Mon Cal SSD?

PSW: discuss Star Wars without "versus" arguments.

Moderator: Vympel

User avatar
Ender
Emperor's Hand
Posts: 11323
Joined: 2002-07-30 11:12pm
Location: Illinois

Post by Ender »

Illuminatus Primus wrote:The Viscount-class is probably near the Executor in scale.
The Viscount is only a name given, never a description. What do you base that conclusion on?
بيرني كان سيفوز
*
Nuclear Navy Warwolf
*
in omnibus requiem quaesivi, et nusquam inveni nisi in angulo cum libro
*
ipsa scientia potestas est
User avatar
phongn
Rebel Leader
Posts: 18487
Joined: 2002-07-03 11:11pm

Post by phongn »

Illuminatus Primus wrote:I don't think the MC80B (Mon Remonda) is really only 1.2 km.

I think its more likely a transposition of 2.1 km at least--remember this thing manages to outgun an Executor from certain angles.
I find this unlikely as official states that it's a minimum-time design for a heavy combatant (direct descendant of the MC80/Liberty designs). At least for the first flight it looks like they ripped out of the fighter bays in favour of massively overpowered shielding (Flight II had 4 squadrons of fighters, Flight III had eight).

The MC90s were only 1.2-km in length as well, so it's not unreasonable for have the MC80Bs of 1.2-km.
User avatar
phongn
Rebel Leader
Posts: 18487
Joined: 2002-07-03 11:11pm

Post by phongn »

Darth Garden Gnome wrote:
phongn wrote:A single MC80 (or another ship of comparable tonnage) is dead against an ISD, but it will likely inflict severe damage.
Not neccesarily. While in a straight out slug-fest with TLs I'm pretty convinced an ISD would win, once you throw fighters into the mix an MC80 could give an ISD a run for its money.
You'd need a good fighter wing, though - one well trained in "combined arms" space combat. That is not always available to the Rebellion, though it's likely to be normal for the Republic.

All things equal an MC80 should be dead.
User avatar
RTN
Youngling
Posts: 117
Joined: 2003-04-25 09:36am
Location: Edge of Forever, USA
Contact:

Post by RTN »

Ender wrote:
Illuminatus Primus wrote:The Viscount-class is probably near the Executor in scale.
The Viscount is only a name given, never a description. What do you base that conclusion on?

Where is the Viscount ever mentioned??
Seek not to bar my path, for I shall turn stone to sand with the force of my blade...I am the Guardian on the Edge of Forever!!!

"Understanding is a three-edged sword... your side, my side, and the truth." -- B5

Elder member of SpaceBattles.com
User avatar
Illuminatus Primus
All Seeing Eye
Posts: 15774
Joined: 2002-10-12 02:52pm
Location: Gainesville, Florida, USA
Contact:

Post by Illuminatus Primus »

phongn wrote:
Illuminatus Primus wrote:I don't think the MC80B (Mon Remonda) is really only 1.2 km.

I think its more likely a transposition of 2.1 km at least--remember this thing manages to outgun an Executor from certain angles.
I find this unlikely as official states that it's a minimum-time design for a heavy combatant (direct descendant of the MC80/Liberty designs). At least for the first flight it looks like they ripped out of the fighter bays in favour of massively overpowered shielding (Flight II had 4 squadrons of fighters, Flight III had eight).

The MC90s were only 1.2-km in length as well, so it's not unreasonable for have the MC80Bs of 1.2-km.
Which is my whole point--these ships are supposed to outclass ISDs and in one occasion--out gun an Executor.

The MC80B is a completely different design from the MC80 and MC80a.

The lower-limit demands that a MC80B can fire a broadside that's heavier than the forward fire of an Executor.

I think 2.1 km is reasonable--if not neccessary for at least that firepower.

At Endor, 3.8 km and 1.4 km cruisers were present.
"You know what the problem with Hollywood is. They make shit. Unbelievable. Unremarkable. Shit." - Gabriel Shear, Swordfish

"This statement, in its utterly clueless hubristic stupidity, cannot be improved upon. I merely quote it in admiration of its perfection." - Garibaldi in reply to an incredibly stupid post.

The Fifth Illuminatus Primus | Warsie | Skeptical Empiricist | Florida Gator | Sustainability Advocate | Libertarian Socialist |
Image
User avatar
Ender
Emperor's Hand
Posts: 11323
Joined: 2002-07-30 11:12pm
Location: Illinois

Post by Ender »

RTN wrote:
Ender wrote:
Illuminatus Primus wrote:The Viscount-class is probably near the Executor in scale.
The Viscount is only a name given, never a description. What do you base that conclusion on?

Where is the Viscount ever mentioned??
IN Hero's trial, they mention increasing production of Viscount class Star Defenders from the Corellisn yard.
بيرني كان سيفوز
*
Nuclear Navy Warwolf
*
in omnibus requiem quaesivi, et nusquam inveni nisi in angulo cum libro
*
ipsa scientia potestas est
User avatar
Illuminatus Primus
All Seeing Eye
Posts: 15774
Joined: 2002-10-12 02:52pm
Location: Gainesville, Florida, USA
Contact:

Post by Illuminatus Primus »

Ender wrote:
Illuminatus Primus wrote:The Viscount-class is probably near the Executor in scale.
The Viscount is only a name given, never a description. What do you base that conclusion on?
Mediator, described as a Mon Calamari battlecruiser. This means that it is almost certainly larger, more heavily armed and armoured than the two types of cruisers at the Battle of Endor, and possibly approaching the size of Home One (depending on whether it's considered a battlesruiser, battleship or commandship in Mon Calamari terms). The use of the term "battlecruiser" is consistent throughout Vector Prime.
Viscount; Mon Calamari Star Defender; substantially larger than a battlecruiser, which should be appreciably larger than a cruiser or destroyer. The previously largest Mon Calamari ship loaned to the Rebel Alliance or New Republic was Home One at almost 4km long. Viscount ought, implicitly, to be appreciably longer. It is probably in excess of six kilometres long and may even compare to great human-designed warships such as the Executor (almost 18km long). This indicates the Republic has finally started building larger warships, possibly having learned a lesson from The Black Fleet Crisis.
Viscount is no shorter than Home One, and the battlecruiser Mediator is about half its length, therefore Mediator must be about 2km long or more.

The term "Star Defender" is a novelty; it probably serves as a brand name for what is a battleship or commandship.
Vector Prime wrote:and it was spectacular. Like all Mon Calamari ships, this one was unique, an artwork, sleek and flowing, and ultimately deadly. It was the largest ship ever produced on the watery world, nearly twice the size of the battle cruiser they had left behind between Osarian and Rhommamool, and the first Mon Calamari Star Defender produced for the New Republic fleet.
emphasis mine.
"You know what the problem with Hollywood is. They make shit. Unbelievable. Unremarkable. Shit." - Gabriel Shear, Swordfish

"This statement, in its utterly clueless hubristic stupidity, cannot be improved upon. I merely quote it in admiration of its perfection." - Garibaldi in reply to an incredibly stupid post.

The Fifth Illuminatus Primus | Warsie | Skeptical Empiricist | Florida Gator | Sustainability Advocate | Libertarian Socialist |
Image
User avatar
Ender
Emperor's Hand
Posts: 11323
Joined: 2002-07-30 11:12pm
Location: Illinois

Post by Ender »

Alot of that is Dr. Saxton's speculation based on the terms of battlecruiser and cruiser and destroyer, all of which are used interchangebly throughout all thge novels. While I agree the Viscount is probably similar to Home One's size, I see no reason to think it is anything comparable to the Executor's scale.
بيرني كان سيفوز
*
Nuclear Navy Warwolf
*
in omnibus requiem quaesivi, et nusquam inveni nisi in angulo cum libro
*
ipsa scientia potestas est
User avatar
Illuminatus Primus
All Seeing Eye
Posts: 15774
Joined: 2002-10-12 02:52pm
Location: Gainesville, Florida, USA
Contact:

Post by Illuminatus Primus »

Ender wrote:Alot of that is Dr. Saxton's speculation based on the terms of battlecruiser and cruiser and destroyer, all of which are used interchangebly throughout all thge novels.
Perhaps that's because that's what those words mean. The EU's moronic nomenclature fuck ups doesn't change the fact that destroyers are called destroyers in SW, the corporate equivalent to a battleship is called a battleship, and the commandship is called just that, a commandship.

Anyway:

The New Republic does now control the majority of the galaxy and most patrol all of it. Its a galactic-spanning organization--and using little starliner scale cruisers as its backbone does not seem reasonable.

There's no reason to assume that is only Home One's size.

Thinking of canon itself, we see a bunch of Mon Cal cruisers and one larger craft--which assuming as little as possible must be at least a battlecruiser--which makes the Mediator Home One's size, and the Viscount 2 x Home One.
"You know what the problem with Hollywood is. They make shit. Unbelievable. Unremarkable. Shit." - Gabriel Shear, Swordfish

"This statement, in its utterly clueless hubristic stupidity, cannot be improved upon. I merely quote it in admiration of its perfection." - Garibaldi in reply to an incredibly stupid post.

The Fifth Illuminatus Primus | Warsie | Skeptical Empiricist | Florida Gator | Sustainability Advocate | Libertarian Socialist |
Image
User avatar
RTN
Youngling
Posts: 117
Joined: 2003-04-25 09:36am
Location: Edge of Forever, USA
Contact:

Post by RTN »

Illuminatus Primus wrote:
Ender wrote:Alot of that is Dr. Saxton's speculation based on the terms of battlecruiser and cruiser and destroyer, all of which are used interchangebly throughout all thge novels.
Perhaps that's because that's what those words mean. The EU's moronic nomenclature fuck ups doesn't change the fact that destroyers are called destroyers in SW, the corporate equivalent to a battleship is called a battleship, and the commandship is called just that, a commandship.

Anyway:

The New Republic does now control the majority of the galaxy and most patrol all of it. Its a galactic-spanning organization--and using little starliner scale cruisers as its backbone does not seem reasonable.

There's no reason to assume that is only Home One's size.

Thinking of canon itself, we see a bunch of Mon Cal cruisers and one larger craft--which assuming as little as possible must be at least a battlecruiser--which makes the Mediator Home One's size, and the Viscount 2 x Home One.
I haven't had time to read a SW novel in about 6 years but uh... didn't the Yuuzhan Vong (spelling?) take Coruscant?
Seek not to bar my path, for I shall turn stone to sand with the force of my blade...I am the Guardian on the Edge of Forever!!!

"Understanding is a three-edged sword... your side, my side, and the truth." -- B5

Elder member of SpaceBattles.com
User avatar
Kuja
The Dark Messenger
Posts: 19322
Joined: 2002-07-11 12:05am
Location: AZ

Post by Kuja »

RTN wrote: I haven't had time to read a SW novel in about 6 years but uh... didn't the Yuuzhan Vong (spelling?) take Coruscant?
After about a year (IIRC) of fighting, which itself was several years after the Empire finally surrendered.
Image
JADAFETWA
User avatar
Illuminatus Primus
All Seeing Eye
Posts: 15774
Joined: 2002-10-12 02:52pm
Location: Gainesville, Florida, USA
Contact:

Post by Illuminatus Primus »

Over a year. 1.5-2 years.
"You know what the problem with Hollywood is. They make shit. Unbelievable. Unremarkable. Shit." - Gabriel Shear, Swordfish

"This statement, in its utterly clueless hubristic stupidity, cannot be improved upon. I merely quote it in admiration of its perfection." - Garibaldi in reply to an incredibly stupid post.

The Fifth Illuminatus Primus | Warsie | Skeptical Empiricist | Florida Gator | Sustainability Advocate | Libertarian Socialist |
Image
User avatar
Peregrin Toker
Emperor's Hand
Posts: 8609
Joined: 2002-07-04 10:57am
Location: Denmark
Contact:

Post by Peregrin Toker »

I don't think the Viscount-class is as absolutely enormous as the Executor, which was designed more for show than anything else. But it is certainly many times bigger than an ISD. Maybe it's the size of Admiral Giel's battleship?
"Hi there, would you like to have a cookie?"

"No, actually I would HATE to have a cookie, you vapid waste of inedible flesh!"
User avatar
RTN
Youngling
Posts: 117
Joined: 2003-04-25 09:36am
Location: Edge of Forever, USA
Contact:

Post by RTN »

Did the book ever mention what the Viscount class was armed with?
Seek not to bar my path, for I shall turn stone to sand with the force of my blade...I am the Guardian on the Edge of Forever!!!

"Understanding is a three-edged sword... your side, my side, and the truth." -- B5

Elder member of SpaceBattles.com
User avatar
Lord Pounder
Pretty Hate Machine
Posts: 9695
Joined: 2002-11-19 04:40pm
Location: Belfast, unfortunately
Contact:

Post by Lord Pounder »

IIRC a standard Mon Cal cruiser was stated to be no bigger or better armed than a Victory Class Destroyer. I hope that helps the debate it bit. One on One an ISD can kill easily anything up to MC80a. When it comes to the MC80b and up thats more in the air due to conflicting reports over the size and weaponary. But when it comes to Fighters on Mon Cals i've never heard of a Moncal carrying more than 4 squadrons.
RIP Yosemite Bear
Gone, Never Forgotten
User avatar
phongn
Rebel Leader
Posts: 18487
Joined: 2002-07-03 11:11pm

Post by phongn »

Darth Pounder wrote:IIRC a standard Mon Cal cruiser was stated to be no bigger or better armed than a Victory Class Destroyer. I hope that helps the debate it bit. One on One an ISD can kill easily anything up to MC80a. When it comes to the MC80b and up thats more in the air due to conflicting reports over the size and weaponary. But when it comes to Fighters on Mon Cals i've never heard of a Moncal carrying more than 4 squadrons.
Home One had 10 squadrons. MC80[A] and Liberty seemed to have 3 squadrons. MC80B had 0, 4 or 8 squadrons depending on which flight. MC90 had 6 squadrons.
User avatar
RTN
Youngling
Posts: 117
Joined: 2003-04-25 09:36am
Location: Edge of Forever, USA
Contact:

Post by RTN »

Darth Pounder wrote:IIRC a standard Mon Cal cruiser was stated to be no bigger or better armed than a Victory Class Destroyer. I hope that helps the debate it bit. One on One an ISD can kill easily anything up to MC80a. When it comes to the MC80b and up thats more in the air due to conflicting reports over the size and weaponary. But when it comes to Fighters on Mon Cals i've never heard of a Moncal carrying more than 4 squadrons.
Yeah, but by design a Victory could win an ISD due to longer range weaponry -- even with its less firepower. The only reason it wouldn't would be fighter adn bomber inferiority to ISD.
Seek not to bar my path, for I shall turn stone to sand with the force of my blade...I am the Guardian on the Edge of Forever!!!

"Understanding is a three-edged sword... your side, my side, and the truth." -- B5

Elder member of SpaceBattles.com
User avatar
Vertigo1
Defender of the Night
Posts: 4720
Joined: 2002-08-12 12:47am
Location: Tennessee, USA
Contact:

Post by Vertigo1 »

Illuminatus Primus wrote:Over a year. 1.5-2 years.
Thats pretty close to it. Jania was 16 when she joined Rouge Squadron IIRC, and she's 18 now.
"I once asked Rebecca to sing Happy Birthday to me during sex. That was funny, especially since I timed my thrusts to sync up with the words. And yes, it was my birthday." - Darth Wong

Leader of the SD.Net Gargoyle Clan | Spacebattles Firstone | Twitter
Kazuaki Shimazaki
Jedi Council Member
Posts: 2355
Joined: 2002-07-05 09:27pm
Contact:

Hard to support that conclusion...

Post by Kazuaki Shimazaki »

RTN wrote:Yeah, but by design a Victory could win an ISD due to longer range weaponry -- even with its less firepower. The only reason it wouldn't would be fighter adn bomber inferiority to ISD.
The concussion missiles RMAX out at 60 WEG space units. That's more than the ion cannons (50) but not the TLs (75.) And the Victory-I and Victory-II are inferior in all other categories. Can you justify your claim of how the Victory has "longer range?"

And if anything could possibly have longer range, it is almost certainly the concussion missiles. Otherwise, both sides got TLs and ion, and the ISD got more modern ones. It is hard to conceive they'd have less firing range considering their greater power.
JodoForce
Village Idiot
Posts: 1084
Joined: 2003-02-15 04:27am

Post by JodoForce »

Has the ventral vulnerability of ISDs ever been really exploited in canon? That would help the 'ISD--Serious design flaw' thread... :)
User avatar
Ingersoll
Youngling
Posts: 62
Joined: 2002-10-16 12:54am

Post by Ingersoll »

"Some of you still don't seem to realize how well equipped and organized the Rebel Alliance is. Their vessels are excellent, their pilots better. And they are propelled by something more powerful than mere engines: this perverse, reactionary fanaticism of theirs. They're more dangerous than most of you realize."

General Tagge, Episode 4 novel
User avatar
Admiral Johnason
Sith Devotee
Posts: 2552
Joined: 2003-01-11 05:06pm
Location: The Rebel cruiser Defender

Post by Admiral Johnason »

Ingersoll wrote:"Some of you still don't seem to realize how well equipped and organized the Rebel Alliance is. Their vessels are excellent, their pilots better. And they are propelled by something more powerful than mere engines: this perverse, reactionary fanaticism of theirs. They're more dangerous than most of you realize."

General Tagge, Episode 4 novel
You forgot a few things, those peskey Skywalkers and those crazy Solos
Liberals for Nixon in 3000: Nixon... with carisma and a shiny robot body.

never negoiate out of fear, but never fear to negoiate.

Captian America- Justice League

HAB submarine commander-
"We'll break you of your fear of water."
Post Reply