H.R. 2038, Is this for real?!

N&P: Discuss governments, nations, politics and recent related news here.

Moderators: Alyrium Denryle, Edi, K. A. Pital

User avatar
Edi
Dragonlord
Dragonlord
Posts: 12461
Joined: 2002-07-11 12:27am
Location: Helsinki, Finland

Post by Edi »

Vympel wrote:Looking at this list- just what the fuck is NOT banned? Even the fucking VEPR is banned for fuck's sake.
As I read that list, I was wondering exactly the same thing. Revolvers probably aren't, but they'd be about the only exception. I've always taken a pro-gun control stance (as in having well crafted sensible regulations that allow private gun ownership, instead of banning everything in sight), and whichever fuckwit came up with that piece of overcomplicated, totalitarian crapola should be whipped to death with a limp noodle.

Edi
Warwolf Urban Combat Specialist

Why is it so goddamned hard to get little assholes like you to admit it when you fuck up? Is it pride? What gives you the right to have any pride?
–Darth Wong to vivftp

GOP message? Why don't they just come out of the closet: FASCISTS R' US –Patrick Degan

The GOP has a problem with anyone coming out of the closet. –18-till-I-die
User avatar
The Duchess of Zeon
Gözde
Posts: 14566
Joined: 2002-09-18 01:06am
Location: Exiled in the Pale of Settlement.

Post by The Duchess of Zeon »

Edi wrote: As I read that list, I was wondering exactly the same thing. Revolvers probably aren't, but they'd be about the only exception. I've always taken a pro-gun control stance (as in having well crafted sensible regulations that allow private gun ownership, instead of banning everything in sight), and whichever fuckwit came up with that piece of overcomplicated, totalitarian crapola should be whipped to death with a limp noodle.

Edi
Well, now you understand why we accuse the gun-control crowd in America of having a totalitarian agenda.
The threshold for inclusion in Wikipedia is verifiability, not truth. -- Wikipedia's No Original Research policy page.

In 1966 the Soviets find something on the dark side of the Moon. In 2104 they come back. -- Red Banner / White Star, a nBSG continuation story. Updated to Chapter 4.0 -- 14 January 2013.
User avatar
Edi
Dragonlord
Dragonlord
Posts: 12461
Joined: 2002-07-11 12:27am
Location: Helsinki, Finland

Post by Edi »

The Duchess of Zeon wrote: Well, now you understand why we accuse the gun-control crowd in America of having a totalitarian agenda.
Indeed. Just one question? Why the hell is it that it seems (to outsiders like me anyway) that the only options considered about anything in America are the extremes? There never seems to be anything approaching the middle of the road. Aren't there any sensible people making decisions (or even comments) at all? Or is it that they are there, but just ignored or drowned out by the idiots on both sides?

Edi
Warwolf Urban Combat Specialist

Why is it so goddamned hard to get little assholes like you to admit it when you fuck up? Is it pride? What gives you the right to have any pride?
–Darth Wong to vivftp

GOP message? Why don't they just come out of the closet: FASCISTS R' US –Patrick Degan

The GOP has a problem with anyone coming out of the closet. –18-till-I-die
User avatar
The Duchess of Zeon
Gözde
Posts: 14566
Joined: 2002-09-18 01:06am
Location: Exiled in the Pale of Settlement.

Post by The Duchess of Zeon »

Edi wrote: Indeed. Just one question? Why the hell is it that it seems (to outsiders like me anyway) that the only options considered about anything in America are the extremes? There never seems to be anything approaching the middle of the road. Aren't there any sensible people making decisions (or even comments) at all? Or is it that they are there, but just ignored or drowned out by the idiots on both sides?

Edi
Well, most Americans would say that we have two parties that are the opposites of each other, and things end up in the middle by their pounding away at each other until exhaustion is reached. However, Europeans say that the Democrats appear to be, in general, conservative. So I'm not quite sure what to say on that--to American, the difference would appear very radical, though of course how the difference appears would be... Equally radical.. Depending on your political outlook.

Also, I think people change political affiliation less in the U.S. than in European countries.
The threshold for inclusion in Wikipedia is verifiability, not truth. -- Wikipedia's No Original Research policy page.

In 1966 the Soviets find something on the dark side of the Moon. In 2104 they come back. -- Red Banner / White Star, a nBSG continuation story. Updated to Chapter 4.0 -- 14 January 2013.
User avatar
Edi
Dragonlord
Dragonlord
Posts: 12461
Joined: 2002-07-11 12:27am
Location: Helsinki, Finland

Post by Edi »

The Duchess of Zeon wrote:Well, most Americans would say that we have two parties that are the opposites of each other, and things end up in the middle by their pounding away at each other until exhaustion is reached. However, Europeans say that the Democrats appear to be, in general, conservative. So I'm not quite sure what to say on that--to American, the difference would appear very radical, though of course how the difference appears would be... Equally radical.. Depending on your political outlook.

Also, I think people change political affiliation less in the U.S. than in European countries.
Well, to us it seems like you have the far right wing (Dems) and the farther right wing (Republicans), but that wasn't what I meant, really. Specifically in this case, one group says ban nothing (preferably anyway) and the idiots who came up with this proposal want to ban everything. And the same applies to most other issues too, regardless of political affiliations. It's like everything is seen through a black/white fallacy. That's what seems so strange.

As for the differences to Europe, multiparty systems work differently, there is more variation in the spectrum, even if the general trend is more to the left than in America. To you i must look like I'm painted in deep, socialist red, when I'm in fact right wing by any European standards. :)

Edi
Warwolf Urban Combat Specialist

Why is it so goddamned hard to get little assholes like you to admit it when you fuck up? Is it pride? What gives you the right to have any pride?
–Darth Wong to vivftp

GOP message? Why don't they just come out of the closet: FASCISTS R' US –Patrick Degan

The GOP has a problem with anyone coming out of the closet. –18-till-I-die
User avatar
Peregrin Toker
Emperor's Hand
Posts: 8609
Joined: 2002-07-04 10:57am
Location: Denmark
Contact:

Post by Peregrin Toker »

Edi wrote: Well, to us it seems like you have the far right wing (Dems) and the farther right wing (Republicans), but that wasn't what I meant, really.
:? :? :? :? :? :? :?

To me, it always appeared like the Democrats were centrists rather than right-winged. And the Europeans aren't that right-winged compared to the Americans. For example, the prime ministers of Denmark and Great Britain gets well along with Bush.
"Hi there, would you like to have a cookie?"

"No, actually I would HATE to have a cookie, you vapid waste of inedible flesh!"
User avatar
Ace Pace
Hardware Lover
Posts: 8456
Joined: 2002-07-07 03:04am
Location: Wasting time instead of money
Contact:

Post by Ace Pace »

If you read the end, the part about high ammo guns, this means ANY Automatic weapon above a fixed ammo capacity exept a .22 ammo, is banned.
Brotherhood of the Bear | HAB | Mess | SDnet archivist |
User avatar
Perinquus
Virus-X Wannabe
Posts: 2685
Joined: 2002-08-06 11:57pm

Post by Perinquus »

Simon H.Johansen wrote: To me, it always appeared like the Democrats were centrists rather than right-winged. And the Europeans aren't that right-winged compared to the Americans. For example, the prime ministers of Denmark and Great Britain gets well along with Bush.
Centrist? Ever since the McGovernite wing of the party really got hold of the party leadership in the late 60s, the Democrats have been rather far to the left. The leadership of the Democratic party consistently supports gun control, abortion, socialized medicine, affirmative action, higher taxes to pay for more social programs, the NEA (ahich means opposing vouchers with all their will), amnesty for illegal aliens (in order to pander to the hispanic voting bloc), and more. On these, and several other issues, the Democratic party supports things that are not supported by the majority of the American people. This is why they've managed to elect just two presidents in the last thirty-five years - the candidates they run are too liberal. In order to get Clinton elected, he had to pose as a moderate "new democrat", and distance himself from the liberals in control of his party.

When a party is consistently advocating things that the majority of the citizens of its country do not support, it is not centrist.
User avatar
Stuart Mackey
Drunken Kiwi Editor of the ASVS Press
Posts: 5946
Joined: 2002-07-04 12:28am
Location: New Zealand
Contact:

Post by Stuart Mackey »

kojikun wrote:leave it go, stuart. let her die with honor.
Why? was the moron banned in my absence?
Via money Europe could become political in five years" "... the current communities should be completed by a Finance Common Market which would lead us to European economic unity. Only then would ... the mutual commitments make it fairly easy to produce the political union which is the goal"

Jean Omer Marie Gabriel Monnet
--------------
User avatar
Alan Bolte
Sith Devotee
Posts: 2611
Joined: 2002-07-05 12:17am
Location: Columbus, OH

Post by Alan Bolte »

Amendment II

A well regulated militia, being necessary to the security of a free state, the right of the people to keep and bear arms, shall not be infringed.

Amendment IX

The enumeration in the Constitution, of certain rights, shall not be construed to deny or disparage others retained by the people.

So what is this shit? I don't even have a gun, and I find this outrageous. You know what one of the defining characteristics of America is to me? We don't trust power, and we retain our ability to effect regime change within our own country whenever that becomes necessary. That hasn't really been possible for decades, and if this passes it marks the end of the ability of any man to defend himself in any way. Damnit, I like the idea of a government that isn't responsible for every fucking thing.
New Zealand's sheep-to-human ratio has nothing on the U.S. these days.
Any job worth doing with a laser is worth doing with many, many lasers. -Khrima
There's just no arguing with some people once they've made their minds up about something, and I accept that. That's why I kill them. -Othar
Avatar credit
User avatar
UltraViolence83
Jedi Master
Posts: 1120
Joined: 2003-01-12 04:59pm
Location: Youngstown, Ohio, USA

Post by UltraViolence83 »

"From my cold, dead hands..."


I don't care if guns are illegal, it's not like illegal activity has stopped me before.


As soon as this country passes a gun ban, I'll be absolutely sure the government has officially spit on the constitution and will do my utmost to subvert and destroy it in any way possible. Repeat: IN ANY WAY POSSIBLE.
...This would sharpen you up and make you ready for a bit of the old...ultraviolence.
User avatar
LT.Hit-Man
Rabid Monkey
Posts: 1351
Joined: 2003-01-08 09:23pm

Post by LT.Hit-Man »

Looks like the crunch is coming down for you guys and gals in the US if you waint to keep your rights to have fire arms you all will have to do something, perhapps a mass march on the white house by all gun owners, peacefuly of corse maybe a mass liflet campane.
Or if all else fails by armed force.
It's up to you after all the goverment is there to servre the people not the other way around.
Brotherhood of the Monkey: Rabid Sith Monkey from hell.
Mad scribbler of the Writer's Guild Headquarters
Grand Inquisitor of ASVS (ret) ASVS Vets Assc.

" poor bruised and mistreated? jesus Christ Iggy, you haven't been watching Voyager reruns again have you? " - Darth Fanboy
User avatar
Peregrin Toker
Emperor's Hand
Posts: 8609
Joined: 2002-07-04 10:57am
Location: Denmark
Contact:

Post by Peregrin Toker »

Perinquus wrote: The leadership of the Democratic party consistently supports gun control, abortion, socialized medicine, affirmative action, higher taxes to pay for more social programs, the NEA (ahich means opposing vouchers with all their will), amnesty for illegal aliens (in order to pander to the hispanic voting bloc), and more.
Those elements alone do not make you far-left. At least not by Danish standards. (okay, maybe the social programs thing)

Nah, as the son of an old-school communist, I know what a true far-left party believes. A far-left party supports collective ownership of industry, all means of transportation and state seizure of real estate. When did the Democrats do THAT??

The Democrats might be slightly left of center, but I wouldn't call them far-left. Not with Ralph Nader and his Green Party around.

And why is it necessarily leftist to support free abortion and gun control? As this thread's topic shows, gun control also has its supporters on the far right....
"Hi there, would you like to have a cookie?"

"No, actually I would HATE to have a cookie, you vapid waste of inedible flesh!"
User avatar
Edi
Dragonlord
Dragonlord
Posts: 12461
Joined: 2002-07-11 12:27am
Location: Helsinki, Finland

Post by Edi »

Perinquus wrote:Centrist? Ever since the McGovernite wing of the party really got hold of the party leadership in the late 60s, the Democrats have been rather far to the left.
They'd be center-right at best in most European countries, Perinquus, or center-left in some countries that have a stronger right wing. Like Simon said, support for the things you listed doth not a leftist party make. You want a leftist party, look at basically any Social Democratic party in Europe (the Finnish, Swedish and German ones are good examples) and the parties to the left of those. You're coming across as frothing at the mouth here.

The National Coalition, Finland's main right wing party, would probably be decried as outright communist in America. They support social security nets, and a whole lot of the stuff on your list of 'leftist' agendas, but you fail to see that it's not the support for certain things, but how you go about them. I'm quite sure a lot of Americans, even right wing people such as yourself, would be quite willing to support many of those as long as things were done sensibly, i.e. strip off bureaucratic bloat, pork barreling and corruption. It doesn't need to cost an absolute shitload of money and it doesn't need a Big Brother government to do them, unless you want to do them all wrong in the first place. As for the current state of said services in America and how to go about improving them, that's a whole another debate that has nothing to do with left or right wing as such, but with sensible planning and implementation.

Edi
Warwolf Urban Combat Specialist

Why is it so goddamned hard to get little assholes like you to admit it when you fuck up? Is it pride? What gives you the right to have any pride?
–Darth Wong to vivftp

GOP message? Why don't they just come out of the closet: FASCISTS R' US –Patrick Degan

The GOP has a problem with anyone coming out of the closet. –18-till-I-die
User avatar
The Duchess of Zeon
Gözde
Posts: 14566
Joined: 2002-09-18 01:06am
Location: Exiled in the Pale of Settlement.

Post by The Duchess of Zeon »

Edi wrote:
Perinquus wrote:Centrist? Ever since the McGovernite wing of the party really got hold of the party leadership in the late 60s, the Democrats have been rather far to the left.
They'd be center-right at best in most European countries, Perinquus, or center-left in some countries that have a stronger right wing. Like Simon said, support for the things you listed doth not a leftist party make. You want a leftist party, look at basically any Social Democratic party in Europe (the Finnish, Swedish and German ones are good examples) and the parties to the left of those. You're coming across as frothing at the mouth here.

The National Coalition, Finland's main right wing party, would probably be decried as outright communist in America. They support social security nets, and a whole lot of the stuff on your list of 'leftist' agendas, but you fail to see that it's not the support for certain things, but how you go about them. I'm quite sure a lot of Americans, even right wing people such as yourself, would be quite willing to support many of those as long as things were done sensibly, i.e. strip off bureaucratic bloat, pork barreling and corruption. It doesn't need to cost an absolute shitload of money and it doesn't need a Big Brother government to do them, unless you want to do them all wrong in the first place. As for the current state of said services in America and how to go about improving them, that's a whole another debate that has nothing to do with left or right wing as such, but with sensible planning and implementation.

Edi
Even I as a libertarian support unemployment benefits and certain forms of medical coverage, along with tax breaks for the very poor and the elderly, among other such things. However, with the exception of the tax breaks for the very poor and elderly, I think all of those programs should be exclusively handled at the state level, and that all federal programmes along those lines (or in excession of them) should be eliminated. So in a sense you're right.

But you have to realize that some of the Democrat ideas are just, well, dumb over here. Back in the 90s an idea for healthcare was proposed by them that probably would have made Britain's NHS look good--and of course that crashed and burned bad. So everything in regard to healthcare has to operate in the shadow of that now (which is, of course, good, since I only want healthcare at the state level, and taylored to state needs, anyway).
The threshold for inclusion in Wikipedia is verifiability, not truth. -- Wikipedia's No Original Research policy page.

In 1966 the Soviets find something on the dark side of the Moon. In 2104 they come back. -- Red Banner / White Star, a nBSG continuation story. Updated to Chapter 4.0 -- 14 January 2013.
User avatar
Edi
Dragonlord
Dragonlord
Posts: 12461
Joined: 2002-07-11 12:27am
Location: Helsinki, Finland

Post by Edi »

The Duchess of Zeon wrote:Even I as a libertarian support unemployment benefits and certain forms of medical coverage, along with tax breaks for the very poor and the elderly, among other such things. However, with the exception of the tax breaks for the very poor and elderly, I think all of those programs should be exclusively handled at the state level, and that all federal programmes along those lines (or in excession of them) should be eliminated. So in a sense you're right.
So, if we were to start a serious discussion over this, then we'd probably be squabbling over how best to go about doing it and weighing the pros and cons of the alternatives, instead of just screaming 'idiot' at each other? I can live with that. :)
The Duchess of Zeon wrote:But you have to realize that some of the Democrat ideas are just, well, dumb over here. Back in the 90s an idea for healthcare was proposed by them that probably would have made Britain's NHS look good--and of course that crashed and burned bad. So everything in regard to healthcare has to operate in the shadow of that now (which is, of course, good, since I only want healthcare at the state level, and taylored to state needs, anyway).
Well, stupid ideas should get the fate they deserve. The problem is that whenever the topic is brought back up, nobody bothers to actually inspect new proposals or ideas on their own merits, they'll just drag out past issues in order to score cheap political points and cause things to go to deadlock. This is very much an impression I've gotten of American political discourse in many areas, based on discussions here and elsewhere and the news sources I read (I get Time Magazine, which I read regularly, other American news media I follow rather spottily).

Edi
Warwolf Urban Combat Specialist

Why is it so goddamned hard to get little assholes like you to admit it when you fuck up? Is it pride? What gives you the right to have any pride?
–Darth Wong to vivftp

GOP message? Why don't they just come out of the closet: FASCISTS R' US –Patrick Degan

The GOP has a problem with anyone coming out of the closet. –18-till-I-die
User avatar
Coyote
Rabid Monkey
Posts: 12464
Joined: 2002-08-23 01:20am
Location: The glorious Sun-Barge! Isis, Isis, Ra,Ra,Ra!
Contact:

Post by Coyote »

Edi mentions something that I have noticed elsewhere-- one thing Sarit, my GF in Israel always asked, is "why are Americans so extreme in everything?" Things must be either total or not at all. Since coming back to the States I have noticed that 'all or nothing' attitude it is is really a source of trouble.....
Something about Libertarianism always bothered me. Then one day, I realized what it was:
Libertarian philosophy can be boiled down to the phrase, "Work Will Make You Free."


In Libertarianism, there is no Government, so the Bosses are free to exploit the Workers.
In Communism, there is no Government, so the Workers are free to exploit the Bosses.
So in Libertarianism, man exploits man, but in Communism, its the other way around!

If all you want to do is have some harmless, mindless fun, go H3RE INST3ADZ0RZ!!
Grrr! Fight my Brute, you pansy!
User avatar
Perinquus
Virus-X Wannabe
Posts: 2685
Joined: 2002-08-06 11:57pm

Post by Perinquus »

Edi wrote:
They'd be center-right at best in most European countries, Perinquus, or center-left in some countries that have a stronger right wing. Like Simon said, support for the things you listed doth not a leftist party make. You want a leftist party, look at basically any Social Democratic party in Europe (the Finnish, Swedish and German ones are good examples) and the parties to the left of those. You're coming across as frothing at the mouth here.
But we are talking about within the context of American politics here. And furthermore, he was claiming the Democrats are centrist. Now they may not be extreme left, but when they consistently advocate policies that are not popular with the mainstream voters, that's not center either.
User avatar
Edi
Dragonlord
Dragonlord
Posts: 12461
Joined: 2002-07-11 12:27am
Location: Helsinki, Finland

Post by Edi »

Perinquus wrote:But we are talking about within the context of American politics here. And furthermore, he was claiming the Democrats are centrist. Now they may not be extreme left, but when they consistently advocate policies that are not popular with the mainstream voters, that's not center either.
As I recall, this started as a gun control thread, and I remarked on how it seems from an outside point of view, and besides the Duchess (and you, obviously), everyone else commenting on the Dems political placement in this thread is from Europe, so context of American politics my ass. If you ran the political spectrums of America and Europe together into a single continuous band, the Democrats would occupy a place ranging from considerably right of centre to just about the middle for their left wing. That's where Simon's comment comes from, as he's from Denmark. We don't necessarily bend over backward to fit everything into the American context even if we speak about American political parties. Why do you think I specifically made the distinction earlier about how the political landscape looks like tonon-Americans? Simon, a non-American, replied to that comment, so the context (European political landscape) should have been pretty clear.

We know most Americans consider them to be leftist or leaning that way, but that's because most Americans don't know what leftist even means. Most don't even have an inkling. As for the social Democratic parties I mentioned, they're not extreme left either. They're on the left, but there are typically one or two parties in each of those countries that are significantly more to the left (e.g. the Leftist Alliance in Finland). Those are the people who are on the extreme left, and even they are not the nuttiest lot, it's just that the raving lunatics are such a small fraction that they never manage to be seen.

I'll also note that the American political landscape is all over the place, in the sense that there are lots of people who support the Democrats only because of their disagreement with the Republican rightwingnut gallery, and vice versa, which is just another symptom of the black/white fallaciousness that seems to be pervasive.

Edi
Warwolf Urban Combat Specialist

Why is it so goddamned hard to get little assholes like you to admit it when you fuck up? Is it pride? What gives you the right to have any pride?
–Darth Wong to vivftp

GOP message? Why don't they just come out of the closet: FASCISTS R' US –Patrick Degan

The GOP has a problem with anyone coming out of the closet. –18-till-I-die
User avatar
The Duchess of Zeon
Gözde
Posts: 14566
Joined: 2002-09-18 01:06am
Location: Exiled in the Pale of Settlement.

Post by The Duchess of Zeon »

Edi wrote:
I'll also note that the American political landscape is all over the place, in the sense that there are lots of people who support the Democrats only because of their disagreement with the Republican rightwingnut gallery, and vice versa, which is just another symptom of the black/white fallaciousness that seems to be pervasive.

Edi
Well, I've long argued that you can't look at the Republicans and Democrats as parties in the European sense. In the European sense they're more like Coalitions--just, well, permanent ones.
The threshold for inclusion in Wikipedia is verifiability, not truth. -- Wikipedia's No Original Research policy page.

In 1966 the Soviets find something on the dark side of the Moon. In 2104 they come back. -- Red Banner / White Star, a nBSG continuation story. Updated to Chapter 4.0 -- 14 January 2013.
User avatar
Perinquus
Virus-X Wannabe
Posts: 2685
Joined: 2002-08-06 11:57pm

Post by Perinquus »

Edi wrote:As I recall, this started as a gun control thread, and I remarked on how it seems from an outside point of view, and besides the Duchess (and you, obviously), everyone else commenting on the Dems political placement in this thread is from Europe, so context of American politics my ass.
This is an American policy issue, proposed by American polticians, to take effect in America (should it pass), on Americans, so of course it's just absurd to view it within the context of American politics. :roll:
Edi wrote:If you ran the political spectrums of America and Europe together into a single continuous band, the Democrats would occupy a place ranging from considerably right of centre to just about the middle for their left wing. That's where Simon's comment comes from, as he's from Denmark. We don't necessarily bend over backward to fit everything into the American context even if we speak about American political parties. Why do you think I specifically made the distinction earlier about how the political landscape looks like tonon-Americans? Simon, a non-American, replied to that comment, so the context (European political landscape) should have been pretty clear.
Perhaps it does look that way to a European, and I grant you, I missed that. But is still makes the most sense to look at the politcal spectrum, and where parties stand, in relation to the electorate of that country. However, a lot of the Democrats, especially in the upper echelons of the party right now are more left wing than you think. Nancy Pelosi, for example, the current Democratic leader in the House, is extremely liberal, favoring higher taxes and more social programs every chance she gets. She has voted for higher income taxes. She voted for the death tax. She even voted against repealing the marriage tax penalty! She wants this money for more social programs, because she is basically a socialist in her ideology. Other Democratic leaders, like Tom Daschle, Dick Gephardt, David Bonior, et al. are more left leaning than I suspect most people realize. The thing is, they have to moderate their stances somewhat, because they are savvy enough politicians to know that a lot of the things that are dear to their hearts simply do not play well to the American public. That doesn't change the fact that they are markedly leftist. Again, in Pelosi's case, even a lot of Democrats were shaking their heads with foreboding when Pelosi was selected to replace Gephardt as House minority leader, because even a lot of Democrats felt she was too left wing, and feared she'd alienate mainstream America. But she was still selected because that's where the Democratic party laedership's collective heart lies - to the left. I grant you, they are not as far left as some of Europe's parties are, but they're still left.
User avatar
Peregrin Toker
Emperor's Hand
Posts: 8609
Joined: 2002-07-04 10:57am
Location: Denmark
Contact:

Post by Peregrin Toker »

Perinquus wrote: But we are talking about within the context of American politics here. And furthermore, he was claiming the Democrats are centrist. Now they may not be extreme left, but when they consistently advocate policies that are not popular with the mainstream voters, that's not center either.
Popularity has nothing to do with whether a party is centre, left or right.

For example, at last election most Danish voters voted for parties known to be right-winged (such as the Conservative Party or the Danish People's Party) or the slightly left-of-center Social Democrats.

Even though the centrists parties (The Radicals and the Centre Democrats) didn't turn out to be near as popular as the right, does this mean they aren't centrist?
"Hi there, would you like to have a cookie?"

"No, actually I would HATE to have a cookie, you vapid waste of inedible flesh!"
Raoul Duke, Jr.
BANNED
Posts: 3791
Joined: 2002-09-25 06:59pm
Location: Suckling At The Teat Of Missmanners

Post by Raoul Duke, Jr. »

More hoplophobic screeching. The only response this should properly receive is rotten grapefruit facials, preferably delivered by an out-of-work MLB pitcher.
User avatar
Peregrin Toker
Emperor's Hand
Posts: 8609
Joined: 2002-07-04 10:57am
Location: Denmark
Contact:

Post by Peregrin Toker »

Raoul Duke, Jr. wrote:More hoplophobic screeching. The only response this should properly receive is rotten grapefruit facials, preferably delivered by an out-of-work MLB pitcher.
Erm....

1. What the heck is hoplophobia??
2. What doesn't deserve other responses than rotten grapefruits?? My comment about popularity not dictating a political party's orientation, or the original topic?
"Hi there, would you like to have a cookie?"

"No, actually I would HATE to have a cookie, you vapid waste of inedible flesh!"
User avatar
Sir Sirius
Sith Devotee
Posts: 2975
Joined: 2002-12-09 12:15pm
Location: 6 hr 45 min R.A. and -16 degrees 43 minutes declination

Post by Sir Sirius »

1. Irrational fear of weapons.
2. I think he is talking about the original topic of this thread (sse first page).
Image
Post Reply