1SuprJesusFreak wrote:Funny, guys. Be the way Yuri, I'm 16. All of those thinks could have been and have been explained (duh). But you will never (if you do I give you full rights to kill me if I'm still living and do whatever you want with the body) find a scientific answer for the very first living thing. You will never learn where that first spark of life came from without looking to the Bible.
This isn't somebody's funny idea of a troll drill is it? Let's review the facts shall we?
A) Complex organic molecules seem to form spontaneously inside large molecular clouds.
B) Among these organic molecules are amino acids, and at least one DNA base component.
C) One can create structures resembling very primitive cellular membranes (bubbles of lipid, really) in a laboratory environment.
D) Last year, a team of scientists at the State University of New York managed to sucessfully
synthesize a poliovirus without using any sort of natural template.
(For details refer to the journal of the American Association for the Advancement of Science, 9 August, 2002 issue, p. 1016)
E) Note that in none of the previous arguments, I mentioned any sort of God. Neither did I mention the Bible. Furthermore
F) According to the Bible, photosynthesizing plants were created before the light that they rely on. (Gen. 1:14-19)
G) F is completely ludicrous. Furthermore,
H) Flowering plants were created before the animals that they need to fertilize them (Gen 1:1-2:3)
I) This is also an absurdity.
J) Since examining the Bible reveals laughable absurdities, whereas scientific inquiry tends to get it right.
K) One should not rely on the Bible for anything remotely resembling a valid account for the beginning of life. Go read a biology textbook!
