you're serious, you need help.
If you're joking, you still need help.
"I find your lack of humor disturbing."

He said canon *speculation* not explination, so he shot himself down more than you just did

I really don't think this is the guy anyway.

thecreech · Post by **thecreech** » 2002-08-29 03:21pm

Demiurge wrote:
Imperial Federation wrote:So basically his reasoning is
"Star Wars is fantasy therefore I can make up whatever the hell I like about it even if it's complete and utter bullshit"

Right.

Did he deign to explain his Uber-Sovereign?
The sovvie info is based on CANON speculation. The executer was almost 8 km long, and since star trek is more advanced, it must have bigger ships!

LOL OMG... this is the classic, since star trek is more advanced it must have bigger ships, keep going i love this

Grand Admiral Thrawn · Post by **Grand Admiral Thrawn** » 2002-08-29 03:22pm

Fake! Your site says 17.6 km! You say 8 km! Fake fake fake fake!

Demiurge · Post by **Demiurge** » 2002-08-29 03:24pm

XaLEv wrote:Oh, yeah. Assuming you are actually the person who made that site, you just contradicted yourself. You claim the Executor was 8 km long here, but on the site you say 17.6 kms. Congrats.

But...that's the correct length!

Imperial Federation · Post by **Imperial Federation** » 2002-08-29 03:24pm

Isil`Zha wrote:
Imperial Federation wrote:
Demiurge wrote: The sovvie info is based on CANON speculation.
Canon explanation? I think not.
More like cannon explanation, i.e. the cannon that you stuck your head in depriving you of much needed oxygen to your brain.

The executer was almost 8 km long, and since star trek is more advanced, it must have bigger ships!
Hardy har har, dimwit.
If you're serious, you need help.
If you're joking, you still need help.
"I find your lack of humor disturbing."
He said canon *speculation* not explination, so he shot himself down more than you just did

I really don't think this is the guy anyway.

Eh. Speculation, explanation..
Okay, I mix up words sometimes, but at least that guy's still stupider than me!

Grand Admiral Thrawn · Post by **Grand Admiral Thrawn** » 2002-08-29 03:25pm

Demiurge wrote:
XaLEv wrote:Oh, yeah. Assuming you are actually the person who made that site, you just contradicted yourself. You claim the Executor was 8 km long here, but on the site you say 17.6 kms. Congrats.
But...that's the correct length!

Fake fake fake fake!

XaLEv · Post by **XaLEv** » 2002-08-29 03:28pm

Demiurge wrote:
But...that's the correct length!

It is not. It does not matter anyway. You have contradicted yourself, regardless of which figure is correct.

Demiurge · Post by **Demiurge** » 2002-08-29 03:30pm

XaLEv wrote:
Demiurge wrote:
But...that's the correct length!
It is not. It does not matter anyway. You have contradicted yourself, regardless of which figure is correct.

I was referring to the 17.6 km figure.

XaLEv · Post by **XaLEv** » 2002-08-29 03:31pm

Demiurge wrote:
XaLEv wrote:
It is not. It does not matter anyway. You have contradicted yourself, regardless of which figure is correct.
I was referring to the 17.6 km figure.

The I will direct you towards the latter part of my post.

Grand Admiral Thrawn · Post by **Grand Admiral Thrawn** » 2002-08-29 03:34pm

Demiurge wrote:
XaLEv wrote:
Demiurge wrote:
But...that's the correct length!
It is not. It does not matter anyway. You have contradicted yourself, regardless of which figure is correct.
I was referring to the 17.6 km figure.

Fake fake fake fake fake.

And an ISD would absorb 268 200 000 Watts from the sun if it was in orbit around Earth (and since Tantoonie has TWO suns and was a desert so should be closer to the sun, the ones at Tantoonie aborbed x2+ times that.)

Demiurge · Post by **Demiurge** » 2002-08-29 03:36pm

XaLEv wrote:
Demiurge wrote:
XaLEv wrote:
It is not. It does not matter anyway. You have contradicted yourself, regardless of which figure is correct.
I was referring to the 17.6 km figure.
The I will direct you towards the latter part of my post.

I am surprised that he has the correct length listed on his site. Most of the other sizes are incorrect.

XaLEv · Post by **XaLEv** » 2002-08-29 03:37pm

Demiurge wrote:
I am surprised that he has the correct length listed on his site. Most of the other sizes are incorrect.

So now you're not the author of that site? Congratulations, you have done it again.

Demiurge · Post by **Demiurge** » 2002-08-29 03:39pm

Grand Admiral Thrawn wrote:
Demiurge wrote:
XaLEv wrote: It is not. It does not matter anyway. You have contradicted yourself, regardless of which figure is correct.
I was referring to the 17.6 km figure.

Fake fake fake fake fake.

And an ISD would absorb 268 200 000 Watts from the sun if it was in orbit around Earth (and since Tantoonie has TWO suns and was a desert so should be closer to the sun, the ones at Tantoonie aborbed x2+ times that.)

Omicron Theta would disagree.

Demiurge · Post by **Demiurge** » 2002-08-29 03:41pm

XaLEv wrote:
Demiurge wrote:
I am surprised that he has the correct length listed on his site. Most of the other sizes are incorrect.
So now you're not the author of that site? Congratulations, you have done it again.

What if I were to say that Star Trek is less advanced than Star Wars?

Ender · Post by **Ender** » 2002-08-29 03:41pm

I challenge you to a debate.

3 rounds

I will be attacking your numbers, you will be required to defend them and refute my points.

As it is your site, you have the option of playing defense, and therefore having the last word.

Maximum Time frame will be one week for each response each round.

Debates will be posted here in their entirety (I'm sure the mods will be able to keep the others out so that it doesn't descend into a freefor all of everyone against you). The reason for this is so that the editing option will be disabled.

I am also authorizing you to post the transcripts and whatever commentary you feel necessary on your site, so long as you do not change my posts to make me out as a liar.

You may select from the following options the evidence allowed of both sides:
Canon only
Canon and reference guides/Technical manuals
All allowable in a standard debate.

I await your response.

Imperial Federation · Post by **Imperial Federation** » 2002-08-29 03:43pm

Demiurge wrote:
XaLEv wrote:
Demiurge wrote:
I am surprised that he has the correct length listed on his site. Most of the other sizes are incorrect.
So now you're not the author of that site? Congratulations, you have done it again.
What if I were to say that Star Trek is less advanced than Star Wars?

What if you stop messin' around like this?

Grand Admiral Thrawn · Post by **Grand Admiral Thrawn** » 2002-08-29 03:43pm

Demiurge wrote:
Omicron Theta would disagree.

I don't care. I've proved a ISD would absorb more energy then you say. Also, since an ISD's shields can be beaten by another ISD, your weapons are wrong.

Read Mike's page asshole.

XaLEv · Post by **XaLEv** » 2002-08-29 03:44pm

Demiurge wrote:
Grand Admiral Thrawn wrote: Fake fake fake fake fake.

And an ISD would absorb 268 200 000 Watts from the sun if it was in orbit around Earth (and since Tantoonie has TWO suns and was a desert so should be closer to the sun, the ones at Tantoonie aborbed x2+ times that.)
Omicron Theta would disagree.

Irrelevant. Whether the second body in the Tatoo system is a star or not, it still puts out radiation levels comparable to that of a star. The point stands.

Grand Admiral Thrawn · Post by **Grand Admiral Thrawn** » 2002-08-29 03:45pm

Demiurge wrote:
XaLEv wrote:
Demiurge wrote:
I am surprised that he has the correct length listed on his site. Most of the other sizes are incorrect.
So now you're not the author of that site? Congratulations, you have done it again.
What if I were to say that Star Trek is less advanced than Star Wars?

Then you are not the author of the site.

Fake fake fake fake!

Ender · Post by **Ender** » 2002-08-29 03:46pm

Well crap, this is a smurf.

I guess I will just have to challenge him via email.

Ender · Post by **Ender** » 2002-08-29 04:05pm

I have challenged him.

Asst. Asst. Lt. Cmdr. Smi · Post by **Asst. Asst. Lt. Cmdr. Smi** » 2002-08-29 04:09pm

I would BDZ this planet with my stadium lights, but somone karate chopped my ISD in half. This guy probably doesn't know scientific notation or numbers higher than his IQ. The site is most likely an April Fool's joke to the ASVS people.

thecreech · Post by **thecreech** » 2002-08-29 04:33pm

LOL this is to funny