Alyeska wrote:
Its very simple. You advance the film and watch the rate at which the ship moves and you reattach the bridge at the proper point. Much as you dislike Darkstar, its pretty damned low to claim he fakes evidene.
Ah, like when he puts ... in his quotes to distort what people are telling him eh? How DARE I ...
Or let's not forget his 'bands of brightness'.
I have used my copy to determine how close the bridge was to certain elements to visible parts of the main hull. Darkstar kept the bridge in its proper location. Thus critical elments are missing. The captain piece of evidence is meaningless. We see the bridge disapear thus the captain can NOT be on the bridge.
No, you can't see all the elements of the bridge. Big difference.
The asteroid impacts on one side of the bridge yet the whole bridge is destroyed.
Including your conclusion as a premise.
Stop looking at the captain, he is secondary to the outside footage. Look at that footage, then try and rationalize where the captain was located from that point onward.
Recorded? Yes, recorded. I quote the movie:
'That Lord Vader was the last time they appeared in any of our scopes.'
Hence, a recording.
LOL! Needa uses past tense in reference to when they last saw the Falcon, so the whole thing is a recording. You really didn't think very hard when you typed that one, did you?
How do you know he was near the pits?
http://www. angelfire.com/scifi2/iimperium/images /isdbridge.jpg
Remove spaces. See where the hologram pod is? Notice that the communications consoles are just across from it? Notice the bridge pits in relaiton to it?
If he was, however, I'm inclined to believe the blast did NOT destroy the bridge. As I previously stated, since the windows are the weakest section of the bridge, if anything is going to be destroyed in that impact its them. If the officer was in fact on the main deck at the time of the impact and NOT sucked into space (or even fall down) then the damage musn't have been great enough to harm the bridge in any significant way.