The *official* drool over Acacia thread

thecreech · Post by **thecreech** » 2003-06-27 08:57pm

Well that was highly eventful. I didn't know she/he was at mod a TK... but even so give it a chance pounder and if your right you can tell us all "i told you so"

Lord Pounder · Post by **Lord Pounder** » 2003-06-27 08:59pm

My arrogance is enough at the best of times you really don't wanna give me the "i told ya so stick" Remember Acacia = Miss Manners. You heard it here first.

Captain Cyran · Post by **Captain Cyran** » 2003-06-27 09:14pm

There are times I wonder about why I stay at this board when stuff like this happens...

SirNitram · Post by **SirNitram** » 2003-06-27 09:36pm

Paranoia Paranoia everybody's coming to get me....

Honestly, people need to chill out. Or I will get my Beast Planet out.

Nova Andromeda · Post by **Nova Andromeda** » 2003-06-27 10:02pm

--It is truly sad that a denizen like myself who almost never comes to this forum feels the need to come here and tell the witch hunters to STFU until they have proof. A polite and discrete warning to possible rule breakers is acceptable, but smearing people without any proof that they are breaking the rules is totally uncalled for. Imagine how that must make Acacia feel assuming she is what she says she is?
-BTW Pounder, your a grade A+ ass regardless of whether you turn out to be right or not about Acacia. The fact will remain that you attacked someone without any proof of guilt. How about you read up on why McCarthyism was a bad thing....

-Sun of the Suns, you are one of the administrators here. Why are you attacking someone for posting pics. of themselves that don't even begin to compare to the kind of pics. posted Mr. Wong himself of other women? I could understand you warning Acacia about posting pics of other people and claiming they are hers, but attacking her for posting racy pics of herself it TOTALLY uncalled for!

Raoul Duke, Jr. · Post by **Raoul Duke, Jr.** » 2003-06-27 10:24pm

Lord Pounder wrote:Fair enough i'll back off, for now. But mark my words this is a TK whore and when she does show her colours i'll be all over her like that rash she had last year.

LOL! Sorry.

In any case, even if it turns out she is a TKer, she hasn't done anything banworthy yet.

But the rash thing got a chuckle.

DPDarkPrimus · Post by **DPDarkPrimus** » 2003-06-27 11:05pm

And I used to think DP to be semi-mentally stable.

JodoForce · Post by **JodoForce** » 2003-06-27 11:18pm

bah, tell her to post a picture with that SD.net placard then

some webcam porn site this is

Drewcifer · Post by **Drewcifer** » 2003-06-28 02:25am

Just in case anyone missed this announcement...

http://bbs.stardestroyer.net/viewtopic.php?t=24154

Post by **AdmiralKanos** » 2003-06-28 02:35am

Nova Andromeda wrote:--It is truly sad that a denizen like myself who almost never comes to this forum feels the need to come here and tell the witch hunters to STFU until they have proof. A polite and discrete warning to possible rule breakers is acceptable, but smearing people without any proof that they are breaking the rules is totally uncalled for. Imagine how that must make Acacia feel assuming she is what she says she is?

She signed up with a zzn.com account (the provider used by numerous TK trolls to evade our restriction on free webmailers). She already broke one rule when she signed up, and in very suspicious fashion at a very suspicious time. She also spent her entire time here either spamming or defending TK, even during the hack attack. I see no reason to mourn her passing. If she wants back in, she can use a real E-mail address.

Lord of the Farce · Post by **Lord of the Farce** » 2003-06-28 02:41am

So how do I change my vote here? I'm moving from the "No opinion" crowd to the "Like". Cheers, SotS.

Raoul Duke, Jr. · Post by **Raoul Duke, Jr.** » 2003-06-28 02:48am

Let's all hoist a glass to TK's Not-So-Secret Aaaaaaaaaaaaaaagent Men.

SPOOFE · Post by **SPOOFE** » 2003-06-28 03:24am

I have decided that Lord Pounder is a troll, and I will treat him like one. I have no proof, of course, but MARK MY WORDS, sooner or later he'll slip up and prove me right! And since it's inevitable that he'll do so - since I said he will - it's as good as if he had already done so. Ergo, I'm right, because I say so!

Genius logic there, people.

Raoul Duke, Jr. · Post by **Raoul Duke, Jr.** » 2003-06-28 03:40am

SPOOFE wrote:I have decided that Lord Pounder is a troll, and I will treat him like one. I have no proof, of course, but MARK MY WORDS, sooner or later he'll slip up and prove me right! And since it's inevitable that he'll do so - since I said he will - it's as good as if he had already done so. Ergo, I'm right, because I say so!

Genius logic there, people.

I think people were going on a fair bit more than you make it sound, Spoofe.

Crayz9000 · Post by **Crayz9000** » 2003-06-28 03:52am

Acacia already slipped up, mentioning the feud between CC and RDJ. If she really had nothing to do with TK, then how'd she know about it?

Crayz9000 · Post by **Crayz9000** » 2003-06-28 03:58am

Oh yes. Not to mention, that without TrollKingdom being explicitly mentioned, she knew about the voila.fr mirror of the Moderator forum.

Frank Hipper · Post by **Frank Hipper** » 2003-06-28 03:58am

Lord Pounder had admitted to the strength of the local ales before he posted that, as well.

Hamel · Post by **Hamel** » 2003-06-28 04:07am

Acacia is banned. Thank teh zing! Watching people swoon over an obvious TK agent was a bit irritating.

Crayz9000 · Post by **Crayz9000** » 2003-06-28 04:09am

Can we get this HoSd or worse?

At any rate, I was tempted to play along for the sheer hell of it, but whatever.

Hamel · Post by **Hamel** » 2003-06-28 04:16am

Crayz9000 wrote:Can we get this HoSd or worse?

At any rate, I was tempted to play along for the sheer hell of it, but whatever.

I don't have many posts invested in this thread, so I wouldn't mind if it were just sent to oblivion

JodoForce · Post by **JodoForce** » 2003-06-28 05:40am

SPOOFE · Post by **SPOOFE** » 2003-06-28 05:43am

I think people were going on a fair bit more than you make it sound, Spoofe.

I'm referring to Lord Pounder's comments, specifically where he said "I have no firm proof yet" and "Give the wench time and she'll prove me right." THAT sort of bullshit logic should REALLY be discouraged. If he had good reason to suspect her, he should've mentioned it. Note that I don't consider "guilt by association" to be "good reason".

Cpt_Frank · Post by **Cpt_Frank** » 2003-06-28 07:19am

Bad person, good riddance. Moved to HOS.

Post by **Darth Wong** » 2003-06-28 10:38am

SPOOFE wrote:
I think people were going on a fair bit more than you make it sound, Spoofe.
I'm referring to Lord Pounder's comments, specifically where he said "I have no firm proof yet" and "Give the wench time and she'll prove me right." THAT sort of bullshit logic should REALLY be discouraged. If he had good reason to suspect her, he should've mentioned it. Note that I don't consider "guilt by association" to be "good reason".

Did it ever occur to you that people knew more than they were letting on, and were trying to be coy about it? Her use of matching IPs and free webmail providers was well known for quite some time now.

Nova Andromeda · Post by **Nova Andromeda** » 2003-06-28 10:55am

Darth Wong wrote:
SPOOFE wrote:
I think people were going on a fair bit more than you make it sound, Spoofe.
I'm referring to Lord Pounder's comments, specifically where he said "I have no firm proof yet" and "Give the wench time and she'll prove me right." THAT sort of bullshit logic should REALLY be discouraged. If he had good reason to suspect her, he should've mentioned it. Note that I don't consider "guilt by association" to be "good reason".
Did it ever occur to you that people knew more than they were letting on, and were trying to be coy about it? Her use of matching IPs and free webmail providers was well known for quite some time now.

--That sounds like the Bush administrations excuse for detaining U.S. citizens in military brigs. "We have evidence against them, but we can't tell you since it would hurt national security." How can the general populace tell if you are being fair or not when you attack someone without providing any evidence they are doing anything wrong. If you won't provide the evidence then you can expect your attacks to be attacked in turn by people like me. In this case, I was answered with a PM which informed me of the situation, but did nothing to inform others. I don't see why you didn't just make the accusation up front for everyone to see. Did you want to teach people NOT to drool all over anything that claims to be female....

StarDestroyer.Net BBS

The official drool over Acacia thread