beginning of time

SLAM: debunk creationism, pseudoscience, and superstitions. Discuss logic and morality.

Moderator: Alyrium Denryle

Post Reply
User avatar
Shrykull
Jedi Master
Posts: 1270
Joined: 2002-07-05 09:11pm

beginning of time

Post by Shrykull »

So, as I understand it the theory is that big bang began with the beginning of time, but what made time begin, why isn't all the matter and energy in the universe still sitting in a ball like it was?
User avatar
Eframepilot
Jedi Master
Posts: 1007
Joined: 2002-09-05 03:35am

Post by Eframepilot »

A leading current theory is that "prior" to the Big Bang, whatever that means in a domain without a time dimension, there was a false vacuum with a very high energy potential. Think of a glass of water saturated with sugar. Randomly, a quantum fluctuation caused the vacuum to transition to a lower energy state. All of the energy was released and KABOOM! space and time began expanding. Or something.
Shiva Archon
Redshirt
Posts: 26
Joined: 2003-08-03 04:20am
Location: Northwestern University, USA

Post by Shiva Archon »

From what I gathered from Cosmology 101, astronomers can tell you the state of the universe back to 1 second after the Big Bang. Before that...we have little if any factual data. Part of the the problem is that physicists haven't figured out a way to make General Relativity and Quantum Mechanics work together. Maybe when they get those theories straightened out cosmologists can wrap up that first unknown second.
User avatar
Kuroneko
Jedi Council Member
Posts: 2469
Joined: 2003-03-13 03:10am
Location: Fréchet space
Contact:

Post by Kuroneko »

Shiva Archon wrote:From what I gathered from Cosmology 101, astronomers can tell you the state of the universe back to 1 second after the Big Bang. Before that...we have little if any factual data. Part of the the problem is that physicists haven't figured out a way to make General Relativity and Quantum Mechanics work together. Maybe when they get those theories straightened out cosmologists can wrap up that first unknown second.
Cosmologists can do better than a second, but in any case there is a fundamental limit dictated by quantum mechanics: Planck time. Below about somewhere in the order of 1E-44 seconds, the known physical laws are no longer meaningful (which is not to say that nothing is going on, only that we don't (and can't) know what).

Relativity, being completely deterministic, doesn't have this problem. But since quantum effects are actually observed, this is a flaw of relativity rather than quantum mechanics.
"The fool saith in his heart that there is no empty set. But if that were so, then the set of all such sets would be empty, and hence it would be the empty set." -- Wesley Salmon
Post Reply