Defining natural

SLAM: debunk creationism, pseudoscience, and superstitions. Discuss logic and morality.

Moderator: Alyrium Denryle

Post Reply
User avatar
Shrykull
Jedi Master
Posts: 1270
Joined: 2002-07-05 09:11pm

Defining natural

Post by Shrykull »

Where is the line between something natural and unnatural drawn. I read wiccan site once that it stated that magic is natural that there's nothing supernatural about it, even though it doesn't happen without human intervention, it's something they intentionally try to do.
It made me think of Ben Bartlett exchange on the hate mail page when MW was saying that the scientific method always assumes a natural cause for everything that happens, wonder what they mean by "magic is natural"
User avatar
kojikun
BANNED
Posts: 9663
Joined: 2002-07-04 12:23am
Contact:

Post by kojikun »

when it ceases to be there regardless of human intervention
Sì! Abbiamo un' anima! Ma è fatta di tanti piccoli robot.
User avatar
Joe
Space Cowboy
Posts: 17314
Joined: 2002-08-22 09:58pm
Location: Wishing I was in Athens, GA

Re: Defining natural

Post by Joe »

Shrykull wrote:Where is the line between something natural and unnatural drawn. I read wiccan site once that it stated that magic is natural that there's nothing supernatural about it, even though it doesn't happen without human intervention, it's something they intentionally try to do.

They're bullshitting, of course, as the religious have since the dawn of time. How can a nonexistent force be natural?
It made me think of Ben Bartlett exchange on the hate mail page when MW was saying that the scientific method always assumes a natural cause for everything that happens, wonder what they mean by "magic is natural"
Probably that magic is a natural force that exists in the world. They just neglect to come up with any empirical evidence to back up this claim.
Image

BoTM / JL / MM / HAB / VRWC / Horseman

I'm studying for the CPA exam. Have a nice summer, and if you're down just sit back and realize that Joe is off somewhere, doing much worse than you are.
User avatar
Rye
To Mega Therion
Posts: 12493
Joined: 2003-03-08 07:48am
Location: Uighur, please!

Post by Rye »

I define natural as something spontaneous, it doesn't need a being to set it off, or structure it to happen.

This would make things like human settlements and birds' nests unnatural...but leave plants and biological processes etc natural.
EBC|Fucking Metal|Artist|Androgynous Sexfiend|Gozer Kvltist|
Listen to my music! http://www.soundclick.com/nihilanth
"America is, now, the most powerful and economically prosperous nation in the country." - Master of Ossus
mdaw2
Redshirt
Posts: 9
Joined: 2003-07-30 02:29pm
Location: Isle of Wight
Contact:

Post by mdaw2 »

Rye wrote:I define natural as something spontaneous, it doesn't need a being to set it off, or structure it to happen.

This would make things like human settlements and birds' nests unnatural...but leave plants and biological processes etc natural.
It would also make any animal un-natural...
Bored?
Why not try helping a random stranger
User avatar
Rye
To Mega Therion
Posts: 12493
Joined: 2003-03-08 07:48am
Location: Uighur, please!

Post by Rye »

mdaw2 wrote:
Rye wrote:I define natural as something spontaneous, it doesn't need a being to set it off, or structure it to happen.

This would make things like human settlements and birds' nests unnatural...but leave plants and biological processes etc natural.
It would also make any animal un-natural...
How so? DNA is naturally self replicating, and sexual reproduction is a function of evolution. Which is also natural. Let's not leave out asexual reproduction either.
EBC|Fucking Metal|Artist|Androgynous Sexfiend|Gozer Kvltist|
Listen to my music! http://www.soundclick.com/nihilanth
"America is, now, the most powerful and economically prosperous nation in the country." - Master of Ossus
mdaw2
Redshirt
Posts: 9
Joined: 2003-07-30 02:29pm
Location: Isle of Wight
Contact:

Post by mdaw2 »

Rye wrote:I define natural as something spontaneous, it doesn't need a being to set it off,
Without checking my textbooks, im 99% DNA is not self-replicating, it in fact needs other stuff to replicate. Also, animals need other animals to reproduce, so by your 'logic' they arent natural.
And before you start with asexual reproduction, i'll specifically say that you are saying 'Elephants are not natural' in your earlier post
:P
Bored?
Why not try helping a random stranger
User avatar
Rye
To Mega Therion
Posts: 12493
Joined: 2003-03-08 07:48am
Location: Uighur, please!

Post by Rye »

mdaw2 wrote:
Rye wrote:I define natural as something spontaneous, it doesn't need a being to set it off,
Without checking my textbooks, im 99% DNA is not self-replicating, it in fact needs other stuff to replicate. Also, animals need other animals to reproduce, so by your 'logic' they arent natural.
And before you start with asexual reproduction, i'll specifically say that you are saying 'Elephants are not natural' in your earlier post
:P
As if i was.::coughstrawmancough:: Let's see what dictionary.com says.

Dictionary.com
Present in or produced by nature: a natural pearl.
Of, relating to, or concerning nature: a natural environment.
Conforming to the usual or ordinary course of nature: a natural death.

Not acquired; inherent: Love of power is natural to some people.
Having a particular character by nature: a natural leader.
Biology. Not produced or changed artificially; not conditioned: natural immunity; a natural reflex.
Characterized by spontaneity and freedom from artificiality, affectation, or inhibitions. See Synonyms at naive.
Not altered, treated, or disguised: natural coloring; natural produce.
Faithfully representing nature or life.
SO NER :P.
EBC|Fucking Metal|Artist|Androgynous Sexfiend|Gozer Kvltist|
Listen to my music! http://www.soundclick.com/nihilanth
"America is, now, the most powerful and economically prosperous nation in the country." - Master of Ossus
mdaw2
Redshirt
Posts: 9
Joined: 2003-07-30 02:29pm
Location: Isle of Wight
Contact:

Post by mdaw2 »

Rye wrote:I define natural as something spontaneous, it doesn't need a being to set it off, or structure it to happen.

This would make things like human settlements and birds' nests unnatural...but leave plants and biological processes etc natural.
That looks like it's how you define it, but you seem to have failed to credit dictionary.com for your definition.

btw strawman?

'Natural doesnt need a being to set it off' <- your post
'An animal is a being' <-my (and i'd guess most people's views)
'An elephant is an animal' <-my (and i'd guess most people's views)

Therefore, according to your logic, an elephant is not natural :D
Bored?
Why not try helping a random stranger
User avatar
Rye
To Mega Therion
Posts: 12493
Joined: 2003-03-08 07:48am
Location: Uighur, please!

Post by Rye »

Fiiiiiiine, from now on, my definition will be this one:
Present in or produced by nature: a natural pearl.
Of, relating to, or concerning nature: a natural environment.
Conforming to the usual or ordinary course of nature: a natural death.

Not acquired; inherent: Love of power is natural to some people.
Having a particular character by nature: a natural leader.
Biology. Not produced or changed artificially; not conditioned: natural immunity; a natural reflex.
Characterized by spontaneity and freedom from artificiality, affectation, or inhibitions. See Synonyms at naive.
Not altered, treated, or disguised: natural coloring; natural produce.
Faithfully representing nature or life.
EBC|Fucking Metal|Artist|Androgynous Sexfiend|Gozer Kvltist|
Listen to my music! http://www.soundclick.com/nihilanth
"America is, now, the most powerful and economically prosperous nation in the country." - Master of Ossus
mdaw2
Redshirt
Posts: 9
Joined: 2003-07-30 02:29pm
Location: Isle of Wight
Contact:

Post by mdaw2 »

back to the question, anything that exists is in someway natural. Just 'cos it's been made by humans, doesn't mean it's not natural. It may just be naturally occuring only when humans (which are natural) have made it (naturally, just because they can)
Bored?
Why not try helping a random stranger
User avatar
kojikun
BANNED
Posts: 9663
Joined: 2002-07-04 12:23am
Contact:

Post by kojikun »

If an animal is natural then so is a human. if an animals makings are natural then so are a humans. which makes sense, because we are driven by our nature as humans to do the things we do (we take drugs because our bodies like feeling good, we drive cars because we want to make more money to support our families, we build spaceships because its a foothold in space which will eventually preserve our species). So if we take it that everything caused by animals is natural then everything caused by humans is natural because they possess the same reasons behind their causes.

However natural really ends when alterations are done to the milieu by life, be that life planets, ants, dogs, or humans.

The issue here is which meaning of natural do we mean, "occuring in nature" or "inherently occuring". The two are similar but subtly different. Tooth marks on bones are inherently occuring because they're just bound to show up, but they're not occuring in nature because they require something to make those teethmarks where there wouldnt be any before. It all depends on which version of natural you mean.
Sì! Abbiamo un' anima! Ma è fatta di tanti piccoli robot.
User avatar
Rye
To Mega Therion
Posts: 12493
Joined: 2003-03-08 07:48am
Location: Uighur, please!

Post by Rye »

It all depends on which version of natural you mean
Yeah, that's what i thought. Maybe there's natural events, which happen on their own due to the rules of the universe, and natural behaviour as dictated by your genes etc. Like, building a shelter of some kind would be natural behaviour, but the building itself would not be a "natural" state for the building materials to be in.

OR something. :?
EBC|Fucking Metal|Artist|Androgynous Sexfiend|Gozer Kvltist|
Listen to my music! http://www.soundclick.com/nihilanth
"America is, now, the most powerful and economically prosperous nation in the country." - Master of Ossus
User avatar
Wicked Pilot
Moderator Emeritus
Posts: 8972
Joined: 2002-07-05 05:45pm

Post by Wicked Pilot »

Natural means women with hairy legs and hairy other places. Therefore natural is bad.
The most basic assumption about the world is that it does not contradict itself.
User avatar
Slartibartfast
Emperor's Hand
Posts: 6730
Joined: 2002-09-10 05:35pm
Location: Where The Sea Meets The Sky
Contact:

Post by Slartibartfast »

Natural as defined is basically anything manmade.

"Nature" magic is just that, magic that has a nature theme to it. I can have a "nature" building, just put a lot of trees in it and birds and shitty wiccan stuff, and I have a "nature"-themed building. It's still unnatural.

If man does something that isn't against his instincts or those of other animals (ex: sex, or gregarism) then I'd say it's natural.

A dog fetching a ball... well, it's difficult to say. Obviously the ball wouldn't be there if it weren't for man, but I think dogs just like to fetch stuff and play. Playing = natural.
Image
User avatar
Alyeska
Federation Ambassador
Posts: 17496
Joined: 2002-08-11 07:28pm
Location: Montana, USA

Post by Alyeska »

I define everything as natural. Animals are part of nature and thus anything they do is already natural and part of their basic nature. Thus anything humans do is natural. Thus the New york skyline is just as natural looking as a forrest or mountain range.
"If the facts are on your side, pound on the facts. If the law is on your side, pound on the law. If neither is on your side, pound on the table."

"The captain claimed our people violated a 4,000 year old treaty forbidding us to develop hyperspace technology. Extermination of our planet was the consequence. The subject did not survive interrogation."
Post Reply