If that's not the pot calling the kettle black, I don't know what is.The Admiral wrote: 7) Ie, when you lose... Give up?

Moderator: Vympel
He opened the ventilation grate and later downloaded a basic map.The Admiral wrote:3) No r2! Haced things, like the WAYLAND comps... You know GA Thrawns most inportant base, in how long? 10 seconds?
You are talking about the actions of INDIVIDUALS, not thw Empire as a whole, you fucking moron.The Admiral wrote:And for 88's...
1), Hence stupid, 2) Hence stupid, of the rules or the empire do thins like that... And you are to scared to point it out, that proves my point.
So what? Again, you're taking the abilities of ONE individual (in this case, a droid) and extrapolating it to mean that the Empire's security is lame. Bad comparison.3) No r2! Haced things, like the WAYLAND comps... You know GA Thrawns most inportant base, in how long? 10 seconds?
And it wasn't my point either, dope.4) I know ST bridges are stupid... That isn't what my post is about...
Ummmm...WRONG! The Ssi-ruuk fleet was left desperately short of power because the Empire backed out of the deal. They had NO CHOICE but to attack Bakura.5) But if instad of makeing a deal they attacked the ssi-ruuk
WRONG. It's in the Outer Rim (ref: Essential Guide to Planets).6) MOn_CAl is a infuential core world...
Name the exact point the Empire lost the war.7) Ie, when you lose... Give up?
Not as big, but it would still cost the Empire a large amount of resources to invade a well-defended world like Mon Calamari.But not as big as the imprail navy.. Just assult there ship yards like mon cal...
Wrong again. Militaries in wartime are meritocracies, not seniority-dominated. Get it?9) But prevoius captains, get promted to admirals... and have to promet Pelleaon...and have more exprience...
Good god, are you a dumbass? Ditching contracts means that you'll no longer have suppliers for weapons and materials, because no company will sign with a two-faced backstabber.10) Contracts? this is war... You know you ditch the contract and steal he better fighter?
They needed to REGAIN CONTROL of the ships systems. Not something you can accomplish in TEN FUCKING SECONDS.The Admiral wrote:Wild Karrde...
It didn't need to regain control...
It need not to fly all the way over the the death star and ram it...
remeber the fleet was round endor move, and the waited in MG-7.
So how the the exutor got over and crahed before someone could you know...
*sigh*
Admiral
WTF do you mean it didn't need to gain control?!?:shock:The Admiral wrote:Wild Karrde...
It didn't need to regain control...
It need not to fly all the way over the the death star and ram it...
remeber the fleet was round endor move, and the waited in MG-7.
So how the the exutor got over and crahed before someone could you know...
*sigh*
Admiral
Oh sure it has, I mean it's got that incredible... err... No, but remember the time when they.... ok.... But what about their sophisticated... durrr...Kreshna Aryaguna Nurzaman wrote:So, is there a single thing in Star Trek that better than Star Wars? How about medical tech? Consumer goods? Uniform look? Anything?
Hmmmmm...Wild Karrde wrote:Or that it's normal procedure to ram the Imperial flagship into a moon-sized super weapon.IG-88E wrote:Admiral Jackass seems to think that the Rebs had control of the Executor.Wild Karrde wrote: WTF do you mean it didn't need to gain control?!?:shock:![]()
For the average person, to read the above paragraph word by word, would take about ten seconds. Assuming that you had to run 25 meters to the secondary bridge (assuming it takes you about 5 seconds to confirm that the main bridge is down), you'll make it to there just in time to say "oh, shit..." (nevermind arresting the >17km ship's forward momentum).The Admiral wrote:I seem to remeber in the one other case where the bridge feel, on admiral trigits flahsgip, see wraith squardren...
It took them about *srugs* 10 fucking scends mabey. You would think the flagship of the entire inprial navy would have quicker responces...
Strangely, I find that the more I try to understand what the hell you're on about, the less sence (sic) you seem to make.As for the actions of the empire as a whole...
This is the emporer and Grand moff tarkin here, they MADE the empire, or at least te emporer did, and Tarkin was one of its most powerful figures.
You get in power by have more sence than the person who was in power last, so if thats the hight of inprial intellegence - Thrawn. Case in point.
What the fuck don't you understand that the Executor only had mere seconds to react?The Admiral wrote:But you don't need to do any of that, the are crew allready on the secondary bridge. It would be hard to miss the bridge going down, and you don't need to stop its foward momentum. Unless when the bridge is blows up the ships computer system decides to ram the death star. You would think it would be parked in space, as opposed to allready ramming them. When bridge stoped responding, sseondary bridge becomes primary, and thats it. As opposed the bridge goes down, Ship suddly goes at full power into death star II...
See?
Admiral
When dealing with official sources, we go with the one that most accurately reflects what we see in the canon films.spaceluigi wrote:First of all, the Star Wars Essential Guides have the copyright from Lucasfilm. Now, I assume that's what we go by, or do we simply go by whatever makes Star Wars look good and whatever makes Star Trek look bad?
No, it's not. Fighters will be with us for a long time yet. You obviously have no clue what you're talking about.spaceluigi wrote: Star Trek doesn’t even stoop to using fighters, we’re already coming to a close to manned fightercraft today! Dammit, a guy interviewed on CNN said that! And as a matter of fact, I have heard of the F-22, and the rest of the fighters. THEY ARE THE LAST.
Yes. It's an unmanned spyplane that has been successfully used as a missile platform at least once. It has all of the disadvantages of a remote-controlled aircraft, though (reduced information available to the pilot, longer response time, interference from jamming, etc.). It is not a replacement for manned fighters.spaceluigi wrote: Ever heard of Predator?
Because their weapon technology sucks compared to ours. Nonetheless, if we found ourselves at war against North Korea or China, we'd still be sending manned fighters into battle.spaceluigi wrote: Yeah… gee… let’s wonder why the manned fightercraft program is ending… technology improves, and it isn’t safe to put a guy in a skimpy fighter today! The only reason we haven’t lost more guys flying in Iraq is because… they don’t have half the force we do!
"Extremely hard to cut"? Mild steel is "extremely hard to cut". Your claim is worthless.spaceluigi wrote: Anyhow, Star Trek ships use duranium and tritanium! Duranium = Extremely hard to cut, Star Trek Encyclopedia; Titanium = Used in A-10’s TODAY!
No I know you're an idiot. No one on this planet has ever had functioning orbital missile defense system. The idea was proposed as early as the 60's, and the Reagan administration spend millions trying to get it to work in the 80's, but there has never been a successful implementation.spaceluigi wrote: Your damn laser cannons… oh, they’re not lasers, they only have the word laser in them… well, they are… partly. It’s a beam of light and charged particles *slap* gee, that sounds like it could deck a Constitution class in three hits… especially considering that we matched that exact technology in the 1960’s as an orbital missile defense… Source: The Essential Guide to Weapons and Technology and the National Air and Space Museum
Ah, the meaningless "isoton" unit. Well, it does have a meaning really. It means "one ton", but we're usually generous enough to ignore that one.spaceluigi wrote: Trek Photon Torpedoes can easily wipe their viewscreens clean of any Star Wars bug nearby. They use matter and antimatter to kill, with an effective explosive yield of 200 isotons.
You are so delusional. You're relying on edgy science with no experimental support. Furthermore, we've seen Quantum Torpedoes detonate, and they don't release that much energy.spaceluigi wrote: Then there’s the Quantum Torpedo, utilizing the most powerful energy the universe has to offer: Quintessence, Zero-Point Energy (ZPE) or Vacuum Energy, call it what you want! It’s called ZPE because there is another energy out there keeping it at bay… and keeping us alive… if it weren’t out there the universe would expand so fast the electrostatic and nuclear bonds of all matter and energy would cease to exist! It is on the magnitude of 120 orders more powerful than ALL the matter and energy in the universe! It is at a constant density, and can never be used up as the universe expands, doesn’t mean this energy does! There is enough energy in at most 1 coffee cup full of it that IT CAN BOIL THE EARTH’S OCEANS AWAY. Oh, yes, I forgot to add: The range on these mothers is 3.5 million kilometers. As opposed to 300-700 meters. Source: Star Trek Encyclopedia (photon torp) and physicsweb.org (quantum torp)
The only thing spaceluigi is good for is spouting nonsense.spaceluigi wrote: In simpler terms, idiots, the only thing Star Wars is good for is running away!
The "Warsies" here have proved their points many times over. I've yet to see you prove one.spaceluigi wrote: PS: I'd like to add, that why don't you frickin' assholes try proving your point?
I see... then, in Earth terms, Jet planes have a big disadvantage over cars: you have to set a series of instruments so you can take off without crashing and being able to get wherever the heck you're going. Since you can't stop for directions, it's worse than traveling by car.The Admiral wrote:Which takes time, unlike ST ships...
It seems a bit funny though, when people are "On no an interdictor"
Instead of "Turn the navicomp safty of and lets go"
???
Admiral
Why would the designers expect that they'd have to be able to switch control in less than 10 seconds? They probably have a checklist that they run through, like any military operation. This is like asking why a fighter pilot must do a walkaround of his plane before getting in and taking off. Are you saying that there should be a big red button you just push? Over-automation often leads to a loss of robustness, and the whole point of a secondary bridge is that you take over in the event of damage, so you can't assume everything is working perfectly. Think about it.The Admiral wrote:But you don't need to do any of that, the are crew allready on the secondary bridge. It would be hard to miss the bridge going down, and you don't need to stop its foward momentum.
spaceluigi wrote:First of all, the Star Wars Essential Guides have the copyright from Lucasfilm. Now, I assume that's what we go by, or do we simply go by whatever makes Star Wars look good and whatever makes Star Trek look bad?
Moving on.
Alright, you wanna know what Star Trek has? Here. READ.
You say your fighters have hulls that can stand multi-kiloton blasts? BULLSHIT! X-Wings hull’s are made of Titanium! Source: The Essential Guide to Vehicles an Vessels!
Star Trek doesn’t even stoop to using fighters,
Because CNN is the most trusted name in news!we’re already coming to a close to manned fightercraft today! Dammit, a guy interviewed on CNN said that! And as a matter of fact, I have heard of the F-22, and the rest of the fighters. THEY ARE THE LAST.
The Predator is no a Air to Air combat vehicle.Ever heard of Predator? Yeah… gee… let’s wonder why the manned fightercraft program is ending… technology improves, and it isn’t safe to put a guy in a skimpy fighter today! The only reason we haven’t lost more guys flying in Iraq is because… they don’t have half the force we do!
1. Useless names.Anyhow, Star Trek ships use duranium and tritanium! Duranium = Extremely hard to cut, Star Trek Encyclopedia;
Titanium = Used in A-10’s TODAY!
Your damn laser cannons… oh, they’re not lasers, they only have the word laser in them… well, they are… partly. It’s a beam of light and charged particles *slap* gee, that sounds like it could deck a Constitution class in three hits… especially considering that we matched that exact technology in the 1960’s as an orbital missile defense… Source: The Essential Guide to Weapons and Technology and the National Air and Space Museum
This bullshit about an X-Wing possessing enough firepower to confidently duke it out with a Federation fleet? It’s exactly that…bullshit. Source: The Essential Guide to Weapons and Technology…
Trek Photon Torpedoes can easily wipe their viewscreens clean of any Star Wars bug nearby. They use matter and antimatter to kill, with an effective explosive yield of 200 isotons.
Then there’s the Quantum Torpedo, utilizing the most powerful energy the universe has to offer: Quintessence, Zero-Point Energy (ZPE) or Vacuum Energy, call it what you want! It’s called ZPE because there is another energy out there keeping it at bay… and keeping us alive… if it weren’t out there the universe would expand so fast the electrostatic and nuclear bonds of all matter and energy would cease to exist! It is on the magnitude of 120 orders more powerful than ALL the matter and energy in the universe! It is at a constant density, and can never be used up as the universe expands, doesn’t mean this energy does! There is enough energy in at most 1 coffee cup full of it that IT CAN BOIL THE EARTH’S OCEANS AWAY. Oh, yes, I forgot to add: The range on these mothers is 3.5 million kilometers. As opposed to 300-700 meters. Source: Star Trek Encyclopedia (photon torp) and physicsweb.org (quantum torp)
In simpler terms, idiots, the only thing Star Wars is good for is running away!
PS: I'd like to add, that why don't you frickin' assholes try proving your point?