"You said such and such about DBZ so you are wrong about this!!"
How fucking trite.
Also, why don't you point out the bad logic and ignored facts rather than make blanket statements claiming they exist?
1.) DBZ energy blasts exhibit recoil, and the energy is internal. (The former is proved when Krillin uses an energy discharge to propel himself ABOVE Nappa when distracting him so Piccolo and Gohan can grab his tail. Videl also used her own "energy" to push off the ground and fly in the Buu Saga, or not much before it.)
2.) If these "characterS" were flinging bout Planet-shattering level energies, especially regularly, there should be a substantial momentum imparted to the character that must be accounted for. We are not only talking literally millions of gees or more of acceleration, we're talking a substantial INCREASE in mass (in other words, a STAGGERING degree of force is required.)
If DBZ characters COULD generate this force, acceleration or gravitational fields of hundreds of gravities, much less the tens of gravities in the early parts of the Frieza Saga and before, would be INSIGNIFICANT to those characters. We are talking a literal many orders of magntiude difference.
(Also, it doesnt matter if we "ignored" the recoil issue I mentioned in #1. If they propelled the energy blasts with some external force, they should STILL be able to use that force to ignore gravity, since they use that same energy to fly and such.) This applies to Roshi's so called "moon destruction" in DB (prior to Goku's training on teh way to Namek, and prior to training with King Kai), and the other "early" so called planet-killing events (like Vegeta on earth mentioned below.)
I should also note later on that DBZ characters are STILL training in gravitational fields of only hundreds of gees, which again would be INSIGNIFICANT could they generate orders of magnitude greater acceleration or force (such as required to compensate for the recoil of a planet-shattering DET discharge.) Vegeta even says that a foe who trained in five hundred gravities might have an advantage - but he "barely felt ten". And even before the tournament, he was training AS A SUPER-SAIYAN, under 150 gravities.
In short, they can NOT generate the required force to compensate for a PK blasst, and none of you DBZers ever demonstrated the ability, nor explained canonically where this momentum magically disappeared to.
3.) Complete ignorance of what the enviromental effects of planet killing blasts, or evne a fraction of that energy (planet killing events) would do to a planet, and the lack of such observed effects. (Example: Vegeta claims he is going to destroy earth with his "gallic gun", and Goku uses a Kamehameha wave to counter. If these WERE DET events, where the FUCK is this energy going, since it has to go somewhere. And why isnt the recoil affecting either person more substantially like it should?)
Is that clear enough for you now, or do you need it put in big letters spelled out phoenetically?
I could provide qutes from fucking Akira Toriyama himself saying that he didn't know anything about physics. You can't expect what he wrote to deal with things like recoil.
Which says what exactly? You can't ignore physics under suspension of disbelief then claim a conclusion that requires you to obey suspension of disbelief and scientific method. Either physics doesnt apply to DBZ and it can't be analyzed (which means you dont get your DET event energies), or it does and you must obey suspension of disbelief and the scientific method (which means then you must either demonstrate they CAN generate the required force, or accept the fact they destroy planets by alternate methods, which have been proven to exist.)
This "having your cake and eating it too" dishonesty you exhibit doesn't fly.
Besides, I DID provide proof that the beams were kinetic force, I DID provide references of them being able to counter said force, and I DID
"Kinetic force?" ROFLMAO. What the fuck is "Kinetic force?"
Now, if you mean kinetic energy, what you're simply proving is what I mentioned above. That their energy blasts have momentum, recoil, and kinetic energy. (You do realize that Kinetic energy and momentum are related, right? Momentum is mass x velocity, KE is 1/2 mass x velocity squared, at least for non-relatavistic KE calcs - which have a different equation entirely to account for relatavistic mass.)
As for "countering said force", did you even bother to provide an equation to cnsider the MAGNITUDE? ( I provided evidence about how they might counter the force as well by flight/TK, *but* I also pointed out they were incapable of handling the MAGNITUDE. Part of your burden of proof is proving they demonstrated the required force/momentum to counter the recoil of a planet killing blast, which requires either a stated number or a calculation done. Or, prove they can generate the required mass and acceleration to counter it (something on the increase to a million metric tons of body mass and an acceleration to near-lightspeed in a second to counter, IIRC my calcs.)
While I did not see any actual numbers from the DBZ side, I will humor you and assume you did and I simply missed them, so would you *CARE* to provide those and what they were stated/based on? (assuming you *have* calculations, that is, which I doubt.)
Let's not forget the basics here. You were arguing that a Sith would beat Goku. I don't think it is physically or morally possible for you to take the high road in that exchange.
I do not recall actually ever stating whether or not a sith would win, or even arguing FOR the sith. I simply debated the fallacies being employed in terms of DBZ ability and the inability of the DBZ fans to provide the requisite evidence.
And even IF I was arguing for the Sith, how does that negate my points, exactly? What the fuck does physical or moral possibility have to do with it? Are you accusing me of bias and deliberately misinterpreting evidence or using pseudoscience to deliberately weaken your cause? If so, I would love to see you prove this.
Beyond that, when you yourself are using the Force as an argument, you've got no fucking grounds for making us limit ki to strict rules of physics.
How so? I don't recall claiming that individual Sith can go around tossing planet-killing or planet-shattering blasts (IE magnitude matters). In fact, I DO expect the Force to obey science insomuch as is possible (where it doesn't, it cannot be calculated. TK events and other things like Sith lightning do not count, but mind control techniques would. As I recall I was and have typically avoided any sort of mind control argument.)
Or are you going to start arguing that the Force doesn't obey science in the slightest, violates it completely, and that therefore that means its perfectly alright to ignore science yet still pretend you can analyze it as if it does?
(PS, this actually assumes you can PROVE the Force violates science. The fact you're willing to start tossing science out the window to support your cause proves just how weak your position is. I have never once advocated tossing science out the window, nor did I ever quantify anything Force-related that violated science. Note that your definition of "violating science" may differ from mine, due to what appears to be your greater ignorance of the subject, and your desire to win your argument however you can, no matter how irrational you become. I still believe DBZ CAN be analyzed, I am simply contending that the lot of you do so ineptly and incorrectly.)
Oddly enough, the non-DET event was treated entirely differently than every other planet-destroying attack in the entire series, and they made special point of it not being a non-DET event, and Goku was surprised by it.
It sets a precedent, and it fits the facts without ignoring things or inventing or adding new variables (Occam's Razor applies in terms of simplest theory.)
I like how you assume every event "looked" different, so it must have been. Perfectly inline with the ineptly simplistic "analysis" method employed by DBZers, who typically refuse to look more in depth to make sure their theories actually make sense or fit known facts.
Based on?
Based on the fact they have never demonstrated the requisite magnitude of Force needed to compensate for the recoil of blasts of such magnitude, as well as the lack of effect of such blasts on the enviroment (as mentioned above, which you will no doubt ignore in favor of reiterating your "They destroyed planet" argument. Repetition seems to be the limit of your entire argument.)
Shut the fuck up, hypocrite. "OMG precog! How is precog possible? Who cares. It just is!"