Can the Empire build a Dyson Sphere ?

SWvST: the subject of the main site.

Moderator: Vympel

Can the Empire build a Dyson Sphere ?

Yes
48
86%
No
8
14%
 
Total votes: 56

User avatar
Sarevok
The Fearless One
Posts: 10681
Joined: 2002-12-24 07:29am
Location: The Covenants last and final line of defense

Can the Empire build a Dyson Sphere ?

Post by Sarevok »

Can the Empire build a dyson sphere around the solar system assuming they have all the resources in the star wars galaxy ? The Empire has 25 years to finish the job.

I think so. The dyson sphere is a truly massive object, even the death star does not come close to it. This may indicate that the dyson sphere is too big even for the Empire. However there are some reasons why they can build a dyson sphere.

Two thirds of the death star was constructed in complete secrecy in six months without any impact on the galactic economy whatsoever. This indicates the enormous imperial industrial capacity. Also they have world devastators which turn entire planets into useful materials.

So the Empire has enough raw materials to build a dyson sphere but do they have the engineering capacity to put one togather ? The death star is a good example of their engineering. All the raw materials for the moon sized battlestation was transported by the private Black Sun shipping corporation. If this is the transport capability of a private company bringing in the raw materials into the solar for system for construction work would not be a problem for the imperial fleet.

The second problem would be making the parts for the dyson sphere. A star system sized object would require massive abounts of of high quality parts, making them within a reasonable period of time will be an important challenge. However they have duplicator technology which works like star trek replicators. This was used to rapidly fabricate parts for the death star onsite since the Black Sun only brought raw materials not prefabricated parts.

Putting the dyson sphere togather would also not be a problem. The Empire put the death star,a much more thicker object togather very quickly. Since the dyson spheres thickness is not great the Empire can just buid thousand kilomater long sections in solar orbit and put them to gather later. This would not be a problem since they can already move massive objects such as planets with huge tractor beams like the centerporint station.

The most important question is would an imperial dyson sphere hold itself togather. We know that a dyson sphere must deal with gravity, radiation, heat, asteriod impacts etc. The Empire can deal with all these problems.
Gravitational forces would not be problem in an imperial dyson sphere because of two reasons. First the Empire can use neutronium, the same material that made up the original dyson sphere in "Relics". Secondly the death star can survive thousands of gees without destroying itself indicating very advanced structural field systems used to hold a moon sized battlestation togather. Using these technologies the Empire can build a stable dyson sphere.

Radiation and heat too would not be problem since the death star and ISDs can easily dissipate the enormous heat produced by their hypermatter reactors. The same cooling systems can also be used in a dyson sphere.

And asteriod impacts would be no a problem at all since the Empire can use planetary type shield generators. Considering their enormous strength only a small moon would be able to bring them down, but a small would not be a threat in the first place because the Death Star is there.

Any comments ?
Tosho
Rabid Monkey
Posts: 701
Joined: 2002-07-29 03:14am
Location: Texas

Post by Tosho »

If the Empire made building The Dyson sphere its top priority it would be a very task for them.
Sun Sep 07, 2003 3:45 pm 666th post.
User avatar
NecronLord
Harbinger of Doom
Harbinger of Doom
Posts: 27384
Joined: 2002-07-07 06:30am
Location: The Lost City

Post by NecronLord »

There were rumours a while back that KDY was a dyson sphere...
Superior Moderator - BotB - HAB [Drill Instructor]-Writer- Stardestroyer.net's resident Star-God.
"We believe in the systematic understanding of the physical world through observation and experimentation, argument and debate and most of all freedom of will." ~ Stargate: The Ark of Truth
User avatar
Frank Hipper
Overfiend of the Superego
Posts: 12882
Joined: 2002-10-17 08:48am
Location: Hamilton, Ohio?

Post by Frank Hipper »

But why would they waste the resources on something of such dubious value?
Image
Life is all the eternity you get, use it wisely.
User avatar
TurboPhaser
Padawan Learner
Posts: 298
Joined: 2003-05-30 03:39am
Location: Australia

Post by TurboPhaser »

I suppose they could, but it take longer than 25 years.
Voyager summed up in 1 quote:

Neelix: These people dont appreciate what they have! This ship is the match of anything in a hundred lightyears, yet what do they do with it?
(fake voice) Oh, well lets go find some space anomaly today that'll rip it apart!

- Voy: 'The Cloud'
User avatar
SirNitram
Rest in Peace, Black Mage
Posts: 28367
Joined: 2002-07-03 04:48pm
Location: Somewhere between nowhere and everywhere

Post by SirNitram »

On second thoughts, they seem to produce similar structures already.
Episode II ICS wrote:Gravity-altering devices include repulsorlifts that allow unpowered
antigravity flotation, tractor-0beam projectors for remote applicaiton of
force, and acceleration compensators that prevent pulverization of starship
occupants during maneuvers. The gravitoactive constituents of these devices
are subnuclear knots of space-time made in enourmous, unmanned power
refineries encompassing black holes.
"
Relevent part bolded. Not necessarily a Dyson Sphere, but still some structure that can surround a stellar body(Perhaps a closed Ringworld?).
Manic Progressive: A liberal who violently swings from anger at politicos to despondency over them.

Out Of Context theatre: Ron Paul has repeatedly said he's not a racist. - Destructinator XIII on why Ron Paul isn't racist.

Shadowy Overlord - BMs/Black Mage Monkey - BOTM/Jetfire - Cybertron's Finest/General Miscreant/ASVS/Supermoderator Emeritus

Debator Classification: Trollhunter
User avatar
Ender
Emperor's Hand
Posts: 11323
Joined: 2002-07-30 11:12pm
Location: Illinois

Post by Ender »

Based on all the evidence, and heavy analysis on my part, I would say that the definitive answer is: Possibly.

Though "Maybe" is still a lesser yet possible chance.
بيرني كان سيفوز
*
Nuclear Navy Warwolf
*
in omnibus requiem quaesivi, et nusquam inveni nisi in angulo cum libro
*
ipsa scientia potestas est
User avatar
Alyeska
Federation Ambassador
Posts: 17496
Joined: 2002-08-11 07:28pm
Location: Montana, USA

Post by Alyeska »

Frank Hipper wrote:But why would they waste the resources on something of such dubious value?
On the contrary, such a structure would be imensly valuable. It would maximise the use of a star when it comes to a civilization living under it. The imense area could hold trillions up trillions of people. I would hazzard a guess that a single Dyson sphere could hold the entire population of the SW galaxy.
"If the facts are on your side, pound on the facts. If the law is on your side, pound on the law. If neither is on your side, pound on the table."

"The captain claimed our people violated a 4,000 year old treaty forbidding us to develop hyperspace technology. Extermination of our planet was the consequence. The subject did not survive interrogation."
User avatar
Crayz9000
Sith Apprentice
Posts: 7329
Joined: 2002-07-03 06:39pm
Location: Improbably superpositioned
Contact:

Post by Crayz9000 »

Alyeska wrote:On the contrary, such a structure would be imensly valuable. It would maximise the use of a star when it comes to a civilization living under it. The imense area could hold trillions up trillions of people. I would hazzard a guess that a single Dyson sphere could hold the entire population of the SW galaxy.
... now that's stretching it.

A single Dyson Sphere could easily hold the entire population of Coruscant and the Corellian system, I'm sure. But to say that it could hold several quintillion beings? Talk about stretching it...
A Tribute to Stupidity: The Robert Scott Anderson Archive (currently offline)
John Hansen - Slightly Insane Bounty Hunter - ASVS Vets' Assoc. Class of 2000
HAB Cryptanalyst | WG - Intergalactic Alliance and Spoof Author | BotM | Cybertron | SCEF
User avatar
NecronLord
Harbinger of Doom
Harbinger of Doom
Posts: 27384
Joined: 2002-07-07 06:30am
Location: The Lost City

Post by NecronLord »

It's not worth it because a few hundred ringworlds and culture orbitals would not only require less artificial gravity, but will also be less vunerable to supernova induction and radiation changes in the star.
Superior Moderator - BotB - HAB [Drill Instructor]-Writer- Stardestroyer.net's resident Star-God.
"We believe in the systematic understanding of the physical world through observation and experimentation, argument and debate and most of all freedom of will." ~ Stargate: The Ark of Truth
User avatar
Alyeska
Federation Ambassador
Posts: 17496
Joined: 2002-08-11 07:28pm
Location: Montana, USA

Post by Alyeska »

Crayz9000 wrote:
Alyeska wrote:On the contrary, such a structure would be imensly valuable. It would maximise the use of a star when it comes to a civilization living under it. The imense area could hold trillions up trillions of people. I would hazzard a guess that a single Dyson sphere could hold the entire population of the SW galaxy.
... now that's stretching it.

A single Dyson Sphere could easily hold the entire population of Coruscant and the Corellian system, I'm sure. But to say that it could hold several quintillion beings? Talk about stretching it...
If a single planet like Coruscant can hold over a trillion people, think how many a Dyson sphere can hold. You have to have a larger orbit (no night time mind you) size basicaly. You have the entire diameter of that orbit. You then have to think 3d. Think about just how much space there is going to be. Then with such a sphere there is going to be plenty of sub-rooms built into the sphere itself. Even more people as well as supplies and cargo can stay down there.
"If the facts are on your side, pound on the facts. If the law is on your side, pound on the law. If neither is on your side, pound on the table."

"The captain claimed our people violated a 4,000 year old treaty forbidding us to develop hyperspace technology. Extermination of our planet was the consequence. The subject did not survive interrogation."
User avatar
Grand Admiral Thrawn
Ruthless Imperial Tyrant
Posts: 5755
Joined: 2002-07-03 06:11pm
Location: Canada

Post by Grand Admiral Thrawn »

Multiple smaller ships would be easier to construct and less vulnerable. And it's not like there's a space problem in SW.
"You know, I was God once."
"Yes, I saw. You were doing well, until everyone died."
Bender and God, Futurama
User avatar
YT300000
Sith'ari
Posts: 6528
Joined: 2003-05-20 12:49pm
Location: Calgary, Canada
Contact:

Post by YT300000 »

Alyeska wrote:
Frank Hipper wrote:But why would they waste the resources on something of such dubious value?
On the contrary, such a structure would be imensly valuable. It would maximise the use of a star when it comes to a civilization living under it. The imense area could hold trillions up trillions of people. I would hazzard a guess that a single Dyson sphere could hold the entire population of the SW galaxy.
Star Wars power generators can easily produce more energy than a star. A Dyson sphere is pointless.

I did some calcs a while back, and the Dyson sphere worked out be 10 times size of DS2. That would mean that the Empire could build one in about 12 years and 3 months. Also, they wouldn't need to install any weaponry or electronics, making production faster.
Name changes are for people who wear women's clothes. - Zuul

Wow. It took me a good minute to remember I didn't have testicles. -xBlackFlash

Are you sure this isn't like that time Michael Jackson stopped by your house so he could use the bathroom? - Superman
User avatar
Col. Crackpot
That Obnoxious Guy
Posts: 10228
Joined: 2002-10-28 05:04pm
Location: Rhode Island
Contact:

Post by Col. Crackpot »

i don't know.....i mean we are talking about something 2AU in diameter! if they even could do it it would consume most of the galaxy's industrial capacity during the constuction process...and the raw materials needed to build a sphere 2AU in diameter would be enourmous.....millions of planets worth...if not more. quite frankly i do not see the practicallity of building such a thing. very wasteful
"This business will get out of control. It will get out of control and we’ll be lucky to live through it.” -Tom Clancy
User avatar
His Divine Shadow
Commence Primary Ignition
Posts: 12791
Joined: 2002-07-03 07:22am
Location: Finland, west coast

Post by His Divine Shadow »

YT300000 wrote:I did some calcs a while back, and the Dyson sphere worked out be 10 times size of DS2
Thats... utterly ludicrous, the DS2 is 800km or so in diameter, a Dyson Sphere is around 2 AU's, or around 298 million kilometers.
Those who beat their swords into plowshares will plow for those who did not.
User avatar
YT300000
Sith'ari
Posts: 6528
Joined: 2003-05-20 12:49pm
Location: Calgary, Canada
Contact:

Post by YT300000 »

His Divine Shadow wrote:
YT300000 wrote:I did some calcs a while back, and the Dyson sphere worked out be 10 times size of DS2
Thats... utterly ludicrous, the DS2 is 800km or so in diameter, a Dyson Sphere is around 2 AU's, or around 298 million kilometers.
I thought the Dyson sphere is 120 000 km in diameter.

I used the DS2 being 900 km in diameter figure.
Name changes are for people who wear women's clothes. - Zuul

Wow. It took me a good minute to remember I didn't have testicles. -xBlackFlash

Are you sure this isn't like that time Michael Jackson stopped by your house so he could use the bathroom? - Superman
User avatar
His Divine Shadow
Commence Primary Ignition
Posts: 12791
Joined: 2002-07-03 07:22am
Location: Finland, west coast

Post by His Divine Shadow »

YT300000 wrote:
His Divine Shadow wrote:
YT300000 wrote:I did some calcs a while back, and the Dyson sphere worked out be 10 times size of DS2
Thats... utterly ludicrous, the DS2 is 800km or so in diameter, a Dyson Sphere is around 2 AU's, or around 298 million kilometers.
I thought the Dyson sphere is 120 000 km in diameter.

I used the DS2 being 900 km in diameter figure.
No, a Dyson Sphere encloses a star, and the inner surface ought to be as far away as our planet is from the sun.
Those who beat their swords into plowshares will plow for those who did not.
User avatar
YT300000
Sith'ari
Posts: 6528
Joined: 2003-05-20 12:49pm
Location: Calgary, Canada
Contact:

Post by YT300000 »

His Divine Shadow wrote:
YT300000 wrote:
His Divine Shadow wrote: Thats... utterly ludicrous, the DS2 is 800km or so in diameter, a Dyson Sphere is around 2 AU's, or around 298 million kilometers.
I thought the Dyson sphere is 120 000 km in diameter.

I used the DS2 being 900 km in diameter figure.
No, a Dyson Sphere encloses a star, and the inner surface ought to be as far away as our planet is from the sun.
What type of star did the sphere enclose? Was it the same size as sol?
Name changes are for people who wear women's clothes. - Zuul

Wow. It took me a good minute to remember I didn't have testicles. -xBlackFlash

Are you sure this isn't like that time Michael Jackson stopped by your house so he could use the bathroom? - Superman
User avatar
YT300000
Sith'ari
Posts: 6528
Joined: 2003-05-20 12:49pm
Location: Calgary, Canada
Contact:

Post by YT300000 »

It's also important to consider that the DS2 was made using only a small amount of the galaxy's manufacturing capability. The entire Empire could probably make a Dyson sphere pretty quickly if it used all of its resources.
Name changes are for people who wear women's clothes. - Zuul

Wow. It took me a good minute to remember I didn't have testicles. -xBlackFlash

Are you sure this isn't like that time Michael Jackson stopped by your house so he could use the bathroom? - Superman
User avatar
Admiral Johnason
Sith Devotee
Posts: 2552
Joined: 2003-01-11 05:06pm
Location: The Rebel cruiser Defender

Post by Admiral Johnason »

I'd give them 10 years of R&D and 5 years in production to build one. It would take the resources of two or three rich sectors to pull it off, plus lots of slave and droid labor working around the clock. But yes, they could build it.
Liberals for Nixon in 3000: Nixon... with carisma and a shiny robot body.

never negoiate out of fear, but never fear to negoiate.

Captian America- Justice League

HAB submarine commander-
"We'll break you of your fear of water."
User avatar
His Divine Shadow
Commence Primary Ignition
Posts: 12791
Joined: 2002-07-03 07:22am
Location: Finland, west coast

Post by His Divine Shadow »

YT300000 wrote:
His Divine Shadow wrote:
YT300000 wrote: I thought the Dyson sphere is 120 000 km in diameter.

I used the DS2 being 900 km in diameter figure.
No, a Dyson Sphere encloses a star, and the inner surface ought to be as far away as our planet is from the sun.
What type of star did the sphere enclose? Was it the same size as sol?
I have no idea, but the size I gave would be the one if we had a Sol type star.
Those who beat their swords into plowshares will plow for those who did not.
User avatar
YT300000
Sith'ari
Posts: 6528
Joined: 2003-05-20 12:49pm
Location: Calgary, Canada
Contact:

Post by YT300000 »

Seems that the star inside IS ~ the same size as ours:
http://www.ugcs.caltech.edu/st-tng/episodes/230.html wrote:The Enterprise picks up a long-running distress call from the USS Jenolan, a ship that disappeared 75 years ago. They drop out of warp to help, and are immediately shaken by an enormous gravitational field. Although the source is not immediately visible, they trace the field to its center, and find a large metallic shell, 200 million kilometers in diameter, completely surrounding a star. In other words, they've discovered the first known Dyson sphere, used to harness the entire radiant energy output of a star for inhabitants of the sphere's huge inner surface. The Jenolan is located on the surface of the sphere a short distance away, and they head for it.
Name changes are for people who wear women's clothes. - Zuul

Wow. It took me a good minute to remember I didn't have testicles. -xBlackFlash

Are you sure this isn't like that time Michael Jackson stopped by your house so he could use the bathroom? - Superman
User avatar
Ubiquitous
Sith Devotee
Posts: 2823
Joined: 2002-07-03 06:07pm

Post by Ubiquitous »

I think people are underestimating just how difficult it would be to build a DS. Firstly, you have to create the industry possible to even create the DS [I can't even fathom how you would make sure a thing]. Next, you need to have enough neutronium to create the structure. Then you have to shift the manpower to the system in order to create the thing, which would require millions, perhaps billions of workers ...

No, this isn't even Culture level, this is Xeelee level work on the go. Your Empire needs to be universe spanning before you can find the raw material to construct such a device. I can think of only two races who could build such a structure; the ST builders and the Xeelee.

Of course, you could try and make one from something less than neutronium, but then it wouldn't be a true DS ...
User avatar
SirNitram
Rest in Peace, Black Mage
Posts: 28367
Joined: 2002-07-03 04:48pm
Location: Somewhere between nowhere and everywhere

Post by SirNitram »

ALI_G wrote:Of course, you could try and make one from something less than neutronium, but then it wouldn't be a true DS ...
That post was so full of shit I expected a flushing sound when I hit 'quote'.

A 'True' DS, you ignorant little trekkie, is a collection of iron spheres orbiting at approximately 1AU, soaking up the sun's rays. Raiding the Oort Cloud and Asteroid Belt should produce enough iron to capture the majority of the sun's rays.

An 'Enclosed' Sphere is harder to build, but still not requiring even Empire level tech. As Larry Niven pointed out(In A Step Further Out), the mass needed for it is present in the system we live in now. Of course, we'd need to perfect cheap transmutation to convert Jupiter, Saturn, and Neptune into iron, along with the Oort Cloud and Asteroid Belt, to produce a thin one. Any group with decent FTL, reach, and shipping can gather these resources.

The biggest problems such a Sphere encounters are easily overcome with Imperial technology: Gravity can be generated without spin(Removing the problem of the atmosphere gathering on the 'equator'), and shielding can prevent asteroids from wrecking havoc.

Now, on to what you probably thought was a rebuttal. Neutronium does not need to be present for a true Dyson Sphere. The concept was not developed by Trek. If, for some bizarre reason, the Empire wanted it coated in it, it's quite possible: You do recall that the Empire maintained millions of ships, all of which had Imperial Dura-Armour, which is Neutronium based, right?

Finally, I point to my quote, to show that the Empire has use for Dyson Sphere's: They use them to harvest Black Holes and produce antigrav.
Manic Progressive: A liberal who violently swings from anger at politicos to despondency over them.

Out Of Context theatre: Ron Paul has repeatedly said he's not a racist. - Destructinator XIII on why Ron Paul isn't racist.

Shadowy Overlord - BMs/Black Mage Monkey - BOTM/Jetfire - Cybertron's Finest/General Miscreant/ASVS/Supermoderator Emeritus

Debator Classification: Trollhunter
User avatar
NecronLord
Harbinger of Doom
Harbinger of Doom
Posts: 27384
Joined: 2002-07-07 06:30am
Location: The Lost City

Post by NecronLord »

No, this isn't even Culture level,
HA!

HA HA HA

The culture had Spheres. and Rings and Orbitals several centuries before most of the books. (Consider Phlebas)
Superior Moderator - BotB - HAB [Drill Instructor]-Writer- Stardestroyer.net's resident Star-God.
"We believe in the systematic understanding of the physical world through observation and experimentation, argument and debate and most of all freedom of will." ~ Stargate: The Ark of Truth
Post Reply