I think that's about it. For the missing stuff like monitor, I already have. What do you think?Intel Pentium 4 3.06GHz (512/533 FSB)
Motherboard: Intel D845PESVL
Memory: 1GB Kingston PC-2700 DDR RAM (512MB x 2)
Hard Drive: 120GB 7200rpm Ultra DMA/100 (8MB Buffer)
Display Card: 4/8X AGP ATI Radeon 9700Pro 128MB DDR
CD-Writer: Pioneer A05 DVD-RW Writer
Sound Card: PCI Sound Blaster Audigy2 Platinum 6.1
System Case: ATX 278WB Black Color & Edge LED Styler Case 10 Bay & Side Fan w/ 350W P.S. (With neon light)
Help needed with FINAL specs for my new comp
Moderator: Edi
Help needed with FINAL specs for my new comp
Here it is, more or less:
What's her bust size!?
It's over NINE THOUSAAAAAAAAAAND!!!!!!!!!
It's over NINE THOUSAAAAAAAAAAND!!!!!!!!!
-
- Redshirt
- Posts: 42
- Joined: 2002-07-10 01:03am
Hrm...
Intel + DDR == Lose. Get RDRAM or get AMD (ideally AMD, intel is into that whole tcpa shit with M$). If you decide to go with DDR, max it out. Corsair XMS DDR 3500 or 3700, fastest u can buy.
Re: Hrm...
Currently my options are limited. RDRAM only comes in PC800 sizes.Headshots_Sold_Here wrote:Intel + DDR == Lose. Get RDRAM or get AMD (ideally AMD, intel is into that whole tcpa shit with M$). If you decide to go with DDR, max it out. Corsair XMS DDR 3500 or 3700, fastest u can buy.
How supposedly slow is Intel + DDR? Is it like, half-cpu-speed-cut slow or something?
EDIT: I hear AMD is following into the TCPA thing as well. And I don't think they've implemented that yet.
What's her bust size!?
It's over NINE THOUSAAAAAAAAAAND!!!!!!!!!
It's over NINE THOUSAAAAAAAAAAND!!!!!!!!!
First 2 things:
1) ditch inhell, you're not gonna get the performance for your money
2) ditch the ATI POS, you get more bang for your buck with the GF4 series.
Btw, a little bit of info on RDRAM and DDR: 1) RDRAM may be clocked higher than hell, but it has 3 major fallicies: 1: it is serial interface rather than parallel like all the other types of ram, this is why it's clocked higher, it also has reduced bandwidth. 2: the cost is too fucking high. 3: you need to install it in pairs.
DDR is parallel interface of course but with double the data thruput rate (hence the name) it in general will give you better performance at a lower cost. Also DDR400 gives less performance than DDR333 due to the higher system overhead and the fact that there isn't much out there that utilizes it.
1) ditch inhell, you're not gonna get the performance for your money
2) ditch the ATI POS, you get more bang for your buck with the GF4 series.
Btw, a little bit of info on RDRAM and DDR: 1) RDRAM may be clocked higher than hell, but it has 3 major fallicies: 1: it is serial interface rather than parallel like all the other types of ram, this is why it's clocked higher, it also has reduced bandwidth. 2: the cost is too fucking high. 3: you need to install it in pairs.
DDR is parallel interface of course but with double the data thruput rate (hence the name) it in general will give you better performance at a lower cost. Also DDR400 gives less performance than DDR333 due to the higher system overhead and the fact that there isn't much out there that utilizes it.
"Freak on a leash! Freak on a leash!"
-
- Redshirt
- Posts: 42
- Joined: 2002-07-10 01:03am
RDRAM also comes in PC1066
I am just wondering why you are mixing. Intel and AMD top of thelines are fairly similar, with thier proper ram. As for GF4 vs RADEON vs FX: Seems like you have $$ to burn, if you're going intel 3.06. Go for a 9800 or 5800, no point in making another bottleneck. The ATH 3k is marginally faster, for $13 and you save on the ram.
as for TCPA bullshit, I've only heard about intel.
I am just wondering why you are mixing. Intel and AMD top of thelines are fairly similar, with thier proper ram. As for GF4 vs RADEON vs FX: Seems like you have $$ to burn, if you're going intel 3.06. Go for a 9800 or 5800, no point in making another bottleneck. The ATH 3k is marginally faster, for $13 and you save on the ram.
as for TCPA bullshit, I've only heard about intel.
- GrandMasterTerwynn
- Emperor's Hand
- Posts: 6787
- Joined: 2002-07-29 06:14pm
- Location: Somewhere on Earth.
Re: Hrm...
For Intel, DDR is shit.Shinova wrote:Currently my options are limited. RDRAM only comes in PC800 sizes.Headshots_Sold_Here wrote:Intel + DDR == Lose. Get RDRAM or get AMD (ideally AMD, intel is into that whole tcpa shit with M$). If you decide to go with DDR, max it out. Corsair XMS DDR 3500 or 3700, fastest u can buy.
How supposedly slow is Intel + DDR? Is it like, half-cpu-speed-cut slow or something?
EDIT: I hear AMD is following into the TCPA thing as well. And I don't think they've implemented that yet.
DDR memory:
DDR3200 is 400 MHz FSB.
DDR2700 is 333 MHz FSB.
DDR2100 is 266 MHz FSB.
On an Intel system with a 533 Mhz FSB, that translates into a lot of latency, which is time the CPU wastes waiting for stuff to come in from main memory.
Tales of the Known Worlds:
2070s - The Seventy-Niners ... 3500s - Fair as Death ... 4900s - Against Improbable Odds V 1.0
2070s - The Seventy-Niners ... 3500s - Fair as Death ... 4900s - Against Improbable Odds V 1.0
-
- SMAKIBBFB
- Posts: 19195
- Joined: 2002-07-28 12:30pm
- Contact:
Re: Help needed with FINAL specs for my new comp
Hissssss....Shinova wrote:Here it is, more or less:
Sound Card: PCI Sound Blaster Audigy2 Platinum 6.1
Find yourself a Hercules Gametheater XP. With the latest drivers it is a truly wonderful piece of hardware. It also provides you with massive amounts of connectivity via the lovely blue box. While the blue box adds immense street cred to your computers appearance.
Trust me, once you get this baby you won't look back. Not to mention the fact that it will likely be about 100 cheaper than the SB card.
1. I don't need super sound. As long as it can give me good game sound, play mp3s and MIDIs well, I'm fine.
2. How much of a difference is there between DDR and RDRAM? Is it possible to get a stat based on, say, FPS? (FPS=frames per second)
3. I read somewhere just a minute ago that Intel won't be implementing Palladium until second half of 2003. It's not second half yet. And it's supposedly on the P5, not the P4.
2. How much of a difference is there between DDR and RDRAM? Is it possible to get a stat based on, say, FPS? (FPS=frames per second)
3. I read somewhere just a minute ago that Intel won't be implementing Palladium until second half of 2003. It's not second half yet. And it's supposedly on the P5, not the P4.
What's her bust size!?
It's over NINE THOUSAAAAAAAAAAND!!!!!!!!!
It's over NINE THOUSAAAAAAAAAAND!!!!!!!!!
- GrandMasterTerwynn
- Emperor's Hand
- Posts: 6787
- Joined: 2002-07-29 06:14pm
- Location: Somewhere on Earth.
Ain't that the goddamned truth. There are systems that support DDR at 400 MHz, but the throughput compared to 333 is disappointing. And I haven't seen a system that takes any more than one DDR 400 MHz stick.Hyperion wrote:First 2 things:
1) ditch inhell, you're not gonna get the performance for your money
2) ditch the ATI POS, you get more bang for your buck with the GF4 series.
Btw, a little bit of info on RDRAM and DDR: 1) RDRAM may be clocked higher than hell, but it has 3 major fallicies: 1: it is serial interface rather than parallel like all the other types of ram, this is why it's clocked higher, it also has reduced bandwidth. 2: the cost is too fucking high. 3: you need to install it in pairs.
DDR is parallel interface of course but with double the data thruput rate (hence the name) it in general will give you better performance at a lower cost. Also DDR400 gives less performance than DDR333 due to the higher system overhead and the fact that there isn't much out there that utilizes it.
I am told the best system in terms of memory bandwidth is a new Athlon XP 2800+ or better system with the 333 MHz FSB, paired with 333 MHz DDR memory. Practically no latency to speak of.
Tales of the Known Worlds:
2070s - The Seventy-Niners ... 3500s - Fair as Death ... 4900s - Against Improbable Odds V 1.0
2070s - The Seventy-Niners ... 3500s - Fair as Death ... 4900s - Against Improbable Odds V 1.0
-
- SMAKIBBFB
- Posts: 19195
- Joined: 2002-07-28 12:30pm
- Contact:
Perhaps you missed my point. The GameTheater XP gives you a superiour sound deck, and lots of connectivity (not just sound, but USB, gameports et al) as well. And its CHEAPER than you're currently selected card.Shinova wrote:1. I don't need super sound. As long as it can give me good game sound, play mp3s and MIDIs well, I'm fine.
If you go AMD, get an nForce 2 chipset board, but avoid Asus like the plague.
I have an Asus A7N8X Deluxe, and I am not happy with the quality of the board (voltage fluctuations, audio popping, and RF interference with the video at lower refresh rates).
Go over to the nforcershq boards and marvel at the sheer number of problems with the Asus board. I wish someone had steered me to the site before I bought mine.
AOpen just introduced some nForce boards that look interesting.
I have an Asus A7N8X Deluxe, and I am not happy with the quality of the board (voltage fluctuations, audio popping, and RF interference with the video at lower refresh rates).
Go over to the nforcershq boards and marvel at the sheer number of problems with the Asus board. I wish someone had steered me to the site before I bought mine.
AOpen just introduced some nForce boards that look interesting.
"You say that it is your custom to burn widows. Very well. We also have a custom: when men burn a woman alive, we tie a rope around their necks and we hang them. Build your funeral pyre; beside it, my carpenters will build a gallows. You may follow your custom. And then we will follow ours."- General Sir Charles Napier
Oderint dum metuant
Oderint dum metuant
Addendum:
If sound isn't that important, why the SB Audigy Platinum?
If you go Intel:
A more economical choice would be to get the Intel D845PEBT Blue Mountain 2 board.
It has pretty decent built in sound, built in LAN, and Serial ATA built in for future HD upgrades.
Blue Mountain Specs
And if you go AMD, nForce2 sound is roughly the equal of the Audigy2's without the extra $160 for a separate card.
If sound isn't that important, why the SB Audigy Platinum?
If you go Intel:
A more economical choice would be to get the Intel D845PEBT Blue Mountain 2 board.
It has pretty decent built in sound, built in LAN, and Serial ATA built in for future HD upgrades.
Blue Mountain Specs
And if you go AMD, nForce2 sound is roughly the equal of the Audigy2's without the extra $160 for a separate card.
"You say that it is your custom to burn widows. Very well. We also have a custom: when men burn a woman alive, we tie a rope around their necks and we hang them. Build your funeral pyre; beside it, my carpenters will build a gallows. You may follow your custom. And then we will follow ours."- General Sir Charles Napier
Oderint dum metuant
Oderint dum metuant
-
- SMAKIBBFB
- Posts: 19195
- Joined: 2002-07-28 12:30pm
- Contact:
Glocksman wrote:Addendum:
If sound isn't that important, why the SB Audigy Platinum?
If you go Intel:
A more economical choice would be to get the Intel D845PEBT Blue Mountain 2 board.
It has pretty decent built in sound, built in LAN, and Serial ATA built in for future HD upgrades.
Blue Mountain Specs
And if you go AMD, nForce2 sound is roughly the equal of the Audigy2's without the extra $160 for a separate card.
Never EVER go with onboard sound. I did it for a year before shelling out for my GTXP. Its uniformly horrid, tinny and all-around shitty. You'd be better off with PC speaker before going that option.
Two years ago, I would have agreed totally with you.Never EVER go with onboard sound. I did it for a year before shelling out for my GTXP. Its uniformly horrid, tinny and all-around shitty. You'd be better off with PC speaker before going that option.
However, the sound quality of my nForce2 onboard sound totally blows away an SB Live! and is only slightly inferior in analog output (slight bass rolloff) to the Audigy2. If you use the digital output, that difference vanishes.
The Intel onboard sound?
I don't know from personal experience but reviews say it's acceptable, if not nForce2 or Audigy2 level.
In that case, get an Intel 850 board and lots of RDRAM.I forgot to mention that my budget is, relatively speaking, limitless at the moment.
"You say that it is your custom to burn widows. Very well. We also have a custom: when men burn a woman alive, we tie a rope around their necks and we hang them. Build your funeral pyre; beside it, my carpenters will build a gallows. You may follow your custom. And then we will follow ours."- General Sir Charles Napier
Oderint dum metuant
Oderint dum metuant
The PEBT has Serial ATA support, 6 channel built in sound with digital out, and Firewire.
The PESVL has built in audio, but it's not as advanced and it lacks SATA and Firewire support.
The PESVL has built in audio, but it's not as advanced and it lacks SATA and Firewire support.
"You say that it is your custom to burn widows. Very well. We also have a custom: when men burn a woman alive, we tie a rope around their necks and we hang them. Build your funeral pyre; beside it, my carpenters will build a gallows. You may follow your custom. And then we will follow ours."- General Sir Charles Napier
Oderint dum metuant
Oderint dum metuant
Also, who makes the power supply in that case you mentioned?
If it's the Raidmax case that sells for about $60, forget it and get a case with a decent power supply. P4's are power hogs and need clean power and a lot of amps to run.
Skimp on the power supply and you'll have lots of reliability issues.
This is the case I bought.
It's got a quality 380 watt PS that provides plenty of power for your proposed system.
A decent case and PS will last you through several upgrades.
If it's the Raidmax case that sells for about $60, forget it and get a case with a decent power supply. P4's are power hogs and need clean power and a lot of amps to run.
Skimp on the power supply and you'll have lots of reliability issues.
This is the case I bought.
It's got a quality 380 watt PS that provides plenty of power for your proposed system.
A decent case and PS will last you through several upgrades.
"You say that it is your custom to burn widows. Very well. We also have a custom: when men burn a woman alive, we tie a rope around their necks and we hang them. Build your funeral pyre; beside it, my carpenters will build a gallows. You may follow your custom. And then we will follow ours."- General Sir Charles Napier
Oderint dum metuant
Oderint dum metuant
The only fault with the Sonata is that it's a little cramped to work inside when compared to its bigger brothers (such as the SX 1040). But it does run 120mm fans for quietness.
"You say that it is your custom to burn widows. Very well. We also have a custom: when men burn a woman alive, we tie a rope around their necks and we hang them. Build your funeral pyre; beside it, my carpenters will build a gallows. You may follow your custom. And then we will follow ours."- General Sir Charles Napier
Oderint dum metuant
Oderint dum metuant
- Crayz9000
- Sith Apprentice
- Posts: 7329
- Joined: 2002-07-03 06:39pm
- Location: Improbably superpositioned
- Contact:
Go for a 400w power supply, a 350 isn't going to cut it.
A Tribute to Stupidity: The Robert Scott Anderson Archive (currently offline)
John Hansen - Slightly Insane Bounty Hunter - ASVS Vets' Assoc. Class of 2000
HAB Cryptanalyst | WG - Intergalactic Alliance and Spoof Author | BotM | Cybertron | SCEF
John Hansen - Slightly Insane Bounty Hunter - ASVS Vets' Assoc. Class of 2000
HAB Cryptanalyst | WG - Intergalactic Alliance and Spoof Author | BotM | Cybertron | SCEF
-
- SMAKIBBFB
- Posts: 19195
- Joined: 2002-07-28 12:30pm
- Contact:
If this is it, find another case or throw away the PS and buy an Antec or Enermax 380 or 430 watt to replace it.
Among the decent PS brands are Antec, Enermax, Channel Well, Heroichi, and Sparkle.
I would get a better case if cost isn't a concern though.[/url]
Among the decent PS brands are Antec, Enermax, Channel Well, Heroichi, and Sparkle.
I would get a better case if cost isn't a concern though.[/url]
"You say that it is your custom to burn widows. Very well. We also have a custom: when men burn a woman alive, we tie a rope around their necks and we hang them. Build your funeral pyre; beside it, my carpenters will build a gallows. You may follow your custom. And then we will follow ours."- General Sir Charles Napier
Oderint dum metuant
Oderint dum metuant