Maybe Germany wouldn't be so vengeful as to impose reparations that would destroy the country.
It doesn't matter if they destroy France, the idea of the Germans yet again penetrating as far as Paris will encourage the French to start preparing for a war of vengence against them to regain the lost territory.
Really? Italy's treaty was defensive. Why the fuck do you think they fought on the ALLIED side?
That's funny, the whole Central Alliance idea was, in theory, defensive. Did WW1 never happen?
They only fought for the Allies because Tyrol and Trieste were dangled in front of them, not because they felt a moral obligation, idiot.
That makes no sense.
You said Germany would continue building, I said Britain always outbuilt Germany, meaning that Britain's fleet would always be the stronger.....
Oh, I get it! WWII was caused by Germany's "massive" naval buildup.!
Were you paying attention to Britain as it sucked on America's teat before the US entered WW2? No threat from France and Russia ensures total domination by Germany and Britain can't outproduce the most highly-industrialized continent on the globe.
No, it looked like you were trying to create something out of thin air to make a justification.
No, it was one of the myriad situations showing why Britain would never in her right mind side with Germany or stay neutral in the next war.
You are a fucking liar! A goddamned motherfucking liar! That post exists in it's original form for everyone to see, I copied and pasted it you fucking three year old!
Do you understand what "literacy" means? Only a total imbecile would translate that quote to mean France gives Japan their colonies instead of Japan taking Germany's colonies. Oh, did you just do that?
*sigh* Look, little liar, Japan entered WWI because they had a mutual defense treaty with Britain. Seeing as how you've done nothing but misdirect, fabricate fictional scenarios to suit your argument (France&Japan), and show a misunderstanding of historical linkages, I shouldn't expect you to understand how a mutual defense treaty works. Well, honestly, neither did the Japanese, but they ain't going to war on their own, NOT in this.
Fictional scenarios?!? Last time I checked, Britain wasn't neutral in WW1, ignoramus.
Stupid lying fuck, just because you don't want it to be, does not mean that a ship AT ANCHOR isn't vulnerable.
Stupid Kaiser-fellator, no matter how much you wank those wank-naughts of your's, they can't defeat a swarm of torpedo boats or submarines.
Especially half way around the world from the nearest base to repair at!
You dont even see yourself defeating your own pitiful attempt at an arguement here?
You are comedy gold! Tell me, how are deflections from
turreted cannons relevant to submarine combat?
What submarines did France possess in 1914 that could intercept a fleet at sea.
Please plot out the course in which the German fleet will travel to Japan.
You said High Seas Fleet.
No,
you say it's entirely possible.
I've never said anything about them defending the islands, I'm saying they would occupy Indochina as a conclusion to a European war. When your poor understanding of the political relationships stressed Japan's presence in this, I claimed that Germany was capable of projecting power due to the absence of a British blockade.
If you think mega-expansionistic Japan is going to watch the little Euros duke it out without taking advantage of the situation, you are blind. Oh I know, maybe they'll side with Germany, too!
Funy how, in spite of everything gowing against it, the Germans were able to keep a few ships supplied at sea during WWI. And what a glaring, unique failure in German troop ships you've mentioned.
And even more funny, those ships were totally ineffective. Glaring, unique failure as in the
Imperator? The
Vaterland still has to make it home from New York (I do admit it's entirely possible, though) and those are the only two ships that can carry enough troops for such an operation. The
Bismark is a rusting hulk at this point and the largest ship other than those two isn't even half the size.
Luckily, the Germans wouldn't be so stupid as to think a liner could serve as a collier. Small merchantmen are much better suited. They would also plan this to where there would be ships waiting at pre-arranged spots en-route, like they managed to do in RL.
They did this all through the Indian Ocean, eh?
Snipping what you wrote in the original post won't cover up your intent with it. Not in this forum. Anyone with the energy to scroll up can see that for themself.
What the hell are you talking about? Anyone with a brain currently not being prodded by the Kaiser's 'Little Prussian' knows that that is a sarcastic statement. Tell me how the German fleet would prevent the Japanese from cleaning house just like they did. Maybe Tinkerbell will sprinkle pixie dust over the ships and coal trains so you can soar over Asia and drop shells on Tokyo!
).
