Why do people think the Andromeda is so powerful?

SF: discuss futuristic sci-fi series, ideas, and crossovers.

Moderator: NecronLord

Post Reply
Antediluvian
Jedi Knight
Posts: 593
Joined: 2002-07-09 08:46pm

Why do people think the Andromeda is so powerful?

Post by Antediluvian »

This isn't flame bait, I'm honestly curious.

It always seems like it can't take much damage, like when that Than fighter blasted it a few times and it was so heavily damaged it had to hide in an asteriod belt.

And that launching tons of missiles rapidly as has been described seems non-existent, and never used in situations that warrant it, like when they faced that fleet of Friends of Humanity ships.

And for that matter, their missiles look bigger than fist size.

A little help?
Renewed_Valour1
Padawan Learner
Posts: 433
Joined: 2002-07-07 12:29am

Re: Why do people think the Andromeda is so powerful?

Post by Renewed_Valour1 »

Antediluvian wrote:It always seems like it can't take much damage, like when that Than fighter blasted it a few times and it was so heavily damaged it had to hide in an asteroid belt.
She was only attacked by Than vessels once in "Dance of the Mayflies". It wasn't a fighter either; Than capital ships are upscaled versions of their patrol craft.

Some of the missiles you are seeing are smart missiles, which are many times larger than fist sized kinetic missiles. The fist sized missiles are the small streaks that you often see streaking away from her hull. The smart missiles are the large greenish missiles.

As for the rest welcome to the world of Andromeda. We have straight from the writers mouths that the visuals are only an interpretation of what is going on. Roughly speaking that makes the visuals very low in the canon for Andromeda with the dialogue being just about the highest form of canon.
User avatar
GrandMasterTerwynn
Emperor's Hand
Posts: 6787
Joined: 2002-07-29 06:14pm
Location: Somewhere on Earth.

Re: Why do people think the Andromeda is so powerful?

Post by GrandMasterTerwynn »

Antediluvian wrote:This isn't flame bait, I'm honestly curious.

It always seems like it can't take much damage, like when that Than fighter blasted it a few times and it was so heavily damaged it had to hide in an asteriod belt.

And that launching tons of missiles rapidly as has been described seems non-existent, and never used in situations that warrant it, like when they faced that fleet of Friends of Humanity ships.

And for that matter, their missiles look bigger than fist size.

A little help?
Andromeda really isn't all that powerful. About the only thing she has going for her is extreme acceleration (on the order of 60,000 Earth-gravities, if I remember right.)
User avatar
RayCav of ASVS
Jedi Council Member
Posts: 1546
Joined: 2002-07-20 02:34am
Location: Either ISD Nemesis, DSD Demeter or outside Coronet, Corellia, take your pick
Contact:

Post by RayCav of ASVS »

People think Andromeda is powerful because of the Nova Bombs and the apparent ability to transverse distances into other universes, but that's it.

Although, theoretically, the Andromeda can "hyper" into the Coruscant system, and provided it isn't blasted, drop a Nova Bomb and scoot.
::sig removed because it STILL offended Kelly. Hey, it's not my fault that I thing Wedge is a::

Kelly: SHUT UP ALREADY!
Antediluvian
Jedi Knight
Posts: 593
Joined: 2002-07-09 08:46pm

Re: Why do people think the Andromeda is so powerful?

Post by Antediluvian »

(She was only attacked by Than vessels once in "Dance of the Mayflies". It wasn't a fighter either; Than capital ships are upscaled versions of their patrol craft.)

Okay, but it looked fighter size.

Still, that doesn't rebut the fact that she can't take much damage.
Antediluvian
Jedi Knight
Posts: 593
Joined: 2002-07-09 08:46pm

Post by Antediluvian »

(Andromeda really isn't all that powerful. About the only thing she has going for her is extreme acceleration (on the order of 60,000 Earth-gravities, if I remember right.)

If she isn't that powerful, why do some people think she has a good chance against an ISD? Is it because of acceleration, or what?
User avatar
GrandMasterTerwynn
Emperor's Hand
Posts: 6787
Joined: 2002-07-29 06:14pm
Location: Somewhere on Earth.

Post by GrandMasterTerwynn »

Antediluvian wrote:(Andromeda really isn't all that powerful. About the only thing she has going for her is extreme acceleration (on the order of 60,000 Earth-gravities, if I remember right.)

If she isn't that powerful, why do some people think she has a good chance against an ISD? Is it because of acceleration, or what?
Probably because they overestimate Andromeda's weapons. Her kinetic missiles only deliver something like 20 MT each to their targets. And she had a limited supply of these. A single ISD-I seems to have 64 light turbolaser cannons of similar power, and they seem capable of shooting for hours. They can also hit fast moving, small objects. And an ISD-II has eight(?) heavy turbolasers, each with likely more than 200+ GT of damage. Though the Andromeda can probably run circles around an ISD, it only takes the ISD one or two lucky hits to kill her.
septesix
Padawan Learner
Posts: 385
Joined: 2002-07-04 01:48am
Location: 2*** West 38th Vancouver
Contact:

Post by septesix »

Antediluvian wrote: If she isn't that powerful, why do some people think she has a good chance against an ISD? Is it because of acceleration, or what?
Probably becuase the ISD won't have a chance of ever hitting Rommie, not that Rommie's weapon might be able to hurt the ISD either, with those new number from ICS.
User avatar
Mr Bean
Lord of Irony
Posts: 22464
Joined: 2002-07-04 08:36am

Post by Mr Bean »

an ISD-II has eight(?) heavy turbolasers, each with likely more than 200+ GT of damage. Though the Andromeda can probably run circles around an ISD, it only takes the ISD one or two lucky hits to kill her
Check the Star Destroyer Thread, 50 Light LTL, 50 MTL, 50 HTL, 10 Tractors and 50 Ion Cannons

Remeber the ISD IS a space going fortress the Heavy TL, Lights and Mediums are present on all sides from the venteral and dorsal plus the aft and bow sections so depending on its orintation it can only bring 10-30 of each weapon at a time, on the plus side that means manvoring is not as much of a problem because if you race around to one side you simply shoot at them with ANOTHER set of weapons

Depending on scalling an ISD-II medium and heavy weapons are anywhere from Multi-gigaton to low teraton with the current *avarage of calcated figures being roughly 250 Giga-tons for Mediums and 5 Teratons for Heavys

Keep in mind that 200 GT weapon is on a TRANSPORT not a Ship of war

"A cult is a religion with no political power." -Tom Wolfe
Pardon me for sounding like a dick, but I'm playing the tiniest violin in the world right now-Dalton
Renewed_Valour1
Padawan Learner
Posts: 433
Joined: 2002-07-07 12:29am

Post by Renewed_Valour1 »

GrandMasterTerwynn wrote:Probably because they overestimate Andromeda's weapons. Her kinetic missiles only deliver something like 20 MT each to their targets.
Which are her weakest weapons expect for the defensive missiles.
GrandMasterTerwynn wrote:They can also hit fast moving, small objects.
Not at the ranges where a Glorious Heritage Cruiser fight at or the acceleration and maneuverability they have to use. .
Renewed_Valour1
Padawan Learner
Posts: 433
Joined: 2002-07-07 12:29am

Re: Why do people think the Andromeda is so powerful?

Post by Renewed_Valour1 »

Antediluvian wrote:Okay, but it looked fighter size.
Well they were capital ships. Most likely something in the cutter to frigate range.

Antediluvian wrote:Still, that doesn't rebut the fact that she can't take much damage.
The weapons she was hit by were AP cannons. If you followed the thread for weapons strengths for other Sci-fo series you'd note that the exact strength of these weapons is unknown. The only know is that a ship on continuous AP cannon fire will drain her supply in a few moments. In "Belly of the Beast" it was stated that the Maru's AP tanks contain enough AP to destroy a small planet. Of course this could range from a small planetoid to something the size of Earth since Earth sized planets have been called small on the series. The other fact is that the AP cannons are stated to be several times more powerful than you standard kinetic missile barrage. So a small fleet of capital ships mounting these weapons hit her.
User avatar
SirNitram
Rest in Peace, Black Mage
Posts: 28367
Joined: 2002-07-03 04:48pm
Location: Somewhere between nowhere and everywhere

Post by SirNitram »

Andromeda's only chance against an ISD is to peck at it like a fighter. And she better never, ever slow down nearby that flying city(Said flying city pulls something like 5000G's straightline accel, I should point out).
Manic Progressive: A liberal who violently swings from anger at politicos to despondency over them.

Out Of Context theatre: Ron Paul has repeatedly said he's not a racist. - Destructinator XIII on why Ron Paul isn't racist.

Shadowy Overlord - BMs/Black Mage Monkey - BOTM/Jetfire - Cybertron's Finest/General Miscreant/ASVS/Supermoderator Emeritus

Debator Classification: Trollhunter
User avatar
omegaLancer
Jedi Knight
Posts: 621
Joined: 2002-07-04 05:54pm
Location: New york
Contact:

Flak and other facts

Post by omegaLancer »

What is forgot is that ISD turbo laser can be set to detonate like burst of flak, so even if the Andromeda maintain a evasive course, it could be bracketed by serie of explosions that would range from 20 gt to 1000's gt range. This would floored the area of space around the Anromeda with electomagnetic radiation that would damage the Fullerene hull and all exterioral equipment..

The Fullerene hull is design to resist massive KE attacks, and is capable of withstanding temperature in 1000's Centigrade, but would be no match against the energies release by Tubrolaser...

The Andromeda is also arm with a series of drone, that can strike with the force of several gigatons, but she carries less than a dozen of these..



The last series of ship the CW design before it fell, included Cold plasma armor to resist energy weapon, but only two of these ships where created..

But without force shield capable of withstanding the energies of SW ships the Common wealth is at a disadvantage...But she more than a match for the ST vessels...
User avatar
omegaLancer
Jedi Knight
Posts: 621
Joined: 2002-07-04 05:54pm
Location: New york
Contact:

and the range

Post by omegaLancer »

what i forgot to mention is that turbo laser also have a max range of about 2 light minutes.. and since CW ships weapon are also easily fooled by ECM, the range issues is not a critical factor...
User avatar
Grand Admiral Thrawn
Ruthless Imperial Tyrant
Posts: 5755
Joined: 2002-07-03 06:11pm
Location: Canada

Post by Grand Admiral Thrawn »

ADVANTAGES:


1. Acceleration. Only place where .2 C is concidered slow.
2. Firepower. 20 gigaton missle salvoes as per ep with giant planet eater.

DISADVANTAGES

1. No FTL sensors. A ISD can sit a few light hours away and won't be noticed for a while.
2. Pure ammount of missles need. A missle salvo is like 1000.
"You know, I was God once."
"Yes, I saw. You were doing well, until everyone died."
Bender and God, Futurama
User avatar
omegaLancer
Jedi Knight
Posts: 621
Joined: 2002-07-04 05:54pm
Location: New york
Contact:

A Salvo

Post by omegaLancer »

A missile salvo is around 340 missile.. That base on 8 missile per tube per second X 40 tubes...

And that means 340 X 20mt = 6400mt or 6 gigatons per salvo... not even one Light turbo laser...
User avatar
Grand Admiral Thrawn
Ruthless Imperial Tyrant
Posts: 5755
Joined: 2002-07-03 06:11pm
Location: Canada

Post by Grand Admiral Thrawn »

Err..LTLs are megaton range.
"You know, I was God once."
"Yes, I saw. You were doing well, until everyone died."
Bender and God, Futurama
User avatar
omegaLancer
Jedi Knight
Posts: 621
Joined: 2002-07-04 05:54pm
Location: New york
Contact:

Actually is it

Post by omegaLancer »

Is the LTl in the MT range.. all the figures point to the miminum yield would be around 125 MT, but if you look at the Quad turbo lasers be 200GT the med being 20GT the light should be at least 2 GT if you use a scaling of a factor of 10... But it doesnot matter since what ever figur you use the Andromeda yield is less than a lightest warship in the SW universe...
User avatar
Mr Bean
Lord of Irony
Posts: 22464
Joined: 2002-07-04 08:36am

Post by Mr Bean »

Lights are Six MT because they are Anti-Fighter Weaponry, 2MT is enough to seariously hurt them, 6MT is much worse

"A cult is a religion with no political power." -Tom Wolfe
Pardon me for sounding like a dick, but I'm playing the tiniest violin in the world right now-Dalton
User avatar
Crossover_Maniac
Padawan Learner
Posts: 460
Joined: 2002-07-05 07:26pm

Post by Crossover_Maniac »

GrandMasterTerwynn wrote:Probably because they overestimate Andromeda's weapons. Her kinetic missiles only deliver something like 20 MT each to their targets. And she had a limited supply of these. A single ISD-I seems to have 64 light turbolaser cannons of similar power, and they seem capable of shooting for hours.
And at a rate of fire of one shot every two seconds vs. the GHC eight shots per second from 40 OM-5 offensive missile launchers. A GHC has an average rate of fire 10 times faster than the ISD. Also, we see how SW ships handle collision with physical objects (The Hoth asteroid field in RotJ). Now, instead of slow moving asteroids, try projectiles at 0.85c to 0.95 c. Add to the fact that their ordiance is guided and can make course corrections to hit their targets as opposed turbolasers that go pretty much in a straight path.
They can also hit fast moving, small objects. And an ISD-II has eight(?) heavy turbolasers, each with likely more than 200+ GT of damage. Though the Andromeda can probably run circles around an ISD, it only takes the ISD one or two lucky hits to kill her.
Can it get its luck shot before the Andromeda lobs hundreds of missiles into its hull? The heavy turbolasers are not designed to shoot targets that can outmanuever the Falcon or accelerate at rates 50 times faster than any SW ships could ever pull.
"Nietzche is dead"-God
User avatar
Crossover_Maniac
Padawan Learner
Posts: 460
Joined: 2002-07-05 07:26pm

Post by Crossover_Maniac »

Also, even the fighters carry offensive missiles as well. A couple of Centaur and Shrike fighters can go ahead of the main ship and take out the ISD's turbolasers and ion cannons.
"Nietzche is dead"-God
User avatar
Master of Ossus
Darkest Knight
Posts: 18213
Joined: 2002-07-11 01:35am
Location: California

Post by Master of Ossus »

I think that there are a couple of things going on here.

First, I think that it is psychologically important to think that whatever universe we like the best is superior to other universes, and that it is the most powerful. This is, of course, completely illogical. Part of what gave B5 its charm was that humans were not the most powerful race, technologically. Indeed, B5 probably would not have worked as well if it had involved the kind of multi-megaton missiles and energy weapons of Star Trek or Star Wars. Nevertheless, I think that this is a continuation of the old "I'm better than [insert name] because my car is better," or the inverse, "I am not better than [insert name] because my car is worse." It is not in the least bit logical, but I do think that something can be said about human psyches by looking at thise.

Second, I think that many people have difficult evaluating the strengths and weaknesses of technologies that we currently have no knowledge about during our everday lives. For instance, in Star Wars there are immensely powerful turbolasers shooting back and forth across the screen. I remember that I, too, was surprised that they were as extraordinarily powerful as they really are because we really have nothing to compare them to. They rarely destroy anything that we are familiar with, and we assume for many universes that because they have the technology to build something it must be better in every way than modern technology (hand phasers, anyone?), even when in actuality it may be more limited or have other disadvantages.
"Sometimes I think you WANT us to fail." "Shut up, just shut up!" -Two Guys from Kabul

Latinum Star Recipient; Hacker's Cross Award Winner

"one soler flar can vapririze the planit or malt the nickl in lass than millasacit" -Bagara1000

"Happiness is just a Flaming Moe away."
User avatar
omegaLancer
Jedi Knight
Posts: 621
Joined: 2002-07-04 05:54pm
Location: New york
Contact:

number of batteries

Post by omegaLancer »

problem is the number of Turbo lasers you use is from the old WEG games.. The figure is incorrect.. Just from the film the number is to low.. A ISD II has 64 turbo laser just in the turret flanking the bridge.. plus it doesnot take in account heavy battery, super heavy battery, LTL and the twin quad batteries.

As for other factor, remember the fact that Flak capablities make up for any lack of homing ability....
User avatar
Connor MacLeod
Sith Apprentice
Posts: 14065
Joined: 2002-08-01 05:03pm
Contact:

Post by Connor MacLeod »

[quote="Crossover_Maniac]
And at a rate of fire of one shot every two seconds vs. the GHC eight shots per second from 40 OM-5 offensive missile launchers. A GHC has an average rate of fire 10 times faster than the ISD. Also, we see how SW ships handle collision with physical objects (The Hoth asteroid field in RotJ). Now, instead of slow moving asteroids, try projectiles at 0.85c to 0.95 c. Add to the fact that their ordiance is guided and can make course corrections to hit their targets as opposed turbolasers that go pretty much in a straight path.
[/quote]

The asteorid incident has been covered exhaustively by both Wayne Poe and Mike Wong. I suggest you check out their sites if you are not familiar with the details. SW Particle shielding is quite sufficient to deal with a single barrage of kinetic missiles from almost any Andromeda vessel, even at fairly low ends and assuming 100% accuracy on the Andromeda ship's part. Don't start pulling this "I'm going to ignore the EU and cite the Canon as overriding" BS. It doesn't work. Ask anyone who has debated Darkstar.

Can it get its luck shot before the Andromeda lobs hundreds of missiles into its hull? The heavy turbolasers are not designed to shoot targets that can outmanuever the Falcon or accelerate at rates 50 times faster than any SW ships could ever pull.
perhaps, but again this assumes that it can actually DO anything to begin with. I've rather exhaustively covered the whole KE missile angle, and the options available to an Imperial vessel.
User avatar
Connor MacLeod
Sith Apprentice
Posts: 14065
Joined: 2002-08-01 05:03pm
Contact:

Post by Connor MacLeod »

Crossover_Maniac wrote:Also, even the fighters carry offensive missiles as well. A couple of Centaur and Shrike fighters can go ahead of the main ship and take out the ISD's turbolasers and ion cannons.
Again, assuming they can breach the shields.
Post Reply