I've lost a whole year?!anarchistbunny wrote:DAY? You mean year.Coaan wrote:Ah, our first catch of the day....
Concentrate all forward fire on that idiot.
sure I meant day
Moderator: Vympel
Bullshit; there is no source, canon or official, which gives any kind of quantum torpedo the firepower necessary to compete with SW, where one-man patrol craft like Slave-1 carry 12 gigaton warheads.
It's good to know that you finally agree with him then. Unless you wanted to add something? We all read that quote.spaceluigi wrote:From "Lord Wong" himself:Bullshit; there is no source, canon or official, which gives any kind of quantum torpedo the firepower necessary to compete with SW, where one-man patrol craft like Slave-1 carry 12 gigaton warheads.
Is he just trying to hard to be annoying or is it just me?Slartibartfast wrote:It's good to know that you finally agree with him then. Unless you wanted to add something? We all read that quote.spaceluigi wrote:From "Lord Wong" himself:Bullshit; there is no source, canon or official, which gives any kind of quantum torpedo the firepower necessary to compete with SW, where one-man patrol craft like Slave-1 carry 12 gigaton warheads.
Comparison: Tunguska was around 20 megatons, or about .02 gigatons.The Admiral wrote:What would a 12 gigaton warhead do to a city?
Strawman.The Admiral wrote:So...
Boba fett could blow up a planet with a full load of warheads?
Dosn't that sound a bit wrong?
You are misrepresenting my words. I am saying that the mines are 12 gigatons, no more, no less.The Admiral wrote:???
Admiral
Huh? You do realise that seismis charges are not torpedoes, right? And that even modern day fighter-scale jets can carry nukes with massive yield, right? Ultimately, nobody but you really cares whether you like the sound of SW having fighter-scale spacecrafts having weapons in the gigaton range, so stop trying to push around your subjective belief like they have any bearings.The Admiral wrote:So drop them on the planet...
Of cource this is still a one man craft, so what are better trops like?
It's spelled SHIELD, god damn it! Learn the words!The Admiral wrote:SO in that case why wen't they used?
At all?
I never heard Imprial commanders ording the Ties down to nuke the planetary schild gerenerators...
Can this "Admiral" character really be so stupid as to think you can just blow up a shield generator without having to take down the shield it's putting up around itself?Dalton wrote:It's spelled SHIELD, god damn it! Learn the words!The Admiral wrote:SO in that case why wen't they used?
At all?
I never heard Imprial commanders ording the Ties down to nuke the planetary schild gerenerators...
And furthermore, it's pretty hard to destroy a planetary shield generator when it's UNDER THE SHIELD!
The Admiral wrote:SO in that case why wen't they used?
At all?
I never heard Imprial commanders ording the Ties down to nuke the planetary schild gerenerators...
Admiral