Lowest End Sci-Fi Universe?

SF: discuss futuristic sci-fi series, ideas, and crossovers.

Moderator: NecronLord

User avatar
NecronLord
Harbinger of Doom
Harbinger of Doom
Posts: 27384
Joined: 2002-07-07 06:30am
Location: The Lost City

Post by NecronLord »

Darth Wong wrote:I think the weakest is the Stargate sci-fi universe. They have these ultra-fast stargates for interplanetary travel, but their industrial base is unskilled labourers!
With respect lord wong, it should be pointed out that the TNG era Federation mines it's dilitium in the same way, execpt that their laborers happen to all be qualified doctors.

also the stargate was not invented by the Goa'uld, they were invented by the 'ancient ones'

They also have tha asgard, who despite being annoying who can travel from galaxy to galaxy in a matter of minutes. and have outdated ships about twice the size of an ISD.

and taking the film as seperate, Ra was on his own, what kind of an industrial base do you expect him to have?
Superior Moderator - BotB - HAB [Drill Instructor]-Writer- Stardestroyer.net's resident Star-God.
"We believe in the systematic understanding of the physical world through observation and experimentation, argument and debate and most of all freedom of will." ~ Stargate: The Ark of Truth
User avatar
NecronLord
Harbinger of Doom
Harbinger of Doom
Posts: 27384
Joined: 2002-07-07 06:30am
Location: The Lost City

Post by NecronLord »

Stargate: Which faction? Arguably, the "Earth" faction is the weakest of all because all they have going for them is the alien Stargate, but otherwise they're just 20th century Earth. But arguably, they also don't really qualify either The Gou'old would give ST trouble, but they would be ripped to shreds by anyone else. They appear to have FTL speeds arguably within SW's range (they crossed a good size of the galaxy in two hours in "Envelope" not to mention "Nemesis", and that instantaneous Stargate system too) but are deficient in other areas. Lord Wong already mentioned the Gou'old's poor infastructure and the Tok'ra infastructure is even worse. Their weapons appear to be in the low KT range (several shots were required to destroy a Gou'old mothership from another one, and in "Envelope" a single AIM-120 modified with a low KT nuke was claimed to be capable of destroying them). The most powerful race is undoubtedly the Asguard, of which appear to possess massive fleets relative to other races, but their fleet numbers seem comparable to a single ST faction's, at best. Nonetheless, they seem to be able to take on a ST fleet on pretty equal terms, barring simply disengaging with their FTL drives.

"envolope?" there is no such episode of SG1. http://www.stargates.tk/

and their weapons are not in the KT range. They regard a gigaton nuclear warhed as a joke, when their sheilds are up anyway.

I assume that you refer to the destruction of heru-ur's ship by apophis' battleship. It should be noted that the other ship had it's shields raised, and the destruction started after one~three shots. How long does it take for one isd to destroy another? how long does it take an SSD to destroy an ISD?
Superior Moderator - BotB - HAB [Drill Instructor]-Writer- Stardestroyer.net's resident Star-God.
"We believe in the systematic understanding of the physical world through observation and experimentation, argument and debate and most of all freedom of will." ~ Stargate: The Ark of Truth
User avatar
RayCav of ASVS
Jedi Council Member
Posts: 1546
Joined: 2002-07-20 02:34am
Location: Either ISD Nemesis, DSD Demeter or outside Coronet, Corellia, take your pick
Contact:

Post by RayCav of ASVS »

NecronLord wrote:
"envolope?" there is no such episode of SG1. http://www.stargates.tk/

and their weapons are not in the KT range. They regard a gigaton nuclear warhed as a joke, when their sheilds are up anyway.

I assume that you refer to the destruction of heru-ur's ship by apophis' battleship. It should be noted that the other ship had it's shields raised, and the destruction started after one~three shots. How long does it take for one isd to destroy another? how long does it take an SSD to destroy an ISD?
First of all, USE THE DAMN QUOTE BUTTON!

Second, I swear the episode's name was "Envelope" Nonetheless, there was an episode with a USAF Gou'old fighter, the one with the recall device.

In that episode, a single AIM-120C was claimed sufficient enough to destroy a Gou'old ship. It normally carries a conventinal warhead, and probably cannot carry anything bigger than a W-80 or W-88 warhead.

Thanks for reminding me of the gigaton device from the movie! The show does kinda fuck some things up in terms of canon. From the movie it's clear the Stargate WAS a Gou'old invention, but they changed that in the show.
::sig removed because it STILL offended Kelly. Hey, it's not my fault that I thing Wedge is a::

Kelly: SHUT UP ALREADY!
User avatar
Sea Skimmer
Yankee Capitalist Air Pirate
Posts: 37390
Joined: 2002-07-03 11:49pm
Location: Passchendaele City, HAB

Post by Sea Skimmer »

RayCav of ASVS wrote:
NecronLord wrote:
"envolope?" there is no such episode of SG1. http://www.stargates.tk/

and their weapons are not in the KT range. They regard a gigaton nuclear warhed as a joke, when their sheilds are up anyway.

I assume that you refer to the destruction of heru-ur's ship by apophis' battleship. It should be noted that the other ship had it's shields raised, and the destruction started after one~three shots. How long does it take for one isd to destroy another? how long does it take an SSD to destroy an ISD?
First of all, USE THE DAMN QUOTE BUTTON!

Second, I swear the episode's name was "Envelope" Nonetheless, there was an episode with a USAF Gou'old fighter, the one with the recall device.

In that episode, a single AIM-120C was claimed sufficient enough to destroy a Gou'old ship. It normally carries a conventinal warhead, and probably cannot carry anything bigger than a W-80 or W-88 warhead.

Thanks for reminding me of the gigaton device from the movie! The show does kinda fuck some things up in terms of canon. From the movie it's clear the Stargate WAS a Gou'old invention, but they changed that in the show.

AIM-120 carries a 90-pound Blast Frag warhead, and no nuclear warhead in existence would fit. Plenty weight little enough, but there all the wrong shape and have yields of only 250 tons.

W-88 and W-80 are both much to large to work.


Earth 2150 is pretty low, 120mm cannons and 122mm artillery are still competitive weapons, course they do have orbit altering nukes and energy weapons that can reach the Earth from the Moon plus POS.
"This cult of special forces is as sensible as to form a Royal Corps of Tree Climbers and say that no soldier who does not wear its green hat with a bunch of oak leaves stuck in it should be expected to climb a tree"
— Field Marshal William Slim 1956
User avatar
NecronLord
Harbinger of Doom
Harbinger of Doom
Posts: 27384
Joined: 2002-07-07 06:30am
Location: The Lost City

Post by NecronLord »

RayCav of ASVS wrote:
NecronLord wrote:
"envolope?" there is no such episode of SG1. http://www.stargates.tk/

and their weapons are not in the KT range. They regard a gigaton nuclear warhed as a joke, when their sheilds are up anyway.

I assume that you refer to the destruction of heru-ur's ship by apophis' battleship. It should be noted that the other ship had it's shields raised, and the destruction started after one~three shots. How long does it take for one isd to destroy another? how long does it take an SSD to destroy an ISD?
First of all, USE THE DAMN QUOTE BUTTON!

Second, I swear the episode's name was "Envelope" Nonetheless, there was an episode with a USAF Gou'old fighter, the one with the recall device.

In that episode, a single AIM-120C was claimed sufficient enough to destroy a Gou'old ship. It normally carries a conventinal warhead, and probably cannot carry anything bigger than a W-80 or W-88 warhead.

Thanks for reminding me of the gigaton device from the movie! The show does kinda fuck some things up in terms of canon. From the movie it's clear the Stargate WAS a Gou'old invention, but they changed that in the show.
Hey, I can make one single mistake can't I?

The AIM-120C was upgraded with Naquda, x 100 firepower. and she said it was going to use some funky sheild disruption device to get past the sheilds. Theres an episode where they fire 1000 gigaton enhanced ICBM's at apophis' ships and he basically laughs at them.

The ep was called tangent by the way :D

I also noticed that the timer on the movie bomb lost twenty seconds on the way.. humm hisenburgs(SP) plot principle?
Superior Moderator - BotB - HAB [Drill Instructor]-Writer- Stardestroyer.net's resident Star-God.
"We believe in the systematic understanding of the physical world through observation and experimentation, argument and debate and most of all freedom of will." ~ Stargate: The Ark of Truth
User avatar
NecronLord
Harbinger of Doom
Harbinger of Doom
Posts: 27384
Joined: 2002-07-07 06:30am
Location: The Lost City

Post by NecronLord »

Sea Skimmer wrote:
RayCav of ASVS wrote:
NecronLord wrote:
"envolope?" there is no such episode of SG1. http://www.stargates.tk/

and their weapons are not in the KT range. They regard a gigaton nuclear warhed as a joke, when their sheilds are up anyway.

I assume that you refer to the destruction of heru-ur's ship by apophis' battleship. It should be noted that the other ship had it's shields raised, and the destruction started after one~three shots. How long does it take for one isd to destroy another? how long does it take an SSD to destroy an ISD?
First of all, USE THE DAMN QUOTE BUTTON!

Second, I swear the episode's name was "Envelope" Nonetheless, there was an episode with a USAF Gou'old fighter, the one with the recall device.

In that episode, a single AIM-120C was claimed sufficient enough to destroy a Gou'old ship. It normally carries a conventinal warhead, and probably cannot carry anything bigger than a W-80 or W-88 warhead.

Thanks for reminding me of the gigaton device from the movie! The show does kinda fuck some things up in terms of canon. From the movie it's clear the Stargate WAS a Gou'old invention, but they changed that in the show.

AIM-120 carries a 90-pound Blast Frag warhead, and no nuclear warhead in existence would fit. Plenty weight little enough, but there all the wrong shape and have yields of only 250 tons.

W-88 and W-80 are both much to large to work.


Earth 2150 is pretty low, 120mm cannons and 122mm artillery are still competitive weapons, course they do have orbit altering nukes and energy weapons that can reach the Earth from the Moon plus POS.
It was specifically called a modified one using hybrid tech.
Superior Moderator - BotB - HAB [Drill Instructor]-Writer- Stardestroyer.net's resident Star-God.
"We believe in the systematic understanding of the physical world through observation and experimentation, argument and debate and most of all freedom of will." ~ Stargate: The Ark of Truth
User avatar
RayCav of ASVS
Jedi Council Member
Posts: 1546
Joined: 2002-07-20 02:34am
Location: Either ISD Nemesis, DSD Demeter or outside Coronet, Corellia, take your pick
Contact:

Post by RayCav of ASVS »

Sea Skimmer wrote:
RayCav of ASVS wrote:
NecronLord wrote:
"envolope?" there is no such episode of SG1. http://www.stargates.tk/

and their weapons are not in the KT range. They regard a gigaton nuclear warhed as a joke, when their sheilds are up anyway.

I assume that you refer to the destruction of heru-ur's ship by apophis' battleship. It should be noted that the other ship had it's shields raised, and the destruction started after one~three shots. How long does it take for one isd to destroy another? how long does it take an SSD to destroy an ISD?
First of all, USE THE DAMN QUOTE BUTTON!

Second, I swear the episode's name was "Envelope" Nonetheless, there was an episode with a USAF Gou'old fighter, the one with the recall device.

In that episode, a single AIM-120C was claimed sufficient enough to destroy a Gou'old ship. It normally carries a conventinal warhead, and probably cannot carry anything bigger than a W-80 or W-88 warhead.

Thanks for reminding me of the gigaton device from the movie! The show does kinda fuck some things up in terms of canon. From the movie it's clear the Stargate WAS a Gou'old invention, but they changed that in the show.

AIM-120 carries a 90-pound Blast Frag warhead, and no nuclear warhead in existence would fit. Plenty weight little enough, but there all the wrong shape and have yields of only 250 tons.

W-88 and W-80 are both much to large to work.


Earth 2150 is pretty low, 120mm cannons and 122mm artillery are still competitive weapons, course they do have orbit altering nukes and energy weapons that can reach the Earth from the Moon plus POS.
I thought the W-88 was the smallest nuke warhead in existence. Wasn't that the one the Chinese stole from Los Alamos?

And this is not real life, I'm going by what the show states.

I would rate Earth 2150 at least one notch below Gundam.
::sig removed because it STILL offended Kelly. Hey, it's not my fault that I thing Wedge is a::

Kelly: SHUT UP ALREADY!
User avatar
RayCav of ASVS
Jedi Council Member
Posts: 1546
Joined: 2002-07-20 02:34am
Location: Either ISD Nemesis, DSD Demeter or outside Coronet, Corellia, take your pick
Contact:

Post by RayCav of ASVS »

NecronLord wrote:
RayCav of ASVS wrote:
NecronLord wrote:
"envolope?" there is no such episode of SG1. http://www.stargates.tk/

and their weapons are not in the KT range. They regard a gigaton nuclear warhed as a joke, when their sheilds are up anyway.

I assume that you refer to the destruction of heru-ur's ship by apophis' battleship. It should be noted that the other ship had it's shields raised, and the destruction started after one~three shots. How long does it take for one isd to destroy another? how long does it take an SSD to destroy an ISD?
First of all, USE THE DAMN QUOTE BUTTON!

Second, I swear the episode's name was "Envelope" Nonetheless, there was an episode with a USAF Gou'old fighter, the one with the recall device.

In that episode, a single AIM-120C was claimed sufficient enough to destroy a Gou'old ship. It normally carries a conventinal warhead, and probably cannot carry anything bigger than a W-80 or W-88 warhead.

Thanks for reminding me of the gigaton device from the movie! The show does kinda fuck some things up in terms of canon. From the movie it's clear the Stargate WAS a Gou'old invention, but they changed that in the show.
Hey, I can make one single mistake can't I?

The AIM-120C was upgraded with Naquda, x 100 firepower. and she said it was going to use some funky sheild disruption device to get past the sheilds. Theres an episode where they fire 1000 gigaton enhanced ICBM's at apophis' ships and he basically laughs at them.

The ep was called tangent by the way :D

I also noticed that the timer on the movie bomb lost twenty seconds on the way.. humm hisenburgs(SP) plot principle?
Thanks for the clarification!

I would pass of the "time loss" as just a scene where they cut to time elapse. Happens all the time :D
::sig removed because it STILL offended Kelly. Hey, it's not my fault that I thing Wedge is a::

Kelly: SHUT UP ALREADY!
User avatar
NecronLord
Harbinger of Doom
Harbinger of Doom
Posts: 27384
Joined: 2002-07-07 06:30am
Location: The Lost City

Post by NecronLord »

Poor Ra, Camera tricks destroyed him. I demand a rematch. Also she said should be sufficient to disable it. Note that has never happened. it's like the infamous 30% crust destruction.
Superior Moderator - BotB - HAB [Drill Instructor]-Writer- Stardestroyer.net's resident Star-God.
"We believe in the systematic understanding of the physical world through observation and experimentation, argument and debate and most of all freedom of will." ~ Stargate: The Ark of Truth
User avatar
NecronLord
Harbinger of Doom
Harbinger of Doom
Posts: 27384
Joined: 2002-07-07 06:30am
Location: The Lost City

Post by NecronLord »

ICK, that should have been thousand Megaton ICBM's
Superior Moderator - BotB - HAB [Drill Instructor]-Writer- Stardestroyer.net's resident Star-God.
"We believe in the systematic understanding of the physical world through observation and experimentation, argument and debate and most of all freedom of will." ~ Stargate: The Ark of Truth
User avatar
RayCav of ASVS
Jedi Council Member
Posts: 1546
Joined: 2002-07-20 02:34am
Location: Either ISD Nemesis, DSD Demeter or outside Coronet, Corellia, take your pick
Contact:

Post by RayCav of ASVS »

NecronLord wrote:Poor Ra, Camera tricks destroyed him. I demand a rematch. Also she said should be sufficient to disable it. Note that has never happened. it's like the infamous 30% crust destruction.
Yeah, true. Should've thought of that myself.
::sig removed because it STILL offended Kelly. Hey, it's not my fault that I thing Wedge is a::

Kelly: SHUT UP ALREADY!
User avatar
paladin
Jedi Master
Posts: 1393
Joined: 2002-07-22 11:01am
Location: Terra Maria

Post by paladin »

SolidSnake wrote:Well, Battlestar Galactica is just lacking in FTL sensors, and thats all. Perhaps the new series of Battlestar Galactica will shed some light on the tech.
Space: Above and Beyond has some amazing FTL. I remember an episode where it took them less than five seconds to enter a new Star System.
I don't know why people think B5 is weak. It couldnt dent the GE, but it would destroy the UFP, and the First Ones could destroy the Borg. B5 has good FTL, and the power of gravimetric drive makes a capital ship as manuverable as a fighter.
Why do people think B5 is weak? I think it's because only a few races have uber tech. The First Ones seem to be only ones with some kind of force fields and planet killing weapons.
User avatar
Alyeska
Federation Ambassador
Posts: 17496
Joined: 2002-08-11 07:28pm
Location: Montana, USA

Post by Alyeska »

The AIM 120 listed in SG-1 as being able to destroy a Goa'uld mothership was stated to have a naquida enhanced warhead (which indicates vastly improved nuclear reaction) combined with shield penetrating capabilities. It was meant to be fired through a motherships shields and hit critical points on Motherships.
"If the facts are on your side, pound on the facts. If the law is on your side, pound on the law. If neither is on your side, pound on the table."

"The captain claimed our people violated a 4,000 year old treaty forbidding us to develop hyperspace technology. Extermination of our planet was the consequence. The subject did not survive interrogation."
User avatar
NecronLord
Harbinger of Doom
Harbinger of Doom
Posts: 27384
Joined: 2002-07-07 06:30am
Location: The Lost City

Post by NecronLord »

please ignore my posts, i'm not here, i am clearly unworthy :evil:
Superior Moderator - BotB - HAB [Drill Instructor]-Writer- Stardestroyer.net's resident Star-God.
"We believe in the systematic understanding of the physical world through observation and experimentation, argument and debate and most of all freedom of will." ~ Stargate: The Ark of Truth
User avatar
seanrobertson
Jedi Council Member
Posts: 2145
Joined: 2002-07-12 05:57pm

Post by seanrobertson »

RayCav of ASVS wrote:Here's what I think:
BTech: would still rip ST to shreds.
?
At worse, BTech's ranges are only as bad as Star Trek's (BTech=up close and personal, ST=up close and personal as seen in countless examples, none the least of which is SOA).
Actually, that's far from the case. Check our ISA page. Pay particular
attention to the White Star's range limitations.

Btw, why are you grouping all of Star Trek together? The Borg are more
powerful than the Federation, yet both are a part of Trek. Would all
of B5 be able to whip the Borg? No. Even the First Ones would struggle
with that.
BTech weapons are from low kiloton to low megaton range, nothing worse than a phototorp,
Hmm...I tend to think low megaton range is possible, but a good bit
of episodic evidence indicates it's much lower. For the most
part, Trek outguns the YR by roughly an order of magnitude. This is
evident in the scale of their most massive weapons; e.g., G'Kar's 500 megaton Gaim bombs, so effective against the Shadows, are a full order of magnitude weaker than Cardassian heavy interceptors (21.5 gigaton yield).
and are better armed than a ST ship.
Strongly disagree here. No conventional ship in Babylon 5 has ever displayed the ability to wipe out all planetary life in short order.
The Centauri used 12 cruisers, attacking over four DAYS, to kill
several million Narns. Even in Kirk's era a single starship could
do a more thorough job in arguably far less time.
ST may have anywhere from a slight to a significant advantage in ship numbers, though, as BTech possesses relatively few space fairing vessels.
The First Ones have a lot of ships, tens of thousands observed. Small powers like the EA probably have hundreds to around a thousand including support ships. Minbari and Centauri forces probably go 3-5,000 ships (including rustbuckets like Liandra). Given that the Dominion Alliance had 30,000 ships in "Tacking Into the Wind," young Trek powers would
have a slight numerical advantage.
This may just be a result of the lop-sided attention BMechs get in the literature, so there may actually be a fair number of ships. Nonetheless, I predict that BTech should fair at least slightly better than equal against Star Trek.
First Ones? Yes. But without their planet-killers, even they are far more vulnerable than some are willing to admit. And the point remains,
the Shadow Planet Killer is less effective at planetary bombardment
than a small fleet of top-of-the-line Alpha Quadrant warships.
Independence Day (NOT Independence War!): Pretty-ass weak. They were defeated by stupid 20th century humans, after all! Their weaponry still has a long ways to go before they even break into the kiloton range, with the sole exception of the city-ship lasers, and even they may just barely reach into the KT range if at all. Their defensive and offensive capabilities appear to be centered around carrier ops and the large laser of their city ships, as they haven't demonstrated any other weapons. However, ST's lack of starfighter support may mean that ID4 has an advantage with their sheer numbers of fighters, and it all depends on the ships' ability to absorb firepower rather than dishing it out. It's hard to judge, but I think it's possible for ID4 to win against Trek, even if it might require a bit of luck.
If their tactics are anything like in the film, they might do fine against
ground forces, but they'd promptly get their ass handed to them
in space. Those city ships only appear to have one ventral weapon,
and it doesn't appear to be a threat to a Trek warship's shields (as
you've described them). Plus, they're extremely slow to maneuver:
could they ever get off a shot? Did the mother ship have any weapons?
It, too, would be a nice target for a fleet to simply bombard with impugnity.
If its shields happened to prove especially resistant (something we have
no proof of), just crash an AM tanker into the thing.

The fighters were a joke. They could barely shred jet fighters. Fire
a photorp into a swarm of them, BAM.
Homeworld: Already discussed, I think they'll crush Trek.

World War: I think these guys really should be lumped together with the ID4 aliens (come to think of it, I think ID4 is a total rip of WW). I really don't know much about them, but Trek may stand a good to very good chance against them, based on what I heard.

Starship Troopers: Can someone say Trek Stomping Party(TM)? :)

StarCraft: See above, multiply by 10, rinse, repeat
From what I've heard of SC, it should win rather easily. Starship Troopers,
though? Nah. Those goofy bug farts tore up their ships. And their
ships maneuvered like cows. With no apparent point defense weapons
or shields, photorps would shred 'em.
Pain, or damage, don't end the world, or despair, or fuckin' beatin's. The world ends when you're dead. Until then, ya got more punishment in store. Stand it like a man ... and give some back.
-Al Swearengen

Cry woe, destruction, ruin and decay: The worst is death, and death will have his day.
-Ole' Shakey's "Richard II," Act III, scene ii.
Image
User avatar
Sea Skimmer
Yankee Capitalist Air Pirate
Posts: 37390
Joined: 2002-07-03 11:49pm
Location: Passchendaele City, HAB

Post by Sea Skimmer »

[quote="NecronLord]

Theres an episode where they fire 1000 gigaton enhanced ICBM's at apophis' ships and he basically laughs at them.

[/quote]

The missiles didn't detonate though; they just smashed into debris against the shields.
"This cult of special forces is as sensible as to form a Royal Corps of Tree Climbers and say that no soldier who does not wear its green hat with a bunch of oak leaves stuck in it should be expected to climb a tree"
— Field Marshal William Slim 1956
User avatar
The Yosemite Bear
Mostly Harmless Nutcase (Requiescat in Pace)
Posts: 35211
Joined: 2002-07-21 02:38am
Location: Dave's Not Here Man

Post by The Yosemite Bear »

Black Regiment/Warworld/Hellworld/Darkover/Caticle for Leibowitz

See what happens when the starspanning empire collapses and your left with sharp objects and the occassional person with telepathy?
Image

The scariest folk song lyrics are "My Boy Grew up to be just like me" from cats in the cradle by Harry Chapin
User avatar
Sea Skimmer
Yankee Capitalist Air Pirate
Posts: 37390
Joined: 2002-07-03 11:49pm
Location: Passchendaele City, HAB

Post by Sea Skimmer »

RayCav of ASVS wrote:
Sea Skimmer wrote:
RayCav of ASVS wrote: First of all, USE THE DAMN QUOTE BUTTON!

Second, I swear the episode's name was "Envelope" Nonetheless, there was an episode with a USAF Gou'old fighter, the one with the recall device.

In that episode, a single AIM-120C was claimed sufficient enough to destroy a Gou'old ship. It normally carries a conventinal warhead, and probably cannot carry anything bigger than a W-80 or W-88 warhead.

Thanks for reminding me of the gigaton device from the movie! The show does kinda fuck some things up in terms of canon. From the movie it's clear the Stargate WAS a Gou'old invention, but they changed that in the show.

AIM-120 carries a 90-pound Blast Frag warhead, and no nuclear warhead in existence would fit. Plenty weight little enough, but there all the wrong shape and have yields of only 250 tons.

W-88 and W-80 are both much to large to work.


Earth 2150 is pretty low, 120mm cannons and 122mm artillery are still competitive weapons, course they do have orbit altering nukes and energy weapons that can reach the Earth from the Moon plus POS.
I thought the W-88 was the smallest nuke warhead in existence. Wasn't that the one the Chinese stole from Los Alamos?

And this is not real life, I'm going by what the show states.
W-88 is the Trident II's primary warhead, 150 kilotons IIRC. Its not the worlds smallest, either in yield or size, though it is quite small. It is however what the Chinese stole, they also stole the RV design and the radar mapping system used by the MIRV targeting system.

I'm not aware of any nuclear weapon which could fit inside a AIM-120, some ADM's and the 250 ton davy crocket warheads weigh under 90 pounds, however they are too wide for the missile airframe.

Using an AIM-120 is quite stupid anyway, without vectored trust it would be little better then a dump fire rocket in space, and in an atmosphere I can think of dozens of better choices.
"This cult of special forces is as sensible as to form a Royal Corps of Tree Climbers and say that no soldier who does not wear its green hat with a bunch of oak leaves stuck in it should be expected to climb a tree"
— Field Marshal William Slim 1956
User avatar
Enlightenment
Moderator Emeritus
Posts: 2404
Joined: 2002-07-04 07:38pm
Location: Annoying nationalist twits since 1990

Post by Enlightenment »

If a line is drawn between technothrillers and real sci-fi/SF, the bottom end of the sci-fi power list is probably in the Firestar, Russian Spring, or Mars universes, none of which depict any technology that couldn't be in production within 25-50 years if we had a good reason to develop it.
It's not my place in life to make people happy. Don't talk to me unless you're prepared to watch me slaughter cows you hold sacred. Don't talk to me unless you're prepared to have your basic assumptions challenged. If you want bunnies in light, talk to someone else.
User avatar
Alyeska
Federation Ambassador
Posts: 17496
Joined: 2002-08-11 07:28pm
Location: Montana, USA

Post by Alyeska »

Sea Skimmer wrote:W-88 is the Trident II's primary warhead, 150 kilotons IIRC. Its not the worlds smallest, either in yield or size, though it is quite small. It is however what the Chinese stole, they also stole the RV design and the radar mapping system used by the MIRV targeting system.

I'm not aware of any nuclear weapon which could fit inside a AIM-120, some ADM's and the 250 ton davy crocket warheads weigh under 90 pounds, however they are too wide for the missile airframe.

Using an AIM-120 is quite stupid anyway, without vectored trust it would be little better then a dump fire rocket in space, and in an atmosphere I can think of dozens of better choices.
They should have been using the AIM 54's, or even rebuilt AIM 47s.
"If the facts are on your side, pound on the facts. If the law is on your side, pound on the law. If neither is on your side, pound on the table."

"The captain claimed our people violated a 4,000 year old treaty forbidding us to develop hyperspace technology. Extermination of our planet was the consequence. The subject did not survive interrogation."
Jim Raynor
Sith Devotee
Posts: 2922
Joined: 2002-07-11 04:42am

Post by Jim Raynor »

Enlightenment wrote:If a line is drawn between technothrillers and real sci-fi/SF, the bottom end of the sci-fi power list is probably in the Firestar, Russian Spring, or Mars universes, none of which depict any technology that couldn't be in production within 25-50 years if we had a good reason to develop it.
Yeah, I think that this should be kept to space-faring scifi universes. Without that, people can bring in anything from Waterworld to Minority Report to Robocop and call them the weakest.
User avatar
RayCav of ASVS
Jedi Council Member
Posts: 1546
Joined: 2002-07-20 02:34am
Location: Either ISD Nemesis, DSD Demeter or outside Coronet, Corellia, take your pick
Contact:

Post by RayCav of ASVS »

seanrobertson wrote:
RayCav of ASVS wrote:Here's what I think:
BTech: would still rip ST to shreds.
?
At worse, BTech's ranges are only as bad as Star Trek's (BTech=up close and personal, ST=up close and personal as seen in countless examples, none the least of which is SOA).
Actually, that's far from the case. Check our ISA page. Pay particular
attention to the White Star's range limitations.

Btw, why are you grouping all of Star Trek together? The Borg are more
powerful than the Federation, yet both are a part of Trek. Would all
of B5 be able to whip the Borg? No. Even the First Ones would struggle
with that.
BTech weapons are from low kiloton to low megaton range, nothing worse than a phototorp,
Hmm...I tend to think low megaton range is possible, but a good bit
of episodic evidence indicates it's much lower. For the most
part, Trek outguns the YR by roughly an order of magnitude. This is
evident in the scale of their most massive weapons; e.g., G'Kar's 500 megaton Gaim bombs, so effective against the Shadows, are a full order of magnitude weaker than Cardassian heavy interceptors (21.5 gigaton yield).
and are better armed than a ST ship.
Strongly disagree here. No conventional ship in Babylon 5 has ever displayed the ability to wipe out all planetary life in short order.
The Centauri used 12 cruisers, attacking over four DAYS, to kill
several million Narns. Even in Kirk's era a single starship could
do a more thorough job in arguably far less time.
ST may have anywhere from a slight to a significant advantage in ship numbers, though, as BTech possesses relatively few space fairing vessels.
The First Ones have a lot of ships, tens of thousands observed. Small powers like the EA probably have hundreds to around a thousand including support ships. Minbari and Centauri forces probably go 3-5,000 ships (including rustbuckets like Liandra). Given that the Dominion Alliance had 30,000 ships in "Tacking Into the Wind," young Trek powers would
have a slight numerical advantage.
This may just be a result of the lop-sided attention BMechs get in the literature, so there may actually be a fair number of ships. Nonetheless, I predict that BTech should fair at least slightly better than equal against Star Trek.
First Ones? Yes. But without their planet-killers, even they are far more vulnerable than some are willing to admit. And the point remains,
the Shadow Planet Killer is less effective at planetary bombardment
than a small fleet of top-of-the-line Alpha Quadrant warships.
Independence Day (NOT Independence War!): Pretty-ass weak. They were defeated by stupid 20th century humans, after all! Their weaponry still has a long ways to go before they even break into the kiloton range, with the sole exception of the city-ship lasers, and even they may just barely reach into the KT range if at all. Their defensive and offensive capabilities appear to be centered around carrier ops and the large laser of their city ships, as they haven't demonstrated any other weapons. However, ST's lack of starfighter support may mean that ID4 has an advantage with their sheer numbers of fighters, and it all depends on the ships' ability to absorb firepower rather than dishing it out. It's hard to judge, but I think it's possible for ID4 to win against Trek, even if it might require a bit of luck.
If their tactics are anything like in the film, they might do fine against
ground forces, but they'd promptly get their ass handed to them
in space. Those city ships only appear to have one ventral weapon,
and it doesn't appear to be a threat to a Trek warship's shields (as
you've described them). Plus, they're extremely slow to maneuver:
could they ever get off a shot? Did the mother ship have any weapons?
It, too, would be a nice target for a fleet to simply bombard with impugnity.
If its shields happened to prove especially resistant (something we have
no proof of), just crash an AM tanker into the thing.

The fighters were a joke. They could barely shred jet fighters. Fire
a photorp into a swarm of them, BAM.
Homeworld: Already discussed, I think they'll crush Trek.

World War: I think these guys really should be lumped together with the ID4 aliens (come to think of it, I think ID4 is a total rip of WW). I really don't know much about them, but Trek may stand a good to very good chance against them, based on what I heard.

Starship Troopers: Can someone say Trek Stomping Party(TM)? :)

StarCraft: See above, multiply by 10, rinse, repeat
From what I've heard of SC, it should win rather easily. Starship Troopers,
though? Nah. Those goofy bug farts tore up their ships. And their
ships maneuvered like cows. With no apparent point defense weapons
or shields, photorps would shred 'em.

Wow, this whole post is a mess

When I say BTech, I mean BattleTech, which is far different from Babylon 5 :P
::sig removed because it STILL offended Kelly. Hey, it's not my fault that I thing Wedge is a::

Kelly: SHUT UP ALREADY!
Howedar
Emperor's Thumb
Posts: 12472
Joined: 2002-07-03 05:06pm
Location: St. Paul, MN

Post by Howedar »

Weakest spacefaring scifi would probably be very early Known Space civilization (Thrint-contact era or so).
Howedar is no longer here. Need to talk to him? Talk to Pick.
User avatar
Crown
NARF
Posts: 10615
Joined: 2002-07-11 11:45am
Location: In Transit ...

Post by Crown »

I LOVE SPACE: ABOVE AND BEYOND!!!! :mrgreen:
SolidSnake wrote:Space: Above and Beyond has some amazing FTL. I remember an episode where it took them less than five seconds to enter a new Star System.
Yes S:AAB does have some outrages FTL travel, on the show they classify it as the Eckerly Inertialess Drive (I think), however in the novelisations it states that interstellar travel is accomplished by naturally forming wormholes, (that one imagines open with some kind of 'trigger') that occur around Stars.

Having said that however all the info I could find on the web state as the Saratogas' heaviest hitting weapon would be the 1.2GigaWatt pulse Laser cannon. Assuming the energy is transfered in on second, it gives us only 285tons of TNT for a minimum. If we assume that it's transfered over one tenth of a second; 2.857 kilotons of TNT. And even though it doesn't act like a laser, ie travels slower than light, can be seen in a vaccum, it would be a hard sell convincing Trekkies, that it would get beneath the navigational shields :roll: It also has a 'kinetic particle weapon' but were aren't told it's yeild. Also it Phalanx missiles, one assumes, are fusion grade weapon warheads.

But either way, it puts the fire power of S:AAB below a SW fighter, so....

I think that the reason I love S:AAB so much is that it didn't feel like a Sci-Fi show. I mean it just felt like you were watching the lives of some people who could very easily be you. They weren't chossen by destiny to fulfill a certain role, they were just following orders and trying to find their way through a situation that they didn't know anything about and that they couldn't control. If any show ever made me wanna join the military it was S:AAB. And it was the only show that I can recall that the good guys, were in essence always loosing in some form or another. The show wasn't afraid to kill it's characters, and that above all added a sence of realism that I found lacking in other series.
Image
Η ζωή, η ζωή εδω τελειώνει!
"Science is one cold-hearted bitch with a 14" strap-on" - Masuka 'Dexter'
"Angela is not the woman you think she is Gabriel, she's done terrible things"
"So have I, and I'm going to do them all to you." - Sylar to Arthur 'Heroes'
User avatar
Vendetta
Emperor's Hand
Posts: 10895
Joined: 2002-07-07 04:57pm
Location: Sheffield, UK

Post by Vendetta »

Least advanced sci-fi universe?

The Difference Engine?
Post Reply