Illuminatus Primus wrote:SuperSNIP!
Guess I have to do this Wong-style. I simply don't have the time to go through all this, not to mention other people's posts.
Challenge #1: Status of the Imperial government.
The existence of orbital defence batteries or vast ground armies is not necessary to explain certain events in Star Trek. The existence of an Imperial government closely controlled by Thrawn
is. It is called to rationalize. Hard to understand?
So, if Thrawn
didn’t communicate with his government regularly and kept a solid grip on it, explain to me why no one ever told Thrawn to go fuck himself and disposed of him before he became too popular. Explain why no one ever tried to screw up his campaign by delaying supplies. Explain why Thrawn’s government
never gave him any problems.
Challenge #2: Other officers.
In real life modern warfare requires several high-ranking officers under one commander-in-chief. Hard to understand? This make your assumptions that Thrawn either didn’t have any such officers or didn’t communicate with them very often is ridiculous at best, especially since we are talking about front that’s hundreds of lightyears long. No matter Thrawn’s fleet count, the New Republic must have had hundreds, even thousands of warships. Thrawn couldn’t possibly have been present at every battle; therefore it follows that he must have had competent commanders in charge of those battles.
So, if Thrawn didn’t communicate with those officers often, explain why the New Republic was retreating on all fronts, despite fighting nail, tooth and claw. Explain why they never scored one victory of any magnitude until Bilbringi. Explain why the New Republic
still lost Corusant afterward.
Challenge #3: Thrawn & strategy.
That Thrawn was an idiot when it came to strategy has to be the silliest of your arguments. And for your stupid ‘rebels are idiots too’-argument to hold water, virtually
all officers and government officials in
both the Empire
and the Republic would have to be idiots. Do I
really need to point out what’s wrong with this?
So explain how Thrawn was able to coordinate a galaxy-wide offensive that brought the New Republic down to its knees. Explain how he was able to craft a battle plan that stretched several years into the future, and has been described as ‘astonishingly detailed’. Explain why he was made into a Grand Admiral when Admirals are usually required to make huge strategic decisions.
It seems to me that you are buying into the usual anti-Thrawn argument: “Uh, Thrawn studied art to understand his enemies, that’s stupid. Therefore Thrawn is stupid.” You ignore that Thrawn couldn’t possibly have maintained his war effort without at least a
marginally functioning government and dozens, even hundreds of battle fleets following a carefully laid plan. All this in order to keep your pet theory.
