Ready? Don't say I didn't warn you…
All quotes (until said otherwise) come from this topic: Link 1
At which, someone calls him a Communist, and…I'll write books on philosophy and have an alternate job.I myself considered it befitting to obtain a role as a philosopher, however, colleges and universities that want a philosophy professor are extremely rare, and certainly, philosophers cannot make a living like they did long before, so the only position even close to a philosopher in the career world is just what I mentioned, to become a professor. So, good luck, because you will most *definitely* need it
I don't care about money. Material things cause greed killing and suffering so i dont need much money.
I then say that anarchy is worse than communism, and what does he say to that?#1 im not a communist im an anarchist
Im just bad at explaining what I mean with out writing it out and thinking about what I wrote to make sure it sounds write.
#2 Im not a hippy most hippies just did acid and talk about dreams and never did much else.
After a bit of debating, The Moron trys to refute our statements.How are anarchists worse than communists.
True anarchists beleive in absolute freedom.
Are against all violence and killing.
And actually care about people.
We don't like to see any one or anything mistreated.
Laughing yet? Wait, it gets better!You have been tricked into beleiving that humans have no good in them.Let's see, anarchy is lawlessness isn't it? Chaos and such without order?
In an anarchy there is no need for fighting because there is no competition or greed because every one has the same things.Chaos is what they want you to think anarchy would be like. If choas is absolute freedom and peace then I'm all for it but that is not how you mean it. Face it you are not your own person you are simply tricked and not intelegent enough to know that the only reason for government is to opress some and let the few others proper.The great amount of anarchists in the late 19th and early 20th centuries were typically individuals who sponsored assassinations of state leaders and unraveling all social fabric because they believed that humans could independently achieve macroscopic and microscopic social harmony without a focal governing element.
All through violence.
Communism, anyone?
Most anarchists are against any killing. I am discusted at the thought of any one being killed by another person.
The media doesn't like to talk about things unless they are bad or "Good"
they don't say any thing about true anarchists who are complete pacifists and would be shot rather than shooting first
A nice rebuttal from a board regular.It would take about one week to 6 months after freedom from government before people understand that there is really no need for things like DVD players and would have not reason to kill or steal because every one is really the same in many ways and if there is no competition than there is no longer any problems simple as that or as complex as that.
Check out the Wall of IgnoranceMisterJones wrote:You just owned yourself.deathsythe7 wrote:"How do you know that I have never roughed it"
If I turned off my computer now how would I continue this discusion?
Uh oh, now he is getting moody!You truly are not understanding. Which is normal. There would most likly be a gradual change and gradual removal from government because what you are saying is that you would create another government. Anarchy can only come if the ma jority of people will stand up for it and that is what am trying to get at with this.
I could explain myself much better in person and give better easier to understand answers to your questions and we would all benifit more from it.
Now he just starts talking nonsenseYou need the whole world to have an anarchy not just one place or others will fuck it up.
I know that there will never be a true anarchy in my lifetime but I can try to help the future people beter by tring to convince some people that anarchy is the only way at freedom not being some mindless idiot who supports mass murder(WAR).
I would rather try to help the futer than hinder it unlike most of the population who say fuck the future Im here now they can figure out what to do when I ruin this planet.
If I thought that people could judge 100% fairly than I would not be an anarchist but it is not like that so no person should be able to rule over another.
Rio has got it the best of every one else here.
I DO NOT CARE ABOUT WHAT YOU THINK ABOUT ME SAY WHAT YOU WANT JUSAT KNOW THAT YOU WILL NOT BE RIGHT BECAUSE YOU HAVE NEVER ACTUALLY MET ME AND YOU DON'T KNOW ME.
Here, the idiot destroys his own argument:In an anarchy there is no reason to want a gun.
In an anarchy a gun would do you no good because the people would stand up to death for freedoms only a small minded weak person would not stand up for what they beleive in.
I guess he doesn't realize that the only way for an anarchy to ever work would be for everyone to have the exact same opinion on everything.What Rio say's is not nessarily what I believe because not all anarchists have the same ideas.
Some beleive in violence and some like me don't.
In an anarchy there is no need for money so what ever some one else has you can have it because most likly it wouldn't be that important to them to gaurd it with their life.
Put it this way at least im not like you who say that nothing can change Im actually truing to make a better future for every one not just sitting on my ass complaining.
After much more debate, I have to point this out:
His reply?DarkPrimus wrote:Indeed. I have the correct opinion.deathsythe7 wrote: You have a diffferent opinoin on human nature than me
Just to refresh your memory, that is the opinion that human beings are all bastards and will use brute force against each other and plunder from those unable to defend themselves rather than work and live together in peaceful harmony. Before you try to say that I'm wrong, take a good look at human history.
What point? All points he posted have been proven wrong.You still fail to realize the point.
Plenty more gems exist in the topic, it goes on for FIVE MORE PAGES. However, I think it's time to move on to another topic… (Yes folks, there's more!)
Link 2!
What's that? That's right folks, not ONLY is he an “anarchist” (never mind he disagreed with the dictionary term of anarchy), he is also a die-hard vegan and, it seems, a fundamentalist!I belive in creation god made animals to eat that is not the whole reason we no longer need to eat them so why murder gods creations when it is not needed.Put it this way.
If you believe in creation, then God made animals for you to kill off every once in a while so you could use them for tools and of course, meat.
If you believe in evolution, then limiting your diet and eliminating a great amount of nutrition isn't a very wise choice for personal or species survival.
I completly understand not being able to get access to only vegan foods.
I don't think meat tastes bad it the killing that bothers meunhealthy/untasty and stuff like that are just being fucking hypocrites to themselves.You might want to check your facts.There's more animals killed to clear the fields for your organic vegetables, and to KEEP them clear, than it is to kill one simple animal to have one simple good tasting steak.
You are so far off it is amazing.
Can't you just FEEL the idiocy?Im getting really pissed off that none of you fuckers can understand that the god lord wants us to make desic ions of our own and not to beforced to think what the larger of the population thinks.
It would take it seems a book wriiten about what I believe for your understanding to even scratch the surface about what I'm saying.
The bolded text is in my signature. As for that last line, I have no idea what the hell he is trying to say.I would not throw away a hamburger if it was in front of me I would gladly give it to any one who needed it.
Also We feed pigs better than some people get fed so people like you can eat meat instead of giving food to people who need it give it to people who are starving.I can tell by your responses but I would be happy to be proven wrong.How do you know this? Does your god talk to you?
It ends up with me getting to say this:
To which, he replies(!):DarkPrimus wrote:So, you're conceeding. Okay. GG, we win.deathsythe7 wrote:With this I wont post here again it seems I have made my point and I don't feel like doing this debate any more.deathsythe7 wrote: I agree Im not saying Im better Im telling you that I dont beleive in eating meat. Eat meat if you want meat. I wont think less of you.
All but one of my friends eat meat.
My immediate reply:No I figure I just put too much energy into this already and if you want to eat meat go ahead I wont try to stop you.
That was more or less the end of that, I am happy to say. But the reign of idiocy is far from over…DarkPrimus wrote: I thought you weren't going to be posting here again?
You conceeded. Attempts at denial shall merit you only further ridicule.
In fact, now it becomes absolutely ludicrous. Link 3
During a debate on whether or not a member's potentially offensive signature, The Moron had this to say:
Amazing, how stupid he is…Why do you care what some ones signature is can be a representation of themselves you cannot for them to change them seves so don't try to make them.
That would be like forcing a kid with a mohawk to shave their head or be expelled.
If it is to large tell them and they will probably change it.
People say things many times worse than any signature I have ever seen. Right or wrong is relative in many minds. Forcing some one to do something they don't want to do is wrong
Well, after a few pages of us discussing other stuff, he decided to come back and say the following brilliant thesis… but, before you do, I must warn you, do not be drinking any liquids while reading it!
And finally…You are all idiots ive obviously thought more about anarchy and politics more than any of you have ever thought about anything.
Education is not the same as being smart.
I did say that it was impossible for communism to work many times because in a communis5t society there is always some one abouve every one else (the leader.)
I am not in junior high im slightly out of there do you think an idoit 8th grader could comprehend something where you actually have to think instead of just agreeing with what others saywhen you cannot even comprehend it.
There is nothing that you can possibly say that I cannot counter because the system you veiw so highly of is a load of shit.
I have formed my views by experienceing, and thinking things though rather than be some mindless testosterone filled dumbass.
If you want to see the idiot IN ACTION, then check out this current topic, about things that peeve members off! Apparently, The Moron doesn't like how some people said they hated him because he was an idiot and believed in impossibilities.
But before that, he had this to say:
And yet he plays Starcraft.computer games are one thing what I don't like is the people thatt get into it and think it is alright to kill or any one who thinks killing is alright this includes wars.
His final post (so far) in the thread:
Let me interrupt with this: BWAHAHAHAHAHA!How the hell can you hate me if you don't know me dumb ass.
Y'know, that is really ironic, considering what he has posted before…- People who talk about stuff like they know every thing about it but they really don't know about don't have the slightest idea what they are talking about.
More to come, as it happens.
EDIT: Fixed many a tag.
