"Asimov Worm" vs. Bastion

FAN: Discuss various fictional worlds that don't qualify for SF.

Moderator: Steve

Post Reply
User avatar
The Yosemite Bear
Mostly Harmless Nutcase (Requiescat in Pace)
Posts: 35211
Joined: 2002-07-21 02:38am
Location: Dave's Not Here Man

"Asimov Worm" vs. Bastion

Post by The Yosemite Bear »

Let's say some hacker in the Marvel universe created a worm virus and sucessfully uploaded it into the Project Wideawake mainframe. The effects of this virus is that all infected Sentinel Robots become currupted with Asimov Protocols. Now can Bastion/Nimrod reprogram himself/adapt around such a worm? What would the effects of Asimov protocol be on a normal sentinel?
Image

The scariest folk song lyrics are "My Boy Grew up to be just like me" from cats in the cradle by Harry Chapin
User avatar
neoolong
Dead Sexy 'Shroom
Posts: 13180
Joined: 2002-08-29 10:01pm
Location: California

Post by neoolong »

I don't know about Nimrod, but for the second it seems to depend on whether the Sentinel computers think that mutants are considered human. Since that seems to be the basis of Asimov's three laws.
Member of the BotM. @( !.! )@
User avatar
generator_g1
Jedi Master
Posts: 1185
Joined: 2003-01-19 10:17pm
Location: Halfway between the gutter and the stars....

Post by generator_g1 »

What was the Asimov Protocols again? Was that about the rules that robots cannot kill human beings...?
My FLICKR page! :D
Remember, people, commas are your friends. Love them, embrace them, cherish them, and for crying out loud, USE them.
User avatar
neoolong
Dead Sexy 'Shroom
Posts: 13180
Joined: 2002-08-29 10:01pm
Location: California

Post by neoolong »

generator_g1 wrote:What was the Asimov Protocols again? Was that about the rules that robots cannot kill human beings...?
If it's the three laws of robotics:

1. A robot may not injure a human being, or, through inaction, allow a human being to come to harm.

2. A robot must obey the orders given it by human beings except where such orders would conflict with the First Law.

3. A robot must protect its own existence as long as such protection does not conflict with the First or Second Law.
Member of the BotM. @( !.! )@
Post Reply