Darkstar Poll

Post by **Darth Wong** » 2002-09-08 01:01pm

OK Darkstar, fine. I challenge you to one-on-one debate. Face me, you little dipshit. I'm sick of you blathering on about how you could kick my ass if you only had a chance. Your chance is now.

2000AD · Post by **2000AD** » 2002-09-08 01:18pm

WAHOOOO!!!!

GO MIKE! GO MIKE! GO MIKE!

Master of Ossus · Post by **Master of Ossus** » 2002-09-08 01:23pm

DarkStar wrote:He repeatedly says it isn't his universe, and Cerasi says that for "the real story of Star Wars, you must turn to the films themselves - and only the films", with the rest of the canon being "very accurate depictions".

So how come you use the novelizations, radio dramas, and scripts as canon even though he specifically said that even the rest of canon is only a very accurate depiction? Your position is inconsistent with your own interpretation of his quote.

Master of Ossus · Post by **Master of Ossus** » 2002-09-08 01:26pm

Darth Wong wrote:OK Darkstar, fine. I challenge you to one-on-one debate. Face me, you little dipshit. I'm sick of you blathering on about how you could kick my ass if you only had a chance. Your chance is now.

This one's over before it begins. Watch Darth Wong utterly demolish DarkStar on his hate mail page. If DarkStar accepts the debate, that will be his greatest mistake. He clearly has no chance against Mike.

SirNitram · Post by **SirNitram** » 2002-09-08 01:36pm

Master of Ossus wrote:
Darth Wong wrote:OK Darkstar, fine. I challenge you to one-on-one debate. Face me, you little dipshit. I'm sick of you blathering on about how you could kick my ass if you only had a chance. Your chance is now.
This one's over before it begins. Watch Darth Wong utterly demolish DarkStar on his hate mail page. If DarkStar accepts the debate, that will be his greatest mistake. He clearly has no chance against Mike.

You know that. I know that. The tortoise next door knows that. But Robert doesn't.

Tsyroc · Post by **Tsyroc** » 2002-09-08 01:39pm

Mr Bean wrote:So by the poll that six delisousnals(Hmm LeRoy, Shadow, Darkstar, Lord Edam, Walper prehaps? Number six is probably from a diffrent IP of his or another as he seems to have three accounts here(probably school and the local library)

And 54 people who think he should be gone

Truthfully I was the first one of the delusional group. I thought some of the the Trek information he brought up about the holodeck bullets discussion was pretty good.

He does seem to have problems accepting that he is wrong or at least that almost no one here is going to agree with him but he also takes a lot of shit (an awful lot) when he might actually have a valid point.

Post by **Mr Bean** » 2002-09-08 01:40pm

I'm torn between saying All to Easy and imagining how the E-D would do VS the Death Star II

2000AD · Post by **2000AD** » 2002-09-08 01:56pm

i'm sure there were 11 pages last time i looked at this topic.

?????

Post by **Darth Wong** » 2002-09-08 01:58pm

I split all of that off-topic Borg KE shit to another thread ("Yet another Borg KE thread").

2000AD · Post by **2000AD** » 2002-09-08 02:02pm

Well done.

If DS accepts the challenge then .. well i'd say good luck but i don't think you'll need it.

DarkStar · Post by **DarkStar** » 2002-09-08 02:06pm

(Another thread hijacking attempt deleted. Darkstar, if you want to debate me, don't pull this guerilla "knock off a point here and there" shit and accept my challenge to one-on-one debate- Darth Wong)

Master of Ossus · Post by **Master of Ossus** » 2002-09-08 02:12pm

DarkStar wrote:(Another thread hijacking attempt deleted. Darkstar, if you want to debate me, don't pull this guerilla "knock off a point here and there" shit and accept my challenge to one-on-one debate- Darth Wong)

Are you going to accept his challenge or not? If not, then I suggest you shut up. If you are, then great. Best wishes, DumbShit.

2000AD · Post by **2000AD** » 2002-09-08 02:27pm

Why can DarkStar write a long thread hijack on borg KE shielding, but can't give a simple yes/no answer to a debate challenge?

2000AD · Post by **2000AD** » 2002-09-08 02:28pm

Wait a minute ... HOLY SH*T . someone else has voted in favour of DS!!!!!

DarkStar · Post by **DarkStar** » 2002-09-08 02:29pm

Darth Wong wrote:OK Darkstar, fine. I challenge you to one-on-one debate. Face me, you little dipshit. I'm sick of you blathering on about how you could kick my ass if you only had a chance. Your chance is now.

I said: "You wouldn't know how to be a good, decent, honest debater. You have to throw up smokescreens, attack from behind, fling insults like a monkey throwing feces, and do all sorts of other bullshit. That's your definition of one-on-one debate."

Wong replies: "Face me, you little dipshit"

Thank you for proving my point.

I said: "If you had ever, even once , led me to believe for a moment that you could refrain from such childish behavior in a debate against me, I'd tell you to bring it on. However, you wouldn't be able to hold your inner bastard in check for long. You have an image to maintain . . . disciples to impress . . . propaganda to peddle."

Wong replies: "I'm sick of you blathering on about how you could kick my ass if you only had a chance."

I'm really quite sorry, Wong, but I do believe I specifically mentioned that I'd tell you to bring it on, on the condition that you refrained from your childish behavior.

Do you think you can do that? Do you think you can focus exclusively on the arguments and the evidence, and not the man?

I'm not sure you can do that. Your disciples might be disappointed . . . you might even have to back off from an argument you can't win when you can't fling feces at the opposition as a smokescreen. If you want to have a proper debate, and if you are worried that you won't be able to keep the charlatanism to a minimum in a public debate, I'll even accept a private one.

But, if you really think you can keep a promise to maintain civility in a public forum, then let's get it on. But bear in mind that if you break that promise, it will be considered a concession.

You game?

Grand Admiral Thrawn · Post by **Grand Admiral Thrawn** » 2002-09-08 02:30pm

2000AD wrote:Wait a minute ... HOLY SH*T . someone else has voted in favour of DS!!!!!

7. There should be nine excluding DarkStar. Anyone who figures out why there should be nine gets a cookie.

2000AD · Post by **2000AD** » 2002-09-08 02:30pm

Course he's game. He made the challenge you idiot!

DarkStar · Post by **DarkStar** » 2002-09-08 02:31pm

DarkStar wrote:(Another thread hijacking attempt deleted. Darkstar, if you want to debate me, don't pull this guerilla "knock off a point here and there" shit and accept my challenge to one-on-one debate- Darth Wong)

I reply to posts one at a time, in most cases, in linear order of their appearance. I had not seen your message at that time.

In any event, if you feel it necessary to delete messages which are clearly on-topic and strong counters to the bullshit arguments you post here, that's really quite sad.

2000AD · Post by **2000AD** » 2002-09-08 02:32pm

2000AD wrote:Why can DarkStar write a long thread hijack on borg KE shielding, but can't give a simple yes/no answer to a debate challenge?

considering DS's reply to the challenge i think i might be in touch with the force a little.

2000AD · Post by **2000AD** » 2002-09-08 02:33pm

DarkStar wrote:
DarkStar wrote:(Another thread hijacking attempt deleted. Darkstar, if you want to debate me, don't pull this guerilla "knock off a point here and there" shit and accept my challenge to one-on-one debate- Darth Wong)
I reply to posts one at a time, in most cases, in linear order of their appearance. I had not seen your message at that time.

In any event, if you feel it necessary to delete messages which are clearly on-topic and strong counters to the bullshit arguments you post here, that's really quite sad.

And just how is a load of stuff about Borg KE shielding on topic in a topic named Darkstar Poll?

SirNitram · Post by **SirNitram** » 2002-09-08 02:35pm

DarkStar wrote:
Darth Wong wrote:OK Darkstar, fine. I challenge you to one-on-one debate. Face me, you little dipshit. I'm sick of you blathering on about how you could kick my ass if you only had a chance. Your chance is now.
I said: "You wouldn't know how to be a good, decent, honest debater. You have to throw up smokescreens, attack from behind, fling insults like a monkey throwing feces, and do all sorts of other bullshit. That's your definition of one-on-one debate."

Wong replies: "Face me, you little dipshit"

Thank you for proving my point.

I said: "If you had ever, even once , led me to believe for a moment that you could refrain from such childish behavior in a debate against me, I'd tell you to bring it on. However, you wouldn't be able to hold your inner bastard in check for long. You have an image to maintain . . . disciples to impress . . . propaganda to peddle."

Wong replies: "I'm sick of you blathering on about how you could kick my ass if you only had a chance."

I'm really quite sorry, Wong, but I do believe I specifically mentioned that I'd tell you to bring it on, on the condition that you refrained from your childish behavior.

Do you think you can do that? Do you think you can focus exclusively on the arguments and the evidence, and not the man?

I'm not sure you can do that. Your disciples might be disappointed . . . you might even have to back off from an argument you can't win when you can't fling feces at the opposition as a smokescreen. If you want to have a proper debate, and if you are worried that you won't be able to keep the charlatanism to a minimum in a public debate, I'll even accept a private one.

But, if you really think you can keep a promise to maintain civility in a public forum, then let's get it on. But bear in mind that if you break that promise, it will be considered a concession.

You game?

I love this stuff.

DarkStar: I'd beat anyone in a fair debate.

DarthWong: So debate me.

DarkStar: See, <Blah Blah Blah Blah>. Want to debate me?

I can only wait to see how long he'll keep this up.

Grand Admiral Thrawn · Post by **Grand Admiral Thrawn** » 2002-09-08 02:38pm

DarkStar wrote:
DarkStar wrote:(Another thread hijacking attempt deleted. Darkstar, if you want to debate me, don't pull this guerilla "knock off a point here and there" shit and accept my challenge to one-on-one debate- Darth Wong)
I reply to posts one at a time, in most cases, in linear order of their appearance. I had not seen your message at that time.

In any event, if you feel it necessary to delete messages which are clearly on-topic and strong counters to the bullshit arguments you post here, that's really quite sad.

How is a thread about Darkstar=Borg KE shields?

Grand Admiral Thrawn · Post by **Grand Admiral Thrawn** » 2002-09-08 02:41pm

A debate between DS and Mike should be email, and the responces posted here.

2000AD · Post by **2000AD** » 2002-09-08 02:42pm

And on Mike's site and (if he wants) Darkstar's site.

2000AD · Post by **2000AD** » 2002-09-08 03:38pm

did DS actually agree to the debate? it seemed to me that his reply was a challenge to Mike, even though Mike had just challenged him.

StarDestroyer.Net BBS

Darkstar Poll

Does Darkstar contribute anything useful to this board?