Well, who faithfully repeats, what even "serious" media have quoted time and again shouldn´t wonder, if he gets emberassed.
Not only did i have to realize some new things about the nuclear thread of a war after doing a quick research, i also had to realize some worrying facts about Germany´s politics concerning nuclear-powerplants.
Not only are our political tree-huggers almost hysterical about nuclear fission, its scaring how willing the population is to believe them.
But another question:
According to some estimates 80% of earths population and infrastructure are centered at the costs or only hundred kilometers away from the next sea.
So what would cause more death and destruction: To bomb the cities directely or to drop the warheads into the oceans and on vulcanos, creating Tsunamis and earthquakes?
Ability of Bombar fleets to destroy planets
Moderator: Vympel
- Sea Skimmer
- Yankee Capitalist Air Pirate
- Posts: 37390
- Joined: 2002-07-03 11:49pm
- Location: Passchendaele City, HAB
To hit them directly, a Tsunami or artificial earthquake will only deliver a fraction of the weapons yield to the target.FTeik wrote:
So what would cause more death and destruction: To bomb the cities directely or to drop the warheads into the oceans and on vulcanos, creating Tsunamis and earthquakes?
"This cult of special forces is as sensible as to form a Royal Corps of Tree Climbers and say that no soldier who does not wear its green hat with a bunch of oak leaves stuck in it should be expected to climb a tree"
— Field Marshal William Slim 1956
— Field Marshal William Slim 1956