Causality calculator

SLAM: debunk creationism, pseudoscience, and superstitions. Discuss logic and morality.

Moderator: Alyrium Denryle

Post Reply
User avatar
His Divine Shadow
Commence Primary Ignition
Posts: 12791
Joined: 2002-07-03 07:22am
Location: Finland, west coast

Causality calculator

Post by His Divine Shadow »

http://www.hisdivineshadow.com/misc/causality.asp

I've made a causality calculator, it assumes we can send FTL signals from system to system, this calculator uses the relative velocity of the two systems and speed of the transmission to see wheter there will be a causality violation.

I am not entierly sure about the workings here, since I am a newbie at this, but if you get a negative number as the reply, there will be a causality violation.

However you can only get one of those if the transmission and recieving points are moving towards each other(thats when you use a negative number).
If they move away you use a positive number and you never get a negative number, so either it means you can go infinitely fast if the two locations move away from each other or I have missed something.
Those who beat their swords into plowshares will plow for those who did not.
User avatar
Dalton
For Those About to Rock We Salute You
For Those About to Rock We Salute You
Posts: 22640
Joined: 2002-07-03 06:16pm
Location: New York, the Fuck You State
Contact:

Post by Dalton »

Needs better documentation.
Image
Image
To Absent Friends
Dalton | Admin Smash | Knight of the Order of SDN

"y = mx + bro" - Surlethe
"You try THAT shit again, kid, and I will mod you. I will
mod you so hard, you'll wish I were Dalton." - Lagmonster

May the way of the Hero lead to the Triforce.
User avatar
His Divine Shadow
Commence Primary Ignition
Posts: 12791
Joined: 2002-07-03 07:22am
Location: Finland, west coast

Post by His Divine Shadow »

Dalton wrote:Needs better documentation.
Yeah, but I'm concerned about the code and wheter anyone with the know-how can find any faults in it.
Those who beat their swords into plowshares will plow for those who did not.
User avatar
kojikun
BANNED
Posts: 9663
Joined: 2002-07-04 12:23am
Contact:

Post by kojikun »

causality can never be violated so long as the time it takes to travel the distance is greater then the time the signal was sent back in time.
Sì! Abbiamo un' anima! Ma è fatta di tanti piccoli robot.
Loki
Youngling
Posts: 66
Joined: 2002-12-11 01:33am

Post by Loki »

Great! Want to explain what causality is for us unenlightened types who don't understand a word of the dictionary definition? :lol:
User avatar
His Divine Shadow
Commence Primary Ignition
Posts: 12791
Joined: 2002-07-03 07:22am
Location: Finland, west coast

Post by His Divine Shadow »

Loki wrote:Great! Want to explain what causality is for us unenlightened types who don't understand a word of the dictionary definition? :lol:
The principle of cause and effect.

This calculator will help you figure out how fast you can send a tachyonic message between two points in space without violating causality(which would mean sending the message back in time, which does not work according to saxton, it'll just generate static if so)
Those who beat their swords into plowshares will plow for those who did not.
User avatar
Batman
Emperor's Hand
Posts: 16449
Joined: 2002-07-09 04:51am
Location: Seriously thinking about moving to Marvel because so much of the DCEU stinks

Post by Batman »

Every time I run across this thread title I read 'casualty calculator' and think WTF?

I need to have some serious words with my subconcious...
'Next time I let Superman take charge, just hit me. Real hard.'
'You're a princess from a society of immortal warriors. I'm a rich kid with issues. Lots of issues.'
'No. No dating for the Batman. It might cut into your brooding time.'
'Tactically we have multiple objectives. So we need to split into teams.'-'Dibs on the Amazon!'
'Hey, we both have a Martian's phone number on our speed dial. I think I deserve the benefit of the doubt.'
'You know, for a guy with like 50 different kinds of vision, you sure are blind.'
User avatar
SPOOFE
Sith Devotee
Posts: 3174
Joined: 2002-07-03 07:34pm
Location: Woodland Hills, CA
Contact:

Post by SPOOFE »

Heh... my "casualty calculator" is my Colt .45... :D
The Great and Malignant
ClaysGhost
Jedi Knight
Posts: 613
Joined: 2002-09-13 12:41pm

Re: Causality calculator

Post by ClaysGhost »

His Divine Shadow wrote:http://www.hisdivineshadow.com/misc/causality.asp

I've made a causality calculator, it assumes we can send FTL signals from system to system, this calculator uses the relative velocity of the two systems and speed of the transmission to see wheter there will be a causality violation.
What exactly are you calculating with this? Can you be more specific as to the output? I'm worried by the way I can send a signal at many times c between two relatively stationary observers and have no casuality problems.
This calculator will help you figure out how fast you can send a tachyonic message between two points in space without violating causality
I seem to remember seeing a proof that you can't, at least not with the popular imaginary mass tachyons. Two options were available; you could send a local disturbance (message) encoded as IM tachyons, but the message would propagate at subluminal speed. However, superluminal disturbances would be non-local (infinite in extent), so you could never encode a receivable message in the first place.
(3.13, 1.49, -1.01)
User avatar
His Divine Shadow
Commence Primary Ignition
Posts: 12791
Joined: 2002-07-03 07:22am
Location: Finland, west coast

Re: Causality calculator

Post by His Divine Shadow »

ClaysGhost wrote:[What exactly are you calculating with this? Can you be more specific as to the output? I'm worried by the way I can send a signal at many times c between two relatively stationary observers and have no casuality problems.
Well at certain speeds there apparently is no causality violation, it only approaches velocites far above C, or so I am told.
I seem to remember seeing a proof that you can't, at least not with the popular imaginary mass tachyons. Two options were available; you could send a local disturbance (message) encoded as IM tachyons, but the message would propagate at subluminal speed. However, superluminal disturbances would be non-local (infinite in extent), so you could never encode a receivable message in the first place.
Hmm, this proof is?
Those who beat their swords into plowshares will plow for those who did not.
User avatar
Crayz9000
Sith Apprentice
Posts: 7329
Joined: 2002-07-03 06:39pm
Location: Improbably superpositioned
Contact:

Post by Crayz9000 »

Well, if I put in a signal travelling at 200c and a relative velocity between the two objects of -150c, I get a very small negative result.

Edit: Tried it again, this time with a signal at 100c and a relative velocity of -1. Apparently if the two objects are moving towards each other at a speed faster than light, it results in a casuality violation...

Other than that, I can't get any casuality violations, even if the signal is moving at 1E24 times the speed of light (if the objects are static.)
A Tribute to Stupidity: The Robert Scott Anderson Archive (currently offline)
John Hansen - Slightly Insane Bounty Hunter - ASVS Vets' Assoc. Class of 2000
HAB Cryptanalyst | WG - Intergalactic Alliance and Spoof Author | BotM | Cybertron | SCEF
ClaysGhost
Jedi Knight
Posts: 613
Joined: 2002-09-13 12:41pm

Re: Causality calculator

Post by ClaysGhost »

His Divine Shadow wrote: Well at certain speeds there apparently is no causality violation, it only approaches velocites far above C, or so I am told.
What exactly does the number the calculator produces correspond to?
Hmm, this proof is?
It involves solution of the Klein-Gordon equation (relativistic generalisation of the Schrodinger equation) for an imaginary mass; the consequences come from that. I'll look it out tomorrow.
(3.13, 1.49, -1.01)
User avatar
His Divine Shadow
Commence Primary Ignition
Posts: 12791
Joined: 2002-07-03 07:22am
Location: Finland, west coast

Re: Causality calculator

Post by His Divine Shadow »

ClaysGhost wrote:What exactly does the number the calculator produces correspond to?
Well if the number is negative, there is a causality violation, or so I understood, I provided you with further information of this and the development of this calculator through PM recently
It involves solution of the Klein-Gordon equation (relativistic generalisation of the Schrodinger equation) for an imaginary mass; the consequences come from that. I'll look it out tomorrow.
Maybe by then my brain will have cooled down from reading that.
Those who beat their swords into plowshares will plow for those who did not.
Post Reply