Hi,
Anyway who knows, please help me with the following question.
At what point does the designation capital ship no longer apply? I am pretty sure that anything from a cruiser upwards is designated as such, but specifically, can a destroyer or a frigate be labelled likewise?
Thanks.
Naval designation cut-off
Moderator: Edi
- Supreme_Warlord
- Youngling
- Posts: 149
- Joined: 2002-07-04 12:04pm
- Location: East Ham, London, United Kingdom, Europe, Earth, Sol System, Orion Arm, Milky Way, Universe
Naval designation cut-off
For those who believe, no explanation is necessary. For those who do not, no explanation will suffice.
Men don't follow titles, they follow courage!
________________________________________
100th post on Wed, 28 Apr, 2004 15:23
Men don't follow titles, they follow courage!
________________________________________
100th post on Wed, 28 Apr, 2004 15:23
- Sea Skimmer
- Yankee Capitalist Air Pirate
- Posts: 37390
- Joined: 2002-07-03 11:49pm
- Location: Passchendaele City, HAB
Capital ships are battleships, battlecruisers and more recently aircraft carriers. Cruisers are not capital ships.
The term is often blurred by sci fi fans who refer to anything bigger then a fighter as a capital ship.
The term is often blurred by sci fi fans who refer to anything bigger then a fighter as a capital ship.
"This cult of special forces is as sensible as to form a Royal Corps of Tree Climbers and say that no soldier who does not wear its green hat with a bunch of oak leaves stuck in it should be expected to climb a tree"
— Field Marshal William Slim 1956
— Field Marshal William Slim 1956
- Sir Sirius
- Sith Devotee
- Posts: 2975
- Joined: 2002-12-09 12:15pm
- Location: 6 hr 45 min R.A. and -16 degrees 43 minutes declination
- Grand Admiral Thrawn
- Ruthless Imperial Tyrant
- Posts: 5755
- Joined: 2002-07-03 06:11pm
- Location: Canada
- Col. Crackpot
- That Obnoxious Guy
- Posts: 10228
- Joined: 2002-10-28 05:04pm
- Location: Rhode Island
- Contact:
i would imagine so, she's only half a dozen or so meters shorter than the Iowa BB's even though she's a cruiser by name.Grand Admiral Thrawn wrote:Could the Kirov be called a Capital Ship?
EDIT: i found some stuff:
Kirov: http://www.warships1.com/RUSrkr05_Ushakov_specs.htm
Iowa: http://www.warships1.com/USbb61_specs.htm
"This business will get out of control. It will get out of control and we’ll be lucky to live through it.” -Tom Clancy
- Frank Hipper
- Overfiend of the Superego
- Posts: 12882
- Joined: 2002-10-17 08:48am
- Location: Hamilton, Ohio?
"Capitol" Ship is a term that is losing it's meaning due to a blurring of definition. It could be argued that SSBNs are the premiere capitol ships of the U.S. navy. Then again, modern destroyers are of a size and capability to earn them the title, too.
And I'd rate the Kirovs as capitol ships, without doubt. In the classic sense.
And I'd rate the Kirovs as capitol ships, without doubt. In the classic sense.
Life is all the eternity you get, use it wisely.
- Sea Skimmer
- Yankee Capitalist Air Pirate
- Posts: 37390
- Joined: 2002-07-03 11:49pm
- Location: Passchendaele City, HAB
Yup, by size and role there capital ships. Often there referred to as being CBN's, CB is basically what the USN uses to designate battlecruisers. N is nuclear of course.Grand Admiral Thrawn wrote:Could the Kirov be called a Capital Ship?
"This cult of special forces is as sensible as to form a Royal Corps of Tree Climbers and say that no soldier who does not wear its green hat with a bunch of oak leaves stuck in it should be expected to climb a tree"
— Field Marshal William Slim 1956
— Field Marshal William Slim 1956
Given the flag facilities aboard a Ticonderoga, it *might* be within the capital ship designation.
Howedar is no longer here. Need to talk to him? Talk to Pick.