Also, if it WAS once Earthlike, could there have been an intelligent species living on it (ala Martians
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/acc89/acc891d758acd96416cd8c3e544f7726953d7813" alt="Wink ;)"
Moderator: Alyrium Denryle
Suprising. Granted, Mars's escape velocity is lower, but it is also colder, which would inhibit atmospheric loss, particularly for more massive gasses like O2 and especially CO2. Venus has 90% Earth's gravity, and yet has an atmosphere nearly a hundred times more massive, despite being much hotter. Mars not having much of an atmosphere suggests it probably didn't have much (or, at least the heavier gases) to begin with.SyntaxVorlon wrote:I've heard that at one time the atmosphere on mars was large enough to support life, but because of too little gravity, it lost its atmosphere for the most part.
Care to elaborate? Why is Mars' atmosphere so thin? I always thought it had to do with the gravitity being weaker.kojikun wrote:Mars' size has NOTHING to do with its atmospheric density. Moons of Jupiter have denser atmospheres then Earth does and theyre much smaller then mars!
None of Jupiter's moons have atmospheres even remotely comparable to that Earth. What you're probably thinking of is Titan, a moon of Saturn, which has surface pressure of 1.6 bars (Earth's is 1.01bars).kojikun wrote:Mars' size has NOTHING to do with its atmospheric density. Moons of Jupiter have denser atmospheres then Earth does and theyre much smaller then mars!
Still, dismissing gravity as irrelevant is too hasty. Titan's escape velocity may be one-quarter of Earth's, but at 94K it is also more than three times colder. Based on this and tha fact that Titan's atmosphere is primarily nitrogen (like Earth's), I estimate Titan's atmospheric loss is about 4/sqrt(288/94) = 2.3 times higher than Earth's, but given that Earth is expected to be able to hold an atmosphere much longer than the Sun is expected to last, that's not really all that much.kojikun wrote:bah. jupiter, saturn, whats the difference.
Current theories suggest that Mars may have been warm and Earthlike for less than a billion years after it formed and everything settled down. Then, due to it's very low mass, it's interior rapidly cooled off, and no more volatiles were outgassed to replace the stuff lost by Mars. So the planet very quickly froze, except for the occasional outflow of material from buried glaciers and permafrost melted by meteor strikes.Sektor31 wrote:It's been postulated that Mars was once an Earthlike planet, but how long have the experts at work determined Mars' current state?
Also, if it WAS once Earthlike, could there have been an intelligent species living on it (ala Martians ;) )?
Wrong. Mars's size has a great deal to do with it's lack of atmospheric density. Especially when combined with the flux of solar radiation it recieves (which warms the gas, whose individual particles then tend to get bumped clear out of the atmosphere.) Mars lacks the gravitational pull needed to hold on to much of an atmosphere. And this lack of mass also means that Mars cooled down faster, so it quit outgassing earlier, so it couldn't replace what solar heating blew away. It's size and mass are the very reasons it has practically no real atmosphere to speak of.kojikun wrote:Mars' size has NOTHING to do with its atmospheric density. Moons of Jupiter have denser atmospheres then Earth does and theyre much smaller then mars!
What if the culture on Mars build its homes in subterranean caverns, harvesting subterannean fungi?? I know it sounds a little bit Space Opera-ish, but I just got the idea, no matter how weird it might seem.Slartibartfast wrote:Had there been a civilization in Mars, there would be a HELLUVA lot of ruins and stuff, not some hill that if you look at it at a certain angle with certain shadows kinda looks like it might be a face or a pyramid.
If people went through all the trouble of excavating complex cities underground, it was because somehow the surface was way too dangerous or the weather or radiation or whatever made it nearly impossible to settle in the surface - this means that Mars was hardly Earthlike. Only in fantasy the dwarves choose to live underground for no obvious reasonSimon H.Johansen wrote:What if the culture on Mars build its homes in subterranean caverns, harvesting subterannean fungi?? I know it sounds a little bit Space Opera-ish, but I just got the idea, no matter how weird it might seem.Slartibartfast wrote:Had there been a civilization in Mars, there would be a HELLUVA lot of ruins and stuff, not some hill that if you look at it at a certain angle with certain shadows kinda looks like it might be a face or a pyramid.
Of course! How else would you explain this?Sektor31 wrote:Also, if it WAS once Earthlike, could there have been an intelligent species living on it (ala Martians)?
Natural features combined with lighting. Haven't they rephotographed it and it's been shown to be curious natural feature?Galvatron wrote:Of course! How else would you explain this?Sektor31 wrote:Also, if it WAS once Earthlike, could there have been an intelligent species living on it (ala Martians)?
It's a conspiracy, maaan! [/hippie voice]Stormbringer wrote:Natural features combined with lighting. Haven't they rephotographed it and it's been shown to be curious natural feature?Galvatron wrote:Of course! How else would you explain this?Sektor31 wrote:Also, if it WAS once Earthlike, could there have been an intelligent species living on it (ala Martians)?
There are colonies of shrimp on the ocean floor, and bacteria, (as shown on the blue planet bbc program) who get their energy from geothermal vents. No light gets down to those depths, and there isnt enough "marine snow" (dead animal and plant matter that sails down the sea and feeds alot of the life) that actually gets to the bottom to feed the creatures.Slartibartfast wrote:If people went through all the trouble of excavating complex cities underground, it was because somehow the surface was way too dangerous or the weather or radiation or whatever made it nearly impossible to settle in the surface - this means that Mars was hardly Earthlike. Only in fantasy the dwarves choose to live underground for no obvious reasonSimon H.Johansen wrote:What if the culture on Mars build its homes in subterranean caverns, harvesting subterannean fungi?? I know it sounds a little bit Space Opera-ish, but I just got the idea, no matter how weird it might seem.Slartibartfast wrote:Had there been a civilization in Mars, there would be a HELLUVA lot of ruins and stuff, not some hill that if you look at it at a certain angle with certain shadows kinda looks like it might be a face or a pyramid.If all the "good things" were underground (mostly the atmosphere and lack of killer storms) and life EVOLVED down there (if the conditions on the surface were so harsh, it wouldn't make sense for sentient life to start up there) it might be possible... but aren't sunrays or lightning bolts or both necessary for such thing?
No, it's a martian taking a nap underneath the dirt, proving that there are martians, and that they are giants.Stormbringer wrote:Natural features combined with lighting. Haven't they rephotographed it and it's been shown to be curious natural feature?Galvatron wrote:Of course! How else would you explain this?Sektor31 wrote:Also, if it WAS once Earthlike, could there have been an intelligent species living on it (ala Martians)?
A trick of light, shadow, and piss-poor image resolution. The later Mars spacecraft re-imaged it as a weathered set of hills on a somewhat square-ish plateau.Galvatron wrote:Of course! How else would you explain this?Sektor31 wrote:Also, if it WAS once Earthlike, could there have been an intelligent species living on it (ala Martians ;) )?
http://nssdc.gsfc.nasa.gov/image/planet ... s/face.jpg
BAH!!! The later photos were obviously doctored!GrandMasterTerwynn wrote:A trick of light, shadow, and piss-poor image resolution. The later Mars spacecraft re-imaged it as a weathered set of hills on a somewhat square-ish plateau.Galvatron wrote:Of course! How else would you explain this?Sektor31 wrote:Also, if it WAS once Earthlike, could there have been an intelligent species living on it (ala Martians)?
http://nssdc.gsfc.nasa.gov/image/planet ... s/face.jpg