Imperial guerillas

SWvST: the subject of the main site.

Moderator: Vympel

Locked
User avatar
Admiral Johnason
Sith Devotee
Posts: 2552
Joined: 2003-01-11 05:06pm
Location: The Rebel cruiser Defender

Imperial guerillas

Post by Admiral Johnason »

If the Empire opted for special forces/insurgance strikes and no out and out fleet engaementa against the Federation, would they be successful in destroying the Federation or at least taking control of the government? They can't use superweapons, heavy ships, or lots of fighters (at once.)
Liberals for Nixon in 3000: Nixon... with carisma and a shiny robot body.

never negoiate out of fear, but never fear to negoiate.

Captian America- Justice League

HAB submarine commander-
"We'll break you of your fear of water."
User avatar
Master of Ossus
Darkest Knight
Posts: 18213
Joined: 2002-07-11 01:35am
Location: California

Post by Master of Ossus »

I think we need more information. It's pretty clear that regardless of how the Empire were to go about the war, if they were seriously dedicated to winning it then the UFP would have no chance. However, special forces are almost always insufficient to take and hold territory themselves. What sort of ground troops (if any) would the Empire be able to use for this scenario, and please explain the starship limitations further (ie. Are lightly armed carriers OK?).
"Sometimes I think you WANT us to fail." "Shut up, just shut up!" -Two Guys from Kabul

Latinum Star Recipient; Hacker's Cross Award Winner

"one soler flar can vapririze the planit or malt the nickl in lass than millasacit" -Bagara1000

"Happiness is just a Flaming Moe away."
User avatar
Admiral Johnason
Sith Devotee
Posts: 2552
Joined: 2003-01-11 05:06pm
Location: The Rebel cruiser Defender

Post by Admiral Johnason »

Master of Ossus wrote:I think we need more information. It's pretty clear that regardless of how the Empire were to go about the war, if they were seriously dedicated to winning it then the UFP would have no chance. However, special forces are almost always insufficient to take and hold territory themselves. What sort of ground troops (if any) would the Empire be able to use for this scenario, and please explain the starship limitations further (ie. Are lightly armed carriers OK?).
The Empire is forced into avoid direct fleet confirnations and can use no ship larger than a Strike-class. The Empire can use any of it's crack units, such as stormies or commandos. NO BDZs OR LARGE SPACEBATTLES!
Liberals for Nixon in 3000: Nixon... with carisma and a shiny robot body.

never negoiate out of fear, but never fear to negoiate.

Captian America- Justice League

HAB submarine commander-
"We'll break you of your fear of water."
User avatar
Darth Wong
Sith Lord
Sith Lord
Posts: 70028
Joined: 2002-07-03 12:25am
Location: Toronto, Canada
Contact:

Post by Darth Wong »

Strike-class ships and below would be able to decimate Federation forces on their own. Take a sci-fi universe in which the heaviest starship weapons appear to be low megaton-class and then inject ships from a universe where fighters can carry gigaton-class weapons and have the speed to engage only at times and places of their choosing, and you have a one-sided slaughter.
Image
"It's not evil for God to do it. Or for someone to do it at God's command."- Jonathan Boyd on baby-killing

"you guys are fascinated with the use of those "rules of logic" to the extent that you don't really want to discussus anything."- GC

"I do not believe Russian Roulette is a stupid act" - Embracer of Darkness

"Viagra commercials appear to save lives" - tharkûn on US health care.

http://www.stardestroyer.net/Mike/RantMode/Blurbs.html
User avatar
Connor MacLeod
Sith Apprentice
Posts: 14065
Joined: 2002-08-01 05:03pm
Contact:

Post by Connor MacLeod »

Why is this thread even in existence? ITs simply another one of those "I'm trying to keep the ST vs SW debate alive" threads that relies on hideously skewing the issue by crippling one side or enhancing the other. Lets face it, the Federation is basically screwed no matter WHAT happens (short of actually depriving them of their actual advantages or bringing in near-omnipotents).
Howedar
Emperor's Thumb
Posts: 12472
Joined: 2002-07-03 05:06pm
Location: St. Paul, MN

Post by Howedar »

Consider the starter.

I rest my case.
Howedar is no longer here. Need to talk to him? Talk to Pick.
User avatar
Darth Fanboy
DUH! WINNING!
Posts: 11182
Joined: 2002-09-20 05:25am
Location: Mars, where I am a totally bitchin' rockstar.

Post by Darth Fanboy »

Howedar wrote:Consider the starter.

I rest my case.
Indeed, SPanky the Dolphin said it best when he said that the Amdiral here should be custom titled "Perpetual Noob"

Seriously I remember this kids first posts and he hasn't learned a damn thing since seemingly.

Lockage seems necessary I would think.
"If it's true that our species is alone in the universe, then I'd have to say that the universe aimed rather low and settled for very little."
-George Carlin (1937-2008)

"Have some of you Americans actually seen Football? Of course there are 0-0 draws but that doesn't make them any less exciting."
-Dr Roberts, with quite possibly the dumbest thing ever said in 10 years of SDNet.
User avatar
Ghost Rider
Spirit of Vengeance
Posts: 27779
Joined: 2002-09-24 01:48pm
Location: DC...looking up from the gutters to the stars

Post by Ghost Rider »

Let's see.

Like Wong pointed ut it becomes basically SHips that can still arm themselves with at least one GT weapon and possibly multiple MT weaponry.

The only difference is that the Empire would basically be going on a reign of terror instead of holding planets.

Thread locky.
MM /CF/WG/BOTM/JL/Original Warsie/ACPATHNTDWATGODW FOREVER!!

Sometimes we can choose the path we follow. Sometimes our choices are made for us. And sometimes we have no choice at all

Saying and doing are chocolate and concrete
Locked