*man in black smothers Spanky with chloroform*Spanky The Dolphin wrote:Don't forget your tinfoil helmet when you check out, conspiracy nut...
Err...right. Uhm...never wear tin foil hats outside...never...ever...its not..?..fashionable yes...FNORD
Moderator: Edi
*man in black smothers Spanky with chloroform*Spanky The Dolphin wrote:Don't forget your tinfoil helmet when you check out, conspiracy nut...
IIRC, the wings ripped off on primary impact with the Pentagon and their momentum forced them in along for the ride (pushing "in" on the aircraft). No fuel would have been sprayed on the lawn.BlkbrryTheGreat wrote:If the wings ripped off Jet fuel would have sprayed, and ignited, across the entire front lawn. You can clearly see that this isnt the case in the picture.Remember, the aircraft in question struck ground BEFORE it hit the Pentagon - it's entirely probable that the wings ripped off before the fuselage hit the building.
No, you shouldn't. The thing was literally ripped apart as it pushed through various rings of the Pentagon - which is designed to take quite a pounding. Fire and collapse did the rest.You should still see some parts of the fueslage, I mean we're talking about over 100 tons of metal here. If the plane did indeed "bounce", ripping off the wings, then those parts of the plane should be visible in the picture; forward momentum dosen't just disappear.
I think you missed the part about how there is footage of the plane flying in the building when you were having your little squabble with Spanky.BlkbrryTheGreat wrote:Snoppes sight cleared it up, no further explaination required.
Yea, guess I did. "Opps"anarchistbunny wrote:I think you missed the part about how there is footage of the plane flying in the building when you were having your little squabble with Spanky.BlkbrryTheGreat wrote:Snoppes sight cleared it up, no further explaination required.
BlkbrryTheGreat wrote:You should still see some parts of the fueslage, I mean we're talking about over 100 tons of metal here.
Last time I checked most planes don't slam directly into multiple layers of reinforced concrete. However if you take a look at any major plane crash onto mere dirt you'd noticed that there is very little left.BlkbrryTheGreat wrote:
100 turns of metal dosen't suddenly disappear in any normal plane crash, or explosion. Last I checked, it takes a Nuke to make that much metal disapper.
You'd think it'd have the decency to atleast leave a tail or a wing together, but nooooo. The tail and wing sections are conspiring to conspire!Sea Skimmer wrote:Strange that material that?s mostly millimeters thick would do that when hitting massive solid objects.
Yes, obviously because this particular theory is wrong, they all must be. Your a fucking idiot spanky.Spanky The Dolphin wrote:And now the reason why conspiracy theories are always wrong comes into view:
The theorists don't fucking think.
The Boeing assembly line is the real heart of this bit of truth twisting evil! Lets do for the kill!kojikun wrote:
You'd think it'd have the decency to atleast leave a tail or a wing together, but nooooo. The tail and wing sections are conspiring to conspire!
No, they're all wrong because they're all wrong.BlkbrryTheGreat wrote:Yes, obviously because this particular theory is wrong, they all must be. Your a fucking idiot spanky.Spanky The Dolphin wrote:And now the reason why conspiracy theories are always wrong comes into view:
The theorists don't fucking think.
Most of it would remain in the wings, and inertia would carry most of it through into the building. It wouldn't ignite until a heat source presented itself, by the way.BlkbrryTheGreat wrote: If the wings ripped off Jet fuel would have sprayed, and ignited, across the entire front lawn. You can clearly see that this isnt the case in the picture.
Right..... and Lee Harvy Osward killed JFK will a "magic bullet".No, they're all wrong because they're all wrong.
More ad hominum; which seems to be all that your capable of.Spanky The Dolphin wrote:No the mob killed him from a sewar grate. But I don't consider that a conspiracy.
And yes, you are a fucking idiot, you fruitcake crackpot.
As opposed to your own ability to believe and defend idiocy with the whole board against you.BlkbrryTheGreat wrote:
More ad hominum; which seems to be all that your capable of.
Funny, since your the only one consistently using ad hominum attacks against my arguments. You also don't have any justification for claiming my brain is rotten in that changed my postition as soon as I came across evidence that contradicted the theory. I look at each case and judge it based on the evidence. You, on the otherhand you seem to think that every conspiracy theory is meritless REGARDLESS of the evidence and reasoning behind the theory. Furthermore, even IF everyone else who posted in this thread thought my brain was "rotten" you would just be appealing to authority since you've put no evidence on the table to support your arguement. So, shut the fuck up spanky, your posts are completly worthless.Spanky The Dolphin wrote:Look Bickleberry, I'm not the only one in this thread that thinks your brain is rotten, got that?