IRG CommandoJoe wrote:*vomits*Zaia wrote:*swoons*Next of Kin wrote:I prefer to waltz out on the beach with my bulbous beer gut hanging over my fish-net speedos! Did I mention that my back is a shag rug?
![Mr. Green :mrgreen:](./images/smilies/icon_mrgreen.gif)
C'mon, I'm cute. Admit it.
![Very Happy :D](./images/smilies/icon_biggrin.gif)
Moderator: Edi
IRG CommandoJoe wrote:*vomits*Zaia wrote:*swoons*Next of Kin wrote:I prefer to waltz out on the beach with my bulbous beer gut hanging over my fish-net speedos! Did I mention that my back is a shag rug?
*cough cough*aerius wrote:Same thing here, it's kinda bad when my GF weighs more than me, if only by a couple pounds.Trytostaydead wrote:I'm Asian, my goal is to GAIN weight
Beowulf wrote:*cough cough*
My girlfriend weighs more than a couple pounds more than I do...
Are you sure about that? Mine filled in quite nicely in university despite doing 4-5 hours of swim training and workouts every day.Trytostaydead wrote:Girls! Don't work out too much! Your boobs will shrink!!
Dude, more is not better when it comes to lifting.aerius wrote:Same thing here, it's kinda bad when my GF weighs more than me, if only by a couple pounds. Problem is I can't gain weight unless I spend my life in the gym lifting weights all day, and I just don't have the dedication for that. I'd much rather be outside biking, rollerblading, running, and other such stuff instead of being inside a gym pumping iron.Trytostaydead wrote:I'm Asian, my goal is to GAIN weight
Nah, they'll keep their boobs so long as they don't lose a lot of bodyfatTrytostaydead wrote:Girls! Don't work out too much! Your boobs will shrink!!
I love the beach but I abhor the heat. So I probably won't be bothering with the beach at all.Faram wrote:Okay anyone else feels the need to lose some slack for the beach season?
I just joined the VV and according to them I have 7kg to lose.
Now at 172cm/82kg goal ~74kg
No worries...Vympel wrote:I go to the gym at least 3 times a week as it is, and it's autumn going into winter over here. I need to put ON weight. I'm a little over 170cm and only weigh like ... 63-5kg?
30 mins cardio, then say 40 mins of weights (usually 3 sets of 10 on the equipment on my program- this is my second), then finish off with abs, then go home.seanrobertson wrote:
No worries...
What does your routine look like?
I don't eat as much as I should- I skip breakfast too oftenDiet's important, too, of course, but so long as we're eating enough, diet's secondary to getting all of your training variables in order.
Shit man- thanks for the info!They are, in short: volume (amount of work), intensity (how much effort you put into an individual set) and frequency (how often you train, as in each bodypart *and* the body as a whole).
Volume and frequency are given the most fanfare; e.g., "I do 20 sets for chest," or "I work out every day of the week." But those two are secondary to intensity, which I define as training to momentary muscular "failure"--the point at which you can't complete another rep in spite of maximum effort to do so.
Fewer sets of high intensity are far more productive than doing lots of submaximal sets, as in 1 set with 300 lbs. for 10 very hard reps vs. 100 sets with 10 lbs. x 10 easy reps. This is evident in the builds we see among sprinters, who do very hard work in a short period of time and generally at least have strong-looking legs, vs. that of distance runners, who do thousands of "reps" but are usually skinny as rails.
Once the intensity is in order, volume falls into place naturally...most simply cannot do many sets at maximum. Let's say you do a set of squats with your 10 rep max. But instead of stopping at 10, you simply breathe at the top, knees locked, until you think you can squeeze out another. You'd rest a bit more, get another rep, and so on, until you've gotten a near impossible 20 reps.
If someone could duplicate that, they're a robot. Doing anything beyond that would be a waste of time. (One truly hard set, for every bodypart, is all that's truly needed IMO, though it's a bit extreme for those without a couple years' lifting experience.)
And then, with intensity and volume in place, comes training frequency. Obviously, if you can train each bodypart every day of the year and gain reps or weight each time, you'll progress faster than if you only did the same workout 50 times a year.
But chances are good most people would do best to only drill a bodypart that hard maybe twice a week; and even then, to prevent CNS exhaustion, you'd want to use different exercises for that bodypart in the second workout.
That's the key: find a frequency at which you can train a bodypart and make nice strength gains. The lower your training volume, the higher the potential frequency can be, within your abilities to recover (no more than twice a week for most, and oftentimes less depending on the routine).
That's greatly oversimplified, complicated as I already made it sound!, but playing with those three variables can help you construct a productive routine. There are lots of important derivatives--exercise selection, rep ranges, for example--but those won't do a person any good if they're doing too much work, too often, not hard enough.