Whiskey Tango Foxtrot: Google Pic Search: "Katana"

Einhander Sn0m4n · Post by **Einhander Sn0m4n** » 2003-04-20 12:14pm

verilon wrote:Minus boobs plus dick = [drool]

*thinks about that for a few seconds.......*

Seconded!

Peregrin Toker · Post by **Peregrin Toker** » 2003-04-20 12:40pm

Darth Pounder wrote:Nice to see another pic of Chyna from the WWE. Was that taken from her Playboy shoot?

Funny that you mentioned Chyna. Wasn't she actually born a hermaphrodite and later had surgery performed upon her to make her wholly female?? (or so I've heard)

DPDarkPrimus · Post by **DPDarkPrimus** » 2003-04-21 01:46am

Darth Pounder wrote:Nice to see another pic of Chyna from the WWE. Was that taken from her Playboy shoot?

*Points at signature quote.*

Asst. Asst. Lt. Cmdr. Smi · Post by **Asst. Asst. Lt. Cmdr. Smi** » 2003-04-21 02:47pm

I actually found that to be pretty funny, to be honest. It's like someone from EliteFitness or something.

Baron Mordo · Post by **Baron Mordo** » 2003-04-21 03:44pm

Simon H.Johansen wrote: Funny that you mentioned Chyna. Wasn't she actually born a hermaphrodite and later had surgery performed upon her to make her wholly female?? (or so I've heard)

Don't tell me you buy into that bizarre rumour.

Kelly Antilles · Post by **Kelly Antilles** » 2003-04-21 08:38pm

Come on guys... this is the Artwork and Photos forum.

paladin · Post by **paladin** » 2003-04-21 10:00pm

Einhander Sn0m4n wrote:
Tsyroc wrote: WTF is right.

And I thought Bev Francis was scary.
Who?

*Google Pic Searches: Bev Francis*

*comes back with: ##WTF## NO BOOBS!!!! ##WTF##*

[Austin Powers]She's a man, baby![/Austin Powers]

Howedar · Post by **Howedar** » 2003-04-21 10:38pm

Whisky Charlie Foxtrot indeed.

kojikun · Post by **kojikun** » 2003-04-21 11:23pm

Whisky Charlie Foxtrot indeed.

WCF? ::chortle::

SPOOFE · Post by **SPOOFE** » 2003-04-23 07:03pm

Dalton...

The main goal of a female of any species is to make more of that species. This is the process known as "life".

Funny, that's the same goal as the male of any species. Since you have failed to answer the question that you were supposedly responding to, I'll ask it again: Why do strong women evoke a negative reaction, when strong men do not? Please try to answer with intelligence this time, please.

I liked your strawman before. Do you build them yourself?

Do you even know what a strawman is?

AnarchistBunny...

What? Do you buy into that PC bullshit that men and women are equal in every way?

THIS is a strawman, Dalton. Take notes.

Anyway, you mind-numbingly idiotic simpleton, I nowhere claimed that men and women are equal "in every way". However, I fail to see why the sight of a strong woman evokes such a negative response in anybody other than insecure little boys who are trying desperately to prove their machismo on a message board.

Women by design are not suppose to grow large mucles in areas men have no problem growing them,

Why? Where in the genetic code does it say this? What physical design trait do women have that says that they're not "supposed" to grow large muscles? They have the same muscles sets that men do... pectorals, biceps, triceps, quads, abs. So why are men "designed" to have large muscles, and women are not?

It's not natural

Sure it is. Do lots of physical excercise, and you get big muscles. This applies universally to men and women.

their basicly making themselves part man,

Uh-huh.

You DO know the only organ distinctly male is the penis, right? Musculature has nothing to do with it? Or do you complain that women also have hands, feet, knees, hair, noses, ears (TWO of them! Gasp!), navels, bones, nerves, lungs, etc.?

and quite frankly, it's disgusting.

Your own personal small-minded mysoginistic opinion means two things to me: Jack and shit.

Saurencaerthai · Post by **Saurencaerthai** » 2003-04-23 08:12pm

Just from stuff I've read and heard from various health sources, usually, when a woman has a visable six-pack, it is often a sign that she doesn't have enough fat to menstruate. That being said, if you don't mind your body not functioning the way it was designed to function, the aquisition of traits from the opposite gender (both for males and females), and the potential risks to your health such as the fact that the anabolic steroids only develop muscle mass, but not the ligaments and tendons, thus increasing the chance of tears, fine by me.

There's nothing wrong, I think, about developing that muscle mass without chemical aids, but the second they step in, I think that the people are really cheating themselves.

Queeb Salaron · Post by **Queeb Salaron** » 2003-04-23 10:53pm

Einhander Sn0m4n wrote:Who?

*Google Pic Searches: Bev Francis*

*comes back with: ##WTF## NO BOOBS!!!! ##WTF##*

EGAD!

THAT MAN HAS NO PENIS!

Saurencaerthai · Post by **Saurencaerthai** » 2003-04-23 10:57pm

So women aren't allowed to be strong? Y'all would prefer that they stay in the kitchen, barefoot and pregnant?

I'd prefer they not put chemicals into their bodies so they can build grotesque amounts of muscle mass.

Vertigo1 · Post by **Vertigo1** » 2003-04-23 10:57pm

WTF indeed....

Queeb Salaron · Post by **Queeb Salaron** » 2003-04-23 10:58pm

Saurencaerthai wrote:There's nothing wrong, I think, about developing that muscle mass without chemical aids, but the second they step in, I think that the people are really cheating themselves.

Women cannot develop the muscle tone of that Bev lady without chemicals. If you want to see what a really jacked woman looks like, look at professional female weightlifters, shotputters, and discus throwers. Also take a peek at the underground world of female greco-roman wrestling.

All "Ms. Universe" candidates, a la Bev, have upped their testosterone to unnatural (and possibly unsafe) levels. It's kind of the same thing that man-to-woman transgendered people do to give themselves breasts and hips. These women just take testosterone for muscle mass.

InnerBrat · Post by **InnerBrat** » 2003-04-24 03:51am

SPOOFE wrote:
The main goal of a female of any species is to make more of that species. This is the process known as "life".
Funny, that's the same goal as the male of any species. Since you have failed to answer the question that you were supposedly responding to, I'll ask it again: Why do strong women evoke a negative reaction, when strong men do not? Please try to answer with intelligence this time, please.

Fine. Want a 'scientific' answer why a woman with testosterone-induced bulging muscles is not seen as attractive as a man with the same?

Because testosterone makes a man more fertile and a woman less so. As you freely admit that the goal of either sex is to reproduce, isn't it obvious why a woman clearly punped up with testosterone and with to littl ebody fat to carry a child woudl be seen as un sexy?

What? Do you buy into that PC bullshit that men and women are equal in every way?
Anyway, you mind-numbingly idiotic simpleton, I nowhere claimed that men and women are equal "in every way". However, I fail to see why the sight of a strong woman evokes such a negative response in anybody other than insecure little boys who are trying desperately to prove their machismo on a message board.

The same reason why a hugely obese woman (or man) would evoke a negative reaction. It's not attractive

Women by design are not suppose to grow large mucles in areas men have no problem growing them,
Why? Where in the genetic code does it say this? What physical design trait do women have that says that they're not "supposed" to grow large muscles? They have the same muscles sets that men do... pectorals, biceps, triceps, quads, abs. So why are men "designed" to have large muscles, and women are not?

In the part of the genetic code that restricts the release of testosterone into the body at the expense of oestrogen and progesterone.

It's not natural
Sure it is. Do lots of physical excercise, and you get big muscles. This applies universally to men and women.

No, do lots of physical exercise and you get strong muscles. If you ever go into a gym in your life, compare the body shape of the female trainers with the male. Does the difference mean the women just aren't working out enough?

their basicly making themselves part man,
Uh-huh.

You DO know the only organ distinctly male is the penis, right? Musculature has nothing to do with it? Or do you complain that women also have hands, feet, knees, hair, noses, ears (TWO of them! Gasp!), navels, bones, nerves, lungs, etc.?

Oh for crying out loud, do you really think that apart from a penis there is NO difference? Do the women in your life all have deep voices, flat chests and hairy chins?

and quite frankly, it's disgusting.
Your own personal small-minded mysoginistic opinion means two things to me: Jack and shit.

About as much as your stupidity and PC bullshit meam to the real women on the board

Johonebesus · Post by **Johonebesus** » 2003-04-24 04:28am

verilon wrote:Minus boobs plus dick = [drool]

As the picture loaded I thought, "A guy holding a sword. Even if he's naked, what's the big deal? Kind of cute for a cartoon." Then the chest appeared, and now I can't stop laughing.

Post by **Gandalf** » 2003-04-24 05:53am

Sweet Merciful Crap.

Well that was one image I didn't need.

Cpt_Frank · Post by **Cpt_Frank** » 2003-04-24 08:43am

This is funny and disturbing as hell.

Montcalm · Post by **Montcalm** » 2003-04-24 08:47am

If you don`t want to be freaked out don`t click.

Kelly Antilles · Post by **Kelly Antilles** » 2003-04-24 09:00am

*applauds innerbrat for putting the little man in his place*

Post by **Lagmonster** » 2003-04-24 09:24am

Why....WHY....WHY IS THIS HERE???

Here I was, settling in for some good ol' Science, Logic, or Morality, or maybe some neat pictures of swords, and here I'm confronted with: Captain Transexual.

I'm a very sad lagmonster.

Kelly Antilles · Post by **Kelly Antilles** » 2003-04-24 09:27am

Lagmonster wrote:Why....WHY....WHY IS THIS HERE???

Here I was, settling in for some good ol' Science, Logic, or Morality, or maybe some neat pictures of swords, and here I'm confronted with: Captain Transexual.

I'm a very sad lagmonster.

Sorry Lag. It was originally in A&P. Didn't belong there either. Perhaps we should have a mod change the thread title.

InnerBrat · Post by **InnerBrat** » 2003-04-24 09:41am

Kelly Antilles wrote:
Lagmonster wrote:Why....WHY....WHY IS THIS HERE???

Here I was, settling in for some good ol' Science, Logic, or Morality, or maybe some neat pictures of swords, and here I'm confronted with: Captain Transexual.

I'm a very sad lagmonster.
Sorry Lag. It was originally in A&P. Didn't belong there either. Perhaps we should have a mod change the thread title.

Perhaps a mod should have changed it before moving it?

(sorry, 20:20 hindsight)

P.S. Thanks, BTW, seem to be on a roll this week.

Kelly Antilles · Post by **Kelly Antilles** » 2003-04-24 09:42am

Hey, I'm new at this.

That was one of the first threads I moved.