What's the worst movie you've ever saw?

Dark Hellion · Post by **Dark Hellion** » 2003-07-26 01:19am

Angry, of course he's angry, he ain;'t getting his DFR (daily fujiko requirment)[man i bet i butchered the spelling]

Knife · Post by **Knife** » 2003-07-26 01:46am

I have seen scores of bad movies but the ones I have actually turned off and went/done something else are...

Avengers
Hunch Drunk Love
Moooolon Rogue (I know I spelled it wrong)

Post by **Dalton** » 2003-07-26 01:50am

Mitth-raw-nuruodo wrote:Dalton, maybe it's just your avatar, but you seem angry.

Gil just told you why he thinks the shots were like that, I don't think there's anything else to say.

But...but...he didn't curse the movie! In fact, he seemed to be looking for a bright point!

DAMN YOU TO HELL GIL!!

Dark Hellion wrote:Angry, of course he's angry, he ain;'t getting his DFR (daily fujiko requirment)[man i bet i butchered the spelling]

Yeah, Lupin III wasn't on tonight

Ahh, Fujiko...she of the large, large breasts.

Post by **Dalton** » 2003-07-26 01:52am

Knife wrote:I have seen scores of bad movies but the ones I have actually turned off and went/done something else are...

Avengers
Hunch Drunk Love
Moooolon Rogue (I know I spelled it wrong)

I saw a little bit of Moulin Rouge, and it was easily some of the oddest stuff I've ever watched. Quite comical too...

Dark Hellion · Post by **Dark Hellion** » 2003-07-26 02:15am

Moulon rouge wasn't that bad. Leguazammo is a very underrated actor.

As for the lupin III, yah, the large breasts are definately a very big perk (in the pants) to an already hilarious show.

DeadM · Post by **DeadM** » 2003-07-26 02:36am

Darth Garden Gnome wrote:Bleh, I still say the movie that begin with "T" and end in "itanic". (cookie to who gets that reference)

Let me guess..... Maddox?

Post by **Dalton** » 2003-07-26 02:48am

Dark Hellion wrote:Moulon rouge wasn't that bad. Leguazammo is a very underrated actor.

John Leguizamo is fucking great both comically and dramatically.

Dark Hellion wrote:As for the lupin III, yah, the large breasts are definately a very big perk (in the pants) to an already hilarious show.

There was one episode full of women wearing nothing but panties and translucent blouses

Post by **The Yosemite Bear** » 2003-07-26 04:13am

Uncle Joe Shannon..

Alcohol, Pthos, Scuicide & Cancer

Peregrin Toker · Post by **Peregrin Toker** » 2003-07-26 04:32am

The silliest movie I saw was "Reptilicus". The most cliché-ridden movie I saw was "Cobra". The weirdest movie I saw was probably "The Idiots".

But the least entertaining movie I've seen must be "The Blair Witch Project". The premise was good enough, but it should have been done as a written short story, not as a movie. In my opinion, the horror genre is better suited to books than movies. Just look at all the awful adaptations of H.P. Lovecraft short stories.

Asst. Asst. Lt. Cmdr. Smi · Post by **Asst. Asst. Lt. Cmdr. Smi** » 2003-07-26 11:01am

I usually don't go out and see movies that I think are bad, and when I go to see a movie (I haven't in about 6 months), I'm usually not dissapointed. I did rent Wrongfully Accused once, though, and I'll have to say it was pretty dumb. Although there were a few funny parts, it completely overdid the cheap laughs, creating a pretty dumb movie.

Rye · Post by **Rye** » 2003-07-26 11:05am

XTRO 2. It's so bad it makes me want to vomit, now, after i gave it someone as an ironic present.

Kitsune · Post by **Kitsune** » 2003-07-26 02:51pm

Master of Ossus wrote:Actually, I vote for "The Musketeer."

No real plot but not the Worst I have ever seen
How about "Iron Thunder", Richard Hatch at about his worst

Kitsune · Post by **Kitsune** » 2003-07-26 05:22pm

Kitsune wrote: No real plot but not the Worst I have ever seen
How about "Iron Thunder", Richard Hatch at about his worst

I think I found one even worse, Babe!!!

Dahak · Post by **Dahak** » 2003-07-26 05:46pm

Frank Hipper wrote:Notice how Brukheimer is responsible for some of the most hated films of all time?

Titanic?

Armageddon?

Pearl Harbor?

I might be terribly wrong, but as far as I know, Bruckheimer had nothing to do with Titanic. Which was a quite good movie. Except of course Leo di Caprio...

And although Josh Hartnett stars in Pearl Harbor, I couldn't get myself to watch it...

As for my personal un-favourite movie, the vote goes to:
Armageddon. But it might be really entertaining as a comedy...

Shinova · Post by **Shinova** » 2003-07-26 05:47pm

My most hated movie:

Quest for Camelot

That one animated movie.

I hate it so much that when a bunch of kids were watching it, I had to shut my door, put on some headphones, and listen to music to try to drown out the sounds coming from that movie.

Arthur_Tuxedo · Post by **Arthur_Tuxedo** » 2003-07-26 06:24pm

Jack Frost 2 was the worst. Jack Frost was great because it was such a bad horror movie that it was unintentionally hilarious (and it's got Shannon Elizabeth), but the sequel was so utterly terrible that it wasn't even unintentionally funny, it was just mind-rending. A part of me died the day I watched that film.

Frank Hipper · Post by **Frank Hipper** » 2003-07-26 06:29pm

Doesn't matter how many times this topic has been covered, it's still hellatious fun!

SeebianWurm · Post by **SeebianWurm** » 2003-07-26 06:33pm

The Prince of Space. Unbelievably bad 50's japanese SF movie.

Dark Hellion · Post by **Dark Hellion** » 2003-07-26 06:34pm

Please folks, find a copy of Nuckie. You will cry. It is so god awful bad you cannot believe it.

Post by **Sea Skimmer** » 2003-07-26 06:37pm

irishmick79 wrote:"The Killer Condom" just looks stupid. Jerking off can be considered a higher form of art than that piece of shit. But at least "The Killer Condom" didn't pretend to be a good film that paid tribute to vetrans. Pearl Harbor is much more evil, thanks to it's greater exposure to the fragile minds of pre-pubescants who don't know any better.

The closest thing to a "good" aspect of that movie was it resulted in a major crackdown on the Pentagon's terms for supporting movie productions.

Utsanomiko · Post by **Utsanomiko** » 2003-07-26 06:57pm

Anyone else see anything from Evolution?

Corpus Christie creaming his jockstrap at the sight of Saint Josophat, that was one fucking stupid movie. I fortunately only caught the last ~45 minutes of it, but the ending was purely retarded.

Basically, the extremely-moronic scientists' unbelievably-stupid sidekicks found out that shampoo was poisonous to that the crazy, growing, changing blob that was the source of all the crazy lifeforms from earlier in the film, iirc (this is evidently the writer's idea of evolution), which was now getting huge and moving on its own (due to the heat from the nuke or bomb dropped on it, iirc, because the blob could feed off of heat and thus grow in size and mobility. Yeah...).

And the extremely-moronic scientists explantation? The extremely-moronic scientists babbled about how the blob was silicon-based, and that terrestrial lifeforms are carbon-based (trust me, I'm making this sound much smarter than how they explained it), and that brand of shampoo contained the element antimony (Sb). They explained how on the periodic chart, Antimony is two rows down and one column to the right of silicon, which is the same relation of carbon to arsenic. To put it in other words for fucking-stupid antiscience, antimony is to silicon lifeforms as arsenic is to carbon lifeforms. I'm still at a loss for words.

So the last half-hour of the film involves said extremely-moronic scientists and unbelievably-stupid sidekicks filling a firetruck's tanks with yellow Head and Shoulders, running it under the giant wandering blob's sphincter in its underbelly, and pointing the firehose up it in order to get antimony inside the monster.

Let me just repeat that spoiler in big, bold letters (spoiler alert):

The last half-hour of Evolution was a firetruck filling a giant blob's rectum with shampoo!!

My only thoughts afterwards:
Would the same movie-makers also title a film Modern Applied Chemistry if it was 90 minutes of Gargamel 'explaining' how exactly he would turn Smurfs into gold?

Hamel · Post by **Hamel** » 2003-07-26 07:06pm

Master of Disguise

awful awful awful

Rye · Post by **Rye** » 2003-07-26 07:12pm

I quite liked Evolution, it's not meant to be taken seriously. Plus it thought it'd be good to just put in a load of product placement for Head and Shoulders shampoo for reasons unknown.

But XTRO 2 people! Just look at it's name! XTRO 2!

AGHHHHHHHHHHHHHH.

honestly, i've never seen anything so bad...XTRO 2!

Joe · Post by **Joe** » 2003-07-26 07:19pm

Hamel wrote:Master of Disguise

awful awful awful

I have lost all respect for Dana Carvey on account of that movie. What the hell was he thinking?

Gil Hamilton · Post by **Gil Hamilton** » 2003-07-26 07:23pm

Dalton wrote:But...but...he didn't curse the movie! In fact, he seemed to be looking for a bright point!

DAMN YOU TO HELL GIL!!

Hey, man, I never said I liked the movie, though I did have a good time laughing at it with my friends. I'm just saying that I heard they shot all those angled shots to try and make the Psychlos look taller than they were.

I'm suprised no one has said Bowling for Columbine yet as the worst movie ever.