Straight men are hypocrites

Sam Or I · Post by **Sam Or I** » 2003-08-07 02:58pm

innerbrat wrote:It must be pointed out here, that we're talking about more than rejecting unwanted advances. In the OP I mentioned two gay members of the Anglican clergy, one recently made a bishop, one slightly less recently denied the post of a bishop

We are talking about men whose jobs are on the line for acting like, well, men. You can talk all you want about how "we're used to be the sexual aggressors" and "women ask for it because of how they dress" (which I find VERY offensive, BTW), but essentially, no man is gonig to be deemed unsuitable for a promotion just because he comes on to women.

I have not kept up with the story, but if they are priest wouldn't their job be on the line for making sexual advances on anyone.

InnerBrat · Post by **InnerBrat** » 2003-08-07 03:01pm

Sam Or I wrote:I have not kept up with the story, but if they are priest wouldn't their job be on the line for making sexual advances on anyone.

Not in the CofE, love.

Not read Jane Austen? Her heroines were forever marrying vicars.

Sam Or I · Post by **Sam Or I** » 2003-08-07 03:22pm

innerbrat wrote:
Sam Or I wrote:I have not kept up with the story, but if they are priest wouldn't their job be on the line for making sexual advances on anyone.
Not in the CofE, love.

Not read Jane Austen? Her heroines were forever marrying vicars.

Ok, I don't keep track of religious groups.

Sam Or I · Post by **Sam Or I** » 2003-08-07 03:24pm

(I am not refering to Jane Austen but the CofE)

NapoleonGH · Post by **NapoleonGH** » 2003-08-07 06:52pm

i think we picked up on that Sam Or I