Why do people think the Andromeda is so powerful?
Moderator: NecronLord
-
- Jedi Knight
- Posts: 593
- Joined: 2002-07-09 08:46pm
Why do people think the Andromeda is so powerful?
This isn't flame bait, I'm honestly curious.
It always seems like it can't take much damage, like when that Than fighter blasted it a few times and it was so heavily damaged it had to hide in an asteriod belt.
And that launching tons of missiles rapidly as has been described seems non-existent, and never used in situations that warrant it, like when they faced that fleet of Friends of Humanity ships.
And for that matter, their missiles look bigger than fist size.
A little help?
It always seems like it can't take much damage, like when that Than fighter blasted it a few times and it was so heavily damaged it had to hide in an asteriod belt.
And that launching tons of missiles rapidly as has been described seems non-existent, and never used in situations that warrant it, like when they faced that fleet of Friends of Humanity ships.
And for that matter, their missiles look bigger than fist size.
A little help?
-
- Padawan Learner
- Posts: 433
- Joined: 2002-07-07 12:29am
Re: Why do people think the Andromeda is so powerful?
She was only attacked by Than vessels once in "Dance of the Mayflies". It wasn't a fighter either; Than capital ships are upscaled versions of their patrol craft.Antediluvian wrote:It always seems like it can't take much damage, like when that Than fighter blasted it a few times and it was so heavily damaged it had to hide in an asteroid belt.
Some of the missiles you are seeing are smart missiles, which are many times larger than fist sized kinetic missiles. The fist sized missiles are the small streaks that you often see streaking away from her hull. The smart missiles are the large greenish missiles.
As for the rest welcome to the world of Andromeda. We have straight from the writers mouths that the visuals are only an interpretation of what is going on. Roughly speaking that makes the visuals very low in the canon for Andromeda with the dialogue being just about the highest form of canon.
- GrandMasterTerwynn
- Emperor's Hand
- Posts: 6787
- Joined: 2002-07-29 06:14pm
- Location: Somewhere on Earth.
Re: Why do people think the Andromeda is so powerful?
Andromeda really isn't all that powerful. About the only thing she has going for her is extreme acceleration (on the order of 60,000 Earth-gravities, if I remember right.)Antediluvian wrote:This isn't flame bait, I'm honestly curious.
It always seems like it can't take much damage, like when that Than fighter blasted it a few times and it was so heavily damaged it had to hide in an asteriod belt.
And that launching tons of missiles rapidly as has been described seems non-existent, and never used in situations that warrant it, like when they faced that fleet of Friends of Humanity ships.
And for that matter, their missiles look bigger than fist size.
A little help?
Tales of the Known Worlds:
2070s - The Seventy-Niners ... 3500s - Fair as Death ... 4900s - Against Improbable Odds V 1.0
2070s - The Seventy-Niners ... 3500s - Fair as Death ... 4900s - Against Improbable Odds V 1.0
- RayCav of ASVS
- Jedi Council Member
- Posts: 1546
- Joined: 2002-07-20 02:34am
- Location: Either ISD Nemesis, DSD Demeter or outside Coronet, Corellia, take your pick
- Contact:
People think Andromeda is powerful because of the Nova Bombs and the apparent ability to transverse distances into other universes, but that's it.
Although, theoretically, the Andromeda can "hyper" into the Coruscant system, and provided it isn't blasted, drop a Nova Bomb and scoot.
Although, theoretically, the Andromeda can "hyper" into the Coruscant system, and provided it isn't blasted, drop a Nova Bomb and scoot.
::sig removed because it STILL offended Kelly. Hey, it's not my fault that I thing Wedge is a::
Kelly: SHUT UP ALREADY!
Kelly: SHUT UP ALREADY!
-
- Jedi Knight
- Posts: 593
- Joined: 2002-07-09 08:46pm
Re: Why do people think the Andromeda is so powerful?
(She was only attacked by Than vessels once in "Dance of the Mayflies". It wasn't a fighter either; Than capital ships are upscaled versions of their patrol craft.)
Okay, but it looked fighter size.
Still, that doesn't rebut the fact that she can't take much damage.
Okay, but it looked fighter size.
Still, that doesn't rebut the fact that she can't take much damage.
-
- Jedi Knight
- Posts: 593
- Joined: 2002-07-09 08:46pm
(Andromeda really isn't all that powerful. About the only thing she has going for her is extreme acceleration (on the order of 60,000 Earth-gravities, if I remember right.)
If she isn't that powerful, why do some people think she has a good chance against an ISD? Is it because of acceleration, or what?
If she isn't that powerful, why do some people think she has a good chance against an ISD? Is it because of acceleration, or what?
- GrandMasterTerwynn
- Emperor's Hand
- Posts: 6787
- Joined: 2002-07-29 06:14pm
- Location: Somewhere on Earth.
Probably because they overestimate Andromeda's weapons. Her kinetic missiles only deliver something like 20 MT each to their targets. And she had a limited supply of these. A single ISD-I seems to have 64 light turbolaser cannons of similar power, and they seem capable of shooting for hours. They can also hit fast moving, small objects. And an ISD-II has eight(?) heavy turbolasers, each with likely more than 200+ GT of damage. Though the Andromeda can probably run circles around an ISD, it only takes the ISD one or two lucky hits to kill her.Antediluvian wrote:(Andromeda really isn't all that powerful. About the only thing she has going for her is extreme acceleration (on the order of 60,000 Earth-gravities, if I remember right.)
If she isn't that powerful, why do some people think she has a good chance against an ISD? Is it because of acceleration, or what?
Tales of the Known Worlds:
2070s - The Seventy-Niners ... 3500s - Fair as Death ... 4900s - Against Improbable Odds V 1.0
2070s - The Seventy-Niners ... 3500s - Fair as Death ... 4900s - Against Improbable Odds V 1.0
-
- Padawan Learner
- Posts: 385
- Joined: 2002-07-04 01:48am
- Location: 2*** West 38th Vancouver
- Contact:
Probably becuase the ISD won't have a chance of ever hitting Rommie, not that Rommie's weapon might be able to hurt the ISD either, with those new number from ICS.Antediluvian wrote: If she isn't that powerful, why do some people think she has a good chance against an ISD? Is it because of acceleration, or what?
Check the Star Destroyer Thread, 50 Light LTL, 50 MTL, 50 HTL, 10 Tractors and 50 Ion Cannonsan ISD-II has eight(?) heavy turbolasers, each with likely more than 200+ GT of damage. Though the Andromeda can probably run circles around an ISD, it only takes the ISD one or two lucky hits to kill her
Remeber the ISD IS a space going fortress the Heavy TL, Lights and Mediums are present on all sides from the venteral and dorsal plus the aft and bow sections so depending on its orintation it can only bring 10-30 of each weapon at a time, on the plus side that means manvoring is not as much of a problem because if you race around to one side you simply shoot at them with ANOTHER set of weapons
Depending on scalling an ISD-II medium and heavy weapons are anywhere from Multi-gigaton to low teraton with the current *avarage of calcated figures being roughly 250 Giga-tons for Mediums and 5 Teratons for Heavys
Keep in mind that 200 GT weapon is on a TRANSPORT not a Ship of war
"A cult is a religion with no political power." -Tom Wolfe
Pardon me for sounding like a dick, but I'm playing the tiniest violin in the world right now-Dalton
-
- Padawan Learner
- Posts: 433
- Joined: 2002-07-07 12:29am
Which are her weakest weapons expect for the defensive missiles.GrandMasterTerwynn wrote:Probably because they overestimate Andromeda's weapons. Her kinetic missiles only deliver something like 20 MT each to their targets.
Not at the ranges where a Glorious Heritage Cruiser fight at or the acceleration and maneuverability they have to use. .GrandMasterTerwynn wrote:They can also hit fast moving, small objects.
-
- Padawan Learner
- Posts: 433
- Joined: 2002-07-07 12:29am
Re: Why do people think the Andromeda is so powerful?
Well they were capital ships. Most likely something in the cutter to frigate range.Antediluvian wrote:Okay, but it looked fighter size.
The weapons she was hit by were AP cannons. If you followed the thread for weapons strengths for other Sci-fo series you'd note that the exact strength of these weapons is unknown. The only know is that a ship on continuous AP cannon fire will drain her supply in a few moments. In "Belly of the Beast" it was stated that the Maru's AP tanks contain enough AP to destroy a small planet. Of course this could range from a small planetoid to something the size of Earth since Earth sized planets have been called small on the series. The other fact is that the AP cannons are stated to be several times more powerful than you standard kinetic missile barrage. So a small fleet of capital ships mounting these weapons hit her.Antediluvian wrote:Still, that doesn't rebut the fact that she can't take much damage.
- SirNitram
- Rest in Peace, Black Mage
- Posts: 28367
- Joined: 2002-07-03 04:48pm
- Location: Somewhere between nowhere and everywhere
Andromeda's only chance against an ISD is to peck at it like a fighter. And she better never, ever slow down nearby that flying city(Said flying city pulls something like 5000G's straightline accel, I should point out).
Manic Progressive: A liberal who violently swings from anger at politicos to despondency over them.
Out Of Context theatre: Ron Paul has repeatedly said he's not a racist. - Destructinator XIII on why Ron Paul isn't racist.
Shadowy Overlord - BMs/Black Mage Monkey - BOTM/Jetfire - Cybertron's Finest/General Miscreant/ASVS/Supermoderator Emeritus
Debator Classification: Trollhunter
Out Of Context theatre: Ron Paul has repeatedly said he's not a racist. - Destructinator XIII on why Ron Paul isn't racist.
Shadowy Overlord - BMs/Black Mage Monkey - BOTM/Jetfire - Cybertron's Finest/General Miscreant/ASVS/Supermoderator Emeritus
Debator Classification: Trollhunter
- omegaLancer
- Jedi Knight
- Posts: 621
- Joined: 2002-07-04 05:54pm
- Location: New york
- Contact:
Flak and other facts
What is forgot is that ISD turbo laser can be set to detonate like burst of flak, so even if the Andromeda maintain a evasive course, it could be bracketed by serie of explosions that would range from 20 gt to 1000's gt range. This would floored the area of space around the Anromeda with electomagnetic radiation that would damage the Fullerene hull and all exterioral equipment..
The Fullerene hull is design to resist massive KE attacks, and is capable of withstanding temperature in 1000's Centigrade, but would be no match against the energies release by Tubrolaser...
The Andromeda is also arm with a series of drone, that can strike with the force of several gigatons, but she carries less than a dozen of these..
The last series of ship the CW design before it fell, included Cold plasma armor to resist energy weapon, but only two of these ships where created..
But without force shield capable of withstanding the energies of SW ships the Common wealth is at a disadvantage...But she more than a match for the ST vessels...
The Fullerene hull is design to resist massive KE attacks, and is capable of withstanding temperature in 1000's Centigrade, but would be no match against the energies release by Tubrolaser...
The Andromeda is also arm with a series of drone, that can strike with the force of several gigatons, but she carries less than a dozen of these..
The last series of ship the CW design before it fell, included Cold plasma armor to resist energy weapon, but only two of these ships where created..
But without force shield capable of withstanding the energies of SW ships the Common wealth is at a disadvantage...But she more than a match for the ST vessels...
- omegaLancer
- Jedi Knight
- Posts: 621
- Joined: 2002-07-04 05:54pm
- Location: New york
- Contact:
and the range
what i forgot to mention is that turbo laser also have a max range of about 2 light minutes.. and since CW ships weapon are also easily fooled by ECM, the range issues is not a critical factor...
- Grand Admiral Thrawn
- Ruthless Imperial Tyrant
- Posts: 5755
- Joined: 2002-07-03 06:11pm
- Location: Canada
ADVANTAGES:
1. Acceleration. Only place where .2 C is concidered slow.
2. Firepower. 20 gigaton missle salvoes as per ep with giant planet eater.
DISADVANTAGES
1. No FTL sensors. A ISD can sit a few light hours away and won't be noticed for a while.
2. Pure ammount of missles need. A missle salvo is like 1000.
1. Acceleration. Only place where .2 C is concidered slow.
2. Firepower. 20 gigaton missle salvoes as per ep with giant planet eater.
DISADVANTAGES
1. No FTL sensors. A ISD can sit a few light hours away and won't be noticed for a while.
2. Pure ammount of missles need. A missle salvo is like 1000.
"You know, I was God once."
"Yes, I saw. You were doing well, until everyone died."
Bender and God, Futurama
"Yes, I saw. You were doing well, until everyone died."
Bender and God, Futurama
- omegaLancer
- Jedi Knight
- Posts: 621
- Joined: 2002-07-04 05:54pm
- Location: New york
- Contact:
A Salvo
A missile salvo is around 340 missile.. That base on 8 missile per tube per second X 40 tubes...
And that means 340 X 20mt = 6400mt or 6 gigatons per salvo... not even one Light turbo laser...
And that means 340 X 20mt = 6400mt or 6 gigatons per salvo... not even one Light turbo laser...
- Grand Admiral Thrawn
- Ruthless Imperial Tyrant
- Posts: 5755
- Joined: 2002-07-03 06:11pm
- Location: Canada
- omegaLancer
- Jedi Knight
- Posts: 621
- Joined: 2002-07-04 05:54pm
- Location: New york
- Contact:
Actually is it
Is the LTl in the MT range.. all the figures point to the miminum yield would be around 125 MT, but if you look at the Quad turbo lasers be 200GT the med being 20GT the light should be at least 2 GT if you use a scaling of a factor of 10... But it doesnot matter since what ever figur you use the Andromeda yield is less than a lightest warship in the SW universe...
- Crossover_Maniac
- Padawan Learner
- Posts: 460
- Joined: 2002-07-05 07:26pm
And at a rate of fire of one shot every two seconds vs. the GHC eight shots per second from 40 OM-5 offensive missile launchers. A GHC has an average rate of fire 10 times faster than the ISD. Also, we see how SW ships handle collision with physical objects (The Hoth asteroid field in RotJ). Now, instead of slow moving asteroids, try projectiles at 0.85c to 0.95 c. Add to the fact that their ordiance is guided and can make course corrections to hit their targets as opposed turbolasers that go pretty much in a straight path.GrandMasterTerwynn wrote:Probably because they overestimate Andromeda's weapons. Her kinetic missiles only deliver something like 20 MT each to their targets. And she had a limited supply of these. A single ISD-I seems to have 64 light turbolaser cannons of similar power, and they seem capable of shooting for hours.
Can it get its luck shot before the Andromeda lobs hundreds of missiles into its hull? The heavy turbolasers are not designed to shoot targets that can outmanuever the Falcon or accelerate at rates 50 times faster than any SW ships could ever pull.They can also hit fast moving, small objects. And an ISD-II has eight(?) heavy turbolasers, each with likely more than 200+ GT of damage. Though the Andromeda can probably run circles around an ISD, it only takes the ISD one or two lucky hits to kill her.
"Nietzche is dead"-God
- Crossover_Maniac
- Padawan Learner
- Posts: 460
- Joined: 2002-07-05 07:26pm
- Master of Ossus
- Darkest Knight
- Posts: 18213
- Joined: 2002-07-11 01:35am
- Location: California
I think that there are a couple of things going on here.
First, I think that it is psychologically important to think that whatever universe we like the best is superior to other universes, and that it is the most powerful. This is, of course, completely illogical. Part of what gave B5 its charm was that humans were not the most powerful race, technologically. Indeed, B5 probably would not have worked as well if it had involved the kind of multi-megaton missiles and energy weapons of Star Trek or Star Wars. Nevertheless, I think that this is a continuation of the old "I'm better than [insert name] because my car is better," or the inverse, "I am not better than [insert name] because my car is worse." It is not in the least bit logical, but I do think that something can be said about human psyches by looking at thise.
Second, I think that many people have difficult evaluating the strengths and weaknesses of technologies that we currently have no knowledge about during our everday lives. For instance, in Star Wars there are immensely powerful turbolasers shooting back and forth across the screen. I remember that I, too, was surprised that they were as extraordinarily powerful as they really are because we really have nothing to compare them to. They rarely destroy anything that we are familiar with, and we assume for many universes that because they have the technology to build something it must be better in every way than modern technology (hand phasers, anyone?), even when in actuality it may be more limited or have other disadvantages.
First, I think that it is psychologically important to think that whatever universe we like the best is superior to other universes, and that it is the most powerful. This is, of course, completely illogical. Part of what gave B5 its charm was that humans were not the most powerful race, technologically. Indeed, B5 probably would not have worked as well if it had involved the kind of multi-megaton missiles and energy weapons of Star Trek or Star Wars. Nevertheless, I think that this is a continuation of the old "I'm better than [insert name] because my car is better," or the inverse, "I am not better than [insert name] because my car is worse." It is not in the least bit logical, but I do think that something can be said about human psyches by looking at thise.
Second, I think that many people have difficult evaluating the strengths and weaknesses of technologies that we currently have no knowledge about during our everday lives. For instance, in Star Wars there are immensely powerful turbolasers shooting back and forth across the screen. I remember that I, too, was surprised that they were as extraordinarily powerful as they really are because we really have nothing to compare them to. They rarely destroy anything that we are familiar with, and we assume for many universes that because they have the technology to build something it must be better in every way than modern technology (hand phasers, anyone?), even when in actuality it may be more limited or have other disadvantages.
"Sometimes I think you WANT us to fail." "Shut up, just shut up!" -Two Guys from Kabul
Latinum Star Recipient; Hacker's Cross Award Winner
"one soler flar can vapririze the planit or malt the nickl in lass than millasacit" -Bagara1000
"Happiness is just a Flaming Moe away."
Latinum Star Recipient; Hacker's Cross Award Winner
"one soler flar can vapririze the planit or malt the nickl in lass than millasacit" -Bagara1000
"Happiness is just a Flaming Moe away."
- omegaLancer
- Jedi Knight
- Posts: 621
- Joined: 2002-07-04 05:54pm
- Location: New york
- Contact:
number of batteries
problem is the number of Turbo lasers you use is from the old WEG games.. The figure is incorrect.. Just from the film the number is to low.. A ISD II has 64 turbo laser just in the turret flanking the bridge.. plus it doesnot take in account heavy battery, super heavy battery, LTL and the twin quad batteries.
As for other factor, remember the fact that Flak capablities make up for any lack of homing ability....
As for other factor, remember the fact that Flak capablities make up for any lack of homing ability....
- Connor MacLeod
- Sith Apprentice
- Posts: 14065
- Joined: 2002-08-01 05:03pm
- Contact:
[quote="Crossover_Maniac]
And at a rate of fire of one shot every two seconds vs. the GHC eight shots per second from 40 OM-5 offensive missile launchers. A GHC has an average rate of fire 10 times faster than the ISD. Also, we see how SW ships handle collision with physical objects (The Hoth asteroid field in RotJ). Now, instead of slow moving asteroids, try projectiles at 0.85c to 0.95 c. Add to the fact that their ordiance is guided and can make course corrections to hit their targets as opposed turbolasers that go pretty much in a straight path.
[/quote]
The asteorid incident has been covered exhaustively by both Wayne Poe and Mike Wong. I suggest you check out their sites if you are not familiar with the details. SW Particle shielding is quite sufficient to deal with a single barrage of kinetic missiles from almost any Andromeda vessel, even at fairly low ends and assuming 100% accuracy on the Andromeda ship's part. Don't start pulling this "I'm going to ignore the EU and cite the Canon as overriding" BS. It doesn't work. Ask anyone who has debated Darkstar.
And at a rate of fire of one shot every two seconds vs. the GHC eight shots per second from 40 OM-5 offensive missile launchers. A GHC has an average rate of fire 10 times faster than the ISD. Also, we see how SW ships handle collision with physical objects (The Hoth asteroid field in RotJ). Now, instead of slow moving asteroids, try projectiles at 0.85c to 0.95 c. Add to the fact that their ordiance is guided and can make course corrections to hit their targets as opposed turbolasers that go pretty much in a straight path.
[/quote]
The asteorid incident has been covered exhaustively by both Wayne Poe and Mike Wong. I suggest you check out their sites if you are not familiar with the details. SW Particle shielding is quite sufficient to deal with a single barrage of kinetic missiles from almost any Andromeda vessel, even at fairly low ends and assuming 100% accuracy on the Andromeda ship's part. Don't start pulling this "I'm going to ignore the EU and cite the Canon as overriding" BS. It doesn't work. Ask anyone who has debated Darkstar.
perhaps, but again this assumes that it can actually DO anything to begin with. I've rather exhaustively covered the whole KE missile angle, and the options available to an Imperial vessel.Can it get its luck shot before the Andromeda lobs hundreds of missiles into its hull? The heavy turbolasers are not designed to shoot targets that can outmanuever the Falcon or accelerate at rates 50 times faster than any SW ships could ever pull.
- Connor MacLeod
- Sith Apprentice
- Posts: 14065
- Joined: 2002-08-01 05:03pm
- Contact: