Is this a way that Treknology could defeat a Jedi?

SWvST: the subject of the main site.

Moderator: Vympel

User avatar
Ted C
Sith Marauder
Posts: 4486
Joined: 2002-07-07 11:00am
Location: Nashville, TN
Contact:

Post by Ted C »

neoolong wrote:Actually, I meant it to show that transporters do work on moving targets.
The sniper rifle is not evidence of such a thing occuring. It acts on the bullet, which is located in the barrel of the weapon. While not actually motionless, its location is extremely easy to determine. From there it simply rematerializes the bullet straight in front of the barrel at a distance determined by the internal sensor system. It does not transport the bullet directly into the body of a moving target.
"This is supposed to be a happy occasion... Let's not bicker and argue about who killed who."
-- The King of Swamp Castle, Monty Python and the Holy Grail

"Nothing of consequence happened today. " -- Diary of King George III, July 4, 1776

"This is not bad; this is a conspiracy to remove happiness from existence. It seeks to wrap its hedgehog hand around the still beating heart of the personification of good and squeeze until it is stilled."
-- Chuck Sonnenburg on Voyager's "Elogium"
User avatar
neoolong
Dead Sexy 'Shroom
Posts: 13180
Joined: 2002-08-29 10:01pm
Location: California

Post by neoolong »

I never said you could transport it into someone's body.

It was in response to "I've never seen a Trek transporter transport a moving target."
Member of the BotM. @( !.! )@
User avatar
Darth Garden Gnome
Official SD.Net Lawn Ornament
Posts: 6029
Joined: 2002-07-08 02:35am
Location: Some where near a mailbox

Post by Darth Garden Gnome »

And when have we seen transporters so closely manipulate a being cell structure?
Leader of the Secret Gnome Revolution
User avatar
Darth Fanboy
DUH! WINNING!
Posts: 11182
Joined: 2002-09-20 05:25am
Location: Mars, where I am a totally bitchin' rockstar.

Post by Darth Fanboy »

Darth Garden Gnome wrote:And when have we seen transporters so closely manipulate a being cell structure?
well technically replicators and transporters work on the same principles, and replicators work on that level (am i right on that?)

I dont think you can beam things out of the bloodstream though, and I think thats just treknoogy wanking at its worst, the transporter is not the great savior of Trek vs. SW. Evidence u ask? Well if someone is being beamed up to a ship and someone touches them during transport they go along with them. eliciting a "where the hell am I" response. If that happens with two distinct individuals then the transporter will have a helluva time beaming blood or parts of said blood out of a body.
"If it's true that our species is alone in the universe, then I'd have to say that the universe aimed rather low and settled for very little."
-George Carlin (1937-2008)

"Have some of you Americans actually seen Football? Of course there are 0-0 draws but that doesn't make them any less exciting."
-Dr Roberts, with quite possibly the dumbest thing ever said in 10 years of SDNet.
User avatar
Darth Servo
Emperor's Hand
Posts: 8805
Joined: 2002-10-10 06:12pm
Location: Satellite of Love

Post by Darth Servo »

Darth Garden Gnome wrote:And when have we seen transporters so closely manipulate a being cell structure?
Unnatural Selection. A transporter can re-write your DNA with proper tweeking.

[Link fixed- in future, put a "+" sign between the words in the episode name- DW]
"everytime a person is born the Earth weighs just a little more."--DMJ on StarTrek.com
"You see now you are using your thinking and that is not a good thing!" DMJay on StarTrek.com

"Watching Sarli argue with Vympel, Stas, Schatten and the others is as bizarre as the idea of the 40-year-old Virgin telling Hugh Hefner that Hef knows nothing about pussy, and that he is the expert."--Elfdart
Raoul Duke, Jr.
BANNED
Posts: 3791
Joined: 2002-09-25 06:59pm
Location: Suckling At The Teat Of Missmanners

Post by Raoul Duke, Jr. »

Darth Fanboy wrote:
Darth Garden Gnome wrote:And when have we seen transporters so closely manipulate a being cell structure?
well technically replicators and transporters work on the same principles, and replicators work on that level (am i right on that?)
True. In fact, IIRC, the replicator is actually a less sophisticated variation on the technology.
Howedar
Emperor's Thumb
Posts: 12472
Joined: 2002-07-03 05:06pm
Location: St. Paul, MN

Post by Howedar »

Would it not be possible to transport a Jedi along with a large area of air around him, similar to the whales in ST4? Perhaps that would keep him in.
Howedar is no longer here. Need to talk to him? Talk to Pick.
Howedar
Emperor's Thumb
Posts: 12472
Joined: 2002-07-03 05:06pm
Location: St. Paul, MN

Post by Howedar »

Darth Wong wrote:Second, we are disregarding the fact that a sufficiently large volume of firepower would defeat even a Jedi, so why play games?
I think its a forgone conclusion that nobody considers worth the time to type. Even the most rabid idiotic Wars fan would not claim that several hundred photon torpedos would not kill a Jedi. If you add enough energy, you can kill a lot of things.
Howedar is no longer here. Need to talk to him? Talk to Pick.
User avatar
Darth Fanboy
DUH! WINNING!
Posts: 11182
Joined: 2002-09-20 05:25am
Location: Mars, where I am a totally bitchin' rockstar.

Post by Darth Fanboy »

Darth Wong wrote:Second, we are disregarding the fact that a sufficiently large volume of firepower would defeat even a Jedi, so why play games?
Because many of the ignorant and/or uneducated that believe in STs technological superiority always point to the transporters as a key if not the key) argument to back their claim.

Transporters as a weapon is ridiculous due to their inherent inability to work in technobabble storms, around cosmic energy fields, or even during a Spring Shower if the clouds aren't coated in a methyoxillidatic susbtance that increases field resonancy to the point where maximum subspace cohesion can occur.
"If it's true that our species is alone in the universe, then I'd have to say that the universe aimed rather low and settled for very little."
-George Carlin (1937-2008)

"Have some of you Americans actually seen Football? Of course there are 0-0 draws but that doesn't make them any less exciting."
-Dr Roberts, with quite possibly the dumbest thing ever said in 10 years of SDNet.
User avatar
Lord Poe
Sith Apprentice
Posts: 6988
Joined: 2002-07-14 03:15am
Location: Callyfornia
Contact:

Post by Lord Poe »

Darth Servo wrote: Unnatural Selection. A transporter can re-write your DNA with proper tweeking.
Yet in "The Enemy", they can't replicate "ribsomes"
Image

"Brian, if I parked a supertanker in Central Park, painted it neon orange, and set it on fire, it would be less obvious than your stupidity." --RedImperator
User avatar
Master of Ossus
Darkest Knight
Posts: 18213
Joined: 2002-07-11 01:35am
Location: California

Post by Master of Ossus »

neoolong wrote:I never said you could transport it into someone's body.

It was in response to "I've never seen a Trek transporter transport a moving target."
It happened in ST:Nemesis a couple of times. Picard looked shocked when he was beamed out by the Remans, and then the E-E beamed up the little tactical fighter that Picard and Data were escaping from Skippy's fortress in.
"Sometimes I think you WANT us to fail." "Shut up, just shut up!" -Two Guys from Kabul

Latinum Star Recipient; Hacker's Cross Award Winner

"one soler flar can vapririze the planit or malt the nickl in lass than millasacit" -Bagara1000

"Happiness is just a Flaming Moe away."
User avatar
Darth Servo
Emperor's Hand
Posts: 8805
Joined: 2002-10-10 06:12pm
Location: Satellite of Love

Post by Darth Servo »

Lord Poe wrote:
Darth Servo wrote: Unnatural Selection. A transporter can re-write your DNA with proper tweeking.
Yet in "The Enemy", they can't replicate "ribsomes"
Hence the phrase "proper tweeking" which is basically any unreliable technobabble solution.
"everytime a person is born the Earth weighs just a little more."--DMJ on StarTrek.com
"You see now you are using your thinking and that is not a good thing!" DMJay on StarTrek.com

"Watching Sarli argue with Vympel, Stas, Schatten and the others is as bizarre as the idea of the 40-year-old Virgin telling Hugh Hefner that Hef knows nothing about pussy, and that he is the expert."--Elfdart
User avatar
Darth Wong
Sith Lord
Sith Lord
Posts: 70028
Joined: 2002-07-03 12:25am
Location: Toronto, Canada
Contact:

Post by Darth Wong »

Could the Trekkies who think transporters can do this please find me the episode in which the transporter was used to instantly remove all of the Borg nanoprobes from an assimilated crewman's body?
Image
"It's not evil for God to do it. Or for someone to do it at God's command."- Jonathan Boyd on baby-killing

"you guys are fascinated with the use of those "rules of logic" to the extent that you don't really want to discussus anything."- GC

"I do not believe Russian Roulette is a stupid act" - Embracer of Darkness

"Viagra commercials appear to save lives" - tharkûn on US health care.

http://www.stardestroyer.net/Mike/RantMode/Blurbs.html
User avatar
Col. Crackpot
That Obnoxious Guy
Posts: 10228
Joined: 2002-10-28 05:04pm
Location: Rhode Island
Contact:

Post by Col. Crackpot »

Darth Wong wrote:Could the Trekkies who think transporters can do this please find me the episode in which the transporter was used to instantly remove all of the Borg nanoprobes from an assimilated crewman's body?
they can't, because it has never happened. IIRC in FC (and i'm pretty damn sure) Picard still has borg implants in his body that are impossible to remove.
"This business will get out of control. It will get out of control and we’ll be lucky to live through it.” -Tom Clancy
User avatar
Darth Servo
Emperor's Hand
Posts: 8805
Joined: 2002-10-10 06:12pm
Location: Satellite of Love

Post by Darth Servo »

Darth Wong wrote:Could the Trekkies who think transporters can do this please find me the episode in which the transporter was used to instantly remove all of the Borg nanoprobes from an assimilated crewman's body?
One better: In "Conspiracy" not only did they not even attempt to use the transporters to remove the parasite controling Admiral Quinn, their renouned bio-filters didn't even detect the thing, even though Dr. Crusher's medical equipment had no problem scanning it.

Funny--there are no entries for this episode in the database.
"everytime a person is born the Earth weighs just a little more."--DMJ on StarTrek.com
"You see now you are using your thinking and that is not a good thing!" DMJay on StarTrek.com

"Watching Sarli argue with Vympel, Stas, Schatten and the others is as bizarre as the idea of the 40-year-old Virgin telling Hugh Hefner that Hef knows nothing about pussy, and that he is the expert."--Elfdart
User avatar
neoolong
Dead Sexy 'Shroom
Posts: 13180
Joined: 2002-08-29 10:01pm
Location: California

Post by neoolong »

Col. Crackpot wrote:
Darth Wong wrote:Could the Trekkies who think transporters can do this please find me the episode in which the transporter was used to instantly remove all of the Borg nanoprobes from an assimilated crewman's body?
they can't, because it has never happened. IIRC in FC (and i'm pretty damn sure) Picard still has borg implants in his body that are impossible to remove.
Isn't the usual explanation that they need the parts to survive? Kind of like why Seven still has some Borg parts?

I still don't think it's possible though.
Member of the BotM. @( !.! )@
User avatar
Sea Skimmer
Yankee Capitalist Air Pirate
Posts: 37390
Joined: 2002-07-03 11:49pm
Location: Passchendaele City, HAB

Post by Sea Skimmer »

Col. Crackpot wrote:
they can't, because it has never happened. IIRC in FC (and i'm pretty damn sure) Picard still has borg implants in his body that are impossible to remove.
Yes, he says there implants are still throughout body.
"This cult of special forces is as sensible as to form a Royal Corps of Tree Climbers and say that no soldier who does not wear its green hat with a bunch of oak leaves stuck in it should be expected to climb a tree"
— Field Marshal William Slim 1956
User avatar
Col. Crackpot
That Obnoxious Guy
Posts: 10228
Joined: 2002-10-28 05:04pm
Location: Rhode Island
Contact:

Post by Col. Crackpot »

neoolong wrote:
Col. Crackpot wrote:
Darth Wong wrote:Could the Trekkies who think transporters can do this please find me the episode in which the transporter was used to instantly remove all of the Borg nanoprobes from an assimilated crewman's body?
they can't, because it has never happened. IIRC in FC (and i'm pretty damn sure) Picard still has borg implants in his body that are impossible to remove.
Isn't the usual explanation that they need the parts to survive? Kind of like why Seven still has some Borg parts?

I still don't think it's possible though.
i think whether or not the parts are needed to survive is relevant. but not in the way you are thinking. the the question is do the feddie transporters have the ability to remove all borg nanoprobes from someones body. the answer to that is no,or at best not without killing the infected person. if they had this ability Picard would be Borg-free. There was a TNG episode IIRC where nanites were removed from crewmembers using, at least in part, the transporters. most likely this claim is a result of a leap in logic and an assumption that if the transporters can remove nanites then the transporter can remove all little mechanical thingies and thingamabobs from someone's body.
"This business will get out of control. It will get out of control and we’ll be lucky to live through it.” -Tom Clancy
User avatar
Darth Wong
Sith Lord
Sith Lord
Posts: 70028
Joined: 2002-07-03 12:25am
Location: Toronto, Canada
Contact:

Post by Darth Wong »

If we were to believe all of the Trekkie claims about transporters and replicators being able to remove impurities, reconstruct damaged organs from DNA, fabricate organs etc., then Picard would have his original heart and not a single Borg implant in his body.

The funny thing is that Trekkies won't admit that they overestimate the transporter. The FACT is that Roga Danar was able to break a transporter lock and foil a transport attempt by pushing against it, and all of the crying in the world won't change that fact, nor will it change the fact that throughout the history of armed Trek conflict, hostile boarding parties on starships are never instantly beamed out into space or into holding areas, despite Trekkie predictions.
Image
"It's not evil for God to do it. Or for someone to do it at God's command."- Jonathan Boyd on baby-killing

"you guys are fascinated with the use of those "rules of logic" to the extent that you don't really want to discussus anything."- GC

"I do not believe Russian Roulette is a stupid act" - Embracer of Darkness

"Viagra commercials appear to save lives" - tharkûn on US health care.

http://www.stardestroyer.net/Mike/RantMode/Blurbs.html
User avatar
Grand Admiral Thrawn
Ruthless Imperial Tyrant
Posts: 5755
Joined: 2002-07-03 06:11pm
Location: Canada

Post by Grand Admiral Thrawn »

Lord Poe wrote:
Darth Servo wrote: Unnatural Selection. A transporter can re-write your DNA with proper tweeking.
Yet in "The Enemy", they can't replicate "ribsomes"

Nor a vaccine in Code of Honor.
"You know, I was God once."
"Yes, I saw. You were doing well, until everyone died."
Bender and God, Futurama
User avatar
Isolder74
Official SD.Net Ace of Cakes
Posts: 6762
Joined: 2002-07-10 01:16am
Location: Weber State of Construction University
Contact:

Post by Isolder74 »

Darth Wong wrote:The funny thing is that Trekkies won't admit that they overestimate the transporter. The FACT is that Roga Danar was able to break a transporter lock and foil a transport attempt by pushing against it, and all of the crying in the world won't change that fact, nor will it change the fact that throughout the history of armed Trek conflict, hostile boarding parties on starships are never instantly beamed out into space or into holding areas, despite Trekkie predictions.
There is only one instance of beaming intruders into a holding area. Its Rascals. But this required sneeking up and placing a federation com thing onto them in order to do it. Not much good if you ask me.
Hapan Battle Dragons Rule!
When you want peace prepare for war! --Confusious
That was disapointing ..Should we show this Federation how to build a ship so we may have worthy foes? Typhonis 1
The Prince of The Writer's Guild|HAB Spacewolf Tank General| God Bless America!
Joe Momma
Jedi Knight
Posts: 684
Joined: 2002-12-15 06:01pm

Post by Joe Momma »

Isolder74 wrote:There is only one instance of beaming intruders into a holding area. Its Rascals. But this required sneeking up and placing a federation com thing onto them in order to do it. Not much good if you ask me.
Shit, now we have to wait for rabid Trekkies to scream that Data and Worf could transport Jedi by nailing them with combadges tossed like throwing stars.* After all, the Feds have ninja suits so they must be trained in the dark arts.

*Well, actually Data was supposed to do this in a deleted scene from Insurrection, breaking a drone open and throwing the isolinear tags at So'na troops to get them inadvertantly transported away.

-- Joe Momma

Yeah, I know that the Jedi would just deflect or dodge them anyway...
It's okay to kiss a nun; just don't get into the habit.
User avatar
General G
Youngling
Posts: 83
Joined: 2002-07-04 10:28pm

Post by General G »

Is the Transporter really necessary ? A few hundred redshirts moving in at the Jedi from all directions while fireing generic phaser rifles should be able to get a hit. Jedi aren’t exactly immune to a large number of weapons being fire at them at once, as shown in AOTC. The phasers may have a slower rate of fire than battledroids’s guns but a large number of them would be able to bring down a Jedi.
Former Ruler of the Terran Alliance
Member of the Iron Brigade.
User avatar
Darth Servo
Emperor's Hand
Posts: 8805
Joined: 2002-10-10 06:12pm
Location: Satellite of Love

Post by Darth Servo »

General G wrote:Is the Transporter really necessary ? A few hundred redshirts moving in at the Jedi from all directions while fireing generic phaser rifles should be able to get a hit. Jedi aren’t exactly immune to a large number of weapons being fire at them at once, as shown in AOTC. The phasers may have a slower rate of fire than battledroids’s guns but a large number of them would be able to bring down a Jedi.
You forgot to explain how a jedi would allow himself to get into that situation in the first place.
"everytime a person is born the Earth weighs just a little more."--DMJ on StarTrek.com
"You see now you are using your thinking and that is not a good thing!" DMJay on StarTrek.com

"Watching Sarli argue with Vympel, Stas, Schatten and the others is as bizarre as the idea of the 40-year-old Virgin telling Hugh Hefner that Hef knows nothing about pussy, and that he is the expert."--Elfdart
User avatar
Admiral Valdemar
Outside Context Problem
Posts: 31572
Joined: 2002-07-04 07:17pm
Location: UK

Post by Admiral Valdemar »

General G wrote:Is the Transporter really necessary ? A few hundred redshirts moving in at the Jedi from all directions while fireing generic phaser rifles should be able to get a hit. Jedi aren’t exactly immune to a large number of weapons being fire at them at once, as shown in AOTC. The phasers may have a slower rate of fire than battledroids’s guns but a large number of them would be able to bring down a Jedi.
That's assuming by some miracle they don't all shoot one another by accident or forget to continue breathing as they feel victory coming on.
Post Reply